Avoidant Attachment: When Closeness Feels Like a Threat
If you want closeness but keep pulling away, or you love someone who goes quiet and distant for no reason you can name, you’re not alone. Avoidant attachment builds a subtle wall against intimacy, rooted in early experience and nervous system wiring. This post explains what avoidant attachment is, how it shows up in driven women, and how healing actually happens.
- Nothing Was Wrong: The Avoidant’s Farewell
- What Is Avoidant Attachment?
- The Neurobiology of a Nervous System on Guard
- How Avoidant Attachment Shows Up in Driven Women
- The Avoidant in Relationship: What the Pattern Does to Partners
- Both/And: Your Independence Is Real AND Your Avoidance Is Costing You
- The Systemic Lens: When the Culture Rewards You for Needing No One
- Can Avoidant Attachment Change?
- Frequently Asked Questions
Nothing Was Wrong: The Avoidant’s Farewell
You’re sitting in a dimly lit restaurant, the low hum of other diners a distant backdrop to the silence between you. Across the small table, he looks calm, almost relieved. His fingers trace absent circles on the stem of his wine glass. You keep asking, “What happened? Was it something I did?” His answer comes soft and steady: “Nothing was wrong. Everything was good. I just couldn’t.”
If your nervous system learned the safest way to exist was to manage everyone else's world, my self-paced course Enough Without the Effort is the recovery map.
The words feel like a riddle with pieces you can’t find. The relationship ends without a scene, without a fight, without a clear break. It just stops. From the outside, this kind of relational injury looks like quiet exits, an emotional distance that reads as indifference or even relief, and an almost clinical avoidance of confrontation or messy feeling.
But what happens inside the avoidant partner is far more complicated than the calm exterior suggests. It’s not that nothing was wrong. It’s that closeness itself triggered something deeply uncomfortable, even threatening. There’s a private negotiation running underneath the calm voice, a dance of wanting connection while feeling unsafe the moment it arrives. The nervous system has learned to read closeness as danger, and it activates protective moves that push intimacy away before it can land.
Imagine the world from inside that experience: a constant tug-of-war between craving connection and fearing engulfment, between needing others and needing, with something close to desperation, to remain self-reliant. The farewell you just sat through was a curtain drawn over a complicated internal landscape of unmet needs, suppressed emotion, and survival strategies learned so early that they now feel like personality rather than adaptation.
In my work with driven women over more than fifteen years, specifically those who came in convinced they were simply “not relationship people,” I’ve seen this pattern often enough that I now listen for it in the first session: a woman fluent in her own competence and strangely foreign to her own longing. In this post, we’ll look at what avoidant attachment actually is, how it shapes relationships for driven women, and how healing becomes possible, even for those who have believed closeness wasn’t built for them.
What Is Avoidant Attachment?
One of the adult attachment styles identified through decades of attachment research. Characterized by a pronounced valuing of independence and self-sufficiency, minimization or dismissal of attachment needs, difficulty accessing emotional memories from childhood, and low comfort with closeness or dependency. It traces back to early-attachment research on the avoidant infant pattern, first documented in laboratory separation-and-reunion studies of infant and caregiver behavior.
In plain terms: Dismissive-avoidant attachment is what happens when you learned, early, that having needs led to rejection or to being overwhelmed. So you got very, very good at not needing. It works, right up until the absence of real intimacy starts to cost more than the protection it once provided.
Attachment theory began with groundbreaking early-attachment research that identified the avoidant infant through a now-famous separation-and-reunion paradigm. These infants appeared unfazed when caregivers left and returned, showing little visible distress. What looked like independence was, on closer study, a strategy for coping with caregivers who were emotionally unavailable or subtly rejecting. The infant hadn’t stopped needing comfort. The infant had stopped expecting it.
That early observation was later extended into adult attachment styles, including what researchers call the dismissive-avoidant adult, distinct from the hypervigilant scanning common in betrayal trauma. People with this style emphasize self-sufficiency and downplay their own emotional needs. They struggle to access memories of childhood attachment emotion, and find emotional closeness mildly threatening, the way a hand might tense before a hot stove without a clear memory of ever being burned.
