Seam by seam. And they will not fit. This course is where that stops.

In my work with clients, I've watched brilliant, perceptive people spend years trying to recover from a relationship that didn't follow the rules of normal human cruelty. They weren't dealing with someone who got defensive or occasionally selfish. They were dealing with someone who had constructed an entire persona, deliberately, and targeted them specifically.
What I see consistently is this: the standard narcissistic abuse recovery framework helps, but something doesn't quite fit. Because the mechanism of sociopathic or antisocial abuse is categorically distinct. There's no ambivalence, no underlying wound they're working from, no real relationship you were actually in. What you trusted was a construction. And that specific truth, once it fully lands, changes the nature of the recovery work entirely.
This course exists because that distinction matters clinically. And your healing deserves that precision.
These aren't symptoms. They're rational responses to something irrational.
Most recovery content blends narcissistic and sociopathic abuse into one framework. They're not the same. This course walks you through the clinical picture of antisocial personality disorder, the predatory targeting, the constructed persona, the absence of conscience, and why that distinction changes the recovery map entirely.
Shame about being targeted. Grief for a relationship that may never have been real. A body that can't get the memo to stand down. The Wreckage Inventory, the Evidence File, and the Protective Intelligence framework in this course are built specifically for this terrain, not adapted from a general trauma course.
There's no cohort, no group call where you have to perform your recovery. You move through 13 lessons and a 108-page companion workbook at exactly the pace that works for your life. Lifetime access means you can return to any lesson as many times as you need it.
3 acts · 13 lessons · 108-page companion workbook
The clinical picture of antisocial personality disorder, the predatory playbook, and the moment of clarity: naming what happened without minimizing or catastrophizing it. Drawing on the work of Martha Stout, PhD, psychologist and author of The Sociopath Next Door, and Robert Hare, PhD, forensic psychologist and creator of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist, researchers who spent careers documenting exactly this pattern.
The trauma bond, the body after a predatory relationship, the grief of mourning someone who may never have truly existed, and the Wreckage Inventory. Grounded in the somatic trauma work of Peter Levine, PhD, developer of Somatic Experiencing, and Bessel van der Kolk, MD, psychiatrist and trauma researcher, author of The Body Keeps the Score.
Rebuild self-trust as a daily evidence-based practice, build your Protective Intelligence framework, and understand what genuine post-traumatic growth can look like from here. Drawing on the recovery stage model developed by Judith Herman, MD, psychiatrist and author of Trauma and Recovery.

Three months from now, you wake up and the first thought isn't about them. It's not a replay, not a loop, not another attempt to find the seam in the story. The silence where that thought used to live is a little disorienting at first, you've been carrying it so long it felt like part of you. It wasn't.
You don't need them to have been worse than they were, or better than they were, or anything other than exactly what the clinical evidence says they were: someone without a conscience who targeted you specifically because you were perceptive, trustworthy, and good at giving people the benefit of the doubt. Those qualities didn't make you naive. They made you human. You know that now in your body, not just your head.
The hypervigilance that kept you safe during the relationship doesn't automatically resolve when it ends. Without a clinical framework to understand why your body is still responding this way, you carry it forward, into new relationships, into work environments, into moments of ordinary safety that feel inexplicably dangerous.
Without separating survival intelligence from complicity, the question "why didn't I see it?" becomes the frame through which you evaluate your own trustworthiness. You don't stop trusting them, you stop trusting yourself. That costs more than the original relationship did.
In my work with clients, I've seen what happens when someone walks away from a predatory relationship without the specific clinical map: they remain vulnerable to the same targeting. Not because they're broken, but because they haven't built the Protective Intelligence framework that lets them vet, with discernment rather than fear, the next person who shows up with a constructed persona and a ready pity story.

