Camille just closed a $1.1 billion exit and saw her carry hit her account, but instead of relief, she’s caught in a complex waiting game. This post looks at the identity and relational costs of the carry track for female private equity partners who thought the payout would be a finish line — but find it’s more of a starting gun.
- Camille Refreshed Schwab Eleven Times in the Back Seat
- What the Carry Waiting Room Does to a Female Partner’s Body in Year Three, Year Five, Year Seven, and the Realization Quarter
- Why the Number Hitting Does Not Close the Loop the Way the Industry Promised It Would
- The Three Specific Wounds of the Carry Track — Time Compression, Identity Foreclosure, and the Frozen Relationship Layer
- The Specific Hazard of the Salmon-In-the-Fridge Marriage (And Why “We Knew What We Signed Up For” Is Not Enough)
- Both/And: You Earned the Carry AND The Carry Is Not a Door That Lets You Out of the Self You Built to Earn It
- Systemic Lens: Why PE’s Five-to-Ten-Year Carry Architecture Functions as Identity Foreclosure Even When It Pays Out
- What a Female Partner Actually Does With Year Eleven (And the Three Versions of “Stay” That Are Different From Each Other)
- Frequently Asked Questions
Camille Refreshed Schwab Eleven Times in the Back Seat
Camille sat silently in the back of the black SUV, the city lights blurring against the glass window as the car idled at the red light near the FDR Drive onramp. Boris, the driver, kept the radio off, honoring fourteen years of unspoken understanding with Bain Capital — no small talk, no distractions. The air smelled faintly of cigar smoke, a residual ghost from the senior partner who had smoked defiantly against fire-code at the closing dinner just hours earlier. Camille could feel the smell clinging to her hair and skin, certain that three showers before dawn wouldn’t erase it.
Her phone buzzed quietly on her lap. The screen lit up with a text from her husband, a corporate M&A partner at Cravath, who she hadn’t seen for dinner on a Wednesday in eleven months: “Congrats. Salmon in the fridge. I’m at the office.” The words felt both tender and distant, a reminder of the parallel lives they led under the same roof.
At 4:47 p.m., a number had hit her brokerage account. Since then, she had refreshed Schwab eleven times. Eleven. She hadn’t told a soul. The number was supposed to represent freedom, a finish line after years of relentless carry vesting. Instead, it felt like a starting gun. Camille thought, “I have been waiting since I was twenty-six to be allowed to feel finished. The number arrived. I am still not allowed to feel finished. The number is not the door. I think there is no door.”
What the Carry Waiting Room Does to a Female Partner’s Body in Year Three, Year Five, Year Seven, and the Realization Quarter
Years three, five, and seven on the carry track are marked less by milestones than by a creeping bodily exhaustion that no spa day or weekend getaway can touch. For Camille and many women like her, the waiting room is a physical space inside the body — a knot in the stomach, a jaw clenched beneath the surface, shoulders that never quite relax.
The carry waiting room is the liminal space where success and anticipation collide with uncertainty and invisibility. In year three, the body learns to tense preemptively, bracing for every call, every update, every possible delay. By year five, the nervous system is caught in a chronic loop of vigilance, a state of allostatic load where the cost of waiting begins to accumulate in fatigue, insomnia, and subtle aches.
In year seven, the weariness deepens into a sense of identity foreclosure, a term coined by Erik Erikson, MD, describing a premature closing off of identity exploration because the future is tightly scripted by carry vesting timelines and fund cycles. The body embodies this foreclosure as a frozen tension, a physical unwillingness to fully inhabit the present or envision a future outside the carry track.
By the realization quarter, when the payout lands, the body often responds with disbelief or numbness rather than relief. The nervous system’s years-long adaptation to delayed gratification — a concept Walter Mischel, PhD, explored in the famous marshmallow paradigm and its adult extensions — does not simply reset with a deposit. Instead, it can trigger a cascade of mixed emotions, from grief over lost time to anxiety about what comes next.
The carry waiting room refers to the prolonged state of anticipatory stress and bodily tension experienced by private equity partners during the multi-year vesting period before carry payouts, often marked by chronic vigilance, fatigue, and identity constraints.
In plain terms: It’s the invisible weight your body carries when you’re stuck waiting for a payoff that’s supposed to change everything — but instead keeps you on edge and exhausted.