Karen Horney, the psychoanalyst who described what she called “moving away from people” as one of the core strategies humans use to manage basic anxiety, put language decades ago to something I still watch clients discover about themselves in real time. Horney argued that detachment isn’t the absence of need. It’s a solution, chosen (mostly outside of conscious awareness) because the alternatives, moving toward people or moving against them, once felt more dangerous. That reframe matters clinically. The dismissive-avoidant woman sitting across from me hasn’t failed at intimacy. She solved a problem with the tools she had.
Dismissive-avoidant attachment is distinct from fearful-avoidant attachment, which combines avoidance with anxiety and a live fear of rejection. The dismissive-avoidant person tends to minimize attachment needs outright, rather than oscillating between wanting closeness and fearing it the way the fearful-avoidant pattern does.
This style shows up as a hyper-independence that can look admirable, but it carries hidden costs. The needs haven’t disappeared. They were always there, pushed below the surface to avoid the old pain of needing and not receiving. Recognizing avoidant attachment for what it is, a learned strategy, is the first step toward loosening its grip.
The Neurobiology of a Nervous System on Guard
Behavioral and cognitive strategies used by dismissive-avoidant individuals to suppress awareness of attachment needs and minimize engagement with closeness. These strategies, named within adult-attachment research on deactivating and hyperactivating coping, include emotional distancing, intellectual rationalizing of relational events, minimizing a partner’s importance, and focusing on a partner’s flaws to create psychological distance.
In plain terms: Deactivating strategies are the avoidant nervous system’s volume dial for attachment needs, turned down so low that the person often can’t hear their own longing anymore. Common forms: throwing yourself into work the moment a relationship deepens, suddenly finding fault with a partner who has gotten close, or framing pulling away as simply “needing space.”
Why does closeness feel like a threat to the avoidant nervous system? A 2025 study in the International Journal of Psychology used electrocortical measures to compare how people high in attachment avoidance process emotional material when they suppress feeling versus when they reappraise it, and found that suppression carries a measurably different neural signature, one consistent with effortful, costly inhibition rather than calm indifference (Yang et al. 2025). In plain terms, the avoidant brain isn’t unbothered by closeness. It’s working hard, moment to moment, to look unbothered.
I recently sat with that finding for a long time, because it names something I’ve watched for years without quite having the language for it. The avoidant client who says “I’m fine” in a flat, even voice isn’t lying to me. She’s often not lying to herself either. Her brain has learned to reroute the felt experience of longing into something quieter before it ever reaches conscious report. That rerouting takes energy. It’s not the absence of a threat response. It’s a threat response that has gotten extremely efficient at hiding.
This is why closeness can trigger a fight, flight, or freeze pattern in an avoidant person even when nothing outwardly alarming has happened. A partner asks a slightly more intimate question, or reaches for a hand a beat too long, and the nervous system reads it the way it might read a loud noise in a dark hallway. The avoidant default becomes deactivation: shut the feeling down, restore distance, and safety returns.
The paradox worth sitting with is that avoidant people have the same underlying attachment needs as everyone else. They have learned to push those needs so far below conscious awareness that they often can’t locate them without help. This confuses both the person living it and the people who love her. She’s not choosing distance the way she might choose a restaurant. Distance is choosing her, automatically, faster than thought.
Deactivating strategies were adaptive once. A child who learned that big feelings led to a caregiver’s withdrawal did something intelligent when she quieted those feelings down. The strategy that once kept a small girl safe now keeps a grown woman lonely, and no one sent her the memo that the danger has passed.
How Avoidant Attachment Shows Up in Driven Women
Renata is 44, a cardiologist who has lived alone by choice since her residency ended. It’s a Tuesday evening in late October, and her apartment is exactly as she left it that morning: swept, spare, a single water glass drying by the sink. Her schedule belongs to her and no one else. She has had good relationships, but they all seem to reach a point where her partner’s presence starts to register as pressure rather than comfort. She can’t pinpoint exactly when the shift happens. One evening she simply notices she’s staying at the hospital later, and that walking back into her too-quiet apartment now feels like relief.
“I don’t think I’m avoiding him,” she told me, turning her water bottle in slow circles on her knee. “I think I’m just someone who needs a lot of space. I have always been like this. My mother used to say I came out of the womb independent.” She said it almost proudly, and then, a beat later, quieter: “But he says I disappear on him even when I’m sitting right next to him. I don’t know what he means by that. I’m right there.”
