Weekly vs. Intensive Therapy for Driven Women: How to Choose What Actually Works
The 50-minute weekly session became the default not because research established it as the optimal therapeutic dose. But because it fits insurance billing codes. For driven women with compressed schedules and complex trauma histories, understanding the actual clinical difference between weekly and intensive therapy formats can change how fast and how deeply you heal.
Last reviewed: June 2026 by Annie Wright, LMFT
- The Slow Leak: Simone’s Story
- What Intensive Therapy Actually Is. And Isn’t
- The Neurobiology: Memory, Integration, and Why Intensives Work
- When Weekly Therapy Is the Right Clinical Choice
- When Intensive Formats Offer a Clinical Advantage
- Both/And: Weekly and Intensive Therapy as Complements
- The Systemic Lens: The 50-Minute Hour as an Insurance Artifact
- How to Choose the Format That Fits Your Healing
- Frequently Asked Questions
The Slow Leak: Simone’s Story
| Dimension | Weekly Therapy | Intensive Therapy |
|---|---|---|
| Session structure | 50, 60 minutes, once per week. The most common format, designed for sustained relationship-building and gradual therapeutic progress across many sessions. | Multiple hours per day or per week. Half-day, full-day, or multi-day formats that compress significant therapeutic work into a shorter, more concentrated period. |
| Best suited for | Ongoing trauma processing, relational work, or identity development that benefits from the rhythm of return. The week between sessions is itself part of the process. | Driven women with scheduling constraints, those in acute transition or crisis, or presentations that benefit from immersive depth without the weekly interruptions. |
| What intensive therapy uniquely provides | Weekly therapy provides something intensive can’t fully replicate: the consistent returning to a relationship over time, which is itself the treatment for relational trauma. | Intensive therapy creates the conditions for breakthroughs that weekly pacing doesn’t allow. Sustained time in the therapeutic container can move material that 50 minutes rarely reaches. |
| Schedule compatibility | More sustainable long-term. Weekly sessions fit into ongoing professional and personal schedules without requiring large blocks of protected time. | Requires scheduling significant protected time. Typically works best when a client can arrange a true retreat from professional demands; works poorly when the phone keeps going. |
| For driven women’s particular needs | The weekly rhythm works well for clients who benefit from the processing that happens between sessions. Driven women often do significant integration work on their own time. | Intensive formats work particularly well for driven women who struggle to gear shift weekly into therapy. Sustained immersion can bypass the transition cost. |
| Cost and investment | More spread out. The weekly commitment is ongoing but doesn’t require a large upfront investment; HSA/FSA can often be used throughout the year. | Larger upfront investment. Intensive therapy may cost more in a single week than monthly weekly sessions; for some clients, the ROI of a meaningful intensive is higher. |
Simone, 46, is a trial attorney at a V10 firm. The kind of woman whose professional life is defined by precision, forward motion, and an almost preternatural capacity to hold complexity without showing cracks. For three years she’s been in weekly therapy, carving a 50-minute slot out of a schedule that runs 80 hours and asks a lot of her in every one of them.
If your nervous system learned the safest way to exist was to manage everyone else's world, my self-paced course Enough Without the Effort is the recovery map.
The therapy isn’t nothing. She’s made real progress. She can name her triggers, she understands the family dynamics that shaped her relationship to authority and approval, she’s developed better coping tools. She leaves most sessions feeling something has moved. But by the following Tuesday, a specific and frustrating thing has happened: much of what shifted has eroded. She spends the first 20 minutes rebuilding the emotional base she established the week before. She’s always getting back to where she was rather than moving forward from it.
“Is there a faster way to heal that doesn’t sacrifice depth?” she asked me recently. “Because this feels like trying to fill a deep well one cup at a time.”
The answer is yes. And understanding why requires understanding what the 50-minute weekly session actually is. And what it isn’t.
What Intensive Therapy Actually Is. And Isn’t
The 50-minute weekly therapy session became standard not through clinical research demonstrating it as the optimal therapeutic dose. It became standard because it was the most administratively convenient unit for insurance reimbursement in the mid-20th century. It maps cleanly onto billing codes. That’s the origin story. Not neuroscience, not outcome research, not what’s actually most effective for specific presentations. Billing convenience.
Intensive therapy is not simply “more therapy.” It’s a fundamentally different approach to the delivery of care. One that concentrates the work in ways that have specific neurobiological effects. Intensive formats can include:
- Multi-session weeks: Two or more standard sessions per week, maintaining therapeutic momentum between meetings.
