
Going Low Contact with a Narcissistic Parent: A Step-by-Step Guide
When a parent is narcissistic, full no contact isn’t always possible or even wanted. Going low contact is a middle path: you reduce the frequency, depth, and format of contact so you can protect your nervous system while keeping the relationship on your own terms. This guide walks through what low contact actually means, why pulling back can feel so dangerous in your body, and the concrete steps, scripts, and boundaries that make low contact sustainable for the long haul.
- The Text She Never Sends
- What Does Going Low Contact Actually Mean?
- Why Does Pulling Back From a Narcissistic Parent Feel So Dangerous?
- How Do You Actually Set Low-Contact Boundaries?
- What About the Flying Monkeys?
- Both/And: Can You Love a Parent and Still Protect Yourself From Them?
- The Systemic Lens: Why Are Women Told They Owe Their Parents Endless Access?
- How Do You Heal While Staying Low Contact?
- Frequently Asked Questions
The Text She Never Sends
Rania is sitting in her car in the hospital parking garage at 9:40 p.m., still in her white coat, and her phone is lit up with a text she has typed and deleted four times. The overhead fluorescent light through the windshield makes everything look slightly gray. Her mother’s name sits at the top of the screen above a paragraph Rania has been drafting since her lunch break. She has cut it down from six sentences to two. She reads it again. I need some space right now. I’ll reach out when I’m ready. Her thumb hovers over send.
If you're the person in your family line who decided to stop the pattern, my self-paced course Parenting Past the Pattern is the practical work of doing it.
“I’ve written this same text probably forty times in the last two years,” she tells me, the following week, sitting cross-legged on my couch with her badge still clipped to her scrubs pocket. “And every single time, right before I hit send, I think about her voice. Not what she’d say. The tone. That flat, wounded tone she gets. And I just.” She stops. She looks at her hands. “I delete it. Every time.”
I recognize the tightening in my own chest after fifteen years of sitting across from women like Rania, a thirty-nine-year-old attending physician who runs a trauma bay with more composure than most people bring to a grocery run, yet cannot send a two-sentence text to her mother without her hands shaking. It isn’t cowardice. It’s a nervous system that learned, decades before Rania ever held a scalpel, exactly what happens to the child who pulls away.
What I’ve come to think of as the forty-drafts pattern is one of the most common things I see in driven women who grew up as the emotional caretaker of a narcissistic parent. The competence is real. The fear underneath it is also real. Both are true at once. That’s where this guide starts. Not with the fantasy of a clean break, but with the actual, three-in-the-morning question so many women bring into my office: is there a way to pull back without either staying trapped or losing her entirely?
There is. It’s called going low contact, and it is different from no contact, and it is different from simply “setting better boundaries” the way a self-help headline might use that phrase. This guide is a step-by-step walk through what low contact actually is, why your body might treat the idea of it like a five-alarm fire, and how to build a version of it that you can actually sustain, not just white-knuckle through for six weeks before the guilt drags you back to where you started.
What Does Going Low Contact Actually Mean?
Most of the women I work with arrive at this question already exhausted by the vocabulary. No contact. Low contact. Estrangement. Boundaries. Gray rock. The words start to blur, and underneath the blur is a much simpler question: how much of myself do I have to keep handing over, and is there a version of this relationship that doesn’t cost me my whole nervous system?
Low contact is a deliberate reduction in the frequency, duration, emotional depth, and format of contact with a family member, typically a parent, whose relational pattern is harmful, without a full and permanent severing of the relationship. It differs from estrangement, which researchers such as Megan Gilligan, PhD, sociologist and gerontologist at Iowa State University, define as a relationship marked by extended physical and emotional distance driven by at least one party’s choice (Gilligan, Suitor & Pillemer, 2015), and it differs from no contact, which is a complete cessation of communication, often indefinite.
In plain terms: Low contact means you’re not disappearing. You’re deciding, on purpose and in advance, exactly how much access this person gets to you. That might look like texting only, once a week, about logistics only. It might look like one phone call a month, twenty minutes, no discussion of your marriage or your job or your choices. You’re the one holding the dial now.