Sitting with Renata that afternoon, I felt the particular ache I’ve come to associate with this pattern in driven women: not pity, and not quite worry, but a kind of recognition. She wasn’t lying about needing space. She also wasn’t seeing the cost of the space she had built. Both were true in the same body, in the same sentence, without contradiction.
What I’ve come to think of as the competence trap is exactly this: the avoidant pattern in driven women almost always masquerades as admirable self-sufficiency. These are women who build lives that don’t structurally require anyone else. No shared calendars. No visible cracks in the exterior. From the outside, they look profoundly capable, composed, even enviable. From the inside, many are profoundly alone in a way they have trained themselves not to name.
A learned pattern of extreme self-reliance in which a person avoids depending on others even when help is available, appropriate, or would meaningfully ease a burden. Often mistaken for a personality trait rather than a nervous system adaptation to early or repeated experiences in which needing others led to disappointment or harm.
In plain terms: Hyper-independence looks like never asking for help, refusing support even when exhausted, and feeling more anxious when relying on someone than when carrying everything alone. It gets rewarded everywhere except in the parts of life that actually require closeness.
The pattern often looks like throwing yourself into work or a new project the moment a relationship starts to deepen. It can mean intellectualizing feelings, or quietly minimizing how much a partner’s affection matters. It can mean sudden irritation right when a partner tries to close the gap. Each move turns the volume down on attachment needs that have started to feel dangerously loud, and each works, at least short term, which is why the pattern persists for decades.
But the independence carries a cost that compounds quietly. The suppression of attachment needs doesn’t make the needs disappear. In my clinical experience, it tends to surface later as a chronic, low-grade loneliness that a driven woman can outrun for years until a health scare, a birthday, or a quiet Sunday brings it into view. Not every avoidant client reaches this reckoning the same way, but often enough that I’ve learned to ask about it directly.
Understanding this pattern, rather than judging it, is one of the clearer signs you’re healing, and it opens the complicated dance between wanting connection and a nervous system still convinced that connection is where the danger lives.
The Avoidant in Relationship: What the Pattern Does to Partners
Loving someone with avoidant attachment can feel like chasing a shadow that keeps rearranging the furniture. Their deactivating strategies, the withdrawal, the minimized needs, the intellectualized feelings, often read to a partner as coldness or simple unavailability. This can spark what I think of as the pursue-withdraw trap: the anxious partner pursues closeness, which triggers the avoidant partner’s retreat, which fuels more anxious pursuit, a loop that can run for years without either person naming it.
Harry Harlow‘s classic contact-comfort research, which showed infant primates reliably choosing a soft, huggable surrogate over a wire one that dispensed food, still shapes how clinicians think about why closeness matters biologically. Comfort wasn’t incidental to survival in Harlow’s experiments. It was foundational. I think about that research often with avoidant clients, because it’s a reminder that the drive toward contact doesn’t vanish just because a person has gotten skilled at overriding it. The wire mother never became preferred. It was tolerated.
I tell my secret? No indeed, not I:
Perhaps some day, who knows?
But not to-day; it froze, and blows, and snows,
And you’re too curious: fie!
cite: Christina Rossetti, Poet, “My Secret”
Rossetti’s speaker won’t say the secret, not today, and the poem never resolves whether she ever will. That refusal is the closest thing I’ve found in literature to what avoidant attachment feels like from the inside. Not a cold absence of feeling. A guarded, half-teasing, serious withholding, a secret kept even from the self on the coldest days.
The avoidant partner’s most private question is often whether this is the life she wants: one of competence and independence, where no one gets close enough to see all the way inside. That tension makes relationships with her fragile, with real closeness breaking through occasionally only to be shut down again days later.
Bianca, a partner of an avoidant man for six years, described it this way in our first session: “It’s like he opens the door a crack, and I finally exhale, and then he closes it again before I have stepped through. I keep thinking if I’m patient enough, the door will just stay open. I’ve started to wonder if I’m the one with the problem, for staying.” She wasn’t wrong to wonder. She was also not the one running the deactivating strategies.
Partners often feel the pain of this disconnection acutely, but struggle to name what’s actually happening beneath the surface calm. Avoidant people frequently end relationships abruptly, or let them dissolve slowly, leaving partners with unanswered questions and a grief that can feel disorienting. Recognizing the shape of avoidant attachment, and understanding why boundaries feel impossible in the meantime, can help partners hold more empathy and firmer limits at once.