- Extended session blocks: Single sessions of 90 to 180 minutes that allow for processing to continue past the point where a 50-minute session typically cuts off.
- Multi-day intensive programs: Several hours of therapy per day over consecutive days, creating a deeply immersive, concentrated experience designed for significant breakthroughs.
What these formats share is that they don’t break contact with difficult material at the point where a 50-minute session would typically end. Often the exact moment when something important is beginning to emerge. For driven women whose daily lives are high-stimulus and emotionally demanding, maintaining therapeutic momentum matters enormously. The week between weekly sessions isn’t just a gap in scheduling. It’s often a gap in which the work gets progressively covered over by the demands of the life.
Therapeutic dose-response refers to the research finding that there is a measurable relationship between the amount of therapy received and the clinical outcomes achieved. Bruce Wampold, PhD, psychotherapy researcher and professor at the University of Wisconsin, has demonstrated that factors like therapeutic alliance and client engagement are strong predictors of outcome. And that intensive formats can amplify these factors by creating a more concentrated and committed therapeutic container. Research by Robinson, Delgadillo, and Kellett, published in Psychotherapy Research in 2020, confirmed that frequency and intensity of therapy delivery are key variables for complex presentations.
In plain terms: The 50-minute weekly session isn’t a sacred clinical measure. It’s a billing unit. The real question isn’t “Am I doing my hour a week?”. It’s “What dose does my nervous system and my specific treatment goals actually require to create lasting change?”
The Neurobiology: Memory, Integration, and Why Intensives Work
To understand why intensive formats can accelerate healing in specific ways, we have to engage the neurobiology of how traumatic memory is stored and how it changes in therapy.
Traumatic memories. Including the relational and developmental experiences that most often underlie the depression, anxiety, and self-defeating patterns I see in driven women. Are stored in a fragmented, emotionally charged form in subcortical brain structures. They don’t follow the logic of narrative memory. They’re activated by sensory cues, relational triggers, and situational parallels to the original experience. They produce physiological responses. Tightening in the chest, a kind of bracing, the sudden loss of executive function. That seem disproportionate to the present circumstances because they’re not primarily responses to the present. They’re responses to the past, activated in the present.
Healing requires that these memory networks be updated. That the emotional charge associated with them be reduced through a process of reprocessing that allows the brain to integrate the experience into adaptive memory rather than continuing to respond to it as ongoing threat. That reprocessing takes neurobiological time and requires a specific quality of sustained engagement with the material.
Memory consolidation is the neurobiological process by which newly formed memories. Including therapeutic insights and emotional learnings. Are stabilized and transferred into long-term storage. This process occurs primarily during rest and sleep. In trauma therapy, adequate consolidation time between sessions allows the nervous system to integrate difficult material without becoming overwhelmed. Intensive formats are designed to incorporate structured integration activities. Guided reflection, somatic practices, mindful pauses. Within the intensive itself, so that depth of processing is preserved rather than lost.
In plain terms: The brain needs time to digest what happens in therapy. But “time” doesn’t have to mean “a week of your regular life gradually covering over the work.” Intensive formats can build digestion into the structure without sacrificing depth.
The research on intensive trauma treatment is compelling. Eline M. Voorendonk, researcher at Altrecht Academic Anxiety Center, and Ad de Jongh, professor of anxiety disorders and psychotraumatology at the University of Amsterdam, published research in the European Journal of Psychotraumatology in 2020 documenting significant reductions. Including loss of PTSD diagnoses. Following intensive trauma-focused treatment. Their findings suggest that concentrated therapeutic work can achieve in days or weeks what traditional weekly therapy may take years to produce. A 2024 study by Matthijssen, van den Berg, and de Jongh on intensive outpatient PTSD treatment confirmed these findings, showing sustained symptom reduction at follow-up. More recent research by Gahnfelt and Nilsson, published in 2025, found equivalent outcomes from an 8-day intensive treatment program for PTSD and complex PTSD compared to longer conventional treatment timelines.
The mechanism isn’t simply that more hours equals more progress. It’s that sustained immersion. Staying with difficult material long enough for real processing to occur, rather than touching it and then returning to a high-demand life for seven days. Changes what’s neurobiologically possible.