Here’s the three-layer version I actually walk clients through in session. Clinically, low contact is a boundary structure, a defined set of rules about channel, frequency, and topic that you set and hold regardless of the other person’s reaction. Think of it, in kitchen-table terms, like the difference between leaving your front door wide open and installing a door with a lock and a peephole. The door still opens. You decide when. And in Tuesday-afternoon terms, it’s the difference between your phone lighting up with your mother’s name during a client meeting and your chest seizing, versus your phone lighting up with your mother’s name and you glancing at it, finishing your meeting, and replying on your own schedule that evening.
Low contact is not a punishment, and it isn’t a euphemism for “not fully committed to loving your parent.” In my clinical experience, this is consistently what I see in driven women who grew up as the scapegoat or the parentified child inside an enmeshed narcissistic family system: the fantasy is that they have to choose between “good daughter who’s endlessly available” and “cold, cut-off daughter who’s given up.” Low contact is the third option nobody handed them. Not always. Some family systems are dangerous enough, or the parent’s behavior corrosive enough, that full no contact really is the right and necessary choice, and I’ll say more about that later. But for a large number of the women I sit with, low contact is the more honest, more sustainable answer, because it lets them keep a thread of relationship without keeping the whole rope.
Why Does Pulling Back From a Narcissistic Parent Feel So Dangerous?
Here’s what surprises almost every client the first time we talk about it: the fear that shows up when you consider pulling back isn’t really about the parent’s reaction. It’s about your body’s memory of what happened the last time you tried.
Bessel van der Kolk, MD, psychiatrist and trauma researcher, author of The Body Keeps the Score, has spent decades documenting how trauma gets stored not as a story you can narrate calmly, but as a physiological imprint. I think about his work often with clients like Rania, because the fear she feels drafting a two-line text isn’t cognitive. It’s not that she’s calculated the risk and decided it’s too high. Her body has already decided, based on hundreds of childhood repetitions, that distance from her mother equals danger.
Here’s the clinical concept, translated. In a narcissistic family system, a child typically learns early that closeness is conditional and withdrawal gets punished, which is part of what fuels the trauma bond that makes leaving feel so counterintuitive. The punishment shows up as rage, as a chilling withdrawal of affection, or as a sudden collapse into “victim” that makes the child feel monstrous for having needs. Over years, this trains what therapists call a threat-response loop around the parent’s moods. Think of it like a smoke detector installed too close to the stove: calibrated for the original fire, the unpredictable adult who controlled the household’s emotional weather, but now it goes off at the smallest smoke, a slightly cool text, a missed call, a holiday you didn’t attend. In Tuesday-afternoon terms, that means Rania can be running a trauma bay with total composure and still feel her hands shake over a text message to her mother, because her nervous system isn’t responding to the phone. It’s responding to a fifteen-year-old memory of what happened the last time she tried to want something for herself.
An extinction burst is a behavioral phenomenon in which a previously reinforced behavior temporarily increases in frequency or intensity right after the reinforcement stops, before it eventually declines. In the context of narcissistic family dynamics, it describes the surge of calls, texts, guilt appeals, or dramatic escalations a parent produces once they realize their usual methods of pulling you back into contact are no longer working.
In plain terms: Right after you set a real boundary, things often get louder before they get quieter. More calls, angrier texts, sudden health scares, guilt trips delivered through your siblings. This isn’t proof that your boundary is wrong or that you’ve broken something. It’s proof that your boundary is working, and your parent is testing whether you’ll cave.
The extinction burst is not a sign you’re doing this wrong. It is, in my experience with hundreds of clients navigating exactly this transition, one of the most reliable predictors that a boundary is real. Parents who’ve relied on a child’s constant availability for decades don’t relinquish that access quietly. They escalate first, usually for two to six weeks, sometimes longer if enabling relatives amplify the pressure, which we’ll get to shortly. The intensity is proportional to how effective your boundary actually is, which is a strange kind of validation, but a real one.
Of course this feels dangerous. Of course your chest tightens when the fifteenth call comes in on a day you’d already decided not to answer. You’re not imagining how hard this is, and you’re not broken for feeling flooded by something you know, intellectually, is not an emergency. Your body is running an old program that kept a much younger version of you safe. The work isn’t to silence the alarm through willpower. It’s to teach the alarm, slowly, that this particular quiet is safe now. This is often where high-functioning anxiety gets named for the first time, once a client sees the vigilance she’d mistaken for competence as leftover threat detection.
How Do You Actually Set Low-Contact Boundaries?