Both/And: Your Independence Is Real AND Your Avoidance Is Costing You
It matters to name the genuine strengths inside avoidant attachment before naming its costs. Your independence and self-reliance, your capacity not to lose yourself inside a relationship, are real and valuable qualities. They have likely helped you survive and succeed in environments that prize competence above almost everything else.
AND, the suppression of attachment needs doesn’t make those needs disappear. It outsources the cost elsewhere: to your partners, to a loneliness you may not name, to a chronic, low-grade disconnection that tends to surface during a health crisis or an ordinary Tuesday when the apartment feels too quiet. You can be both fiercely independent and quietly disconnected, without one canceling out the other.
This Both/And isn’t a hedge. It’s an invitation to hold your strengths alongside your vulnerabilities, to honor what you built while recognizing what went unlived along the way. It opens space for healing that doesn’t require surrendering your independence, but teaches you to bring that independence into relationship in a way that finally feels safe.
Renata’s story illustrates this tension with unusual clarity. Her choice to live alone and pour herself into her career is a real testament to her strength and discipline. But her avoidant pattern also leaves her isolated in ways she has barely let herself notice, a quiet ache underneath a life that looks, by every external measure, entirely enviable, the same quiet ache I hear described in the hard seasons so many driven women move through alone. For Renata, healing doesn’t mean abandoning the independence she built. It means learning to tolerate the anxiety that comes with letting someone else in, without losing the woman who built the life in the first place.
You've been holding everything together. You're allowed to put some down.
A focused self-paced course on overfunctioning, achievement-first self-concept, and the trauma response that masquerades as a personality. Not a productivity problem. Not a boundary problem. A nervous system that learned competence was the only safety.
“Gaslighting is socially learned , either someone sees it, experiences it, or happens into it as a way of gaining control of the moment and stabilizing themselves and it works!”
Robin Stern, PhD, psychoanalyst and co-founder and associate director of the Yale Center for Emotional Intelligence, The Psychology of Gaslighting (Q&A)
The Systemic Lens: When the Culture Rewards You for Needing No One
Avoidant attachment doesn’t develop in a vacuum, and it doesn’t stay private once it forms. Families, cultures, and professional environments shape and reinforce this pattern long after childhood ends. Many driven women grow up in households where stoicism is praised and neediness is quietly filed under weakness.
Gender expectations do heavy lifting here. Women are often taught early that needing others is dangerous or beneath them. They get rewarded for being “strong” or “unfazed,” while learning to hide the vulnerability underneath. Ralph Waldo Emerson‘s essay “Self-Reliance” has shaped American cultural values for nearly two centuries, and its central claim, that dependence is a kind of failure and true virtue lies in standing alone, has seeped into how many of us think about needing anyone at all. I love Emerson’s prose. I have reservations about what happens when his philosophy gets absorbed by a small girl learning that her needs are an inconvenience.
Corporate culture often takes this further, celebrating disconnection and prizing productivity above emotional connection. In these environments, avoidant strategies stop looking like a wound and start looking like an asset on a performance review, not unlike the way people-pleasing gets rewarded in the same buildings. The woman who never asks for help gets promoted. Nobody asks her if she’s lonely.
Recent research on romantic dyads offers a sobering window into what this costs relationally over time. A 2026 dyadic study of young adult couples in the International Journal of Psychology found that one partner’s insecure attachment, avoidant or anxious, was consistently associated with lower relationship quality reported by both members of the couple (Chen et al. 2026). The cost of avoidance is never fully private. It moves through the relationship the way weather moves through a house with the windows left open.
This systemic lens helps explain why avoidant patterns show up so consistently among driven women, across industries, across an entire generation taught the same lesson at different kitchen tables. The messages these women received from family, culture, and workplace all validated the exact behaviors that keep them disconnected, which makes the pattern harder to see, let alone question. You’re not broken for having adapted to what you were handed. The scripts were written before you arrived, and scripts, unlike people, can be rewritten.
Can Avoidant Attachment Change?
Colette is 37, a venture capitalist, and has been working with an attachment-focused therapist for two years. Last month, between two board calls, she did something she had never done: she called her partner from the parking garage to say she was having a hard time. No plan, no agenda. She just needed him to know. He said, “I’m glad you called.” The sentence hit her sideways. She started crying in her car, overwhelmed by relief and something close to gratitude.