When Weekly Therapy Is the Right Clinical Choice
I want to be direct about when weekly therapy is genuinely the appropriate clinical recommendation. Because the case for intensives isn’t a case against weekly therapy. It’s a case for choosing the right format for the right person at the right stage.
Consider Carmen, 34, a product manager just beginning her therapeutic journey. She’s never been in therapy before. The idea of looking at her interior life feels both necessary and somewhat daunting. She has a lot of coping mechanisms in place, and she can sense that some of them are adaptive and some of them aren’t, but she doesn’t yet know which is which. For Carmen, weekly therapy isn’t just a preference. It’s the clinical recommendation. She needs time to build trust with a therapist. She needs the slow accumulation of corrective relational experience that a consistent therapeutic attachment provides. She needs the week between sessions to observe how new insights land in the texture of her actual life.
Weekly therapy is the right format when the client is early in treatment and building a therapeutic foundation. When the client’s nervous system has a limited window of tolerance for emotional processing. Meaning she becomes overwhelmed or shut down easily. The slower pace protects against re-traumatization. When a client’s external circumstances are unstable or high-stress, weekly contact provides reliable support without demanding more processing capacity than she can currently sustain. And for clients healing developmental trauma. The early relational injuries that arise from years of inconsistent or insufficient attunement. The consistent, long-term relational experience of weekly therapy is itself a core part of the intervention. The reliable presence of a secure therapeutic relationship, week after week, is healing in a way that no intensive program replaces.
When Intensive Formats Offer a Clinical Advantage
The clinical case for intensive formats is strongest when a specific set of conditions converge. Conditions that are remarkably common in driven women seeking support.
The first condition is a plateau in existing weekly therapy. This is what Simone described: genuine progress, genuine engagement, and a persistent stuck point that the weekly format hasn’t broken through. The plateau isn’t a sign that therapy isn’t working. It’s often a sign that the format has hit its structural limit. That the issues need a sustained, immersive container that 50 minutes once a week can’t provide.
The second condition is a compressed professional schedule that makes consistent weekly appointments difficult to maintain over time. Driven women in high-pressure roles. Surgeons, trial attorneys, senior executives, entrepreneurs navigating a launch. Often find that the relentless demands of their professional context make weekly therapy feel like one more obligation they’re failing to honor perfectly. An intensive block. Three to five concentrated days. Can provide more therapeutic work than months of weekly sessions, in a format that fits into the structure of a driven life.
The third condition is a specific crisis or major life transition requiring more intensive support than weekly sessions provide: a significant loss, a relationship rupture, a professional collapse that is forcing a fundamental identity renegotiation. In these moments, the measured pace of weekly therapy can feel profoundly insufficient for what’s actually needed. A more concentrated intervention can provide the level of support and processing the moment requires.
The fourth condition is complex trauma that has multiple layers, extensive history, and strong defensive structures. The kind that weekly therapy approaches slowly and carefully but that sometimes needs a concentrated sustained engagement to break through the upper layers to where the real work can happen. For this population especially, the research on intensive trauma treatment. Including Voorendonk and de Jongh’s foundational work. Suggests that intensive formats can be not just faster but more effective, because they allow for the kind of sustained processing that complex presentations require. You can learn more about trauma-informed therapy in my practice and how I think about intensity and pacing.
Both/And: Weekly and Intensive Therapy as Complements
The most effective framework is not weekly versus intensive. It’s weekly and intensive, used at different moments in service of the same therapeutic arc.
Charlotte, 48, a chief operating officer, had been in weekly therapy for four years. She’d made genuine progress. Her understanding of her own patterns was sophisticated, her coping resources were real. But she’d been stuck at the same stuck point for three years: a persistent sense of inadequacy that didn’t respond to cognitive work, that appeared most reliably in professional situations that activated old relational dynamics. With her therapist’s guidance, she completed a five-day trauma intensive. What she described coming out of it: “Something broke open that I couldn’t break open in four years of Tuesdays. And now I know what I’m working on.”
She returned to weekly therapy after the intensive. The weekly work became different. More targeted, more depth-oriented, building on the breakthrough rather than circling it. The intensive served as a catalyst. The weekly work served as the consolidation container. Each format doing what it does best, in service of the same person’s healing.
In my work with clients exploring intensive treatment formats, the question is never just about speed. It is about what kind of healing the nervous system is ready to receive and integrate.