Once a client understands what low contact is and why her body treats it as a threat, the next question is practical: what do I do. Here is the structure I walk clients through, with the scripts I give them.
Step 1: Decide What Works for You, in Writing, Before You Need It
Don’t decide your terms mid-call. Decide them ahead of time, when your nervous system is calm, ideally with your therapist or a trusted friend as a sounding board. Ask yourself three questions. How often do I actually want to hear from this person, not how often do I feel obligated to. Which format feels least dysregulating. What topics are permanently off the table.
Write the answers down. A written plan is something you can return to at 11 p.m. when a guilt-inducing voicemail has scrambled your resolve. Clinically, this is a pre-commitment device. In plain terms, it’s a note to your future self from a version of you who isn’t currently flooded.
Step 2: Learn Gray Rock and Use It Deliberately
Gray rocking is a communication strategy in which a person deliberately makes themselves an emotionally uninteresting, low-reactive presence, offering brief, neutral, factual responses, in order to reduce a manipulative or volatile person’s incentive to provoke, engage, or extract an emotional reaction.
In plain terms: You become boring on purpose. Not cold, not cruel, just flat and factual. “That’s not something I want to get into right now.” “I have to go, talk soon.” No debate, no defense, no explanation. A narcissistic parent often feeds on your emotional reaction, whether it’s anger, tears, or over-explaining. Take the food away and the behavior usually loses steam.
Here’s the three-layer translation, because gray rock sounds simple and is one of the hardest skills to hold under pressure. Clinically, you’re withdrawing the variable reinforcement, tears, arguing, over-explaining, that has made engaging with you rewarding for a parent who thrives on control and reaction. Think of it like turning off the porch light that’s been drawing moths for thirty years. The moths don’t leave immediately. They circle for a while, confused, before they stop coming. In Tuesday-afternoon terms, this looks like your mother saying something designed to wound you mid-call, and instead of defending yourself for four minutes, you say, “I don’t agree with that, and I’m going to let you go now,” and you actually hang up.
Pair gray rock with an information diet: stop volunteering details about your career wins, relationship, finances, or parenting choices, because a narcissistic parent routinely uses that information later, as either a weapon or a source of comparison. You don’t owe transparency to someone who has repeatedly used your own words against you. My guide to narcissistic abuse recovery covers the broader arc this fits inside.
Step 3: Script Your Communication Boundaries in Advance
Once you know your terms, say them once, plainly, without over-explaining. You don’t owe a defense of your own wellbeing. Some scripts I’ve refined with clients over the years:
“I’m going to check in by text once a week, on Sundays. I’m not available for calls during the week.”
“I love you, and I’m not going to discuss my marriage with you. If it comes up again, I’ll end the call.”
“I hear that you’re upset. I’m still not changing my plans for the holiday.”
Keep the sentence short. Long explanations invite negotiation, and a narcissistic parent is often exceptionally skilled at finding the loose thread in a long justification and pulling until the whole boundary unravels.
Step 4: Use Structure and Technology to Hold the Line for You
Willpower degrades under pressure, and a parent used to unlimited access will apply pressure. Use scheduled sending, message filters, and “Do Not Disturb” hours so the boundary doesn’t rely on you renegotiating it, exhausted, in real time. Batch replies once a day. The goal is to move the decision out of the moment of flood and back into the moment of calm, where you already made it.
Step 5: Prepare for the Extinction Burst Specifically
Expect escalation in the first two to six weeks. More calls. Guilt-laced voicemails. A sudden health scare. Name it out loud to your support system before it happens: “I expect this to get louder before it gets quieter.” Predicting the storm makes it easier to weather without caving.
I think about Imelda, a project manager in her forties, Filipino American, who came to me after six brutal months of full no contact with her father. “I thought no contact would feel like relief,” she told me, hands folded in her lap. “It felt like grief with the volume turned all the way up, and nobody in my family would talk to me about anything else. My aunties, my cousins, everyone kept asking when I was going to ‘fix things.'” Imelda didn’t go back to what she’d left. She built something in between: quarterly phone calls, fifteen minutes, logistics only, and a firm, gray-rocked appearance at two holidays a year, leaving the moment she felt her chest tighten. It wasn’t the clean ending she’d imagined. It was, in her words, “livable, which no contact somehow wasn’t, for me, with my family.” (Rania and Imelda are composites, and identifying details have been changed to protect client confidentiality.)
