The Equity Partner’s Emptiness: When Achievement Outruns Attachment Repair
Many driven women reach the pinnacle of their careers — equity partnership, C-suite roles, medical leadership — only to find the inner emptiness they hoped achievement would dissolve is still there, waiting. This post explores why ambition alone can’t heal attachment wounds, what the arrival fallacy actually is in the body, and how trauma-informed therapy and executive coaching can help you move from hollow success toward something that finally feels real.
- The Corner Office That Feels Empty
- What Is the Arrival Fallacy?
- The Neurobiology of Achievement Without Attachment Repair
- How This Pattern Shows Up in Driven Women
- Shame, Fawning, and the Weight of Status Protection
- Both/And: Achievement as Mirror and Mask
- The Systemic Lens: Why This Isn’t a Personal Failing
- How to Heal: Cultivating Earned Security Beyond Achievement
- Frequently Asked Questions
The Corner Office That Feels Empty
The low hum of the city seeps through the floor-to-ceiling windows. Outside, the late afternoon sun splashes gold across the skyline. Mara’s fingertips drum lightly on the mahogany desk, a subtle rhythm beneath the sharp click of her heels on the marble floor. She’s holding a glass of wine — a rare indulgence after another board meeting full of strategic wins.
Yet as she gazes out, the view feels distant, almost unreal. The partnership plaque on her shelf, the awards stacked in the corner — they seem to mock rather than celebrate. Beneath the surface of Mara’s success lies a quiet, gnawing emptiness she can’t delegate or outwork.
In my work with clients like Mara, what I see consistently is that achievement and external success can’t substitute for the deep, often unseen work of attachment repair. Many driven women reach pinnacles in their careers — equity partnership, senior executive roles, medical leadership — only to find that the inner life they hoped to transform remains heavy, lonely, and fraught with shame.
This dissonance isn’t a personal failure or a lack of gratitude. It’s a complex interplay of neurobiology, relational history, and systemic pressures that no promotion can fix.
What Is the Arrival Fallacy?
There’s a term for the experience Mara keeps having. Psychologist and positive psychology researcher Tal Ben-Shahar coined it the “arrival fallacy” — the mistaken belief that reaching a significant goal will bring lasting happiness or inner relief.
The arrival fallacy refers to the cognitive trap in which individuals believe that reaching a significant goal or milestone will bring lasting happiness or fulfillment. Research by Tal Ben-Shahar, PhD, lecturer at Harvard and author of Happier, shows this typically produces only a brief spike in satisfaction before a return to baseline emotional states — or, for those with unresolved attachment wounds, a return to familiar feelings of emptiness and disconnection.
In plain terms: It’s the feeling that “once I get there, I’ll finally feel okay.” But when you arrive, the okayness doesn’t come — because the thing driving the emptiness wasn’t the destination at all.
The arrival fallacy is painful on its own. But when it’s layered onto unresolved attachment wounds — the relational injuries from early experiences where safety, trust, and emotional attunement were missing or inconsistent — achievement can actually deepen the sense of relational deprivation. You’ve done the thing you thought would fix it, and it didn’t. Now what?
Attachment wounds arise from early relational experiences in which a child’s needs for safety, attunement, and emotional regulation were inconsistently met or neglected, leading to persistent patterns of insecurity and relational difficulty in adulthood. Judith Herman, MD, psychiatrist and author of Trauma and Recovery, and John Bowlby, MD, the British psychiatrist who developed attachment theory, both describe how these early disruptions become encoded as internal working models — blueprints for how safe and worthy of connection we believe ourselves to be.
In plain terms: An attachment wound is the deep hurt from not feeling safe or truly seen by the people who were supposed to care for you when you were small. It shapes what you expect from relationships — and from yourself — for decades afterward.
The Neurobiology of Achievement Without Attachment Repair
Mara’s story illustrates a critical clinical insight: achievement, no matter how substantial, cannot resolve the neurobiological imprint left by early attachment disruptions. Her brain’s threat detection system remains sensitized — calibrated to scan for relational danger, to expect rejection, to interpret ordinary ambiguity as evidence of unworthiness.