This is both/and in practice. Intensive formats are not a wholesale replacement for the long-term relational work of weekly therapy. Especially for developmental trauma, where the consistent presence of a secure therapeutic relationship is itself the primary therapeutic mechanism. But intensive formats can serve as powerful catalysts within a longer therapeutic process: breaking stuck points, enabling concentrated work during transitions, and providing the depth of immersion that weekly contact can’t consistently produce.
My practice is intentionally structured to hold this both/and. I offer ongoing weekly therapy and specialized intensive work because I’ve seen clearly, over more than 15,000 clinical hours, that different stages of healing require different formats. The question isn’t which one is better. The question is which one is right for where you are right now. Fixing the Foundations™ is built on a similar principle. Structured depth work that can complement whatever format of individual therapy you’re currently engaged with.
The Systemic Lens: The 50-Minute Hour as an Insurance Artifact
I think it’s worth being explicit about the systemic reality here, because it has direct practical implications for how driven women make decisions about their care.
The 50-minute weekly session didn’t emerge from research establishing it as the most effective format for psychological healing. It emerged as the standard billable unit in mid-20th century insurance reimbursement. Administratively convenient, easily standardized, compliant with the accounting needs of managed care. The clinical evidence was largely built around this format because it was the available format, not because it was designed as an optimal delivery mechanism.
Intensive therapy formats rarely fit insurance billing codes. Multi-day intensive programs are almost universally self-pay. Extended sessions may or may not be billable depending on how they’re coded and what the insurer permits. The result is a two-tier system: people with financial resources can access the format that clinical research increasingly supports as more effective for complex presentations, while people without those resources are constrained to the format that insurance will fund.
I name this not to imply that intensive therapy is simply “better”. As I’ve described, each format has distinct appropriate applications. I name it because driven women are accustomed to making strategic decisions with accurate information, and the framing they most often receive. That the 50-minute weekly session is the clinical standard and departures from it are exceptional. Is inaccurate. It’s a billing standard, not a clinical one. Understanding that distinction empowers you to have a more honest conversation with your therapist about what format actually serves your healing, rather than defaulting to what’s most familiar or most administratively convenient.
The Strong & Stable newsletter is where I continue to name these systemic realities honestly. The places where the mental health system is designed for something other than optimal individual outcomes, and what that means for driven women trying to make good decisions about their care.
How to Choose the Format That Fits Your Healing
If you’re a driven woman trying to decide whether to stay with weekly therapy, add more frequency, pursue an intensive, or some combination. Here’s how I’d frame the practical decision-making.
Start with an honest assessment of where you are in the therapeutic arc. If you’re early. If you’re still building trust with your therapist, still developing coping resources, still building the sense of safety that makes deeper work possible. Weekly therapy is right. Don’t rush it. The foundation has to be built before the structure goes up.
If you’ve been in weekly therapy for a sustained period, have made real progress, and have hit a persistent stuck point. If you’re using the first half of each session to rebuild what eroded during the week. That’s worth naming directly with your therapist. Ask: “Is my plateau a sign that I need more frequency, a different modality, or a more intensive format?” A skilled therapist will welcome that conversation and engage it honestly rather than defensively.
You've been holding everything together. You're allowed to put some down.
A focused self-paced course on overfunctioning, achievement-first self-concept, and the trauma response that masquerades as a personality. Not a productivity problem. Not a boundary problem. A nervous system that learned competence was the only safety.
If your schedule makes consistent weekly appointments genuinely difficult to sustain, explore flexible formats: extended sessions (90 minutes rather than 50), bi-weekly extended sessions, or an intensive block that concentrates a significant amount of work into a shorter period. The goal is finding a format you can actually sustain, not ideal contact that your schedule makes impossible.
If you’re considering an intensive program, rigorously vet it. Intensive trauma work stirs real emotional material. The container needs to be held by a licensed clinician with specific training in intensive formats and complex trauma. Not a coach, not a facilitator, not a retreat leader without clinical credentials. The intensity of the work makes the quality of the clinical container more important, not less. A consultation is a good place to have this conversation honestly, with someone who can assess your specific situation and help you think through what format is actually indicated.
Healing isn’t one-size-fits-all. The format that serves you best will shift over the course of the work, and a good therapist tracks those shifts and names them. What matters most is that you’re in a format that actually moves the work forward. Not one that feels familiar, not one that your insurance makes easiest, but one that matches what your nervous system needs and your goals require right now.