Imelda’s path isn’t right for every woman. Some narcissistic parents, or the enabling extended family around them, are corrosive enough that even a fifteen-minute quarterly call reopens a wound that never gets to close. But for many women navigating family or cultural expectations that treat full no contact as a scandal rather than a boundary, low contact offers self-protection without severing an entire extended family to get free of one person’s harm.
What About the Flying Monkeys?
“Flying monkeys” is a term borrowed from The Wizard of Oz, clinical shorthand for the relatives or family friends a narcissistic parent recruits, consciously or not, to pressure you back into full access. Some are simply conflict-averse. Others show traits closer to what I describe in my piece on sociopathic traits, genuinely enjoying the role of enforcer. A sibling calls to say Mom’s been crying for weeks. An aunt sends a message about how disappointed everyone is. Sometimes the flying monkey has no idea they’re being used. Sometimes they know exactly what they’re doing.
The response is the same gray rock skill applied outward. “I appreciate you caring about our family. I’m not going to discuss my relationship with Mom with you.” Said once, calmly, repeated verbatim if pushed. You don’t owe every relative a defense of a decision you didn’t make lightly.
“In our studies we keep seeing how difficult it is for traumatized people to feel completely relaxed and physically safe in their bodies. Rather than going into a state of quiet repose, our students’ muscles often continue to prepare them to fight unseen enemies. A major challenge in recovering from trauma remains being able to achieve a state of total relaxation and safe surrender.”
Bessel van der Kolk, MD, psychiatrist and trauma researcher, author of The Body Keeps the Score
I return to that passage often, because it names precisely what I watch happen in a client’s shoulders the first time a flying monkey calls after she’s gone low contact. Her body doesn’t know the call is just a phone call. It’s braced, the way van der Kolk describes, for an unseen enemy that has been very real in the past. Recognizing that bracing as an old, learned response rather than a fresh emergency is most of the work of getting through the flying-monkey phase without abandoning your own boundary.
Both/And: Can You Love a Parent and Still Protect Yourself From Them?
Here’s the truth I want you to leave this guide holding. You can love your mother, or your father, and still need distance from them, and neither fact cancels the other out.
The instinct to stay close, to keep trying, to hope this time will be different, was not naive or codependent. It was a completely rational adaptation to growing up dependent on someone whose love came with conditions. That instinct kept you safe, or at least kept you fed and housed, during years when you had no other option. I will not argue you out of the fact that some part of you still loves this parent, still wants their approval, still grieves the parent you needed and didn’t get.
AND, that same instinct, brought unmodified into your adult life, is the thing keeping you in a pattern that costs you your sleep, your marriage’s bandwidth, your ability to walk into a work meeting without dread sitting in your stomach. This is the same rope-and-anchor dynamic I unpack at length in my guide to relational trauma. Both are true. Your love is real. Your need for distance is also real. You don’t have to pick one to believe. You get to hold both, which is exactly what low contact is designed to let you do: keep the love, reduce the exposure.
Rania put it to me this way, months into the work, after she’d finally sent a version of that parking-garage text: “I don’t hate her. I just can’t keep being the only adult in the relationship. I can love her from over here.” That sentence, said quietly, without drama, is the Both/And in practice. Not a resolution. A place to stand.
You are not your parents. Some nights, that's the hardest thing to hold.
A focused self-paced course on intergenerational trauma and the daily practice of breaking the pattern with your own children. For the 3 AM guilt that wakes you. For the moments you almost said what was said to you. For the work of being the one who stops.
The Systemic Lens: Why Are Women Told They Owe Their Parents Endless Access?
What Rania and Imelda are each navigating is not a personal failing. It’s a pattern that shows up across driven women regardless of industry or income.
Daughters, more than sons, are raised inside unspoken filial-duty scripts: be available, be the one who calls, be the one who remembers the birthday and absorbs the parent’s moods so nobody else has to. Rin Reczek, PhD, sociologist at Ohio State University, and colleagues found in their 2023 study of parent-adult child estrangement that patterns of distance and closeness are shaped by gender, race, and sexuality, not just individual relationship quality (Reczek, Stacey & Thomeer, 2023). Women are disproportionately cast as the family’s designated emotional labor, and pulling back from that role reads, culturally, as a far larger betrayal than it would for a son.
