By Annie Wright, LMFT · Licensed Marriage & Family Therapist (#95719)Last updated May 2026

Balanced After the Borderline: Building Real Emotional Stability

BORDERLINE FAMILY SYSTEMS & RECOVERY • May 05, 2026

Last updated: June 2026 by Annie Wright, LMFT

In short: Recovery after a parent with traits of borderline personality means building stable self reference, the capacity to know your own mind even when someone else’s emotions are dysregulated.

When Calm Feels Like a Trap

It’s a Tuesday evening in late September, and Anuja is sitting in her parked car in her own driveway, engine off, keys still in her hand. The house is quiet. Her husband texted an hour ago that dinner would be simple, nothing planned, no drama. She has been sitting in the driveway for six minutes.

She’s 44, a VP at a mid-size logistics firm, the person her team calls when a deal is about to fall apart. Her Yeti mug from this morning’s coffee is still in the cupholder, cold now. “I don’t know what to do with a quiet house,” she told me the week before. “I keep waiting for the other shoe. There’s no other shoe. That’s the part I can’t get used to.”

Sitting with Anuja that evening in session, I felt the particular ache I’ve come to recognize in daughters of parents with traits of borderline personality. Not sadness, exactly. Something closer to disorientation. Her nervous system had spent four decades treating calm as the pause before an eruption, and now that the eruption reliably didn’t come, her body didn’t know what to do with the silence.

What I’ve come to call the vigilance hangover is exactly this: the body keeps scanning for a storm long after the storm has stopped coming. A daughter who grew up with a parent whose moods swung without warning learns, cell by cell, that peace is the calm before something breaks. Getting free of that isn’t a matter of willpower. It’s a matter of teaching a very old alarm system a new pattern, slowly, on purpose, over years.

I want to be specific about what that actually requires, because vague encouragement doesn’t help anyone in a parked car at 7 p.m. It requires noticing the exact moment the body braces, naming it out loud or on paper, and then staying present long enough to let the brace pass without the disaster it’s expecting. Do that enough times, in enough ordinary moments, and the alarm slowly recalibrates. Not because you decided it should. Because you gave it new evidence, over and over, until the old evidence stopped being the loudest voice in the room.

What Emotional Stability Actually Is

Emotional stability, in the clinical sense, isn’t the absence of hard feelings. It’s the capacity to hold a coherent, resilient sense of self and to regulate your own affect even while something stressful is happening around you or inside you.

That’s different from control, and it’s different from suppression. A woman with real emotional stability still gets angry, still gets scared, still cries in the car sometimes. What’s different is that the feeling passes through her instead of running her. She can be upset and still know who she’s on the other side of it.

For daughters raised by a parent with traits of borderline personality, that skill was rarely modeled at home. The relational environment was often one where emotional unpredictability was simply the air in the house, where the same request could get you warmth on Tuesday and rage on Wednesday, and where you learned to read a room before you learned to read a book.

That history leaves a mark on the body, not just the mind. It biases the nervous system toward heightened vigilance and quick threat responses, whether that shows up as fight, flight, freeze, or the less talked about fawn response.

Here’s a distinction that matters more than it sounds like it should. Declarative memory is the kind you can narrate, the facts of what happened, when, and to whom. Somatic memory is different. It’s implicit, held in posture, breath, and muscle, and it activates without asking permission from the thinking part of your brain. A woman can tell the story of her childhood calmly at a dinner party and still feel her stomach drop when her phone buzzes with an unfamiliar number, because the story and the sensation are stored in two different places. Neither one is more true than the other. They just require different kinds of repair.

I want to be careful here about something important. Naming traits of borderline personality in a parent isn’t the same as diagnosing that parent, and it’s definitely not a license to diagnose yourself. A trait is a pattern, not a verdict, and most families carrying this pattern also carried real love alongside the volatility. Both things can be true. A parent can have loved you fiercely and still have been unpredictable enough to leave a lasting mark on your nervous system. Holding both of those truths at once, without collapsing into either one, is itself part of the work this piece is describing.

