Will This Ruin My Kids? The Actual Data on Children and Divorce
Divorce can feel like an earthquake shaking the foundations of your family. As a therapist who’s worked closely with children and parents navigating this terrain, I want to unpack the real impact divorce has on kids. Drawing from decades of research, including E. Mark Cummings’ emotional security theory and Judith Wallerstein Hetherington’s findings, this post explores the nuanced realities — not myths — of how children experience their parents’ separation. If you’re worried about whether your divorce will “ruin” your kids, this deep dive is for you.
Opening Sensory Scene: Maya’s Morning
Maya sits quietly at the kitchen table, her small hands wrapped tightly around a chipped ceramic mug of lukewarm cocoa. The morning light filters softly through the blinds, casting thin stripes across the counter where yesterday’s school papers lie scattered. Outside, rain taps steadily against the windowpane, a rhythmic whisper that matches the dull ache she feels in her chest. She’s seven years old, and today her parents are sitting across from each other, their voices low but tense, discussing arrangements that feel like unfamiliar territory.
As a therapist, I often imagine what it feels like to be a child in moments like Maya’s — caught in the stillness between upheaval and normalcy. The sensory details matter: the faint smell of coffee brewing, the faint hum of the refrigerator, the cool draft sneaking beneath the door. These small elements ground her, but they can’t fully shield her from the swirling questions inside her mind. Will this change everything? Will she lose her sense of safety? What does it mean that her parents no longer live together?
Maya’s experience is not unique, but it’s deeply personal. The truth is, children’s reactions to divorce are as varied as their personalities, temperaments, and the quality of the family relationships before, during, and after separation. What I want to explore with you is what the research really says — beyond the fear and the stigma — about how divorce affects children’s emotional well-being.
A relational state in which one partner’s personal development — emotional, intellectual, professional, or spiritual — has surpassed the marriage’s capacity to hold, reflect, or support their evolving identity and aspirations. First articulated in clinical work with driven, ambitious women by Annie Wright, LMFT, drawing on the longitudinal divorce research of E. Mavis Hetherington, PhD, psychologist at the University of Virginia and lead researcher on For Better or For Worse.
In plain terms: You didn’t ruin the marriage. You outgrew the container. Those aren’t the same thing — and the distinction matters clinically, ethically, and practically.
What Is Divorce’s Impact on Children?
Divorce’s impact on children is complex and multi-dimensional, often misunderstood through the lens of cultural myths or worst-case scenarios. To clarify, let’s start with a clinical definition.
The impact of divorce on children refers to the psychological, emotional, and behavioral outcomes that arise in children as a result of the legal and relational dissolution of their parents’ marriage. These outcomes are influenced by factors including parental conflict, parenting quality, economic stability, and children’s individual resilience.
Clinically, we recognize that divorce is a major life stressor for children, often disrupting their sense of emotional security — a key construct developed by Dr. E. Mark Cummings in his emotional security theory. This theory posits that children’s primary concern in the context of parental conflict or separation is maintaining a stable and secure emotional environment. When that security is threatened, children may respond with anxiety, sadness, or behavioral challenges.
Importantly, emotional security theory helps us understand why the quality of parental relationships post-divorce matters far more than the divorce itself. High-conflict, hostile parental interactions create an environment where children’s emotional security is undermined, regardless of whether their parents are married or separated. Conversely, when parents manage to maintain respect, cooperation, and consistent caregiving, children’s emotional security — and thus their emotional health — stands a better chance.
One of the landmark longitudinal studies on children and divorce was conducted by Judith Wallerstein and colleagues, but it was E. Mavis Hetherington’s work that brought a nuanced, hopeful perspective to the field. Her research found that approximately 75-80% of children from divorced families fall within the “normal” range of psychological adjustment over time. This means that, despite the upheaval, the vast majority of children do not suffer long-term emotional or behavioral disorders simply due to their parents’ divorce.