Miriam Vignando, PhD, psychologist whose 2023 research examined the mechanism by which parental narcissism damages adult children, found the harm travels specifically through scapegoating: a parent’s narcissistic traits produce anxiety and depression in children largely by routing blame onto one child in particular (Vignando & Bizumic, 2023). That’s the mechanism. Not vague dysfunction. A specific, repeated targeting that trains one child, often the most competent or the most sensitive, to believe distance is a moral failure rather than a legitimate response to being scapegoated for years. Amanda D. Starbird, PhD, and Paula A. Story, PhD, found something related in their 2020 study of adult memories of narcissistic parenting: children who recalled more malevolent and fewer benevolent childhood experiences showed measurably higher narcissistic traits themselves in adulthood (Starbird & Story, 2020). The pattern doesn’t just wound the scapegoated child. It shapes what gets passed down.
The mental health cost of this is not abstract. Lucinda Grummitt, PhD, and colleagues, in a 2024 population-level analysis, estimated that a substantial share of mental disorders and suicide attempts across the population are attributable to childhood maltreatment, framing it as a measurable public health burden rather than an individual failing (Grummitt, Baldwin, Lafoa’i & Keyes, 2024). That doesn’t mean every adult child of a narcissistic parent develops a mental health condition, and it doesn’t let anyone draw a straight line from one relationship to one outcome. It does mean the harm this guide addresses isn’t a fringe, individual sensitivity. It’s a population-level pattern with a measurable cost, which should change how casually we talk about “just call your mother more.”
You’re not broken for finding this hard. You were handed a script that told you your worth was measured by your availability, inside a culture that still largely pathologizes the adult child who pulls back rather than asking why the parent needed pulling back from in the first place. That’s not your unique failing. That’s a structural inheritance, and naming it as such is part of how you stop carrying it as shame.
How Do You Heal While Staying Low Contact?
In my work with clients who are considering, or have already begun, low contact with a narcissistic parent, the most consistent thing I hear is some version of: “I feel guilty, I feel relieved, and I feel terrified that the guilt means I’m doing something wrong.” I want to say this plainly. Guilt is not a reliable indicator of whether a decision is right. For adult children of narcissistic parents, guilt is often one of the most well-trained responses in your entire emotional repertoire. It was installed early, reinforced consistently, and it’s still doing its job. Feeling guilty about low contact doesn’t mean low contact is wrong. It means you had a parent who made sure you’d feel guilty for having limits. Practicing real self-compassion is often the harder skill here, harder than the boundary itself.
Going low contact isn’t a decision you make once. It’s a posture you maintain, and the maintenance has emotional, logistical, and relational layers that shift over time. The structural boundary alone doesn’t do the healing. The healing happens in the work you do with yourself in the space that boundary creates.
Trauma-informed individual therapy is, in my experience, the single most useful resource for anyone navigating this, and much of what I outline in my guide to betrayal trauma applies here too, since a narcissistic parent’s broken promises land on the same nervous-system circuitry as any other betrayal. EMDR is particularly effective for processing the specific memories driving both the decision to reduce contact and the guilt that follows it, the birthday that went wrong, the moment your reality got denied, the instant you realized you’d never be fully safe with this person. EMDR can meaningfully reduce the emotional charge those memories carry, which makes it easier to hold your current limits without getting pulled back into the old dynamic.
Internal Family Systems work is another modality I use extensively here. There’s almost always a part, often a young one, still hoping the parent will change, still hoping that if you just get it right this time, you’ll finally get the parent you always needed. That part isn’t wrong. It’s carrying a very old, natural longing. In IFS, we don’t argue it out of its hope. We sit with it, honor it, and help it understand it’s not alone anymore, that your adult self is here now and can offer what the parent couldn’t. That internal shift is usually what makes the external limit sustainable, rather than something you white-knuckle for a season and abandon.
Practically, low contact holds best when it’s structured rather than reactive: you decide in advance what contact looks like instead of managing it crisis to crisis. A clear framework, once a month, thirty minutes, no discussion of my marriage or finances, removes the daily decision-making and closes off most openings guilt uses to reopen the door. Build your support network deliberately. Low contact often triggers an escalation campaign, more calls, more guilt, triangulation through relatives. A therapist and a friend or two who understand what you’re navigating are often the difference between holding the line and caving. A trauma-informed therapist can help you build that scaffolding, and you don’t have to figure it out alone.
