Signs of Emotional Neglect in Childhood That Most Adults Don’t Recognize
Childhood emotional neglect doesn’t always look like harm. For many driven women, it looked like a perfectly fine upbringing. This post walks through the quiet, often unrecognized signs that the emotional environment of your childhood fell short, from freezing when someone asks what you need, to apologizing for having feelings, to a persistent sense of being too much and never enough at once. If this sounds familiar, you’re not alone, and it’s not your fault.
- When “I’m Fine” Is the Only Answer You Know
- What Is Childhood Emotional Neglect?
- Why the Signs Stay Hidden
- The Unrecognized Signs: What Emotional Neglect Looks Like in Adults
- Why Driven Women Are the Last to See It
- Both/And: You Can Have Had Good Parents and Still Have Been Emotionally Neglected
- The Systemic Lens: When Whole Cultures Normalize Emotional Neglect
- The Path Forward: How to Begin Healing What Was Never Named
- Frequently Asked Questions
When “I’m Fine” Is the Only Answer You Know
Picture this: you’re sitting across from a colleague you trust, someone who genuinely cares, and they ask, simply, What do you need right now?
If your nervous system learned the safest way to exist was to manage everyone else's world, my self-paced course Enough Without the Effort is the recovery map.
The question lands like a small stone dropped into still water. Your mind reaches for an answer, and then nothing. A blank. A kind of interior white noise where a feeling should be.
You smile. You say, “Oh, I’m fine.” Part of you means it, because you genuinely don’t know the alternative.
This moment, unremarkable and almost embarrassing in its smallness, is one of the clearest signatures of childhood emotional neglect. Not dramatic. Not obvious. Just a quiet, years-long gap where emotional attunement should have lived.
In my work with driven women, I see this moment play out constantly: in offices and therapy rooms, in marriages and on leadership retreats, in the quiet dark of 2 a.m. when nothing is wrong and yet everything feels hollow. The women I work with are often extraordinarily capable. They’re the ones everyone else calls in a crisis, and almost none of them know, without prompting, what they feel, or what they need, or that this gap has a name.
This article is about the signs of childhood emotional neglect that most adults never connect to their past: the subtle, persistent markers that get mislabeled as personality traits, ambition, or just “the way I am.” Naming them is, for many women, the first moment anything has ever truly fit. We’ll cover what emotional neglect actually is, why it’s so hard to see, the specific signs to look for in your own life, and what it looks like to begin healing what was never named.
What Is Childhood Emotional Neglect?
Before we can name the signs, we need to name the thing itself, because “neglect” conjures images most people who experienced it don’t recognize. No locked doors. No dramatic absences. Often, not even unkind parents.
Childhood emotional neglect is, at its core, a failure of attunement. It’s what happens when a child’s emotional world, her feelings, her needs, her interior life, is consistently unmet, minimized, or simply not seen. It’s not usually about what parents did. It’s about what they didn’t do.
Childhood emotional neglect describes a caregiver’s chronic failure to notice, validate, or adequately respond to a child’s emotional needs, even in the absence of overt abuse. Unlike physical neglect, it is defined by absence rather than by harmful acts, and it leaves no visible marks and produces few concrete memories, which makes it one of the most underrecognized forms of relational harm.
In plain terms: Your feelings were present as a child, but there was no one reliably there to receive them, reflect them back, or help you make sense of them. Over time, you learned to stop bringing them forward. That learned silence doesn’t disappear in adulthood. It just gets more polished.
What makes emotional neglect in driven women particularly difficult to identify is that it often coexists with functional, caring, even loving families. Parents may have been present, provider-focused, hardworking, and well-intentioned. The food was on the table. The school fees were paid. Achievements were celebrated. And yet the emotional layer, the mirroring, the curiosity about your inner world, the permission to feel and be held in those feelings, was thin or absent.
That gap doesn’t announce itself. It accumulates. By adulthood, it feels less like a wound and more like a personality.
For more on the broader landscape of neglect and its roots in childhood trauma, this site offers extensive reading. But this article goes narrow and specific: the signs. The ones that don’t look like damage. The ones that get mistaken for grit, self-sufficiency, or emotional maturity, until they don’t.