Years three, five, and seven on the carry track aren’t just calendar markers; they’re embodied experiences that accumulate unseen, like sediment layered beneath a riverbed. Camille’s body had learned to recognize the subtle cues—an incoming email ping, a missed call, a whispered rumor at the firm—and it responded with tightening muscles and a racing pulse. The carry waiting room, a phrase coined within Bain Capital circles but rarely spoken aloud, is a physical and psychological crucible where anticipation and exhaustion fuse into a chronic state of allostatic load, as Bruce McEwen, PhD, describes it. This load taxes the stress-response system, leaving female partners like Camille with chronic fatigue, sleep disruption, and a pervasive sense of tension that no weekend or vacation can shake.
At year three, the body begins to anticipate the next disruption. The knot in the stomach is a sentinel, warning of the countless meetings, the delayed returns, and the invisible pressure to stay hyper-vigilant. By year five, this tension no longer flickers intermittently; it settles into the muscles and nervous system like a permanent fixture. Camille’s jaw clenched almost reflexively under the weight of unspoken expectations, while her shoulders hoisted an invisible burden she could neither name nor relieve. This is the physical architecture of the carry waiting room: a body poised perpetually in liminal suspension, caught between celebration and continuation.
By year seven, identity foreclosure, a term from Erik Erikson, MD, surfaces as a psychological wound layered into the body. The carry track scripts a narrow future, constricting the exploratory pathways a woman’s identity might otherwise traverse. For Camille, this meant a silent surrender of alternative selves—mothers, artists, travelers—that she deferred for the promise of carry. The frozen physical posture she maintained was not just fatigue; it was the body’s way of holding space for this halted development, a somatic manifestation of a self still waiting to be fully realized.
Why the Number Hitting Does Not Close the Loop the Way the Industry Promised It Would
The moment the carry number hits an account is supposed to feel like a door opening. In private equity lore, it’s the finish line after years of sacrifice, a proof that the grind was worth it. Yet for Camille, and many women on similar trajectories, the payout often feels like a mirage — close enough to see but too distant to touch.
This dissonance arises because the carry track promises closure but delivers ambiguity. The payout is a financial event but not an emotional or identity event. It fails to close the psychological loop because it isn’t designed to resolve the complex identity work that occurred over the vesting years. Instead, it often triggers a new set of expectations and pressures.
Bruce McEwen, PhD, introduced the concept of allostatic load, describing how chronic stress accumulates physically and emotionally. The carry payout doesn’t erase this load; it can even amplify it by signaling the start of new responsibilities, new cycles, and new relational dynamics that the partner’s nervous system has yet to process.
The internal narrative often shifts from “I’m almost done” to “What now?” but without a clear path forward. The industry’s metrics for success don’t map onto the inner experience of relief or freedom. The payout is a number, but the self remains unfinished.
Allostatic load is the cumulative wear and tear on the body and brain resulting from chronic exposure to stress hormones and the body’s repeated efforts to adapt to stressors, as described by Bruce McEwen, PhD.
In plain terms: It’s the physical and emotional toll your body pays when you’re under constant pressure, even when you think you’re just waiting for things to get better.
When the payout finally hits the brokerage account, the industry promises relief—a closing of the loop after nearly a decade of relentless work and waiting. But for Camille, as with many female PE partners, the arrival of that number does not seal the psychological contract in the way the firm’s culture suggests it should. Instead of a sense of completion, Camille felt a dissonance, a neurobiological mismatch between expectation and reality. The nervous system, conditioned by years of delayed gratification, responds not with freedom but with a complex cascade of emotions: disbelief, numbness, and even grief.
Walter Mischel, PhD, whose marshmallow paradigm famously explored delayed gratification, extended his research into adulthood and found that the prolonged deferral of reward can restructure neural pathways, reinforcing hyper-vigilance and anxiety rather than resetting them. Camille’s body, conditioned to brace for uncertainty and to suppress the desire to feel “done,” could not simply flip the switch at 4:47 p.m. when the money landed. Instead, the number became a paradoxical starting gun, signaling the beginning of a new, unknown race rather than the finish line she’d imagined.
