Founder Burnout After Childhood Overfunctioning: When the Drive That Built Your Company Is Also the Thing Depleting You
For founders who grew up as the responsible one, the one who managed the household’s moods, kept the peace, or stepped into an adult role before she was ready. Burnout isn’t just long hours. It’s a nervous system still running old survival code, a body taxed by years of control-as-safety, and a leadership identity built on competence that never learned to rest. This post looks at the roots of founder burnout after childhood overfunctioning and what actually helps.
- The Weight of Competence
- What Is Childhood Overfunctioning?
- Why Control Started to Feel Like Safety
- How This Shows Up in Founders
- Delegation Anxiety and the Cost of Never Letting Go
- Competence and Depletion Living in the Same Body
- Family Legacy, Startup Culture, and Gendered Overwork
- A Grounded Path Back to Ease and Agency
- Frequently Asked Questions
The Weight of Competence
The espresso has gone cold in the mug beside Addie’s laptop. It’s 6:40 in the morning, and she’s already reviewed the fundraising deck twice, replied to a board member’s late-night email, and rewritten a slide her head of sales got wrong. Outside, the street is still quiet. Inside her chest, something is not.
If your nervous system learned the safest way to exist was to manage everyone else's world, my self-paced course Enough Without the Effort is the recovery map.
Her phone buzzes. A message from an investor asking for updated metrics. Another from her co-founder about a hire who might be leaving. She breathes in, and she feels the tightness travel down through her shoulders into her jaw, the place where she’s been clenching her teeth for years without quite noticing.
Her company has grown from a two-person idea to a team of sixty. By every external measure, Addie is succeeding. And her body feels like it’s running a race that started decades before she ever filed the paperwork to incorporate. The exhaustion isn’t from one hard quarter. It’s structural. It’s old. It was there, she’s starting to understand, long before she founded anything at all.
This is founder burnout after childhood overfunctioning: competence and exhaustion woven into the same life, built on a foundation of relentless responsibility. Addie’s drive, her mastery of control, her refusal to let anyone down, were once survival strategies in an unpredictable home, not unlike what shows up in a fuller picture of relational trauma and its lasting effects. Now they are the very mechanisms taxing her mind and body every day.
What Is Childhood Overfunctioning?
In my work with founders and executives, what I see again and again is that burnout gets mistaken for a failure of stamina or discipline. But underneath it is usually something with a much longer history: childhood overfunctioning.
This is the pattern where a child takes on adult jobs, emotional caretaking, conflict mediation, managing the household’s moods, in order to keep herself and her family stable, usually because a parent’s capacity was limited, inconsistent, or simply absent.
Often described clinically as parentification, childhood overfunctioning is a developmental pattern in which a child takes on adult-level responsibility or emotional caretaking within the family, frequently due to a parent’s absence, distress, or unpredictability. This adaptation tends to produce hypervigilance, a strong need for control, and difficulty tolerating uncertainty or vulnerability well into adulthood. Recent research links early parentification directly to adult burnout risk (PMID: 40104952).
In plain terms: When a kid has to be the grown-up in her own family, keeping the peace, managing the crises, reading everyone’s mood before they even speak, she learns to survive by staying in control. That’s a brilliant adaptation at seven years old. It’s a very expensive one to carry at thirty-seven.
Founder burnout that starts here is not simply about overwork or a bad relationship to boundaries. It’s a replay of survival strategies that once kept a girl safe, and now strain the nervous system and the leadership capacity of the woman she became.
The need to control every detail, the guilt that shows up the moment she delegates, the sense of being responsible for everyone else’s feelings and outcomes. These aren’t quirks of personality. They’re adaptive patterns, wired in through repetition, that were once necessary and now cost more than they give back.
A state of physical, emotional, and cognitive exhaustion common among entrepreneurs, marked by chronic stress, reduced executive function, and a growing disconnection from purpose. When founder burnout is rooted in childhood overfunctioning, it reflects sustained over-responsibility and long-running stress activation rather than plain overwork. Corporate well-being research suggests structural, not just personal, strategies are needed to address it meaningfully (PMID: 40089985).
In plain terms: When a founder feels completely drained and stuck, it’s often because her body has been running in low-grade emergency mode for years, not weeks. Rest alone doesn’t fix it, because rest was never the piece that was missing.