Bessel van der Kolk, MD, psychiatrist and trauma researcher, author of The Body Keeps the Score, has shown how trauma is encoded in the body at a procedural level — below conscious thought, in the patterns of tension, breath, and nervous system activation that shape our daily experience. Achieving equity partnership doesn’t reach down into those encoded patterns and rearrange them. Only attuned relational experience can do that.
Stephen Porges, PhD, neuroscientist and developer of Polyvagal Theory, explains how the autonomic nervous system continuously evaluates safety in our social environment — a process he calls neuroception. When early attachment experiences trained the nervous system to expect threat or emotional unavailability, that system remains in low-grade alert, even when circumstances are objectively safe. This is why Mara can stand in her corner office, know intellectually that she’s “made it,” and still feel the hollow knot of not-enoughness in her chest.
Pat Ogden, PhD, founder of Sensorimotor Psychotherapy, and Janina Fisher, PhD, clinical psychologist and trauma specialist, both emphasize that healing this neurobiological patterning requires body-based, relational approaches — not simply insight or harder work. The body has to experience safety, not just understand it conceptually.
Research published in the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology by Jacobsen and colleagues (2024) found that clients who developed earned secure attachment within therapeutic relationships showed significantly better outcomes — including improved emotional regulation and reduced anxiety — compared to those who gained insight alone. The relationship itself is the medicine.
What this means practically for Mara: the promotion didn’t recalibrate her nervous system because the nervous system isn’t impressed by promotions. It responds to relational experience — to the felt sense of being genuinely seen, of making a mistake and remaining safe, of vulnerability met with warmth rather than judgment. Every time Mara was praised for performance, the underlying attachment system received no new information. It continued operating on its original data: that connection is conditional, that showing up as less than perfect invites rejection, that the inner life is best kept private. Rewiring that system requires new data — and new data only comes through new relational experience. This is precisely the domain where trauma-informed executive coaching and individual therapy operate in ways no career milestone can.
How This Pattern Shows Up in Driven Women
Mara is a composite drawn from many women I’ve worked with in executive coaching. She’s 42, an equity partner at a top law firm. She climbed the ranks with relentless precision, fueled by a drive that masked early experiences of emotional neglect and conditional approval from critical caregivers. Her professional life is a study in delegation, decision-making under pressure, and managing complex interpersonal dynamics without visible strain.
Her inner world tells a different story. After every major win — a partnership vote, a landmark case, a speaking invitation — she feels a hollow victory. The anxious knot of loneliness in her chest doesn’t quiet. The persistent internal voice doesn’t stop whispering: You’re not enough.
What Mara experiences isn’t uncommon among women leaders who grew up with attachment wounds. Despite outward success, the internalized messages of relational deprivation — where emotional needs were unmet or dismissed — continue to shape her neurobiological responses and relational patterns. Her status protection strategies, including overfunctioning and perfectionism, serve as armor. But armor also isolates.
She can’t let anyone see the gap between her outer performance and inner experience. The cost of that concealment is enormous: chronic loneliness, difficulty receiving care from others, and an increasing sense that no one truly knows her. When she imagines softening, even slightly, the old threat response fires: If they see the real you, they’ll know you don’t belong here.
In coaching sessions, Mara and I work on what I call the leadership translation problem: the gap between what a skill looks like from the outside and what it requires neurobiologically on the inside. Delegation, for instance, looks like a time-management tool. But for Mara, delegation is a relational act that activates her oldest fear — that if someone else takes responsibility and something goes wrong, the exposure will fall on her. That isn’t a delegation problem; it’s an attachment problem wearing a delegation costume. We don’t practice delegation techniques in the abstract. We track what happens in her body the moment she imagines handing something over — the tightening, the urge to micro-review, the impulse to pull the task back — and work from there. Leadership skill-building without this neurobiological foundation is like renovating the top floor of a building with a cracked foundation. It won’t hold.
“I have everything and nothing… I’ve climbed to the top of a ladder that was leaning against the wrong wall.”
Marion Woodman, Jungian analyst and author — describing a patient in analysis in Addiction to Perfection
Shame, Fawning, and the Weight of Status Protection
Consider Denise, another composite client. She’s 38, Chief of Surgery at a regional hospital. Beneath her surgical mask of competence runs a persistent undercurrent of shame and fawning — an automatic, often unconscious pattern of people-pleasing born from early relational trauma and reinforced by cultural expectations about women’s emotional labor in medicine.