Why the Signs Stay Hidden
One of the most disorienting things about childhood emotional neglect is that it’s essentially invisible, not just to the people around you, but to your own memory of your past. You can’t point to a single incident. There’s no narrative of harm, only a chronic, ordinary absence of emotional responsiveness, and absence doesn’t generate the kind of memory traces that more obvious harm does.
But the nervous system registers it anyway. Early relational experience shapes how a developing brain learns to process and regulate feeling. When a child’s emotional signals are consistently met with blankness or dismissal, the brain learns, at a structural level, to suppress those signals. The pathways that connect felt emotional experience to conscious awareness don’t develop with the same richness. The result, in adult life, is a kind of emotional static: feelings that arrive muffled, late, or not at all. This phenomenon has a clinical name.
From the Greek meaning “no words for feelings,” alexithymia describes a reduced ability to identify, describe, and differentiate one’s own emotional states. Research links alexithymia to disruptions in early relational attunement, particularly the caregiver-infant exchanges that lay the foundation for emotional self-regulation (PMID: 42442670). Alexithymia exists on a spectrum, from mild difficulty naming feelings to near-complete emotional blankness, and it shows measurable ties to how connected different regions of the brain are at rest (PMID: 42431323).
In plain terms: Someone asks how you feel, and you genuinely don’t know. Not because you’re withholding, but because the emotional signal never made it to the surface clearly enough to name. This isn’t a character flaw. It’s a learned adaptation from an environment that didn’t help you develop that internal language.
Recognizing and naming emotion is, in fact, a skill that develops through practice and modeling rather than something a person is simply born knowing how to do. Daniel Goleman, the American psychologist and science journalist who popularized the concept of emotional intelligence, has written about how the capacity to name and work with feeling can be taught and strengthened well into adulthood. If you struggle to say what you feel, it doesn’t mean something is permanently wrong with you. It means a skill didn’t get built on schedule, and skills can still be built.
The academic roots of that idea go back further. Peter Salovey, the social psychologist who co-originated the academic concept of emotional intelligence, helped establish that the ability to perceive and manage emotion is a distinct, learnable capacity, not a fixed personality trait. For a woman who grew up where feelings were rarely named aloud, this is genuinely useful news: the deficit was environmental, not innate.
Part of what gets disrupted is even more basic than vocabulary. Paul Ekman, known for his pioneering research on emotional expression, has shown how much emotional communication happens through subtle facial and bodily cues long before words enter the picture. Children learn to read their own internal states partly through a caregiver’s face mirroring their experience back to them. When that mirroring is thin or inconsistent, the child misses out on the felt confirmation that her internal states are real and worth attending to.
The signs of neglect in adulthood are the long echo of that early shaping. They don’t feel like symptoms of a deprived childhood. They feel like self.
The Unrecognized Signs: What Emotional Neglect Looks Like in Adults
What follows isn’t a diagnostic checklist. It’s a map: interior experiences and behavioral patterns that, taken together, point toward a childhood emotional environment that didn’t fully meet a child’s needs. You may recognize all of them, or three. Either way, recognition is the beginning.
1. You Freeze When Someone Asks “What Do You Need?”
Not because you’re overwhelmed, and not because you’re being polite. You genuinely don’t know. You might deflect, Oh, whatever works for you, or pivot to what the other person needs instead.
This isn’t people-pleasing. It’s the lived result of growing up where your needs weren’t reliably met, so you stopped tracking them. If no one ever asked, the brain learned: don’t bother generating a signal.
2. You Don’t Know What You Feel Until Long After the Fact
Feelings arrive late, or sideways. You might find yourself crying in the car three hours after a hard conversation and only then realize, Oh. That hurt. In the moment, nothing registers clearly. You manage, you function, you’re composed. Later, sometimes much later, the emotional information surfaces.
This is alexithymia in its milder, common form, related to nervous system regulation. It’s not numbness exactly. It’s a delay, as though the feeling is happening in another room and you’re hearing it through a wall. Many of the women I work with describe feeling “disconnected,” like they’re watching their own lives from a slight remove.
3. You Apologize for Having Feelings
You cry and immediately say, I’m sorry, I don’t know why I’m being so emotional. You feel anger and call it “overreacting” before anyone else does. The emotion arrives, and the second motion is always to make it smaller.
This pattern learned itself in childhood. If your emotional expressions were met with dismissal (“there’s no reason to be upset”), you internalized a voice that apologizes for your feelings, closely tied to perfectionism. In adulthood, this shows up as a woman who manages everyone else’s comfort while suppressing her own.