This statistic alone challenges the pervasive belief that divorce “ruins” kids. Instead, Hetherington’s findings emphasize that while some children do experience difficulties — sometimes serious ones — most adapt and grow resilient with the right support. This resilience doesn’t mean children aren’t affected; rather, they often navigate the adjustment process in ways that allow them to lead healthy, fulfilling lives.
From a clinical standpoint, understanding these data helps parents, therapists, and educators shift from a fear-based view to one grounded in realistic expectations and proactive support. It’s not about minimizing the challenges children face, but about recognizing the pathways through which children can maintain or regain their emotional equilibrium.
In this post, I’ll walk you through the detailed data, the factors that influence children’s outcomes, and practical ways to foster your child’s emotional security during and after divorce. Because if you’re asking, “Will this ruin my kids?” you’re already showing the kind of care and reflection that can make a world of difference in how your children experience this transition.
The Clinical Science of Attachment Theory
Before we dive into the clinical science, let’s ground ourselves with a clear definition:
Definition Box #2: Attachment Theory
Attachment theory is a psychological framework that explores how early relationships with caregivers form the blueprint for how we relate to others throughout our lives. It explains the emotional bonds that develop and how these bonds impact our sense of security, emotional regulation, and interpersonal dynamics.
Attachment theory, first articulated by John Bowlby, has evolved through decades of research, with significant contributions from scholars like E. Mark Cummings, PhD, and Mavis Hetherington, PhD. Their work deepens our understanding of how attachment influences not just childhood development but adult relationships, especially under stress.
E. Mark Cummings, PhD: The Emotional Climate of Attachment
Dr. E. Mark Cummings, a leading researcher in developmental psychology, focuses extensively on family emotional dynamics. His research highlights how attachment isn’t static—it’s deeply affected by the emotional climate within the family system. When caregivers model emotional responsiveness and healthy conflict resolution, children develop secure attachments. Conversely, high levels of parental conflict or emotional unavailability disrupt this process, fostering insecure attachments.
Cummings’ work also emphasizes the ripple effects of attachment security. Securely attached children tend to develop better emotional regulation, social competence, and resilience. In contrast, insecure attachment can manifest as anxiety, avoidance, or ambivalence in relationships. This isn’t just about childhood; these patterns often carry forward into adulthood, shaping how women navigate their careers, friendships, and romantic partnerships.
Mavis Hetherington, PhD: Attachment Across the Lifespan
Mavis Hetherington’s research broadens the lens to examine attachment beyond early childhood, especially through significant life transitions. Her longitudinal studies show that attachment security can be influenced by later experiences, including divorce, loss, and adult relationships. Hetherington’s findings underscore the plasticity of attachment—while early experiences are formative, adult relationships and therapeutic interventions can alter attachment patterns.
Hetherington also explores the bidirectional nature of attachment: not only do our caregivers’ behaviors shape us, but our own attachment style influences how we engage with others. For driven women, this dynamic can be particularly complex. The push for independence and achievement can sometimes clash with underlying attachment needs, creating internal conflict and relational tension.
The Neurobiology of Attachment
Attachment is not just a psychological construct—it’s deeply rooted in our neurobiology. Secure attachment fosters the development of neural pathways linked to emotional regulation and social cognition. When attachment needs are met consistently, the brain’s stress response systems, like the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, are regulated effectively. This means securely attached individuals generally handle stress better and are less prone to anxiety or depression.
Conversely, insecure attachment can lead to hyperactivation or deactivation of these systems, resulting in heightened anxiety, emotional numbing, or difficulty connecting with others. For driven women, this neurobiological undercurrent may fuel relentless self-criticism or emotional withdrawal, undermining both personal satisfaction and professional success.
Attachment Styles: A Closer Look
To contextualize this scientifically, attachment is often categorized into four styles: secure, anxious-preoccupied, dismissive-avoidant, and fearful-avoidant. Each style reflects different ways of managing intimacy and autonomy.
- Secure attachment balances closeness and independence, fostering emotional openness and trust.
- Anxious-preoccupied attachment is marked by fear of abandonment and a strong desire for reassurance, often leading to clinginess or emotional volatility.