108-page clinical companion workbook, the largest of the mini-course set
“I’ve spent my career cross-examining people for a living. I’m not naive. I’m not someone who misses things. And I spent three years in a relationship with someone who’d constructed an entire persona specifically for me, and I didn’t see it until I was so far in that getting out cost me professionally and financially. I bought this course because my therapist didn’t have a framework for what I was describing. The narcissistic abuse content I’d already read helped, but it didn’t fit , and Annie names exactly why. The clinical distinction between narcissistic and antisocial behavior isn’t semantic. It changed what I understood about why I couldn’t reconcile the two versions of him. I’m not in the habit of recommending things. I’m recommending this.”
“I kept trying to find the moment I should’ve known. I went back through every text, every conversation, every red flag I’d rationalized. I was doing what I do in the ER , looking for the thing I missed. What Annie helped me understand is that I didn’t miss anything. There was nothing to find because the person I thought I was in a relationship with wasn’t a real person. That sounds dramatic until you read the actual clinical literature on antisocial personality disorder, which she walks you through clearly and without sensationalism. Act I alone was worth the whole course to me. The rest of it helped me understand why my body was still running like I was in danger six months after I’d left. I’m sleeping again. That’s not nothing.”
“I’d done the therapy. I’d read the books. I had a really good therapist who kept gently suggesting I look at narcissistic abuse frameworks, and some of it fit, but I kept thinking , this doesn’t quite explain the part where he seemed to genuinely enjoy my confusion. Where the cruelty felt deliberate and calibrated. Annie’s course was the first place I found language for that specific thing. The ‘predatory playbook’ section in Act I made me put my laptop down and just sit there for a while. Not because it was devastating , because it was finally accurate. The 108-page workbook isn’t a PDF of journal prompts. It’s actual clinical work. I did it in pieces over about six weeks and I’m a different person on the other side of it.”
“I manage 80 staff members and 1,200 kids. I’m not someone who loses the plot. But I spent two years questioning my own memory in a relationship with someone who had a different story for every situation and could cry on command. By the time it ended I genuinely wasn’t sure what had actually happened. Annie’s Protective Intelligence framework in Act III is the thing I wish I’d had before I ever met him. Not because it would’ve made me paranoid, but because it would’ve given me a way to vet what I was seeing instead of overriding my gut every time it flagged something. I’ve gone back to that act three times. I use pieces of it in how I think about people now , not from fear, but from actually trusting myself again.”
“I want to be honest that I almost didn’t buy this because I was already paying for therapy and adding another expense felt like a lot. I bought it anyway and I want to say clearly: it’s not the same thing as therapy and it doesn’t try to be. What it does is give you a clinical map that most therapists, honestly, don’t have. My therapist is great and she’s been helpful, but she’s been working from a general trauma framework. Annie’s working from a specific one. The difference between ‘he was manipulative’ and ‘here’s the actual clinical anatomy of how antisocial targeting works and why you were a logical target’ is enormous. I stopped blaming myself somewhere in Act II. I didn’t expect that to happen from a self-paced online course. It did.”
“I run a $40 million department. I’m not someone people would describe as a pushover. I say that not to brag but because the shame of what happened to me was directly proportional to how competent I believed myself to be. Smart, capable women aren’t supposed to end up here. Annie addresses that directly and without condescension. The section on why perceptive, trustworthy people are specifically targeted , not victimized because of weakness but targeted because of their strengths , was the first time I felt something other than humiliated about what happened. The Wreckage Inventory in the workbook is hard. Do it anyway. I did it on a Sunday afternoon with the door closed and a lot of coffee and I cried through most of it and I felt genuinely lighter by Monday morning.”
“I’m the kind of person who researches everything before I buy it. I’d already read Martha Stout’s book. I’d read Hare’s work on psychopathy. I thought I had the intellectual understanding handled. What I didn’t have was the recovery map. Understanding what happened to me and knowing how to actually move through the aftermath are completely different problems, and I’d been treating them like the same one. Annie’s course is where those two things finally connected. The somatic work in Act II isn’t woo. It’s grounded in Peter Levine’s research and it explains in plain language why my body was still running threat responses in situations that were objectively safe. I’m a systems thinker. This course gave me a system that actually works.”
“I coach senior leaders for a living. I help people see their blind spots. I spent four years in a relationship with someone who was, in retrospect, a textbook case , and I coached myself through every red flag with the same frameworks I use with clients. That’s the part that was hardest to sit with. Annie’s course helped me understand that the tools I was using , empathy, charitable interpretation, looking for the wound underneath the behavior , are exactly the tools that antisocial people rely on their targets having. That’s not a character flaw. That’s the mechanism. Once I understood the mechanism, the self-blame didn’t have anywhere left to stand. I’ve since recommended this course to three clients. I don’t do that lightly.”
"This work doesn't just reach the people who take it. It reaches the clinicians who refer it."
"Annie is an EMDR genius. She is caring and kind and brilliant. Exceptional clinician."
"I've been working on my relational trauma for a decade and recently became a therapist myself, I regularly send clients to Annie's work. The clinical framework is exactly right."
Tap any question to read the answer
Already on Annie's email list? You're not automatically on this waitlist, add yourself above.
What’s included:
What’s not included, and why:
What you survived is specific. Your healing deserves specificity. The waitlist is open now, join it and you'll be among the first to know when the course becomes available.
Add Yourself to the WaitlistA note on client examples: any references to clients throughout Annie’s work , on this page, in the course, in the workbook, or in the newsletter , are composites, drawn from patterns observed across many people over many years. No single client is ever identifiable.
If you are in crisis: Call or text 988 Text HOME to 741741 988lifeline.org