4. You’re Chronically, Exhaustingly Self-Sufficient
You don’t ask for help. Not really. Logistical help, sure, but emotional help, the kind where you say I’m struggling and I need support, feels almost impossible. It feels like an imposition, proof of something shameful about you.
In the context of childhood emotional neglect, self-sufficiency describes a defensive style of independence that develops when a child learns her emotional needs will go unmet or will burden others. Rather than reflecting genuine ease with autonomy, this adaptation is protective: it minimizes the risk of disappointment by removing the need to ask at all.
In plain terms: Being “so strong” and “so independent” can be a genuine strength and also a scar. You built a self that doesn’t need anyone because needing anyone once felt unsafe or futile. That’s not a character flaw. It’s armor that once made sense.
The child who learned that her needs went unmet or created discomfort for others develops a self-sufficient style that serves her well outside and costs her privately, making self-trust genuinely difficult. She’s the one everyone describes as “so strong,” and the one who has no idea how to let anyone in.
5. You Over-Function in Relationships
You’re the planner, the initiator, the one who checks in, in friendships, partnerships, and family systems. You monitor other people’s emotional states with exquisite sensitivity. Your own internal state often goes untracked, unspoken, unaddressed.
This is the pattern of a child who learned love was something to earn through attentiveness to others, a dynamic that often surfaces later as anxious attachment. Her needs were background noise. That asymmetry shows up in every intimate relationship until it’s named.
6. Compliments Make You Uncomfortable
Someone tells you that you did something beautifully, and they mean it. Something in you contracts. You deflect, minimize, immediately identify what you could have done better. Receiving positive regard genuinely feels awkward, even threatening.
When a child’s worth wasn’t reflected back with warmth, she never developed a comfortable relationship with being seen. Praise bounces off, or lands as pressure. You can achieve extraordinary things and still feel uncomfortable being celebrated.
7. You Feel Like a Burden When You Have Needs
Not just with new people, but people who have proven they care. The voice is there: This is too much. Learning clear boundaries helps unwind this.
This belief isn’t rational, and most women who carry it know that intellectually, but the body doesn’t respond to argument. The felt sense was laid down in an environment where expressing needs generated no response, or visible discomfort. The child’s brain concluded: I am a burden. That conclusion runs on autopilot.
8. You Have Almost No Memories of Emotional Comfort in Childhood
Ask someone with a warm attachment history to recall a time a parent comforted them, and they’ll have something specific: a moment, a felt sense. Ask a woman who grew up with emotional neglect, and there’s often a long pause. I know my parents loved me. I just can’t remember specific moments.
Sometimes parents were present but awkward with distress. They’d fix, distract, or leave. The child was loved but not held in her feelings, a gap central to attachment theory. Those absences generate a sense that comfort happens to other people.
9. You Intellectualize Your Emotional Life
You can describe your childhood with impressive analytical clarity. What you can’t always do is feel it in the room: a warmth in the chest, a grief in the throat, an aliveness in the body when you talk about something that mattered to you.
Intellectualizing was, for many women who grew up emotionally unseen, the only form of processing available. Thinking was safe. Feeling wasn’t, because no one was there to receive it. In executive coaching with driven women, I see this constantly: extraordinary minds that route all experience through analysis, and bodies exhausted from being bypassed.
You've been holding everything together. You're allowed to put some down.
A focused self-paced course on overfunctioning, achievement-first self-concept, and the trauma response that masquerades as a personality. Not a productivity problem. Not a boundary problem. A nervous system that learned competence was the only safety.
10. You’re Fluent in Others’ Emotions and a Stranger to Your Own
You read a room in seconds. You know when your boss is anxious before they do. You sense shifts in your partner’s mood with uncanny accuracy. Asked how you are doing, not your work, not your responsibilities, you draw a genuine blank.
This asymmetry is the signature of the child whose belonging depended on reading her caregiver’s emotional state, related to window of tolerance. She became expert at tracking others. Her own experience was peripheral, practiced away. By adulthood, empathy for others is rich. Self-awareness takes real, effortful work.