Why Control Started to Feel Like Safety
To understand why founder burnout after childhood overfunctioning is so stubborn, it helps to understand what control is actually doing in the body, a pattern closely related to what I write about in a fuller explanation of complex trauma responses.
A nervous system is, at its most basic, a threat-detection instrument. It is constantly scanning the environment for cues of safety or danger, and it uses relational history to decide how to read those cues. For a child who grew up in a home that was unpredictable or emotionally volatile, the nervous system learned something specific and durable: unpredictability equals danger, and control equals survival.
That learning doesn’t dissolve when the child becomes an adult. It goes underground. It becomes the kind of knowing that lives in the body rather than in conscious thought, the body braces even when the spreadsheet says everything is fine.
Twenty years later, when Addie hands off a project and feels a jolt of adrenaline, her nervous system isn’t actually responding to the project. It’s responding to the felt experience of releasing control in an environment it still, on some old level, codes as unsafe.
A pattern describing how people use controlling behaviors to manage anxiety and maintain a sense of predictability in environments they perceive as unsafe or chaotic. These behaviors are typically unconscious adaptations to earlier instability, functioning as automatic responses of a threat-appraisal system rather than deliberate choices.
In plain terms: When the world felt unpredictable growing up, staying in control of everything was how you kept yourself safe. The trouble is that this threat-appraisal system keeps running the same program long after the original danger is gone.
A related body of research distinguishes perfectionism from what some researchers call excellencism, the pursuit of high standards without the punishing self-criticism, and finds the two predict very different outcomes for wellbeing and satisfaction over time (PMID: 40439999). A founder chasing excellencism tends to feel proud after a hard push. A founder caught in fear-based perfectionism tends to feel only briefly relieved, then anxious again by the following morning.
This is why “just delegate more” rarely works as advice. The obstacle isn’t knowledge or skill. Delegation activates a threat response that needs more than a cognitive override to shift.
In sessions, I sometimes ask clients to imagine, in vivid detail, handing an important project entirely to someone else and walking away. Not checking in. Not reviewing it twice. Just trusting.
For founders with overfunctioning histories, this exercise reliably produces a physical response: a tight chest, shallow breath, a low hum of dread. That response is the nervous system communicating plainly that this feels like danger. Until that signal gets addressed directly, no delegation framework holds up for long once real pressure returns.
How This Shows Up in Founders
Addie is a founder in her late thirties who grew up as the eldest of three, in a household marked by a parent’s absence and emotional unpredictability. She became the little adult early: managing conflict, smoothing tension, anticipating needs before anyone said them aloud. This role, sometimes called parentification, was survival. It built a template where control equaled safety, and it seeded a lifelong pattern of over-responsibility.
In our sessions, Addie describes an internal voice that insists, “If I don’t do it exactly right, everything falls apart.” She feels accountable not just for her company’s outcomes but for the emotional state of her team, her investors, and her own family, all at once. Delegating feels like a kind of betrayal. If she lets go, she’s certain chaos follows, and she’s certain she’ll be blamed for it.
Addie’s body carries the residue of this constant vigilance: tension headaches, a stomach that’s rarely calm, a persistent sense of being on edge. Her shoulders round forward. Her breathing stays shallow most of the day. No amount of sleep touches the fatigue, because the fatigue isn’t coming from her hours. It’s coming from chronic activation with no off-switch, running quietly underneath the work itself, the same activation described in a closer look at anxious attachment and its physical signature.
Then there is Ruth.
Ruth built a boutique advisory firm with a loyal client roster and a growing team, and she’s known for extraordinary attention to detail. She’s also stuck in a loop she can’t seem to exit: she delegates reluctantly, hovers over the people she does trust with something, and ends up quietly redoing their work most evenings.
The result is exhaustion, a resentment she can’t fully name, and a team that is slowly learning not to trust its own judgment. Ruth’s early home life was marked by inconsistency, a parent who worked constantly and was rarely emotionally present, and a household where tension could shift without warning. As a child, she learned to read the room and intervene before things erupted. As an adult, that translated into a leadership style that treats control and perfection as protection against a chaos her body is still bracing for.
The practical cost is real. Ruth’s team is capable, but they’ve learned they don’t need to fully commit to their own decisions, because Ruth will come back in and adjust the work anyway. This is a common and rarely named effect of founder overfunctioning: the leader’s survival pattern doesn’t just wear her down, it slowly erodes the confidence and autonomy of the people around her, creating exactly the dependence that makes delegating feel even riskier. The system feeds itself.