Denise’s upbringing was marked by emotional unpredictability and subtle invalidation. As a child, her expressions of vulnerability were met with dismissal or with demands to “be strong.” These experiences seeded a deep attachment wound — one where safety and emotional attunement were conditional and fragile.
Fawning is a trauma survival response characterized by appeasing, people-pleasing, or compliance behaviors intended to reduce perceived threat or avoid conflict, described by trauma therapist Ingrid Clayton as a fourth trauma response alongside fight, flight, and freeze. It’s commonly observed in individuals with attachment-related trauma and chronic interpersonal stress, and often develops in childhood environments where vulnerability was punished or dismissed.
In plain terms: Fawning means going out of your way to keep others happy and comfortable — often at significant cost to yourself — because deep down, you learned that your safety and belonging depended on it.
In her adult professional life, Denise’s response has been a hyperactivation of what I call status protection strategies — overfunctioning, relentless self-criticism, and a fawning approach to colleagues and superiors. These are protective dances around perceived threats to relational safety. But they come at a real cost: chronic exhaustion, diminished agency, and an invisible loneliness that no performance metric can measure.
Status protection refers to behavioral and psychological strategies developed to maintain social standing and relational safety, often through perfectionism, overfunctioning, or appeasement, especially in individuals with attachment wounds or trauma histories. These strategies are adaptive responses to environments where belonging felt conditional or fragile.
In plain terms: Status protection is the relentless effort to be “perfect enough” so no one has reason to exclude or reject you. It works in the short term, but it’s exhausting — and it keeps you performing rather than belonging.
What I see consistently in my work with clients like Denise is how these survival patterns, while adaptive in early relational contexts, become barriers to authentic leadership and relational fulfillment. The shame that underpins her perfectionism and people-pleasing isn’t a character flaw — it’s a wound response. It’s a neurobiological echo of early relational deprivation that achievement alone cannot heal.
For Denise, one of the most clarifying moments in coaching was recognizing how fawning showed up in her leadership meetings. Every time a senior administrator challenged her clinical judgment, she felt the urge to capitulate — not because the administrator was right, but because disagreement, even skilled professional disagreement, triggered the same bodily response as the childhood moments when asserting herself had cost her something relationally. Her nervous system didn’t distinguish between then and now. The administrator’s raised eyebrow landed with the same neurobiological weight as a parent’s withdrawal. Understanding this wasn’t just validating — it was practical. It gave Denise a way to unhook her physiological response from its childhood origin and respond from her actual clinical expertise rather than from the fawn reflex. That’s the work trauma-informed therapy and foundational relational repair make possible.
Research by Kalia and Knauft (2020), published in PLoS One, found that emotion regulation strategies significantly modulate how adverse childhood experiences translate into perceived chronic stress — meaning the patterns we learned in early relationships don’t just shape our feelings, they shape our physiology. The body carries the ledger of relational history in ways that promotions and accolades simply don’t reach.
Both/And: Achievement as Mirror and Mask
Here’s what I want you to hold as you read this: achievement and attachment repair exist in a both/and relationship for driven women leaders. This isn’t an either/or situation.
Achievement can be a powerful mirror — reflecting both the strengths born from resilience and the unresolved relational wounds beneath. It can also act as a mask: a way to cover the vulnerability and loneliness that attachment wounds evoke, a story you tell yourself (and others) about being okay when you’re not.
Mara and Denise’s stories underscore this complexity. Their outer successes are real and hard-earned. Those achievements don’t erase themselves. And at the same time, these achievements alone do not dismantle the neurobiological and relational patterns rooted in early attachment disruptions.
The clinical work I do with clients honors this both/and reality — it never asks you to minimize what you’ve built or to dismiss your accomplishments. But it also gently insists that what you’ve built on the outside can’t do the inner work. That work requires something different.
One clinical pattern I see repeatedly in driven women leaders is what I think of as the celebration collapse: the hours or days immediately following a significant professional win when the high evaporates unusually fast and is replaced by a flat, hollow feeling — sometimes anxiety, sometimes numbness, sometimes a peculiar sadness with no obvious source. For Mara, the celebration collapse happened reliably within 48 hours of every major milestone. She’d learned to plan around it: book something demanding for the following week so the hollowness would have somewhere to go. What she hadn’t yet understood was that the collapse wasn’t pathological — it was information. It was the nervous system reporting back: That wasn’t what we needed. The arrival fallacy isn’t just a cognitive distortion; it’s a bodily signal that the strategy of achievement-as-repair has hit another wall. When we begin to receive that signal with curiosity rather than shame, the whole work shifts.