Adina is a forty-one-year-old product director at a large tech company, known for her composure under pressure and her ability to read her team’s dynamics before anyone else names them. She came to therapy not because of a crisis but because of what she called “a low hum of nothing.” In our early sessions, she struggled to answer even simple check-in questions. How are you? She’d pause and describe what was happening at work. I’d gently redirect: And how do you feel about that? She’d pause again. I honestly don’t know, she told me in our third session. I can tell you exactly how my direct reports are feeling. I have no idea about myself.
Adina’s childhood had not been harsh. Her parents worked hard and were proud of her, but they were not emotionally curious people. When she was upset, they’d suggest solutions. When she cried, they’d get uncomfortable. She learned, over years, to stop crying in front of them, and eventually to stop tracking what might have made her cry at all. The attunement she couldn’t receive internally, she redirected outward, into becoming indispensable to others. It kept her from feeling the emptiness underneath.
Why Driven Women Are the Last to See It
There’s a particular cruelty in the way childhood emotional neglect intersects with ambition: the adaptations that helped you survive emotionally unseen circumstances are often the very traits that make you excellent at your work.
The self-sufficiency that developed because no one reliably responded to your needs made you capable and independent. The over-attunement to others’ emotional states made you a skilled leader. The drive to generate the external validation your environment couldn’t provide internally made you successful. The wound presents as a resume.
What I see consistently is that driven women are often the last to consider their childhoods as sources of present suffering, a pattern that can look a lot like complex PTSD hiding in plain sight, partly because they’ve been so successful, and the narrative of “I turned out fine” is deeply entrenched. Childhood emotional neglect also leaves few memories to point to. You can’t say, this happened, and that’s why I struggle. You can only say, something feels absent in me, and I don’t know why. That absence makes it easier to dismiss, and drives many women deeper into achievement, where at least there are clear metrics of self-worth. Ambition fills the gap. But the gap itself persists until it’s addressed directly.
Qualitative research on how people narrate difficult early experiences in their own words shows that the act of putting language to an unnamed history is itself part of what begins to loosen its grip (PMID: 42442146).
Both/And: You Can Have Had Good Parents and Still Have Been Emotionally Neglected
This is the piece that tends to produce the most resistance, and the most relief once it lands.
Both of these things can be true simultaneously: your parents loved you, and your emotional needs weren’t adequately met. Your childhood was safe, and it was also emotionally thin. Your parents were doing their best, and their best wasn’t enough, not because they were bad people, but because they were likely emotionally limited themselves.
Naming emotional neglect is not a condemnation. It’s a description, closely related to broader relational trauma work. One of the most important things I do clinically is create space for women to grieve the gap without having to simultaneously prosecute or defend their parents.
Aaliyah is a cardiologist who grew up in a household where love was expressed through provision and high expectation. Her parents emigrated to the United States, worked constantly, and were genuinely proud of her. She has no memory of being held when she cried, not because it never happened, but because it was so rare and so awkward when it did that nothing stuck. When we began working together, Aaliyah kept interrupting her own emotional observations with, But they really did love me. I know they did. Yes, I’d say. And. Tell me more about the times you were sad, and what happened next.
The “and” is not a loophole. It’s the whole point. Aaliyah’s parents loved her and were emotionally unavailable. Both things are true. The grief that followed, not for dramatic harm but for the ordinary, accumulated moments of not being seen, was some of the most important work she’d done. The cost, it turned out, was the weight of unfelt feelings that had nowhere to go.
“When someone with the authority of a teacher describes the world and you are not in it, there is a moment of psychic disequilibrium, as if you looked into a mirror and saw nothing.”
Adrienne Rich, “Invisibility in Academe” (1986)
Childhood emotional neglect works the same way, at a smaller and earlier scale. When the people describing your world, your caregivers, never quite described your feelings, you looked for yourself in the mirror of their attention and found less than you needed. If you’re navigating this dual reality, loving your family of origin and grieving what they couldn’t give, that’s not confusion. That’s the both/and. It’s not a contradiction to resolve. It’s a complexity to be held.
The Systemic Lens: When Whole Cultures Normalize Emotional Neglect
It would be incomplete to talk about childhood emotional neglect without naming what made it easy to miss: most of us grew up in cultures that discouraged emotional attunement and called that discouragement by other names. Strength. Resilience.
Western, achievement-oriented cultures have historically treated emotional expressiveness as weakness, especially in girls who grow into driven women. “Big girls don’t cry.” “We didn’t have the luxury of feelings.” These aren’t just individual parental responses. They’re cultural scripts, repeated across generations, normalizing the dismissal of children’s emotional lives as a form of toughening them up.