This failure of closure reveals the clinical architecture beneath the private equity carry system: a temporal dissonance where the payout is a milestone but not a destination. For women in particular, who often navigate intersecting pressures of gendered expectations and professional hyper-responsibility, this dissonance is amplified. The invisible labor of sustaining presence amidst uncertainty stretches the nervous system into a state of chronic stress, making the arrival of the carry number feel less like a door and more like a threshold that can’t be crossed.
The Three Specific Wounds of the Carry Track — Time Compression, Identity Foreclosure, and the Frozen Relationship Layer
Camille’s carry journey revealed three wounds that drive a silent crisis among female private equity partners.
First, time compression—the experience of years passing in a blur, compressed by the relentless pace of deal cycles and fund closings. This compression distorts the ability to grieve or celebrate milestones, leaving a sense of disorientation.
Second, identity foreclosure, a psychological term from Erik Erikson, MD, where the self narrows prematurely. The carry track scripts a future so tightly that alternative identities or life paths feel impossible or even threatening.
Third, the frozen relationship layer, an often-overlooked wound. The carry track creates emotional distance within personal relationships. Partners, spouses, and close friends become spectators to a performance that’s increasingly internalized and isolated. The repeated postponement of “being done” freezes relational dynamics, locking them into patterns of absence, muted disappointment, or resigned acceptance.
Camille’s ride home was quiet, but inside her, these layers churned like a tempest, unresolved and heavy.
Identity foreclosure, a concept from Erik Erikson, MD, occurs when an individual commits prematurely to an identity without adequate exploration, often due to external pressures or timelines.
In plain terms: It’s when you lock yourself into one version of who you are before you’ve had the chance to figure out what else might be possible.
Three specific wounds define the carry track’s impact on female partners: time compression, identity foreclosure, and the frozen relationship layer. Time compression refers to the subjective acceleration of life’s pace, a phenomenon many women report as the pressure to condense years of personal and professional growth into the narrow windows dictated by fund cycles. Camille felt this keenly, as the years from twenty-six to forty-two were bracketed not by milestones of personal fulfillment but by milestones of carry vesting, each demanding a hyper-focused, all-consuming version of herself.
Identity foreclosure, as originally described by Erik Erikson, MD, involves prematurely committing to a defined role while shutting off exploration of alternative selves. In PE, this foreclosure takes the form of a locked-in identity as “the partner who delivers carry,” a role that demands relentless performance and leaves little psychological room for divergence. For Camille, this meant deferring motherhood, creative pursuits, and even friendships, all sacrificed to sustain the identity constructed around fund performance and deal execution.
The frozen relationship layer is the most insidious wound. It describes the emotional and physical suspension of intimate relationships that are held in stasis by the demands of the carry timeline. Camille’s marriage to a Cravath M&A partner was a parallel of intense careers, where proximity did not equate to presence. The frozen layer manifests in moments of emotional disconnection, where shared experiences are deferred or flattened, leaving a relational terrain marked by absence and ambiguity. This layer often creates a relational paradox: partners living under the same roof but inhabiting different psychological time zones.
The Specific Hazard of the Salmon-In-the-Fridge Marriage (And Why “We Knew What We Signed Up For” Is Not Enough)
Priya is in her kitchen at 10:12 p.m. on a Thursday. The overhead light is off because it feels too loud after a long day. She’s unloading the dishwasher in near darkness. Her phone glows softly on the counter with a Slack notification: “Quick call?” Meanwhile, upstairs, her husband reads a Frog and Toad book to their seven-year-old. The salmon he left in the fridge is a quiet signal in their parallel lives — a promise of care that feels both distant and insufficient.
Marriages where both partners are on demanding professional trajectories, especially in private equity and corporate law, often hide a unique strain beneath the surface. The phrase “We knew what we signed up for” becomes a shield against deeper conversations about loneliness, unmet emotional needs, and the invisible erosion of connection.
These partnerships carry the risk of turning into what I call the “salmon-in-the-fridge” marriages — acts of care that feel transactional, intermittent, and inadequate to the emotional labor required. The carry track’s timeline doesn’t pause for relationship repair, and the repeated deferral of presence can accumulate into ambiguous loss, a theory developed by Pauline Boss, PhD, where loss is felt but not openly acknowledged or grieved.
Dani, Camille’s principal who shared part of the drive home before stepping out at 79th Street, once confided in her about this very struggle: “It’s like we’re married to our work, and the rest is just leftover time.” The cost of this dynamic isn’t just emotional; it’s somatic, shaping the very physiology of connection and disconnection.