I recently read Allan N. Schore, PhD, a leading researcher in developmental affective neuroscience, and I keep coming back to one line from his work on interpersonal neurobiology. Schore’s research on the right brain’s role in early attachment describes how repeated relational trauma disrupts the very circuitry that lets us regulate feeling and read other people accurately (Schore, 2021). What that means practically is that a lot of what looks like an overreaction in adulthood is actually an old, well-worn groove, not a character flaw.

Here’s the clinical concept, the kitchen-table version, and what it looks like on an actual Tuesday. The clinical concept: early relational trauma disrupts affect regulation at the level of the nervous system, not just at the level of thought. The kitchen-table version: it’s like a smoke detector installed too close to the stove. It doesn’t just catch real fires. It goes off at toast. The Tuesday-afternoon version: you snap at your partner over a dish left in the sink, and twenty minutes later you’re not sure why it felt like an emergency. It felt like an emergency because your body was trained to treat small ruptures as the front edge of something much bigger.

Both women whose stories anchor this piece, Anuja and Lakshmi, know that groove well. Their work in therapy hasn’t been to silence the alarm. It’s been to teach it, slowly, what actually counts as fire.

How This Shows Up in Driven Women

Anuja’s Yeti mug shows up again in a session eight months later. It’s February this time, the light already fading by five, and she’s holding the mug with both hands like it’s the only warm thing in the room. “I got a promotion,” she says. “And I cried in the bathroom for twenty minutes because I didn’t know how to just be happy about it without checking if something bad was coming to cancel it out. I kept waiting to find the catch. There wasn’t one. I still don’t fully believe there wasn’t one.”

Sitting with her, I felt the specific mix of pride and heaviness I’ve come to know well in this work. Not pity. Recognition. The vigilance that once kept a small girl safe in an unpredictable house was still on duty, decades later, guarding a promotion that never needed guarding.

What I’ve come to call the good news audit is this pattern exactly: a driven woman receives something good, and instead of feeling it, she interrogates it for the hidden cost. It’s not paranoia. It’s an old adaptation doing the only job it ever learned, which is to brace before the room changes.

Anuja’s therapy work leaned on attachment theory as much as it did on nervous-system regulation. Understanding the shape of her own attachment history gave her language for why the good news audit kept happening, and language, in her case, was the first handhold on the way toward practice.

Across town, Lakshmi is having a different kind of Tuesday. She’s 39, a mother of two, and she’s sitting on her kitchen floor at 9 p.m. with her back against the dishwasher because it’s the only place in the house that’s quiet. “I keep waiting to become my mother,” she told me early in our work together. “Every time I feel myself getting frustrated with my daughter, I go still. I’d rather freeze up than risk sounding like her for even one second.”

I felt the weight of that sentence land in the room the first time she said it. A mother so afraid of repeating a pattern that she’d rather disappear from the moment than risk it. That’s not overreaction. That’s a woman doing everything she can to protect her child from something she never got protection from herself.

Lakshmi’s path and Anuja’s path look different on the surface, an executive audit-proofing every piece of good news, a mother going still on a kitchen floor, but they converge on the same mechanism. Both nervous systems learned that instability could arrive at any moment, from the one person who was supposed to be safe. Both women are now doing the slow work of teaching their bodies a different lesson: that steadiness can be trusted, not just braced for.

What I’ve come to think of as the both hands on the mug moment is the marker I watch for in this work. It’s the point where a client stops interrogating the good thing in front of her and just holds it. Anuja got there with the promotion, eventually, four sessions later, not by force but by practice. She still checks the mug is warm before she believes the room is safe. That’s not failure. That’s a nervous system learning a new rhythm one Tuesday at a time.