- Dismissive-avoidant attachment involves emotional distancing and self-reliance, sometimes masking vulnerability with detachment.
- Fearful-avoidant attachment combines a deep desire for connection with intense fear of rejection, resulting in ambivalence and confusion.
Understanding these styles through a clinical lens allows us to identify patterns and tailor interventions that honor individual experiences without judgment.
The research-backed finding that children’s post-divorce outcomes are driven far more by the quality and stability of their parenting relationships than by marital status itself. Articulated by Paul R. Amato, PhD, sociologist and pioneer of divorce-effects meta-analysis, in The Effects of Divorce on America’s Children.
In plain terms: Your children don’t need intact parents living in silent resentment. They need at least one regulated, present parent — and they need to see honest modeling of what growth looks like.
How Attachment Theory Shows Up in Driven Women
Let’s ground this in a real-world vignette to illustrate how attachment dynamics play out in the lives of ambitious women.
Vignette #1: Leila’s Story
Leila is a 34-year-old marketing executive climbing the corporate ladder with impressive speed. On the surface, she exudes confidence and control, but beneath that polished exterior lies a persistent struggle. She finds herself caught in a relentless cycle of overworking and self-doubt. Despite her professional success, Leila feels emotionally isolated and questions whether she’s truly “enough.”
Leila’s early childhood was marked by emotional inconsistency. Her mother, though loving, was often preoccupied with her own anxieties, leading to unpredictable availability. As a child, Leila learned to suppress her needs to avoid burdening her mother, developing an anxious-preoccupied attachment style.
This attachment pattern manifests in Leila’s adult life as a deep fear of rejection, which fuels her drive for perfection. She overcompensates at work, equating achievement with worthiness. Leila’s relationships suffer because she struggles to trust others fully, often testing partners’ commitment or withdrawing when she feels vulnerable.
The Intersection of Ambition and Attachment
Driven women like Leila often find their attachment insecurities amplified by cultural narratives about success and self-sufficiency. The message is clear: you must be independent, resilient, and always in control. Attachment needs for connection and emotional safety can feel like liabilities, weaknesses to hide or overcome.
In therapy, I often see how these women wrestle with the paradox of longing for closeness while fearing dependency. They may excel at managing external demands but struggle with internal emotional needs. This dissonance can lead to burnout, relational turmoil, and a pervasive sense of emptiness despite outward accomplishments.
Recognizing Attachment Patterns in Daily Life
Attachment isn’t confined to childhood memories or therapy sessions—it colors everyday experiences. For driven women, it may show up as:
- Difficulty asking for help: A dismissive-avoidant attachment style can make it hard to seek support, leading to isolation and overwhelm.
- People-pleasing and overcommitment: An anxious attachment may drive women to say “yes” constantly, fearing that saying “no” will lead to rejection.
- Emotional suppression: Fearful-avoidant individuals might avoid expressing vulnerability, leading to emotional numbing and disconnection.
- Perfectionism: Attachment anxiety often fuels perfectionistic tendencies, where achievements are used to mask feelings of inadequacy.
The Emotional Cost of Misaligned Attachment
When attachment needs go unaddressed, the emotional toll can be profound. Women like Leila might experience chronic stress, anxiety, or depression. Their relationships—whether romantic, familial, or professional—may feel fraught with misunderstandings and unmet expectations.
This isn’t just about feeling “insecure”; it’s about the physiological and psychological consequences of living with unresolved attachment wounds. The brain’s stress systems remain on high alert, emotional regulation becomes challenging, and the capacity for joy diminishes.
Toward Healing and Integration
The good news is that attachment styles are not destiny. Through intentional self-awareness, therapeutic work, and supportive relationships, driven women can rewire their attachment patterns. This process involves:
- Recognizing and naming attachment behaviors: Understanding how early experiences shape current patterns is the first step.
- Cultivating self-compassion: Letting go of self-blame and embracing vulnerability opens the door to healing.
- Developing secure relational experiences: Whether through therapy, friendships, or partnerships, experiencing consistent emotional availability fosters new neural pathways.