When Ruth first considers working with a coach who understands this pattern, something in her voice loosens. She isn’t lazy, and she isn’t weak. She’s exhausted from running an operating system that was built for a different, much smaller life, one closer to what I describe in a look at fearful avoidant attachment patterns in adulthood.
Delegation Anxiety and the Cost of Never Letting Go
Delegation anxiety is one of the most common presentations I see in driven women with overfunctioning histories, and one of the most misread.
The distress and physical arousal that shows up when handing tasks or responsibility to someone else, often rooted in early relational patterns that undermine trust in other people’s reliability, or in one’s own ability to tolerate an imperfect outcome. Arnold Bakker, PhD, organizational psychologist known for his research on job demands and resources and the mechanics of exhaustion, has documented how sustained demands without matching resources gradually erode a person’s capacity to recover, a dynamic that maps closely onto what happens when a founder can never fully release control.
In plain terms: It’s that dread in your chest the moment you hand something off, the part of you already rehearsing what will go wrong and whose fault it will be.
For Ruth, handing off a project produces a racing heart, shallow breathing, and a tight chest, classic signs of a threat-appraisal system firing. Her body is responding to delegation as though she were abandoning a post during a crisis. And in an earlier chapter of her life, that’s exactly what it would have meant.
“Believe not those who say the upward path is smooth, lest thou shouldst stumble in the way, and faint before the truth.”
Anne Bronte, “The Narrow Way”
The physical cost of this pattern is real and it accumulates. Sustained activation, the body staying in a low-grade state of alarm for years at a stretch, is associated with disrupted sleep, cardiovascular strain, a weakened immune response, and the kind of cognitive narrowing that makes strategic, creative thinking noticeably harder over time.
Perfectionism compounds all of this, and it often travels alongside the pattern of people pleasing common among driven women. Fear-based perfectionism, the kind rooted in dread rather than care, is a strong predictor of the exhaustion and cynicism at the center of clinical burnout (PMID: 40736561). The founder who can’t tolerate an imperfect outcome isn’t being difficult. She’s running a strategy that, once, carried real stakes.
It helps to separate two very different kinds of perfectionism. There’s the kind rooted in genuine care, a love of craft, high standards tied to values, the wish to do meaningful work well. That kind tends to energize rather than deplete.
And there’s the kind rooted in fear, where a nervous system learned early that imperfection carried real relational consequences, that good enough was never actually safe enough. That second kind depletes, because the real goal was never the quality of the work. The goal was the momentary relief of not getting caught short.
For founders with overfunctioning histories, understanding that distinction is one of the more freeing realizations available to them. Not because it makes the perfectionism disappear, but because it shifts the question from “how do I lower my standards” to “how do I help my body feel safe enough that I no longer need the standards as armor.”
What actually changes this isn’t more discipline or a better system. It’s working directly with the nervous system, building somatic awareness, and creating, in a relational context, small new experiences of letting go that turn out fine. That kind of foundational work is part of what I explore in a protocol for rebuilding self trust after years of overriding your own instincts, for women ready to understand the patterns beneath their patterns.
Both/And: Competence and Depletion Live in the Same Body
Addie’s and Ruth’s stories point to one of the central tensions in this work: these are genuinely competent women. Their leadership is grounded in real skill, real intelligence, real care for the people around them. And underneath that competence lives a body still bracing for threat, still earning safety through performance, still managing for danger that passed long ago.
Both things are true at once, and holding two truths side by side is essential to understanding founder burnout accurately.
Competence and exhaustion coexist. A founder can be genuinely excellent at what she does and genuinely depleted by how she does it. Those aren’t contradictions. They’re the lived experience of a body that learned, early, to perform its way to safety.
You've been holding everything together. You're allowed to put some down.
A focused self-paced course on overfunctioning, achievement-first self-concept, and the trauma response that masquerades as a personality. Not a productivity problem. Not a boundary problem. A nervous system that learned competence was the only safety.
Control and trust are both part of sustainable leadership. Good leadership does require oversight and high standards. It also requires moments of real trust, in other people, in an imperfect outcome, in the body’s own signals for rest. Sustainable leadership makes room for both, rather than sacrificing one for the other.