“I kept waiting to feel like an idiot for calling,” she told me the next session, turning her phone over on her knee. “I didn’t. I felt like I had put something down that I had been carrying since I was maybe nine. I don’t fully understand it. I just know I want to do it again.” Colette’s story shows that change is real, even for a woman who spent decades believing that reaching for help was a kind of failure. It also shows that the path is specific, slow, and often uncomfortable.
The avoidant person typically has to learn, first, to recognize her own deactivating strategies while they’re happening, which usually takes months or years of steady trauma-informed therapy because these strategies operate below conscious awareness. Then she has to build the capacity to tolerate the anxiety that comes with allowing closeness rather than managing it away. This requires a consistent, patient partner or therapist who can offer a steady presence over time, not a single breakthrough session.
A 2026 study in Frontiers in Psychiatry examined adult attachment and relationship satisfaction among university students and found that secure attachment predicted meaningfully higher satisfaction, while avoidant and anxious patterns each predicted lower satisfaction through different pathways (Zhu et al. 2026). What stays with me is that word, pathway. Avoidance and anxiety don’t damage a relationship the same way, which is why generic advice often fails avoidant clients.
There’s also research on what protects couples where a partner carries insecure attachment. A 2025 study in the Journal of Marital and Family Therapy found that a partner’s felt autonomy, the sense of acting from genuine choice rather than obligation, buffered against some of the dissatisfaction typically associated with insecure attachment (Genesse et al. 2025). That lines up with the Both/And framing: healing avoidant attachment isn’t about becoming a more dependent person. It’s learning that autonomy and closeness can coexist.
Sexuality is often the last place this pattern gets named, though rarely the last place it shows up. A 2026 study in the Journal of Sex Research linked attachment avoidance with reduced mentalizing capacity, a diminished ability to read one’s own and a partner’s internal states, and connected that to patterns of dysregulated sexual behavior (Gaertner et al. 2026). This tracks with what I hear from avoidant clients who describe sex as either disconnected from feeling, or the only place they can access feeling at all, since it bypasses the negotiation that triggers the deactivating response.
A term used in adult attachment research to describe the shift from an insecure attachment style, avoidant or anxious, toward secure functioning in adulthood, typically through corrective relational experiences such as a stable partnership, sustained therapy, or other relationships that consistently disconfirm the old expectation that closeness is dangerous.
In plain terms: Earned security means you weren’t born secure, and that’s fine. Security can be built later, slowly, through relationships where someone stays steady even after you let your guard down.
This involves learning to trust another person with need, practicing the sensation of expressing need out loud, and experiencing responsive care that rewrites the nervous system’s old threat response. A few honest places to start: naming the pattern without judgment, learning more about anxious attachment if your relationships tend to pair you with an anxious partner, considering how attachment theory explains an outgrown marriage if this pattern shaped how a long relationship ended, and remembering that what feels like permanent temperament may be a relational trauma response that formed for good reasons and can be unformed.
Healing, in the end, is less a single decision than a slow rediscovery of intimacy without abandoning the strengths that got you here. Like Colette, you can learn to reach for support without waiting for a crisis to justify it, and gradually rewrite a story your nervous system has told on autopilot for years.
If any part of this resonates, you’re in good company. So many driven women I work with spent years believing that needing no one was simply their personality, only to discover that it was a strategy built long ago for reasons that made sense at the time. That strategy can be honored and still be gently set down. Healing doesn’t ask you to need constantly. It asks you to let closeness in without bracing for the cost.
Warmly, Annie.
Q: What does avoidant attachment look like in a relationship?
A: Avoidant attachment in relationships looks like pulling back when things get emotionally closer, difficulty expressing needs directly, finding fault with a partner right when intimacy increases, and framing emotional distance as independence or “just needing space.” These relationships tend to end through gradual disconnection rather than dramatic conflict. From the outside, the avoidant partner can look uninterested, when internally strong feelings sit just out of reach.
Q: Can someone with avoidant attachment fall in love?
A: Yes. Avoidant people can and do form strong attachments. The suppression operates on the conscious expression of those needs, not the underlying feelings. Avoidant individuals often lack reliable access to their own attachment feelings until something disrupts the system: a breakup, a partner’s suffering, a health crisis. Many report intense grief after losing a relationship they appeared indifferent to.