The Nervous System That Learned to Expect Weather

Here’s what I keep returning to in my own reading on this. A parent with traits of borderline personality often experiences their own emotions as sudden weather, arriving without warning and demanding an immediate response from everyone in the house. A child raised inside that weather system doesn’t get to develop a steady internal climate of her own. She becomes a meteorologist instead, always reading the sky, rarely checking in with the ground beneath her.

The clinical term for what gets disrupted is affect regulation, the capacity to modulate the intensity and duration of an emotional response so it fits the situation. The kitchen-table version: it’s the difference between a thermostat and a furnace with no thermostat at all. A thermostat senses the temperature and adjusts. A furnace with no thermostat just runs hot until something shuts it off from outside. Children raised by a parent with unregulated moods often grow into adults whose internal thermostat never got installed, so they either run hot themselves or spend enormous energy managing the temperature of everyone around them instead.

The Tuesday-afternoon version of this shows up as the inbox you can’t close until every email sounds calm, the meeting you replay for hours because someone’s tone shifted for one sentence, the way your own child’s tantrum in the grocery store makes your chest tight in a way that has nothing to do with the tantrum itself.

I recently read Stephen W. Porges, PhD, the neuroscientist who developed polyvagal theory, and one idea from his work has stayed with me for years. Porges describes the vagus nerve as the body’s primary channel for shifting between defense and safety, and his research on autonomic regulation explains why a person can feel unsafe in a room where nothing is objectively wrong (Porges, 2025). A body raised on unpredictability has a vagus nerve trained for storms. Bringing it into safe weather takes repetition, not a single insight.

Judith Herman, MD, whose framework for complex trauma has shaped this entire field, named something that applies directly here. Herman’s work on prolonged, repeated trauma inside a relationship describes a specific kind of injury, different from a single frightening event, because the danger comes from someone the person also depends on for love and survival (Herman 1992). That double bind, needing the very person who’s also the source of the threat, is why the nervous system doesn’t just learn fear. It learns confusion about who’s safe at all.

Bessel van der Kolk, MD, psychiatrist and trauma researcher, has documented that trauma lodges in the body, not only in memory or narrative. A randomized trial he led on yoga as an adjunctive treatment found that participants who did regular yoga practice showed measurable reductions in trauma symptoms, evidence that the nervous system can be recalibrated through the body itself, not only through talk (van der Kolk et al., 2014). I think about that finding often with clients who are frustrated that understanding their childhood intellectually hasn’t been enough to calm their body. Understanding is layer one. The body needs its own layer of repair.

Daniel Siegel, MD, whose work on interpersonal neurobiology I keep returning to in my own reading, describes something he calls the window of tolerance, the band of arousal in which a person can think clearly and stay connected to others without tipping into shutdown or overwhelm (Siegel). Children raised by a parent with unpredictable moods often develop a narrow window, tipping into shutdown or overwhelm faster than a child from a calmer home would. Widening that window, patiently and with practice, is a large part of what stability actually requires.

Both/And. Compassion and Accountability

Here’s the truth I want you to leave this section holding. The vigilance that got you through an unpredictable childhood was smart, and it’s now costing you the calm you’ve worked so hard to build. Both things are true at once.

The hypervigilance was brilliant, in the specific sense that it kept a child safe inside a home where the rules changed without notice. I won’t argue anyone out of that. A girl who read a room accurately, who anticipated the mood shift before it landed, who managed her own needs down to almost nothing so as not to add fuel, was doing exactly what her environment required of her.

And that same skill set, brought unmodified into adulthood, keeps the alarm ringing long after the danger has passed. It’s the reason Anuja can’t hold a piece of good news without checking underneath it. It’s the reason Lakshmi goes still on the kitchen floor instead of letting herself feel simple frustration at her daughter. Compassion says: of course you built these defenses. Accountability says: they’re also the wall between you and the life you’re trying to build now.