The last time I saw Rania, she’d been holding her Sunday-text-only boundary for four months. Her mother had called eleven times in the first two weeks, then quieted. “I still delete the first draft sometimes,” she told me, half-laughing, her badge clipped to her scrubs the way it always was. “But I send the second one now. That’s new.” She hadn’t resolved anything with her mother. She’d resolved something with herself. The proverbial house of life she’d been trying to build her whole adult career on top of finally had one room with a door that closed. The door wasn’t locked forever. It just had a lock, and for the first time, she was the one holding the key.
Q: Is low contact better than no contact with a narcissistic parent?
A: Neither is universally “better.” Low contact tends to work well when a parent’s behavior is harmful but not dangerous, and when you want to preserve some relationship or manage extended family expectations. Full no contact is often the right call when a relationship is abusive enough that any exposure causes real harm. The right choice depends on your specific situation, not on which option sounds more decisive.
Q: How do I handle the guilt of pulling away from my mother or father?
A: Guilt is a trained response, not proof you’re wrong. Most adult children of narcissistic parents were taught early that having limits equals betrayal. Working with a trauma-informed therapist to process where that guilt was installed, rather than trying to reason your way out of it, tends to be more effective than willpower alone.
Q: What is the extinction burst and how long does it last?
A: The extinction burst is the surge in calls, guilt appeals, or dramatic escalations that often follows a new boundary, as a parent tests whether you’ll cave. It typically runs two to six weeks, sometimes longer if relatives amplify the pressure. It’s a sign your boundary is working, not a sign you’ve done something wrong.
Q: What do I say to relatives who take my parent’s side?
A: Keep it short and repeat it verbatim if pushed. Something like, “I appreciate that you care about our family. I’m not going to discuss my relationship with Mom with you.” You don’t owe every relative a justification for a decision that took real thought to reach.
Q: Can I go low contact and still see my parent at holidays?
A: Yes, and for many women this is exactly the point of low contact rather than no contact. You can attend on your own terms, with a time limit, a gray-rocked demeanor, and an exit plan, and leave the moment you notice your body signaling it’s had enough.
Q: What if my parent escalates instead of backing off?
A: Some parents escalate well past the typical extinction-burst window. If contact ever becomes threatening, or if the escalation includes anything that feels unsafe rather than just uncomfortable, that’s a signal to revisit whether low contact is still the right structure, or whether full no contact and additional safety planning are needed.
You didn’t do anything to deserve a parent who made closeness feel conditional. You also don’t owe anyone, including yourself, a version of connection that costs you your own nervous system to maintain. Low contact isn’t giving up on your family. It’s deciding, finally, that you get to be part of the negotiation too. Whatever shape your version of that takes, you get to build it slowly, revise it as you learn, and hold your own hand through the parts that still ache. That’s not failure. That’s the work.
Read Annie’s weekly essays on rebuilding after relational trauma.
Weekly Substack essays from Annie Wright, LMFT on relational trauma, recovery, and the House of Life framework. For driven women who want a structured path back to themselves.
WAYS TO WORK WITH ANNIE
Individual Therapy
Trauma-informed therapy for driven women healing relational trauma. Licensed in 9 states.
Executive Coaching
Trauma-informed coaching for driven women navigating leadership and burnout.
Fixing the Foundations
Annie’s signature course for relational trauma recovery. Work at your own pace.
Strong & Stable
The Sunday conversation you wished you’d had years earlier. 25,000+ subscribers.
Annie Wright, LMFT
LMFT #95719 · Relational Trauma Specialist · W.W. Norton Author
Helping driven women finally feel as good as their résumé looks.
Annie Wright is a licensed psychotherapist (LMFT #95719) and trauma-informed executive coach with over 15,000 clinical hours. She works with driven women, including Silicon Valley leaders, physicians, and entrepreneurs, in repairing the psychological foundations beneath their impressive lives. Licensed in 9 states. Annie is the founder and former CEO of Evergreen Counseling, a multimillion-dollar trauma-informed therapy center she built, scaled, and successfully exited. A regular contributor to Psychology Today, her expert commentary has appeared in Forbes, Business Insider, Inc., NBC, and The Information. She is currently writing her first book with W.W. Norton.