What I notice in the women who make the most progress is a gradual widening of what feels tolerable. Delegation doesn’t stop feeling uncomfortable overnight. But the discomfort becomes something they can notice, sit with, and choose not to act on immediately. That gap between impulse and action is most of the territory of change. It’s small, and it’s nearly everything. Over months, that gap widens further, and a founder starts trusting her own capacity to tolerate an outcome she didn’t control.
Individual patterns and structural forces are both real. Founder burnout is not purely a personal psychology problem. It comes from the interaction of personal history, a nervous system’s learned responses, relational dynamics, and the culture of the organization itself. Treating only one of those dimensions leaves the rest untouched.
Holding both of these ideas together makes room for complexity instead of oversimplification. It invites a gentler kind of inquiry, not “what’s wrong with me” but “what did my body learn, and what would help it learn something different.”
For women who have spent decades treating their own exhaustion as evidence of weakness, that’s not a small shift. It’s closer to a radical one.
The Systemic Lens: Family Legacy, Startup Culture, and Gendered Overwork
Founder burnout after childhood overfunctioning can’t be fully understood, or meaningfully addressed, without looking past the individual to the systems surrounding her.
Start with the family of origin. Families function as emotional units with interlocking roles and unspoken rules. When a child takes on the overfunctioning role, stabilizing a parent’s distress, managing conflict, holding the household’s emotional weather together, that role gets encoded through sheer repetition. It isn’t chosen. It’s a survival adaptation wired in over years.
For Addie and Ruth, the implicit family message was the same: if you don’t do it, no one will. That message became a leadership identity, one that confuses self-worth with over-responsibility and treats rest as a form of neglect.
Then there’s the workplace itself. Companies founded by women with overfunctioning histories often end up mirroring the original family dynamic. The founder becomes the emotional center of gravity, the person everyone turns to for reassurance, answers, and crisis management. That isn’t accidental. It’s the old relational pattern showing up again in organizational form.
Cary Cooper, PhD, organizational psychologist known for decades of research on occupational stress and workplace wellbeing, has argued for years that companies which valorize relentless output while treating boundary-setting as weakness are, by design, manufacturing the very exhaustion they later complain about. Startup culture in particular tends to reward the founder who never seems to need anything, which reinforces her internal mandate rather than interrupting it.
And a workplace does not have to be actively hostile to sustain this pattern. It only has to reward the behavior that overfunctioning already produces: the founder who answers at midnight, who never says the deadline is unreasonable, who treats her own depletion as proof of commitment. Investors and boards, without meaning to, often reinforce this further by praising exactly the founder behaviors that are quietly costing her the most.
Third, gender and cultural expectations shape this too. Cultural narratives that valorize a woman’s self-sacrifice and caretaking make burnout both more likely and more stigmatized when it shows up in women founders. The invisible load of emotional labor and constant availability falls disproportionately on women leaders and tends to go structurally unacknowledged.
Founders from historically underrepresented backgrounds often carry additional layers of systemic strain, from a lack of access to supportive networks to the extra scrutiny that comes with being the exception in the room, and these layers compound the load on an already taxed system, a dynamic that echoes trauma-informed therapy for driven women more broadly.
Amy Wrzesniewski, PhD, organizational psychologist known for her research on job crafting and how people find meaning in their work, has written about how much agency people retain in reshaping the meaning and boundaries of a role, even inside a demanding system. That agency matters here: the individual pattern and the surrounding culture both need attention, and neither alone is sufficient.
“Just set better boundaries” is not a structural intervention. Real change asks a founder to work with her own patterns, her body’s responses, and the cultural stories reinforcing both, together, in a relational context that can actually hold that complexity, which is why boundary-setting so often feels impossible for women with this history until the deeper pattern gets named directly.
A Grounded Path Back to Ease and Agency
The path beyond founder burnout rooted in childhood overfunctioning isn’t linear, and it isn’t quick. What helps is a grounded, embodied approach that takes the nervous system, the relationships, and the surrounding culture seriously, all at once.
Start with the body. Chronic stress and overfunctioning live in physical patterns, tight shoulders, shallow breath, a system stuck in high alert, that insight alone rarely reaches. Simple practices that build body awareness help founders notice the earliest signals of activation and intervene before the old pattern takes over completely, much as a complete guide to betrayal trauma walks through similar early-warning signals in a different context.