Peter Fonagy, PhD, and Patrick Luyten, PhD, whose work on mentalization has influenced how I think about this stage of healing, describe mentalizing as the capacity to hold in mind both your own mental state and someone else’s, without collapsing into either one (Fonagy & Luyten, 2009). That capacity is exactly what gets damaged when a parent’s moods are too big and too unpredictable to track. Rebuilding it’s slow, relational work, not a worksheet you finish in a weekend.

Some of Lakshmi’s grief work in session traced back to what she never got to practice as a young woman, including a clear sense of what the healthy stages of romantic love actually feel like when nobody is managing anyone’s mood. She’s building that capacity now, in her own marriage, years later than she wishes she’d had the chance to.

Lakshmi’s parenting is where this both, and plays out most visibly. She grieves what she didn’t get as a child, and she’s actively building something different for her own children, sometimes in the same conversation. That isn’t contradiction. That’s what healing looks like while it’s still in progress. It rarely looks finished. It looks like a woman doing two hard things simultaneously and mostly succeeding.

You don’t have to choose between honoring what the old strategies did for you and setting them down. You get to hold both, and let a good therapist or coach hold the second one with you until you’re ready to put it down yourself.

In real life, that both, and often shows up as a very ordinary Tuesday decision. You notice the old alarm going off over something small, a delayed text back, a slightly flat tone in an email, and instead of either obeying it completely or shaming yourself for feeling it at all, you pause. You let yourself feel the spike, name it silently as the old pattern, and then choose your next move on purpose instead of on autopilot. That pause, repeated hundreds of times over months, is most of what accountability actually looks like day to day. It rarely feels dramatic while it’s happening. It just feels like a slightly longer breath before you hit send.

The Systemic Lens: Family Systems, Gender, Culture, Class, Loyalty Binds

What Anuja and Lakshmi are working through isn’t a personal failing. It’s a pattern, and the pattern has roots outside of them, in the systems that shaped the households they grew up in.

Family systems theory reminds us that nobody develops in isolation. We develop inside networks with unspoken rules, assigned roles, and loyalty binds that often outlast the household itself. A family organized around one parent’s emotional volatility frequently rewards whichever child learns to smooth things over, and that reward, however unintentional, cements the fawn response as a lifelong habit rather than a childhood phase.

Gender adds its own layer. Women, especially driven women moving through professional spaces the way Anuja does, often feel pressure to perform competence and calm at all times, which can make it harder to admit that their internal experience is anything but calm. The performance becomes its own kind of hiding place.

Culture shapes this too. Lakshmi’s grief over what she didn’t receive as a child sits inside a broader cultural script that prizes maternal sacrifice and treats a mother’s own emotional needs as almost beside the point. That script doesn’t cause the wound, but it does make it harder to name out loud, and a wound that can’t be named is much harder to heal.

Socioeconomic class shapes access, too. Therapy, coaching, and time to do this kind of interior work are resources, not guarantees, and a woman without them has to build stability with fewer supports around her. As Fonagy and Luyten’s research on mentalization suggests, the capacity to reflect on your own mind and someone else’s can still grow inside real constraints; it just tends to grow slower and with more friction (Fonagy & Luyten, 2009).

Loyalty binds deserve their own mention, because they’re often the quietest part of this picture. A daughter who learns early that naming her parent’s volatility out loud will fracture the family often carries that silence for decades, long after she’s built a life far from that household. Speaking honestly about what happened can feel like betrayal even when the person she’d be protecting is the same person who hurt her. That bind doesn’t resolve itself. It has to be worked through, usually with someone steady enough to hold both the loyalty and the truth at the same time.

You’re not broken for having absorbed the rules of the house you grew up in. Those rules were never designed with your steadiness in mind. They were designed, often without anyone choosing it consciously, to keep one parent’s dysregulation from blowing up the whole family. Naming that doesn’t erase the work ahead. It does mean the work isn’t a referendum on your worth.