“Tell me, what is it you plan to do with your one wild and precious life?”
Mary Oliver, “The Summer Day”
Ambiguous loss, defined by Pauline Boss, PhD, describes a type of loss that is unclear and lacks closure, leading to unresolved grief and ongoing uncertainty in relationships.
In plain terms: It’s the feeling of losing something important without being able to fully say goodbye or understand what’s gone.
The so-called “salmon-in-the-fridge” marriage is a vivid metaphor for the unique hazards facing couples where both partners pursue high-stakes, high-demand careers on parallel tracks. Camille’s husband’s text, “Congrats. Salmon in the fridge. I’m at the office,” encapsulated this dynamic—a gesture of care and normalcy overlaid with a tacit acknowledgment of their shared absence. These relationships are a delicate balancing act, fraught with the risk of emotional neglect despite physical cohabitation.
“We knew what we signed up for” is a common refrain in these marriages, but clinical experience shows that intellectual acknowledgment is insufficient to buffer the relational toll. The daily erosion of presence, compounded by the allostatic load each partner carries, accrues into a slow, ambiguous loss—what Pauline Boss, PhD, terms a grief without closure. The salmon waiting in the fridge becomes a symbol of postponed intimacy, a ritualized placeholder for the moments they never find.
Clinically, this dynamic demands more than surface-level communication—it requires intentional relational repair and recalibration. Without this, the risk of relational rupture grows, even as external markers of success accumulate. Couples in this pattern often benefit from trauma-informed coaching and therapeutic interventions that address both individual allostatic load and the frozen relational layer, as explored in resources like Executive coaching and Therapy with Annie.
Both/And: You Earned the Carry AND The Carry Is Not a Door That Lets You Out of the Self You Built to Earn It
Nadia is in her corner office at 9:47 p.m. on a Tuesday. The lemon polish scent from the cleaning crew lingers faintly in the air. She’s just sent a final email for the day but can’t close her laptop. The carry payout has arrived, but her body tightens. She thinks, “I earned this. I deserve this. And yet, I’m still trapped in the same patterns that got me here.”
This moment captures the both/and tension that defines the carry experience. You have earned the carry through years of sacrifice, excellence, and grit. That achievement is real, valid, and worth honoring. Yet the carry is not a door that suddenly lets you out of the self you built to earn it. The identity forged in the crucible of private equity carries forward — with its demands, its expectations, and its shadows.
Delayed gratification, a concept Walter Mischel, PhD, illuminated through his marshmallow paradigm, illustrates this tension. The ability to wait for a future reward is a strength, but when stretched over a decade, it exacts a cost that no payout can erase. The carry number is a milestone, not a destination.
Delayed gratification, studied by Walter Mischel, PhD, refers to the ability to resist an immediate reward in favor of a later, often larger, reward, but prolonged delay can have psychological and physiological costs.
In plain terms: Waiting for the payoff takes strength — but waiting too long can wear you down in ways that money alone won’t fix.
“The most notable fact our culture imprints on women is the sense of our limits. The most important thing one woman can do for another is to illuminate and expand her sense of actual possibilities.”
Adrienne Rich, Of Woman Born: Motherhood as Experience and Institution
Camille’s story illustrates a powerful both/and paradox: she earned the carry and the carry, in turn, did not offer an exit from the self she meticulously built to earn it. The carry payout is not a door that lets you out of the relentless identity of “female PE partner” but rather a mirror reflecting back the self that was shaped, sometimes contorted, to fit that role. Adrienne Rich’s concept of “the sense of actual possibilities” resonates here, underscoring that earning the payout is not the end of the story but a complex inflection point where possibility and constraint coexist.
This ambiguity challenges simplistic narratives of success and freedom. For Camille, the number in her Schwab account was a potent symbol of achievement and yet a reminder that the internal work—the psychological and somatic integration of who she had become in this process—was far from complete. The carry track’s architecture imposes a psychological foreclosure that lingers beyond the financial milestone, requiring a both/and stance to navigate identity and aspiration without binary thinking.
Holding both the accomplishment and the ongoing internal tension requires deliberate therapeutic work and executive coaching, helping women like Camille articulate and integrate the many facets of their evolving identities. This approach, grounded in trauma-informed care, acknowledges that the carry is both a gate and a threshold, a reward and a responsibility. It invites partners to engage with their stories beyond the spreadsheet, as detailed in the Finance hub resources.