Denise began to experience this in therapy after she allowed herself, for the first time, to cry in front of her coach without immediately apologizing. The world didn’t end. Her perceived competence didn’t shatter. What happened instead was a moment of genuine contact — someone actually seeing her rather than her performance. That contact, small as it seemed, began to rewire something. It planted the seed of earned security: the experience, earned through new relational experience, that it’s safe to be a whole person.
This is what therapy and trauma-informed executive coaching can do that no achievement ever can: provide the attuned, compassionate relational experiences that gradually update the nervous system’s expectation from threat to safety.
The Systemic Lens: Why This Isn’t a Personal Failing
Understanding the interplay between achievement and attachment wounds requires a systemic lens — one that situates individual patterns within broader relational, cultural, and organizational contexts. Because Mara and Denise didn’t develop these patterns in a vacuum.
For women like them, systemic forces shape the terrain of their inner lives in ways that are largely invisible and rarely named. Cultural norms valorize overwork and self-sacrifice in women. Tamu Thomas, author of Women Who Work Too Much, documents how women’s labor — paid and unpaid — is culturally framed as a moral obligation, a marker of worthiness, and a site of identity. This systemic pressure normalizes overwork and people-pleasing, obscuring the trauma adaptations beneath.
Organizations, meanwhile, reward relentless productivity but often lack structures that support relational safety or emotional attunement at work. The expectations to delegate without anxiety, hold difficult conversations without adrenaline spikes, and make decisions from clarity rather than reactivity aren’t just skills — they’re embodied states that require healing of neurobiological threat responses. You can’t think your way into a regulated nervous system.
Gender and power intersect here too. Women in leadership navigate double binds that men don’t: expected to lead with both authority and likability, to be ambitious but not threatening, to succeed without being perceived as “too much.” These conflicting demands activate the very survival patterns — fawning, perfectionism, overfunctioning — that the attachment wounds already primed them for.
And at the family systems level, many women who later occupy corner offices grew up in families where conditional approval, emotional invalidation, or rigid expectations around performance shaped early relational templates. These family patterns create blueprints that inform attachment strategies and self-regulation throughout life — blueprints that no career move revises.
Research by Tinajero and colleagues (2020), published in Stress and Health, found that childhood trauma history is significantly associated with pre-sleep arousal, daily hassles, and executive functioning impairment in adults — structural evidence that early relational disruptions leave lasting marks on cognition and daily functioning. These aren’t character deficits. They’re neurobiological footprints.
This systemic perspective shifts the work from “fixing” individual deficits to cultivating environments — both internally and externally — that support earned security, agency, and authentic connection. It reframes perfectionism, fawning, and overwork as strategies that kept you safe in unsafe contexts, rather than as personal failings that require correction.
How to Heal: Cultivating Earned Security Beyond Achievement
The path beyond the equity partner’s emptiness is neither quick nor linear. It requires a multi-layered approach that addresses neurobiological, relational, and systemic dimensions simultaneously. What I see in my clinical and coaching work is that sustainable change comes from integration, not from trying harder.
Embodied awareness and nervous system regulation. Healing begins with reconnecting to the body and its procedural memories — the nonverbal patterns of safety and threat that shape emotion and behavior long before words arrive. Practices grounded in Sensorimotor Psychotherapy and Polyvagal Theory help cultivate neurobiological safety, allowing you to access states beyond fight, flight, freeze, and fawn. This means learning to notice the subtle shifts — the tightening in your chest, the jaw that clenches before a hard conversation, the breath that shortens when you imagine asking for help — and developing the capacity to soften them.
Relational repair and earned secure attachment. Therapeutic and coaching relationships that provide genuine attunement and safe exploration of shame are foundational. This relational repair supports new internal working models of self and other — models that gradually replace “I have to be perfect to belong” with “I’m allowed to be a full person and still be safe.” The 2024 research by Jacobsen and colleagues confirms that earned secure attachment in therapeutic relationships produces measurable improvements in psychological outcomes.