Questions to Bring Into Therapy or Coaching

For women like Anuja and Lakshmi, whose early environments trained them to expect volatility rather than consistency, building stability is real, layered work. It isn’t about achieving a permanent, unshakeable calm. It’s about building a reliable internal compass that can hold steady through ordinary stress.

Anuja: Building Stable Self Reference Amid Executive Demands

Anuja grew up in a home where emotional unpredictability was simply the norm. Her nervous system defaulted early to hypervigilance, and that heightened state followed her into adulthood, showing up as a persistent internal tension that undercut her ability to sustain calm focus even when nothing was actually wrong.

Through therapy and coaching, she began building what Allan Schore describes as right-brain regulation, the capacity to soothe an activated nervous system through relational safety and self-compassion (Schore, 2021). Learning to mentalize, to reflect on her own mental state and someone else’s at the same time, gave her a way to interrupt an old survival response with something more deliberate.

Her work included three things worth naming directly, because clients often ask what this actually looks like day to day:

• Somatic Awareness: Noticing bodily sensations linked to emotional triggers, which helped interrupt automatic fight, flight, or freeze responses before they took over.
• Reflective Practice: Journaling and short mindfulness check-ins to label emotions without judging them.
• Relational Repair: Practicing relationships where vulnerability was met with steadiness instead of drama, which slowly built a new template for what safety with another person could feel like.

Anuja’s progress required both body-based work and cognitive work together. Neither one alone was enough to build a sense of self that didn’t dissolve the moment stress showed up.

Lakshmi: Breaking Patterns While Grieving What Was Never Received

Lakshmi’s early caregiving environment was marked by inconsistency and emotional neglect, which left her with a fragmented sense of identity and grief she hadn’t had room to feel until well into adulthood. Her nervous system defaulted, and still sometimes defaults, to the fawn response, appeasing and over-adapting to avoid conflict at almost any cost to herself.

For Lakshmi, healing meant holding two things at once: actively interrupting the patterns she inherited, and mourning the emotional steadiness she never got as a child. That grief work mattered as much as the behavioral change.

• Grief Work: Making room to feel and name the sorrow of unmet needs, which loosened a shame that had been hiding underneath years of over-functioning.
• Boundary Setting: Learning to say no and to treat her own needs as legitimate, which directly countered a lifelong habit of self-erasure.
• Parenting with Intent: Applying what she was learning about her own nervous system to how she responds to her children, breaking a cycle rather than repeating it by default.

Lakshmi’s work has meant learning to regulate her own responses while also reclaiming an identity that isn’t defined only by what she survived. If you see yourself in either of these two women, that recognition is worth paying attention to, not as a diagnosis, but as information about where your own work might begin.

A question I ask almost every client in this category, whether her path looks more like Anuja’s or more like Lakshmi’s, is simple: what would you do with a Tuesday that didn’t require you to manage anyone’s mood but your own? Most women can’t answer immediately. Some have never been asked. The question itself starts loosening something, because it assumes a version of her life she hasn’t let herself imagine yet, one where her nervous system isn’t on call for someone else’s weather.

Healing and Recovery Map: From Survival to Stability

Emotional stability is often pictured as a calm center, a place you stand from which you can meet life’s ordinary ups and downs without feeling flattened or fragmented. For women who grew up around a parent’s borderline traits, that calm center can feel foreign, sometimes even suspicious, because it was never modeled and rarely available.

The question worth sitting with is a plain one. What does stability look like when nobody showed it to you? The clinical term for the work of answering that’s embodied recovery, an approach that treats trauma as something stored in the body and nervous system, not only in memory or belief. The kitchen-table version: you can understand your childhood perfectly on paper and still flinch at a raised voice, because understanding lives in the thinking brain and flinching lives somewhere else entirely. The Tuesday-afternoon version: it’s the difference between knowing intellectually that your partner isn’t your parent, and actually feeling your shoulders drop when he walks through the door.