Immigrant and first-generation families often carry an additional layer: parents who survived genuine hardship, whose emotional suppression was a survival mechanism, and who could not always access the emotional resources their children needed because those resources had never been available to them either. This isn’t a judgment. It’s a recognition of how poverty, displacement, and cultural context shape the emotional bandwidth parents can offer. Broader research on adverse early experiences suggests these effects can echo for decades, shaping even cognitive health much later in life (PMID: 42375788).
Achievement-oriented environments, highly educated families, academically intense schools, tend to over-index on cognitive development and under-index on emotional development. Children learn early that what matters is performance: grades, awards, productivity. The child who grows up there learns to value herself instrumentally, through what she accomplishes, and to experience her emotional needs as inefficiencies.
Gender plays a role too. Girls are often socialized to prioritize relational harmony over authentic emotional expression, to manage others’ feelings, to be pleasant and agreeable. The result is often sophisticated surface competence in navigating others’ emotions alongside deep unfamiliarity with their own.
None of this makes individual parents less responsible for their children’s emotional development. But parents who were themselves neglected, shaped by cultures that dismissed emotional life, were, in many cases, doing what they knew. Family-level interventions that explicitly teach emotional responsiveness have been shown to improve how families function together, which suggests these patterns are not fixed (PMID: 42416657). Changing the pattern requires naming the cultural water we’re all swimming in and choosing to swim differently.
The Path Forward: How to Begin Healing What Was Never Named
The first step, and it’s not a small one, is recognition. Not “I’m just not emotional” or “I’ve always been this way,” but: the emotional environment of my childhood didn’t adequately meet my needs, and I’m carrying the shape of that today.
Emotional attunement describes a caregiver’s capacity to notice a child’s internal emotional state, respond to it with accuracy and warmth, and help the child understand and regulate what she’s feeling. It is built through thousands of small, repeated exchanges rather than any single grand gesture, and its steady presence or steady absence in childhood shapes how easily a person can identify and trust her own feelings as an adult.
In plain terms: Attunement is the difference between a caregiver saying “you seem really disappointed right now, tell me about it” and a caregiver saying nothing, or changing the subject. One teaches you that your feelings are real and worth attending to. The other teaches you to stop checking.
Recognition doesn’t require certainty. You need only an honest moment of: Some of this sounds familiar. I want to understand this. From there, several threads of healing tend to matter most.
Developing an emotional vocabulary. If you weren’t helped to build one in childhood, you can build it now. Checking in with your felt body experience multiple times a day, what is this sensation in my chest, where is the tension sitting, begins to create the interior language that early environments didn’t provide. Many women notice this alongside other signs you are healing from trauma. This is slow, sometimes frustrating work, and it’s also foundational.
Learning to tolerate receiving. Receiving care, compliments, help, being held in another person’s attention, is a skill for those of us who grew up without it. It feels exposing, even dangerous. Therapy offers a relational container to practice exactly this: to be seen, to receive care without deflecting it.
Grieving the gap. There is genuine grief in this work. Not for dramatic harm, but for the ordinary dailiness of a childhood that was emotionally thin. For the moments you were sad and no one came. That child deserves to be mourned. The grief is not wallowing. It’s the honest accounting of what was and wasn’t, and it’s what allows you to put down what you’ve been carrying.
Renegotiating your relational template. Much of what neglect installs is a kind of relational operating system: how to be in connection, how to ask for things, how to receive care. That system was written in childhood under conditions of emotional scarcity. In adult relationships, with a therapist, a partner, a trusted friend, it can be rewritten. Slowly, through repetition, through allowing yourself to be met and surviving the vulnerability of that.
You weren’t broken by what happened. You were shaped by it, and what was shaped can, with the right conditions, be reshaped. Not back to some imagined original wholeness, but forward, into something that is finally, genuinely yours. That process, of becoming legible to yourself, of learning your own emotional language, isn’t a side project. For driven women who’ve built entire lives on the outside while the inside stayed quiet, it’s often the most important work they’ll ever do.
Warmly, Annie.
Q: How do I know if what I experienced was emotional neglect or just a normal, not-very-expressive family?