Systemic Lens: Why PE’s Five-to-Ten-Year Carry Architecture Functions as Identity Foreclosure Even When It Pays Out
The private equity industry’s carry architecture is designed as a five-to-ten-year runway to incentivize long-term value creation. Yet this system also functions as a mechanism of identity foreclosure, particularly for female partners whose socialized roles include additional invisible labor and relational expectations.
Erik Erikson, MD’s framework on identity development helps us see that the carry timeline compresses identity exploration into a narrow corridor. This foreclosure is systemic, not individual. The industry rewards endurance and delayed gratification but rarely accounts for the relational and psychological costs borne disproportionately by women balancing carry with family and marriage.
Pauline Boss, PhD’s theory of ambiguous loss intersects here, as the carry track’s extended timeline creates relational absences and unresolved grief that ripple through home life and social worlds. The carry isn’t just a financial mechanism; it’s a relational and identity architecture that shapes what women can see as possible for themselves.
Understanding this systemic dimension is essential for partners considering their next chapter. It reframes the internal conflict from a personal failing to a structural tension, opening new possibilities for self-compassion and strategic decision-making.
Systemic identity foreclosure refers to the premature narrowing of identity exploration caused by institutional or cultural structures that limit personal growth opportunities, extending Erik Erikson, MD’s concept to organizational contexts.
In plain terms: It’s when the system you’re in pushes you to become one thing and closes off other parts of who you might be, even if you don’t want it to.
From a systemic perspective, the five-to-ten-year carry architecture functions as a mechanism of identity foreclosure even when it pays out. This architecture is designed to incentivize long-term commitment and performance but inadvertently locks partners into a narrow, scripted identity trajectory. The fund cycle’s rigid timeline leaves little room for exploration or deviation, constraining female partners’ ability to evolve organically both personally and professionally. This systemic constraint mirrors Erik Erikson, MD’s theory of psychosocial development, where identity foreclosure limits the breadth of self-concept.
Moreover, the systemic pressures intersect with gender dynamics in private equity, where women are often underrepresented and hyper-visible. The cumulative allostatic load, as Bruce McEwen, PhD, describes, is magnified by the need to perform not just as partners but as representatives of women in a male-dominated environment. This intersectional load shapes not only individual experiences but also the collective culture within firms, perpetuating cycles of vigilance and frozen potential.
This systemic lens highlights why simply receiving the carry payout does not alleviate the psychological cost. The systemic design enforces a prolonged waiting room that conditions the nervous system and identity formation, necessitating intentional interventions at both individual and organizational levels. To learn more about navigating these systemic challenges, see the identity crisis exit and golden handcuffs resources.
What a Female Partner Actually Does With Year Eleven (And the Three Versions of “Stay” That Are Different From Each Other)
At 7:14 p.m. on a Thursday, Camille stands at her bedroom window, the city stretching endlessly beneath her. The carry has hit, the fund is closed, and yet the question remains: what now? Staying isn’t a single choice but a constellation of possibilities — each carrying different risks and hopes.
The first version of “stay” is the continuation of the carry track with renewed commitment, embracing the known grind and the familiar identity despite the costs. The second is a strategic downshift — staying in the firm or industry but recalibrating priorities, perhaps seeking coaching or therapy to heal the carry’s toll. The third is the hardest: staying in a revised identity that integrates lessons learned and embraces a new path, which may or may not include finance.
Therapy and executive coaching, like the services offered through therapy with Annie or executive coaching, provide essential support for female partners wrestling with these options. Internal exploration, nervous system regulation, and relational repair can help unlock clarity beyond the binary of stay or leave.
Camille’s story is a reminder that the carry payout is not an endpoint but a crossroads. The work of healing and self-definition continues, sometimes in unexpected directions.
Year eleven for a female private equity partner like Camille is a complex terrain populated by three versions of “stay,” each distinct and demanding different psychological resources. The first “stay” is the stay of endurance—the choice to remain within the carry track, continuing to navigate its pressures while seeking new meaning. The second “stay” is the stay of transformation, where the partner actively reshapes her identity and role within the firm, moving beyond the scripted carry narrative. The third “stay” is the stay of departure, a conscious decision to disengage from the carry track but remain engaged in finance or leadership in a different capacity.