Get curious about the overfunctioning, not critical of it. Shame speeds burnout along; it doesn’t heal it. Understanding Addie’s hypervigilance as an intelligent response to an unpredictable childhood, rather than a character flaw to fix, creates the conditions for real change. Compassionate curiosity opens doors that self-judgment tends to keep locked.
Look for a relational container that offers steady, earned trust. When someone experiences consistent attunement and a non-shaming presence in a coaching or therapeutic relationship over time, old patterns of guardedness genuinely start to loosen. The relationship itself becomes part of what heals, not just the content discussed inside it.
Reframe delegation as an exercise in relational trust. Rather than treating delegation purely as risk to be managed, it can become a practice, one that slowly expands a founder’s tolerance for imperfection and builds real trust with her team. Each successful instance of letting go becomes evidence, held in the body, that release doesn’t lead to catastrophe. Starting small helps considerably, a single low-stakes decision handed off cleanly, then another, rather than attempting to release control everywhere at once.
Workaholism deserves a direct mention here, since it so often gets mistaken for simple dedication. Recent research on workaholism found it consistently predicts poorer life balance and wellbeing, independent of how many hours someone is actually contracted to work (PMID: 41327259). The hours are not the whole story. The compulsive quality of the effort is.
Name the cultural narratives and challenge them directly. The message that your worth is proportional to your output isn’t a fact. It’s a story, one that overfunctioning families and overwork-glorifying cultures both keep alive. Naming it doesn’t make it vanish, but it does start to separate it from your sense of self.
Do this work in a sustained way. Change at this level requires repetition and relational consistency, not a single insight or a single weekend. Whether through individualized coaching, a structured course, or individual therapy, the container and the consistency both matter, in much the same way the signs of real healing tend to show up gradually rather than all at once.
Then there’s Sasha, whose story shows what this can look like over time. Sasha built a healthcare technology company after growing up as the family’s unofficial mediator, the one who translated her parents’ arguments into something manageable before either of them fully understood what was happening. She spent her first six years as a founder unable to take a real vacation, convinced that if she stepped away for even a week, something essential would come apart in her absence.
What shifted for Sasha wasn’t a single breakthrough. It was months of noticing the tight chest before a hard conversation, learning to name it instead of override it, and slowly discovering that her team could, in fact, hold things without her hovering. She still works hard. She still cares intensely about the outcome. But she now takes real weekends, and her company hasn’t fallen apart. If anything, her team makes better decisions when she isn’t constantly stepping back in to fix them.
If you’ve built something real and find yourself depleted in ways that don’t line up with everything you’ve achieved, that mismatch deserves to be taken seriously. The exhaustion isn’t a character flaw. It’s a signal, and it’s pointing toward something that can genuinely change with the right support and enough time. If you need somewhere gentler to land on a hard day, words that steady you through hard times might help in the meantime.
Warmly, Annie.
Q: How do I know if my burnout is related to childhood overfunctioning, or if I’m just working too hard?
A: Look for patterns of chronic over-responsibility, a sense that everything collapses if you stop, difficulty delegating even when you know it’s strategically necessary, and exhaustion that doesn’t respond to rest. If you took on caretaking or peacekeeping roles in your family as a child, that history is almost certainly shaping your founder experience today.
Q: Why can’t I just set better boundaries and fix this myself?
A: Because the overfunctioning pattern isn’t primarily a thinking problem. It’s a body problem. Setting a boundary requires tolerating the anxiety that follows it, and for a nervous system that learned letting go equals danger, that anxiety is intense and genuinely hard to override through willpower alone. The work isn’t learning better strategies. It’s helping your body feel safe enough to use the strategies you already know.
Q: What does coaching built around this pattern do differently than regular executive coaching?
A: It works with the survival patterns underneath the leadership behavior, not just the behavior itself. Rather than simply teaching better delegation, it helps you understand why delegation triggers a threat response, and works with that response directly. The approach blends leadership development with an understanding of the body and of relational patterns.
Q: How does perfectionism connect to founder burnout?
A: Fear-based perfectionism, driven by dread of failure rather than love of craft, is strongly associated with the exhaustion and cynicism at the core of burnout. For women who overfunctioned as children, perfectionism is often the learned strategy for maintaining control and preventing what the body still codes as catastrophe. It isn’t a personality trait. It’s a survival pattern that outlived its original purpose.
Q: Why does the body matter so much in understanding and healing founder burnout?