Systemic engagement and organizational awareness. Healing is not only intrapsychic — it’s systemic. Trauma-informed executive coaching can help you shift survival patterns within organizational contexts: learning to delegate without the adrenaline spike, to hold hard conversations from clarity rather than reactivity, to set boundaries that protect relational safety without deepening isolation. Mary Beth O’Neill’s framework in Executive Coaching with Backbone and Heart offers a useful model for leaders navigating these dynamics.
Compassionate integration of achievement. Rather than discarding achievement, the goal is to integrate accomplishment with attachment repair — to value what you’ve built while softening the need for it to carry the weight of your worth. This integration allows you to inhabit leadership roles with both backbone and heart, presence and vulnerability. It’s not about becoming less ambitious. It’s about letting your ambition be rooted in desire rather than survival.
Mara’s coaching journey didn’t erase her anxiety overnight. Instead, it invited her into a conversation with her own nervous system. She learned to notice the subtle shifts in tension when delegating, practiced grounding exercises in moments of overwhelm, and experimented with candid conversations that felt risky but necessary. Her therapist helped her grieve the unmet childhood needs that achievement had been trying — and failing — to fill.
Denise’s path included something slightly different: learning to tolerate the discomfort of not immediately fixing the room. Her fawning had made her extraordinarily responsive to others’ distress — a tremendous clinical asset, and also an exhausting default setting. In coaching, she began to practice the pause: sitting with a colleague’s frustration or a senior administrator’s challenge without immediately moving to manage it. This pause — which sounds small — was neurobiologically enormous for Denise. It required her nervous system to hold discomfort without interpreting it as relational emergency. Over months, the pause became possible. Then it became natural. And her team began to notice: their Chief of Surgery was still highly attuned, but now she also had a steadiness that hadn’t been there before. That’s the shift from survival-mode leadership to what I call grounded authority — and it doesn’t come from leadership training. It comes from repairing the relational foundations beneath the leader.
This integrated approach allowed Mara to move from exhaustion and micromanagement toward leadership that felt embodied and sustainable. Not perfect. But real. If any of this resonates, I want you to know: the hollowness you feel isn’t evidence that something is wrong with you. It’s evidence that you’re human, that you carry a history, and that you’ve been trying to outrun something that deserves to be turned toward with care. You don’t have to figure it out alone. Explore working with me, or start with the quiz to understand the patterns beneath the patterns.
Q: Why doesn’t achieving my goals make me feel fulfilled?
A: Achievement can trigger what researcher Tal Ben-Shahar calls the arrival fallacy — the brain delivers a brief satisfaction spike and then returns to baseline. For women carrying unresolved attachment wounds, that baseline already includes a persistent sense of not-enoughness. No promotion reaches into those encoded patterns. Relational repair does.
Q: What is attachment repair, and how does it relate to leadership?
A: Attachment repair involves healing early relational wounds through safe, attuned relationships that provide new experiences of being truly seen and emotionally held. This supports emotional regulation and authentic presence — both of which are essential for effective, sustainable leadership rather than survival-mode leadership.
Q: How does shame affect ambitious, driven women?
A: Shame often underlies perfectionism and overfunctioning, acting as a hidden driver that fuels exhaustion and isolation despite outward success. It’s the internalized message that your worth is conditional — that if people saw all of you, they’d find you lacking. This shame isn’t a character flaw; it’s a wound response rooted in early relational history.
Q: Can executive coaching help with attachment wounds?
A: Trauma-informed executive coaching addresses survival patterns beneath leadership style — the overfunctioning, the fawning, the perfectionism — helping you shift from reactivity to clarity and agency in your leadership. It works best alongside therapy, which handles the deeper relational and neurobiological repair.
Q: What is fawning, and why does it matter in leadership contexts?
A: Fawning is a trauma response — people-pleasing, appeasing, and over-accommodating to avoid conflict or rejection. In leadership, it shows up as difficulty saying no, over-delivering to earn approval, and suppressing your own perspective to manage others’ reactions. It’s a survival strategy that once kept you safe and now keeps you exhausted.
Q: How do systemic factors influence attachment patterns in women leaders?