The following map lays out where that repair tends to happen, body first, then relationship, then identity. None of these domains move in a straight line. A woman doing this work will often find herself circling back to nervous-system regulation months after she thought she’d graduated from it, usually during a season of unrelated stress, a new job, a move, a pregnancy, anything that raises her baseline arousal. That circling back isn’t regression. It’s what integration actually looks like over years rather than months.

The Deeper Repair

Somatic Experiencing, developed by Peter Levine, PhD, works directly with body sensation to discharge stored survival energy rather than relying on talk alone (Payne, Levine & Crane-Godreau, 2015). In real life, that can look as simple as noticing tension in the jaw before a hard conversation, or tracking the breath through a wave of anxiety instead of trying to think your way past it.

Kristin Neff, PhD, whose research on self-compassion I return to often, has shown that practicing self-compassion measurably reduces shame and supports emotional healing, particularly for people who grew up believing that self-criticism was the only thing keeping them together (Neff et al., 2021). I think about her work whenever a client apologizes for crying in session, as though feeling something were itself the failure.

Donald Winnicott, the pediatrician and psychoanalyst whose ideas still shape how I think about early development, wrote about the holding environment, the felt sense of being safely contained by another person long before a child has words for safety. A childhood without a reliable holding environment doesn’t disappear. It shows up later as an adult who has to learn, often for the first time, what being held without conditions actually feels like.

Marsha Linehan, PhD, the psychologist who developed dialectical behavior therapy after her own experience with intense emotional pain, built an entire treatment model around a premise that still guides how I think about this work: skills only stick when they’re practiced in the body, in real time, not just understood intellectually (Linehan & Wilks, 2015). Her four skill modules, distress tolerance, emotion regulation, interpersonal effectiveness, and mindfulness, map almost exactly onto what adult daughters of emotionally volatile parents need to rebuild. Not because they grew up with the same diagnosis their parent may have carried, but because the skills for tolerating intense feeling without being run by it are universal, and most of these women never got to practice them safely as children.

I’ll add one more piece here, because clients ask about it often. Diana Fosha, PhD, whose model of accelerated experiential dynamic psychotherapy centers on what she calls transformance, the innate drive toward health and growth that exists even in people who’ve been deeply hurt, has shaped how I hold hope in this work without minimizing how hard it’s (Iwakabe et al., 2022). Even in the middle of a hard session, even when a client is certain nothing is changing, there’s usually a small, stubborn pull toward something better already at work underneath the pain. Naming that pull out loud, gently, is sometimes the most useful thing I do in a room.

Parenting programs built around breaking these cycles, including Parenting Past the Pattern, exist because change in one generation is possible even when the parent doing the changing is still doing her own healing at the same time. That’s not a contradiction. That’s usually what it actually looks like.

I want to name one more piece of the deeper repair, because clients rarely ask about it directly but almost always need it. Grief has a place in this work that logic doesn’t reach. Somewhere underneath the nervous-system regulation and the boundary setting is a simple, unglamorous fact: you didn’t get the parent who could hold your feelings steadily, and no amount of healing gives you that specific thing back. What healing can give you is a version of that steadiness built by your own hands, for yourself and for the people you love now. That’s a smaller, harder, and finally more durable gift than the one you didn’t receive.

The Path Forward: Balance After the Borderline

Balance after a volatile childhood isn’t about erasing what happened or arriving at some permanent, static calm. It’s an ongoing process of building safety in the body and in relationships, learning to notice and settle your own nervous system, and rebuilding a sense of self that can hold steady under pressure.

Anuja still checks the mug is warm sometimes. Lakshmi still sits on the kitchen floor on hard nights. Neither of those things means the work has failed. It means two women are learning, slowly and on purpose, that calm doesn’t have to mean the storm is coming. For some women, that work happens one-on-one in therapy with Annie. For others, it starts with a program like Fixing the Foundations, which focuses specifically on nervous-system and attachment repair. Either way, the compass gets built the same way: one steady Tuesday at a time.