A: The distinction isn’t always clear-cut. A useful question is: when you were distressed as a child, what happened? Was there someone who reliably came toward you emotionally, sat with you in it, helped you make sense of it? If the answer is consistently no, or if you genuinely can’t recall those moments, that points to emotional neglect. The impact on you, not the intent, is the best guide.
Q: I had a genuinely difficult childhood, with abuse or instability. Is this even the right frame for me?
A: Emotional neglect frequently co-occurs with other forms of childhood adversity. It isn’t an either-or. Children who experience abuse or chaos almost always also experience emotional neglect, because those environments rarely provide consistent attunement. The signs described here are likely still relevant, often as a layer of the work addressed alongside more acute processing.
Q: Can you heal from childhood emotional neglect as an adult, or is the window for this closed?
A: The window is not closed. The relational and emotional capacities that weren’t developed in childhood can still be developed in adulthood. Good therapy provides, in real time, the kind of attuned, responsive relationship that early environments didn’t. It’s slower work now than it would have been then, but it’s absolutely possible.
Q: I recognize these signs in myself, but when I try to talk to my partner about it, I shut down. Why?
A: This is common and understandable. Naming your emotional experience to someone who matters can activate the same patterns shaped by your original emotional environment. Your nervous system can respond to intimacy with hypervigilance even when the person across from you is safe. Shutting down is protection, not failure. Working with a therapist individually often creates the conditions where vulnerable expression becomes more possible.
Q: I’m a successful person with a full life. Do I really need to address something that happened so long ago?
A: Only you can answer that, but I’d offer this: these signs don’t resolve themselves through success, insight, or time alone. They tend to persist quietly, and expensively, until directly addressed. The cost is often the low hum of disconnection, the inability to fully receive love, the sense that something is missing even in a life that looks complete from the outside. If that resonates, addressing it is an investment in your actual lived experience, not just your achievements.
Q: What’s the difference between emotional neglect and having emotionally immature parents?
A: The two frequently overlap. Parents who struggle with their own emotional maturity often produce emotional neglect as a natural consequence of their limitations, responding in ways that are dismissive, avoidant, or inconsistently reactive. The result for the child is the same either way: emotional needs consistently unmet or invalidated.
Related Reading
Bagby RM. Alexithymia and its relationship to affective symptoms and disorders. (PMID: 42442670).
Holton E, et al. Resting-state functional connectivity and alexithymia. (PMID: 42431323).
Jaen M, et al. Adverse childhood experiences and cognitive health in older adults. (PMID: 42375788).
Colucci S, et al. Emotion-focused family therapy and family functioning. (PMID: 42416657).
Adams K, et al. A qualitative analysis of written narratives of early experience. (PMID: 42442146).
Rich, Adrienne. “Invisibility in Academe.” Blood, Bread, and Poetry: Selected Prose 1979-1985. W.W. Norton, 1986.
Read Annie’s weekly essays on rebuilding after relational trauma.
Weekly Substack essays from Annie Wright, LMFT on relational trauma, recovery, and the House of Life framework. For driven women who want a structured path back to themselves.
WAYS TO WORK WITH ANNIE
Individual Therapy
Trauma-informed therapy for driven women healing relational trauma. Licensed in 15 U.S. jurisdictions, including Colorado (telehealth only).
Executive Coaching
Trauma-informed coaching for driven women navigating leadership and burnout.
Fixing the Foundations
Annie’s signature course for relational trauma recovery. Work at your own pace.
Strong & Stable
The Sunday conversation you wished you’d had years earlier. 25,000+ subscribers.
Annie Wright, LMFT
LMFT · Relational Trauma Specialist · W.W. Norton Author
Helping driven women finally feel as good as their resume looks.
Annie Wright is a licensed psychotherapist (LMFT #95719) and trauma-informed executive coach with over 15,000 clinical hours. She works with driven women, including Silicon Valley leaders, physicians, and entrepreneurs, in repairing the psychological foundations beneath their impressive lives. She is licensed across 15 U.S. jurisdictions, including Colorado (telehealth only), including California, Colorado (telehealth only), Connecticut, District of Columbia, Florida, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Texas, Utah, Virginia, and Washington. Annie is the founder and former CEO of Evergreen Counseling, a multimillion-dollar trauma-informed therapy center she built, scaled, and successfully exited. A regular contributor to Psychology Today, her expert commentary has appeared in Forbes, Business Insider, Inc., NBC, and The Information. She is currently writing her first book with W.W. Norton.