- Balancing ambition with emotional needs: Learning to honor both drive and attachment needs creates a more integrated, fulfilling life.
Leila’s journey is ongoing. As she deepens her awareness of her attachment style, she’s learning to set boundaries, ask for support, and embrace imperfection. It’s not easy, but it’s profoundly liberating.
Attachment theory offers a powerful lens to understand the emotional undercurrents that shape our lives as driven women. By acknowledging the clinical science and seeing how it shows up in real life, we can move toward greater wholeness—honoring both our ambition and our need for connection.
Mindfulness and Emotional Regulation
When I talk about mindfulness in therapy, I’m referring to a practice that’s much more than just sitting quietly or repeating mantras. It’s about cultivating a focused awareness of the present moment without judgment. For driven, ambitious women, this can feel paradoxical—how do you slow down when your mind races with to-do lists and future goals? The clinical truth is that mindfulness helps us step out of autopilot, allowing us to recognize and regulate our emotional responses before they spiral out of control.
Emotional regulation is the ability to manage and respond to emotional experiences in ways that are flexible and constructive rather than reactive or destructive. It’s not about suppressing feelings or pretending everything is fine; it’s about acknowledging emotions, understanding their origins, and choosing how to act in response. Mindfulness serves as a foundational tool for developing this skill because it anchors us in the present, helping us observe emotions as they arise without getting swept away.
Research consistently links mindfulness-based interventions to improvements in emotional regulation, decreased anxiety, and reduced symptoms of depression. As Dr. Jon Kabat-Zinn, a pioneer in mindfulness research, explains, “Mindfulness means paying attention in a particular way: on purpose, in the present moment, and nonjudgmentally.” This deliberate attention allows us to witness our emotional experience without being defined or controlled by it.
I often incorporate mindfulness exercises into sessions with clients struggling to manage intense emotions or chronic stress. For example, a simple practice like focusing on one’s breath can interrupt the cycle of rumination or catastrophic thinking. Over time, this practice can build a greater tolerance for discomfort and uncertainty, which are inevitable in both personal and professional realms.
But here’s the clinical nuance: mindfulness isn’t a quick fix or a cure-all. It requires consistent practice and patience, especially for those who tend to push through feelings or avoid discomfort. It’s normal—and expected—to encounter resistance or frustration when beginning a mindfulness practice. The goal isn’t to eliminate negative emotions but to change our relationship with them so they no longer dictate our behavior or self-worth.
In therapy, I help clients explore how mindfulness can be tailored to their unique needs and lifestyles. For a woman balancing a demanding career and family, mindfulness might look like brief moments of grounding during a hectic day rather than long meditative sessions. The key is integration—making mindfulness a lived experience rather than an abstract concept.
Emotional regulation also requires recognizing patterns—how certain triggers like perfectionism, criticism, or overwhelm ignite emotional responses. Through mindfulness, clients can pause at these moments of activation, observe their internal states, and choose responses aligned with their values instead of impulsive reactions.
This process fosters resilience—the capacity to bounce back from setbacks without losing sight of oneself. For ambitious women, resilience doesn’t mean relentless endurance but a compassionate self-awareness that allows for rest, recalibration, and repair. Mindfulness and emotional regulation are cornerstones of building this kind of resilience.
In summary, mindfulness offers a clinically grounded approach to cultivating emotional regulation. It invites us to meet our emotions with curiosity and kindness, reduce reactivity, and enhance self-understanding. As Kabat-Zinn reminds us, it’s about paying attention on purpose, which is the first step in transforming how we experience and respond to the challenges of life.
“I have everything and nothing. I live on a treadmill. I do not know what I really want.”
Marion Woodman analysand, The Pregnant Virgin
Both/And — Embracing Ambition and Vulnerability
One of the most common clinical challenges I encounter with driven women is the tension between ambition and vulnerability. Society often frames these traits as mutually exclusive: you’re either strong and goal-oriented or open and vulnerable. But in reality, embracing both is not only possible—it’s essential for authentic growth and wellbeing.