Related Reading and PubMed Citations

This piece draws on the work of Marsha Linehan, PhD, on dialectical behavior therapy; Peter Fonagy, PhD, and Patrick Luyten, PhD, on mentalization; Diana Fosha, PhD, on experiential relational repair; Judith Herman, MD, on trauma and recovery; Bessel van der Kolk, MD, on somatic memory; Daniel Siegel, MD, on interpersonal neurobiology; Stephen Porges, PhD, on autonomic regulation; Murray Bowen, MD, and Salvador Minuchin, MD, on family systems theory; Donald Winnicott on holding environments and the false self; and Harriet Lerner, PhD, on the dynamics families fall back into under stress.

Warmly, Annie

References

Peer-Reviewed Research (Vancouver)

1. van der Kolk BA, Stone L, West J, Rhodes A, Emerson D, Suvak M, Spinazzola J. Yoga as an adjunctive treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2014;75(6):e559-65. doi:10.4088/JCP.13m08561. PMID: 25004196. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0295926. PMID: 38198456.
2. Cloitre M, Stolbach BC, Herman JL, van der Kolk B, Pynoos R, Wang J, et al. A developmental approach to complex PTSD: childhood and adult cumulative trauma as predictors of symptom complexity. J Trauma Stress. 2009;22(5):399-408. doi:10.1002/jts.20444. PMID: 19795402.
3. Payne P, Levine PA, Crane-Godreau MA. Somatic experiencing: using interoception and proprioception as core elements of trauma therapy. Front Psychol. 2015;6:93. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00093. PMID: 25699005.
4. Porges SW. Polyvagal Theory: Current Status, Clinical Applications, and Future Directions. PMID: 40735382.
5. Reisz S, Duschinsky R, Siegel DJ. fearful-avoidant attachment and defense: exploring John Bowlby's unpublished reflections. Attach Hum Dev. 2018;20(2):107-134. doi:10.1080/14616734.2017.1380055. PMID: 28952412.
6. Linehan MM, Wilks CR. The Course and Evolution of Dialectical Behavior Therapy. Am J Psychother. 2015;69(2):97-110. PMID: 26160617.
7. Schore AN. The Interpersonal Neurobiology of Intersubjectivity. Front Psychol. 2021;12:648616. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648616. PMID: 33959077.
8. Iwakabe S, Edlin J, Fosha D, Thoma NC, Gretton H, Joseph AJ, et al. The long-term outcome of accelerated experiential dynamic psychotherapy: 6- and 12-month follow-up results. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2022;59(3):431-446. doi:10.1037/pst0000441. PMID: 35653751.
9. Neff KD, Bluth K, Tóth-Király I, Davidson O, Knox MC, Williamson Z, et al. Development and Validation of the Self-Compassion Scale for Youth. J Pers Assess. 2021;103(1):92-105. doi:10.1080/00223891.2020.1729774. PMID: 32125190.

Books & Cultural Sources (Chicago Author-Date)

• Winnicott, D.W.. Playing and reality. Penguin, 1971.
• Oliver, Mary. Devotions. Little, Brown Book Group Limited, 2017.

About the Author

Annie Wright, LMFT

LMFT · Relational Trauma Specialist · Author, W.W. Norton 2027

Helping driven women finally feel as good as their résumé looks.

Annie Wright is a licensed psychotherapist (LMFT #95719) and trauma-informed executive coach with over 15,000 clinical hours. She works with driven women. Including Silicon Valley leaders, physicians, and entrepreneurs. In repairing the psychological foundations beneath their impressive lives. Annie is the founder and former CEO of Evergreen Counseling, a multimillion-dollar trauma-informed therapy center she built, scaled, and successfully exited. A regular contributor to Psychology Today, her expert commentary has appeared in USA Today, Forbes, Business Insider, NBC News, and The Information. She’s currently writing her first book with W.W. Norton.

Work With Annie

Medical Disclaimer