These versions of “stay” differ not only in external action but in internal alignment. The endurance stay often comes with a cost of increased allostatic load and frozen identity layers, while the transformation stay requires therapeutic and coaching support to examine and rebuild identity safely. The departure stay, while liberating, involves grief and renegotiation of the self and relationships. Camille’s own pathway is still unfolding, emblematic of many women who find that the carry payout is not an endpoint but an ongoing dialogue with self and system.
For women navigating these choices, trauma-informed therapy and executive coaching offer vital tools to process the embodied and relational costs of the carry track. Resources like Work one-on-one with Annie provide personalized approaches to healing and growth, helping partners move toward agency and integration beyond the carry’s shadow. The journey through year eleven is less about a definitive answer and more about cultivating the capacity to hold complexity with courage and compassion.
Q: Is “the carry waiting room” actually a thing or a metaphor?
A: The carry waiting room is very real in the lived experience of many private equity partners. It describes the prolonged period of anticipatory stress and physical tension during the years before a carry payout, where the nervous system endures chronic vigilance and fatigue. While it’s a metaphor for this internal state, it maps onto genuine physiological and psychological patterns documented in trauma and stress research.
Q: Why didn’t the carry number hitting feel like the relief I’d been imagining for nine years?
A: The payout doesn’t erase the years of delayed gratification, identity foreclosure, and relational strain that accumulate over the carry track. Your nervous system adapts to chronic stress, and the number hitting your account can trigger mixed emotions including grief, numbness, or anxiety rather than relief. The payout may mark a financial milestone but not an emotional or identity resolution.
Q: How do female PE partners experience the waiting differently from male partners?
A: Female partners often carry additional relational and emotional labor outside of work, which compounds the allostatic load during the carry waiting period. Social expectations around caregiving and maintaining household dynamics can create added layers of stress and identity foreclosure, making the waiting room feel heavier and more isolating.
Q: What’s the right way to handle a marriage where both spouses are partners on parallel tracks?
A: Open communication about emotional needs, boundaries, and the impact of career demands is crucial. Therapy can help partners navigate the “salmon-in-the-fridge” dynamic — where care feels transactional or insufficient — and work toward mutually supportive arrangements that honor both careers and relationship health.
Q: Should I take the next fund cycle off, downshift, or fully exit?
A: There’s no one-size-fits-all answer. Each option carries different implications for identity, relationships, and financial security. Working with an executive coach or therapist can help you clarify your values, needs, and goals to make the choice that aligns best with your well-being and long-term vision.
Q: Is it normal to feel grief at the moment you finally got paid?
A: Yes. Grief is common because the payout signals the end of a long chapter filled with sacrifice and deferred life experiences. You may mourn lost time, relationships, or parts of yourself that were suppressed to meet carry expectations. Recognizing this grief is an important step toward healing.
Q: Does therapy help with the year-eleven question specifically?
A: Therapy can be a valuable space to examine the complex emotions and identity questions that arise at this stage. It supports nervous system regulation, clarifies values, and helps you build the internal resources to make empowered decisions about your next steps, whether that involves staying, shifting, or leaving.
WAYS TO WORK WITH ANNIE
Individual Therapy
Trauma-informed therapy for driven women healing relational trauma. Licensed in 9 states.
Executive Coaching
Trauma-informed coaching for ambitious women navigating leadership and burnout.
Fixing the Foundations
Annie’s signature course for relational trauma recovery. Work at your own pace.
Strong & Stable
The Sunday conversation you wished you’d had years earlier. 20,000+ subscribers.
Annie Wright, LMFT
LMFT · Relational Trauma Specialist · W.W. Norton Author
Helping ambitious women finally feel as good as their résumé looks.
Annie Wright is a licensed psychotherapist (LMFT #95719) and trauma-informed executive coach with over 15,000 clinical hours. She works with driven, ambitious women — including Silicon Valley leaders, physicians, and entrepreneurs — in repairing the psychological foundations beneath their impressive lives. Annie is the founder and former CEO of Evergreen Counseling, a multimillion-dollar trauma-informed therapy center she built, scaled, and successfully exited. A regular contributor to Psychology Today, her expert commentary has appeared in Forbes, Business Insider, Inc., NBC, and The Information. She is currently writing her first book with W.W. Norton.