Let me introduce you to Priya, a composite client whose story illustrates this both/and dynamic. Priya is a 34-year-old marketing executive who has always prided herself on her work ethic and ability to lead large teams. She’s ambitious, organized, and relentlessly focused on career advancement. Yet beneath this exterior, Priya struggles with feelings of isolation and self-doubt that she rarely expresses.
In our sessions, Priya described how she felt pressure to maintain an image of competence and control, especially in male-dominated spaces. Vulnerability felt like a liability—something that might undermine her credibility or expose her to judgment. At the same time, she yearned for deeper connection and authenticity but didn’t know how to reconcile these needs with her professional identity.
Clinically, this is a classic example of the internal conflict many ambitious women face. The cultural script often suggests that vulnerability equals weakness, reinforcing the need to “power through” emotions or mask insecurities. This can lead to chronic stress, emotional suppression, and ultimately burnout.
With Priya, we worked on redefining vulnerability as a form of strength—a courageous act of self-acceptance and openness that enriches relationships and creativity. Vulnerability doesn’t negate ambition; it informs it by fostering empathy, self-awareness, and flexibility.
We explored practical ways for Priya to integrate vulnerability into her daily life without compromising her professional goals. This included setting boundaries to protect her energy, sharing challenges with trusted colleagues, and reflecting on moments when vulnerability actually enhanced her leadership effectiveness.
One breakthrough came when Priya allowed herself to express uncertainty during a high-stakes presentation. Instead of pretending she had all the answers, she acknowledged the complexity of the project and invited input from her team. This vulnerability invited collaboration and deepened trust, which ultimately improved the project’s outcome.
Clinically, this vignette highlights how embracing both ambition and vulnerability supports holistic wellbeing. It challenges the false dichotomy that you must choose between success and emotional authenticity. Instead, it invites a more nuanced understanding of what it means to be a whole person.
From a therapeutic perspective, this both/and framing encourages women to honor the full spectrum of their experiences—the drive to achieve and the need for connection, the confidence and the doubts, the public persona and the private self.
Therapy becomes a space to hold this complexity without judgment, to explore how these seemingly opposing forces inform and enrich each other. It’s about cultivating self-compassion that acknowledges the courage it takes to be ambitious and vulnerable simultaneously.
For many clients like Priya, this integration leads to profound shifts—not just in how they approach work but in how they relate to themselves and others. It opens the door to more sustainable success, grounded in authenticity rather than performance alone.
In my clinical work, I emphasize that living in the both/and is not a destination but an ongoing process. It requires continual reflection, adjustment, and permission to be imperfect. It’s a practice of balancing drive with rest, certainty with curiosity, and strength with softness.
To the ambitious woman reading this, I want you to know this: You don’t have to sacrifice your ambition to be vulnerable. And you don’t have to hide your vulnerability to succeed. You can hold both. You can be powerful and tender. You can reach for your goals while honoring your emotional truth.
This both/and is a radical act of self-care and self-empowerment. It’s a way to live fully, with all parts of yourself in conversation rather than conflict. It’s a path toward a richer, more fulfilling life that honors your complexity and celebrates your humanity.
If you’re ready to explore how this both/and approach can transform your own experience of ambition and vulnerability, therapy offers a safe, supportive space to do just that. Together, we can uncover the strengths in your contradictions and craft a life that reflects the full spectrum of who you are.
The Systemic Lens — Understanding Trauma Within Our Networks
When I talk about trauma, I don’t just mean what happens inside your head or body. Trauma ripples outward, embedding itself within the systems that shape your life. Family, work, culture, and community — these aren’t just backdrops to your experience; they actively influence how trauma manifests, persists, or heals. Viewing trauma through a systemic lens means acknowledging these intricate webs and how they either trap or free us.
Consider family dynamics. Trauma doesn’t exist in isolation; it’s often a shared legacy passed down through generations. Unresolved pain, unspoken rules, and survival strategies get coded into family structures. For example, a mother who experienced emotional neglect may unconsciously replicate patterns of withdrawal or hypervigilance with her child. This isn’t about blame but about recognizing the patterns that keep trauma alive across time. When we look only at the individual, we miss these larger currents.