There’s a conversation I have regularly with driven women who are considering intensive work, and it tends to surface a particular form of resistance that’s worth naming: the belief that wanting more intensive support is a sign of severity, or of something being fundamentally wrong with them in a way that weekly therapy can’t hold. This is a misunderstanding that I want to address directly. Intensive therapy isn’t exclusively for people in crisis. It’s for people who want to move faster, for people whose schedules make sustained weekly contact genuinely difficult, and for people who have hit a ceiling that the weekly format isn’t structured to break through. It’s a format choice, not a severity designation. Many of the women who come to me for intensive work are high-functioning, deeply capable, and doing exactly what a driven professional does when she identifies an inefficiency: looking for a better way.
Megan, 43, a surgeon who had been in weekly therapy for two years, made the choice to pursue a five-day intensive after a conversation with her therapist in which she said: “I need to make progress faster. I have limited time in my life for this, and the pace isn’t matching my goals.” Her therapist. Skilled and appropriately receptive. Validated that the weekly format was creating a structural limitation and helped her find an intensive program. The intensive produced, in five days, a shift in her relationship to a specific set of childhood memories that had been the fixed point around which two years of weekly work had been orbiting. Coming out of it, she described the weekly therapy that followed as “finally being in first gear instead of neutral.” The intensive hadn’t replaced the ongoing work. It had made the ongoing work tractable in a way it hadn’t been before.
The point I want to drive home is this: the format conversation belongs in your clinical relationship. It belongs on the table, as an active variable, rather than as something that’s simply assumed based on what your insurance covers or what’s most convenient. If you’ve been in weekly therapy for a year or more and you’re asking yourself whether there’s a faster way. That question is valid and worth bringing to your therapist directly. A therapist who is invested in your progress rather than simply in your continued attendance will engage that question with you honestly. And if the answer is that your current pace is actually appropriate. That more intensity would overwhelm your current capacity for integration. That’s important clinical information too. What matters is that the question is asked and answered based on what actually serves your healing, not on what the system happens to offer by default.
The free consultation in my practice is specifically designed for this kind of conversation: assessing where someone is in their healing, what format might serve them best, and what the arc of that work could look like. If you’re asking the question Simone was asking. Is there a faster way that doesn’t sacrifice depth. That consultation is the place to start finding your answer.
Q: How often should I see a therapist for complex trauma?
A: The optimal frequency for complex trauma is highly individual and should be determined by your nervous system’s capacity for processing, your life’s demands, and the current stage of your therapeutic work. For many women with complex presentations, weekly therapy is sufficient at some stages and insufficient at others. The most honest answer is: this should be an active, ongoing conversation with your therapist. Not a default that’s never examined.
Q: Are therapy intensives worth the cost?
A: For many driven women who have hit a plateau in weekly therapy or whose schedules make consistent weekly appointments difficult, intensives can represent extraordinary clinical value. Achieving in days what weekly therapy might take months or years to produce. That said, the value depends entirely on the quality of the clinical container and whether the intensive format is actually indicated for your presentation. An intensive with the right clinician at the right moment in your therapeutic arc is one of the most efficient investments in your healing you can make.
Q: Is twice-weekly therapy better than once-weekly?
A: For certain presentations. Especially complex trauma, or when significant momentum is needed. Twice-weekly therapy offers real advantages. The increased frequency maintains therapeutic momentum, allows for more continuous processing, and provides more consistent nervous system support. But it needs to be balanced against your actual capacity for integration. More contact is only advantageous if your nervous system can absorb and use it. Your therapist should be the one helping you assess that, not your schedule or your ambition about your own healing.
Q: Can I do a therapy intensive and then return to weekly therapy?
A: Absolutely. And this is often the most effective structure. The intensive breaks through a stuck point or provides concentrated work during a critical moment, and the subsequent weekly therapy consolidates the gains and continues the longer-term relational work. These formats are genuinely complementary. Charlotte’s story above is a good clinical illustration of how this can work in practice.
Q: What happens in a therapy intensive?
A: A therapy intensive involves concentrated therapeutic work over multiple consecutive hours or days. The specific modalities vary. EMDR, IFS, Somatic Experiencing, and other trauma-focused approaches are common. But the defining feature is sustained, immersive engagement with difficult material. Quality intensives include structured integration practices between processing blocks: somatic movement, guided journaling, mindfulness, and other activities that support the brain’s consolidation of what the therapy is stirring. The experience is intense by design. The container has to be held by someone with the clinical credentials to work safely with what it produces.
Q: Will insurance cover intensive therapy?