A: Cultural norms valorizing overwork and self-sacrifice in women, organizational cultures rewarding relentless productivity, and gendered double binds around authority all reinforce survival patterns like perfectionism and fawning. These systemic forces aren’t separate from attachment wounds — they interact with them, amplifying the inner experience of never being enough.
Q: What is earned security, and is it actually achievable?
A: Earned security is the experience of developing a secure internal base through new relational experiences later in life — in therapy, in coaching, in deeply attuned friendships or partnerships. Research confirms it’s absolutely achievable. It doesn’t require you to have had a perfect childhood; it requires you to have relationships now that provide what was missing then.
Q: What role does the body play in healing from attachment wounds?
A: Enormous. Attachment wounds are encoded in the nervous system at a procedural, pre-verbal level. Healing requires body-based approaches — somatic awareness, nervous system regulation practices, and relational experiences that allow the body to register safety rather than just intellectually understand it. The body keeps the score, as van der Kolk writes, and the body is also where healing registers first.
Q: Is it possible to be ambitious and emotionally healthy at the same time?
A: Not only possible — it’s the goal. Ambition rooted in authentic desire, rather than survival need, feels different in the body: energizing rather than compulsive, chosen rather than driven. When attachment repair happens alongside professional growth, women often find that their leadership becomes more effective, not less, because it’s no longer powered by anxiety.
Q: Where do I start if I recognize this pattern in myself?
A: Start by naming it — the arrival fallacy, the hollow feeling after a win, the sense that the mask is getting heavier. Then seek out support that meets the depth of the pattern: trauma-informed therapy, executive coaching, or a self-paced program like Fixing the Foundations. You don’t have to have this fully figured out to begin.
Related Reading
Jacobsen CF, Falkenström F, Castonguay L, Nielsen J, Lunn S, Lauritzen L, Poulsen S. “The relationship between attachment needs, earned secure therapeutic attachment and outcome in adult psychotherapy.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2024;92(7):410–421. PMID: 39190445. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39190445/
Kalia V, Knauft K. “Emotion regulation strategies modulate the effect of adverse childhood experiences on perceived chronic stress with implications for cognitive flexibility.” PLoS One. 2020;15(6):e0235412. PMID: 32589644. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32589644/
Tinajero R, Williams PG, Cribbet MR, Rau HK, Silver MA, Bride DL, Suchy Y. “Reported history of childhood trauma and stress-related vulnerability: Associations with emotion regulation, executive functioning, daily hassles and pre-sleep arousal.” Stress and Health. 2020. PMID: 32073201. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32073201/
Herman JL. Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence — From Domestic Abuse to Political Terror. Basic Books, 1992.
van der Kolk BA. The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. Penguin Books, 2015.
Ogden P, Fisher J. Sensorimotor Psychotherapy: Interventions for Trauma and Attachment. Norton, 2015.
Porges SW. The Pocket Guide to the Polyvagal Theory: The Transformative Power of Feeling Safe. Norton, 2017.
O’Neill MB. Executive Coaching with Backbone and Heart: A Systems Approach to Engaging Leaders with Their Challenges. Jossey-Bass, 2007.
WAYS TO WORK WITH ANNIE
Individual Therapy
Trauma-informed therapy for driven women healing relational trauma. Licensed in 9 states.
Executive Coaching
Trauma-informed coaching for ambitious women navigating leadership and burnout.
Fixing the Foundations
Annie’s signature course for relational trauma recovery. Work at your own pace.
Strong & Stable
The Sunday conversation you wished you’d had years earlier. 20,000+ subscribers.
Annie Wright, LMFT
LMFT · Relational Trauma Specialist · W.W. Norton Author
Helping ambitious women finally feel as good as their résumé looks.
Annie Wright is a licensed psychotherapist (LMFT #95719) and trauma-informed executive coach with over 15,000 clinical hours. She works with driven, ambitious women — including Silicon Valley leaders, physicians, and entrepreneurs — in repairing the psychological foundations beneath their impressive lives. Annie is the founder and former CEO of Evergreen Counseling, a multimillion-dollar trauma-informed therapy center she built, scaled, and successfully exited. A regular contributor to Psychology Today, her expert commentary has appeared in Forbes, Business Insider, Inc., NBC, and The Information. She is currently writing her first book with W.W. Norton.