Work environments and social systems also play a crucial role. Toxic workplaces, for instance, may reinforce feelings of worthlessness or powerlessness rooted in earlier trauma. Marginalized identities can compound these effects as systemic oppression layers additional wounds. In therapy, I often explore how my clients’ social contexts amplify their symptoms. This approach helps us understand why healing feels so elusive — the system itself may be reinforcing the trauma.
Cultural narratives shape our understanding of trauma, too. Societies often stigmatize mental health struggles or valorize stoicism, which can silence those suffering. Women, especially ambitious ones, face unique challenges here. The pressure to “have it all” and appear resilient can prevent acknowledging vulnerability. When trauma is reframed as weakness or failure, healing stalls. Recognizing these cultural scripts is essential for dismantling barriers to recovery.
Ultimately, the systemic lens invites us to expand our view beyond the individual. It asks: How do your relationships, institutions, and cultural background interact with your trauma? What roles do they play in maintaining pain or fostering resilience? This perspective doesn’t absolve personal responsibility but situates it within a broader context, making healing a collective journey rather than a solitary battle.
Ready to explore your trauma within your system and start healing from the roots?
[Form 47: Sign up for my exclusive webinar, “Fixing the Foundations: Healing Trauma Through a Systemic Approach.”]
How to Heal / Path Forward
Healing trauma is not a linear process with a neat checklist. It’s messy, complex, and deeply personal. But with the right framework and support, it’s absolutely possible to reclaim your life and thrive beyond your wounds. Here’s how I guide ambitious women like you through this transformative journey.
First, it starts with safety. Trauma disrupts your sense of safety—both physically and emotionally. Before any real healing can happen, you need to establish environments and practices that foster safety. This might mean setting firm boundaries, cultivating supportive relationships, or learning grounding techniques to manage overwhelm. Recognizing what makes you feel secure is the foundation of all subsequent work.
Next comes awareness. This involves gently uncovering the layers of your trauma story without retraumatizing yourself. Mindfulness, somatic experiencing, and narrative therapy are powerful tools here. They help you connect with your internal experience in a compassionate way, identifying triggers and patterns that limit your growth. Awareness is not about “fixing” yourself but about knowing yourself deeply.
Then, we address the systemic factors. As I mentioned earlier, trauma is rarely just individual. Healing requires engaging with your relational and cultural contexts. This might look like family therapy, advocacy for workplace changes, or community connection. Sometimes, it means challenging harmful cultural beliefs that have shaped your experience. Healing is as much about shifting these external systems as it is about internal change.
Integration is the next step—bringing together your cognitive, emotional, and physical experiences into a cohesive whole. This stage often involves therapies that encompass the body-mind connection, such as EMDR, somatic therapy, or expressive arts. Integration helps reduce the fragmentation trauma creates and restores a sense of wholeness and agency.
Finally, healing is ongoing. There’s no “end point” where trauma is erased. Instead, it’s about building resilience and cultivating a life that honors your past without being defined by it. Self-compassion, community support, and continuous personal growth are essential here. Remember, healing is a courageous act of reclaiming your power.
If you’re ready to take the first step, my program *Fixing the Foundations* offers a comprehensive, systemic approach tailored for driven women. It’s designed to help you untangle trauma’s grip and create lasting change. Healing isn’t about perfection; it’s about progress and reclaiming your narrative on your terms.
Healing from trauma is a profound and courageous journey, especially when you view it through a systemic lens that honors the complexity of your experience. I see you — the ambitious woman balancing so much, often carrying invisible wounds. You don’t have to do this alone, nor should you.
Together, we can dismantle the old patterns, heal the hidden wounds, and build a foundation strong enough to support the life you envision. Your trauma is part of your story, but it doesn’t have to be the whole story. With empathy, knowledge, and community, you can step into your power and thrive authentically.
Thank you for trusting me to be part of your path. You’re not just surviving—you’re on the way to truly living.