A: Generally, no. Standard insurance billing codes are built around the 50-minute weekly session, and intensive formats typically fall outside those parameters. This is a real access inequity, and it means that intensive therapy is primarily available on a self-pay basis. Check with your insurer directly, but don’t let coverage limitations be the deciding factor in your clinical decision-making if an intensive format is genuinely indicated.
Q: How do I know if I need more than weekly therapy?
A: The clearest signals are: you’re experiencing a persistent plateau despite consistent engagement, you’re using significant session time rebuilding what eroded during the week, your symptoms are not meaningfully changing over months of weekly work, or your schedule is so compressed that consistent weekly contact is genuinely untenable. Any of these warrants an honest conversation with your therapist about whether the format is serving the work or whether a change. In frequency, duration, or intensity. Would move things forward.
Q: What’s the difference between an intensive outpatient program and a therapy intensive?
A: An Intensive Outpatient Program (IOP) is a structured, higher level of care typically offered by treatment centers. Often for mental health or substance use. Involving multiple group and individual sessions per week over several hours a day. A private practice therapy intensive is a more individualized, concentrated block of one-on-one sessions designed to accelerate work on specific presenting issues, most commonly trauma-related. Both are intensive; the private practice version typically offers more individualization and flexibility, while an IOP offers more structured programming and often includes peer group work.
Related Reading
Wampold, Bruce E. “How Important Are the Common Factors in Psychotherapy? An Update.” World Psychiatry 14, no. 3 (2015): 270, 277..
Voorendonk, Eline M., Ad de Jongh, Lena Rozendaal, and Agnes van Minnen. “Trauma-Focused Treatment Outcome for Complex PTSD Patients: Results of an Intensive Treatment Programme.” European Journal of Psychotraumatology 11, no. 1 (2020): 1783955. PMID: 33029323. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2020.1783955
Matthijssen, Suzy J.M.A., David P.G. van den Berg, and Ad de Jongh. “The Effects of an Intensive Outpatient Treatment for PTSD.” European Journal of Psychotraumatology 15, no. 1 (2024): 2341548. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2024.2341548
Robinson, Laura, Jaime Delgadillo, and Stephen Kellett. “The Dose-Response Effect in Routinely Delivered Psychological Therapies: A Systematic Review.” Psychotherapy Research 30, no. 1 (2020): 79, 96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2019.1566676
Gahnfelt, Helena, and Lina Nilsson. “8-Day Intensive Treatment Programme for PTSD and Complex PTSD: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” European Journal of Psychotraumatology 16, no. 1 (2025): 12444955. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2553422
Read Annie’s weekly essays on rebuilding after relational trauma.
Weekly Substack essays from Annie Wright, LMFT on relational trauma, recovery, and the House of Life framework. For driven women who want a structured path back to themselves.
WAYS TO WORK WITH ANNIE
Individual Therapy
Trauma-informed therapy for driven women healing relational trauma. Licensed in 11 jurisdictions.
Executive Coaching
Trauma-informed coaching for driven women navigating leadership and burnout.
Fixing the Foundations
Annie’s signature course for relational trauma recovery. Work at your own pace.
Strong & Stable
The Sunday conversation you wished you’d had years earlier. 25,000+ subscribers.
Annie Wright, LMFT
LMFT · Relational Trauma Specialist · W.W. Norton Author
Helping driven women finally feel as good as their résumé looks.
Annie Wright is a licensed psychotherapist (LMFT #95719) and trauma-informed executive coach with over 15,000 clinical hours. She works with driven women. Including Silicon Valley leaders, physicians, and entrepreneurs. In repairing the psychological foundations beneath their impressive lives. Annie is the founder and former CEO of Evergreen Counseling, a multimillion-dollar trauma-informed therapy center she built, scaled, and successfully exited. A regular contributor to Psychology Today, her expert commentary has appeared in Forbes, Business Insider, Inc., NBC, and The Information. She is currently writing her first book with W.W. Norton.
Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist (LMFT #95719)
15,000+ direct clinical hours
California · Connecticut · Washington DC · Florida · Maine · Maryland · New Hampshire · New Jersey · Texas · Virginia · Washington
Creator of House of Life™ and Fixing the Foundations™
The Everything Years (W.W. Norton)
Founder & former CEO, Evergreen Counseling
Regular contributor to Psychology Today. Expert commentary has appeared in Forbes, Business Insider, Inc., NBC, and The Information.