A: Because that is where these patterns actually live. Chronic stress gets stored in the body’s threat-response patterns and automatic reactions, not primarily in conscious thought. Insight is valuable, but it’s rarely sufficient on its own. Healing tends to require engaging the body directly, through awareness practices and relational experiences that build new evidence of safety over time.
Q: How do gender expectations specifically affect women founders with overfunctioning histories?
A: Women leaders often face contradictory demands, to be authoritative and warm, decisive yet accommodating, ambitious yet self-effacing. These expectations intersect with an overfunctioning history in a way that makes the pressure to do everything for everyone feel culturally required rather than personally excessive. Naming that structural layer doesn’t remove it, but it does shift where the responsibility actually sits.
Q: Is it possible to be both a strong leader and genuinely open about struggling?
A: Not only is it possible, for founders with overfunctioning histories, real openness is often what finally makes leadership sustainable. Openness rooted in a felt sense of safety isn’t weakness. It’s what allows you to trust others, ask for support, and stop carrying the entire company on your own nervous system. That’s an upgrade in leadership, not a liability.
Q: Can this kind of work and growing my company actually happen at the same time?
A: Yes, and for most founders they can’t really be separated. Better emotional regulation directly improves decision-making. A calmer threat response expands cognitive flexibility. Reducing delegation anxiety makes scaling genuinely possible. Recovery and company growth aren’t competing priorities most of the time. They’re often the same project, seen from two angles.
Q: What if I’m not ready for coaching or therapy. Is there a lower-stakes place to start?
A: A self-paced course focused on codependency in driven women is often a good place to start, since overfunctioning and codependency share so much of the same root structure. It’s built for women who sense that something beneath their strategy deserves attention and who want to explore that in a structured way before stepping into more individualized support.
Related Reading
- Bakker, Arnold B. “Job Demands-Resources Theory and Self-Regulation: New Explanations and Remedies for Job Burnout.” Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 2023.
- Cooper, Cary L., and Ivan Robertson. Well-Being: Productivity and Happiness at Work. Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.
- Wrzesniewski, Amy, and Jane E. Dutton. “Crafting a Job: Revisioning Employees as Active Crafters of Their Work.” Academy of Management Review, 2001.
- Bronte, Anne. “The Narrow Way.” Fraser’s Magazine, 1848.
References
Peer-Reviewed Research
- Huczewska M, et al. Childhood parentification and adult burnout risk. 2025. PMID: 40104952.
- Gaudreau P, et al. Distinguishing perfectionism from excellencism in achievement contexts. 2025. PMID: 40439999.
- Malempati S, et al. Perfectionism as a pathway to burnout and depressive symptoms. 2025. PMID: 40736561.
- Abou Hashish EA, et al. Workaholism and life balance among professionals. 2025. PMID: 41327259.
- Yamakawa M, et al. Corporate well-being strategies and employee outcomes. 2025. PMID: 40089985.
Read Annie’s weekly essays on rebuilding after relational trauma.
Weekly Substack essays from Annie Wright, LMFT on relational trauma, recovery, and the House of Life framework. For driven women who want a structured path back to themselves.
WAYS TO WORK WITH ANNIE
Individual Therapy
Trauma-informed therapy for driven women healing relational trauma. Licensed in 15 U.S. jurisdictions, including Colorado (telehealth only).
Executive Coaching
Trauma-informed coaching for driven women navigating leadership and burnout.
Fixing the Foundations
Annie’s signature course for relational trauma recovery. Work at your own pace.
Strong & Stable
The Sunday conversation you wished you’d had years earlier. 25,000+ subscribers.
Annie Wright, LMFT
LMFT · Relational Trauma Specialist · W.W. Norton Author
Helping driven women finally feel as good as their resume looks.
Annie Wright is a licensed psychotherapist (LMFT #95719) and trauma-informed executive coach with over 15,000 clinical hours. She works with driven women, including Silicon Valley leaders, physicians, and entrepreneurs, in repairing the psychological foundations beneath their impressive lives. Annie is the founder and former CEO of Evergreen Counseling, a multimillion-dollar trauma-informed therapy center she built, scaled, and successfully exited. A regular contributor to Psychology Today, her expert commentary has appeared in Forbes, Business Insider, Inc., NBC, and The Information. She is currently writing her first book with W.W. Norton, and she is licensed to practice across Maine and several other states.