THE RESEARCH
The patterns described in this article are supported by peer-reviewed research. Below are key studies that illuminate the clinical territory we’ve been exploring.
- Janne M Tullius, PhD, researcher at the Department of Social Medicine, University of Groningen, writing in European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (2022), established that parental divorce causes—rather than merely accompanies—increases in adolescent emotional and behavioral problems, with these mental health effects emerging after the divorce and persisting into adulthood, making divorce a distinct traumatic stressor warranting clinical attention. (PMID: 33566187) (PMID: 33566187). (PMID: 33566187)
- Paul L Hewitt, PhD, Professor of Psychology at the University of British Columbia, writing in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1991), established that perfectionism is multidimensional—comprising self-oriented, other-oriented, and socially prescribed dimensions—and each dimension uniquely predicts different forms of psychopathology, with socially prescribed perfectionism (believing others demand perfection) showing the strongest links to depression and anxiety. (PMID: 2027080) (PMID: 2027080). (PMID: 2027080)
- Robert E Godsall, PhD, researcher; Gregory J Jurkovic, PhD, Professor Emeritus at Georgia State University and leading researcher on parentification, as co-author, writing in Substance Use & Misuse (2004), established that in families with parental alcohol misuse, parentification is associated with lower self-concept in children overall, though high-functioning children demonstrate resilience when other protective factors are present—highlighting parentification’s conditional harm. (PMID: 15202809). (PMID: 15202809)
Q: Will my kids hate me if I get divorced?
A: It’s common to worry about your children’s feelings during a divorce, but hate is rarely the long-term outcome. Kids often feel confused, sad, or angry, but with honest communication and emotional support, they can adjust and maintain loving relationships with both parents.
Q: How can I support my kids emotionally during the divorce?
A: Be open and age-appropriate in your explanations. Validate their feelings and encourage them to express themselves. Consistency, routine, and reassurance that both parents love them go a long way in creating a sense of security.
Q: What if my kids blame me for the divorce?
A: Children sometimes blame one parent as a way to make sense of the upheaval. This is a normal part of processing. Don’t take it personally; instead, gently remind them that the divorce is an adult decision and that both parents love them.
Q: Can divorce negatively affect my children’s future relationships?
A: Divorce can impact how children view relationships, but it doesn’t doom them. With supportive parenting and sometimes therapy, kids learn healthy relationship skills and resilience. Modeling respect and emotional honesty helps break negative cycles.
Q: How do I balance work and parenting during a divorce?
A: It’s tough, especially if you’re a working mom facing divorce. Prioritize quality time and be present during moments with your kids. Communicate your love and availability clearly—even if your schedule is demanding, they need to feel seen and valued. For more on this, check out my post on [Do My Kids Hate Me Because I Work So Much?](https://anniewright.com/do-my-kids-hate-me-because-i-work-so-much/).
WAYS TO WORK WITH ANNIE
Individual Therapy
Trauma-informed therapy for driven women healing relational trauma. Licensed in 9 states.
Executive Coaching
Trauma-informed coaching for ambitious women navigating leadership and burnout.
Fixing the Foundations
Annie’s signature course for relational trauma recovery. Work at your own pace.
Strong & Stable
The Sunday conversation you wished you’d had years earlier. 20,000+ subscribers.
Annie Wright, LMFT
LMFT · Relational Trauma Specialist · W.W. Norton Author
Helping ambitious women finally feel as good as their résumé looks.
Annie Wright is a licensed psychotherapist (LMFT #95719) and trauma-informed executive coach with over 15,000 clinical hours. She works with driven, ambitious women — including Silicon Valley leaders, physicians, and entrepreneurs — in repairing the psychological foundations beneath their impressive lives. Annie is the founder and former CEO of Evergreen Counseling, a multimillion-dollar trauma-informed therapy center she built, scaled, and successfully exited. A regular contributor to Psychology Today, her expert commentary has appeared in Forbes, Business Insider, Inc., NBC, and The Information. She is currently writing her first book with W.W. Norton.