Q: What causes avoidant attachment to develop?
A: Avoidant attachment typically develops when early caregiving was consistently unresponsive to emotional bids. It doesn’t have to be harsh; it’s often just emotionally distant or quietly rewarding of self-containment. The child learns that expressing needs doesn’t reliably produce comfort, and stops expressing them. That response is adaptive in the environment that produced it, and persists into relationships that no longer require it.
Q: How do you date someone with avoidant attachment?
A: With clear eyes and steady boundaries. An avoidant partner is fully capable of a genuine, loving relationship. The work involves understanding what deactivating strategies look like in the moment, not taking them personally, and naming your own needs without escalating in a way that triggers further withdrawal. The pursue-withdraw trap is real: anxious pursuit activates avoidant withdrawal, which activates more pursuit. Individual therapy, sometimes alongside couples work, is often the most direct path through.
Q: Is avoidant attachment the same as being introverted?
A: No. Introversion is a temperament, a preference for less social stimulation and a need for alone time to recharge. It has nothing inherent to do with fear of intimacy. Many introverts are securely attached and deeply intimate in their close relationships. Avoidant attachment is about the nervous system’s relationship to closeness, not social preference. Some avoidant people are comfortable socially in shallow relationships; it’s depth and dependency that trigger the deactivating response.
Q: Can avoidant attachment look like codependency from the outside?
A: They can look similar: both often involve a driven woman who has built her identity around being endlessly capable. The mechanics differ. Codependency tends to involve over-functioning for others, while avoidant attachment involves under-functioning relationally to protect against connection. Some women carry threads of both, which is part of why codependency in driven women is worth exploring alongside attachment patterns.
Q: Does avoidant attachment ever fully go away?
A: In my clinical experience, most people don’t erase the pattern so much as build a wider range around it. The old deactivating reflex can still flicker under real stress, but a person who has done sustained relational work, often the same work described in rebuilding self trust, usually catches it faster and no longer organizes a life around avoiding that flicker. That’s not the same as never feeling the pull toward distance again. It’s having more choice.
References
Chen, X., et al. 2026. “Dyadic Associations Between Insecure Attachment and Relationship Quality Among Chinese Young Adults.” International Journal of Psychology. PMID: 41383094.
Gaertner, K., et al. 2026. “Attachment Avoidance, Mentalizing, and Dysregulated Sexuality.” Journal of Sex Research. PMID: 42295206.
Genesse et al. 2025. “Autonomy in Insecure Attachment and Couple Satisfaction.” Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. PMID: 41025269.
Rossetti, Christina. 1862. “My Secret.” In Goblin Market and Other Poems. London: Macmillan.
Yang, L., et al. 2025. “Electrocortical Correlates of Suppression Versus Reappraisal in Attachment Avoidance.” International Journal of Psychology. PMID: 41076579.
Zhu, Y., et al. 2026. “Adult Attachment and Intimate Relationship Satisfaction Among University Students.” Frontiers in Psychiatry. PMID: 42109286.
WAYS TO WORK WITH ANNIE
Individual Therapy
Trauma-informed therapy for driven women healing relational trauma. Licensed in 14 U.S. jurisdictions, including Colorado (telehealth only), and registered to provide telehealth in Florida.
Trauma-informed coaching for driven women navigating leadership and burnout.
Annie’s signature course for relational trauma recovery. Work at your own pace.
Annie Wright, LMFT
LMFT · Relational Trauma Specialist · Author, W.W. Norton 2027
Helping driven women finally feel as good as their resume looks.
Annie Wright is a licensed psychotherapist (LMFT #95719) and trauma-informed executive coach with over 15,000 clinical hours. She works with driven women, including Silicon Valley leaders, physicians, and entrepreneurs, in repairing the psychological foundations beneath their impressive lives. Annie is the founder and former CEO of Evergreen Counseling, a multimillion-dollar trauma-informed therapy center she built, scaled, and successfully exited. Licensed in 14 U.S. jurisdictions, including Colorado (telehealth only), and registered to provide telehealth in Florida. A regular contributor to Psychology Today, her expert commentary has appeared in Forbes, Business Insider, NBC News, and The Information. She’s currently writing her first book with W.W. Norton, and she and her family split their time between California and Maine.
