By Annie Wright, LMFT · Licensed Marriage & Family Therapist (#95719)Clinically reviewed May 2026Jordan stares at her HR portal, hovering over the Family Medical Leave Act option while her calculator tallies the harsh reality: twelve weeks unpaid means mortgage plus groceries for four months. This article examines the financial trauma caregiving leave inflicts on driven women caught between eldercare and careers, revealing why FMLA’s protections often fall short and how systemic barriers deepen the crisis.
Last reviewed: June 2026 by Annie Wright, LMFT
- Jordan Has Been Hovering on the FMLA Button for Eleven Minutes
- What FMLA Actually Covers (And What It Catastrophically Does Not)
- Why FMLA Is Structurally Inaccessible for Most Sandwich-Generation Women
- The Three Financial Traumas of Caregiving Leave. Income Loss, Healthcare Premium Spike, and Retirement Hole
- What Happens to Career Trajectory When a Driven Woman Takes Unpaid Leave at Mid-Career
- Both/And: You Are Entitled to This AND The System Is Designed to Make Entitlement Unaffordable
- The Architecture of Taking Leave Sustainably. Negotiating With HR, Stacking PTO, and the Quiet Compromises
- The Women Who Took FMLA and Came Back. What They Knew the Second Time
- Frequently Asked Questions
Jordan Has Been Hovering on the FMLA Button for Eleven Minutes
The “Request Leave” dropdown glows softly on Jordan’s second monitor. Her cursor hovers stubbornly over the third option: Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA). Eleven minutes have slipped by without a click. On the adjacent screen, her calculator app displays a grim sum. Twelve weeks unpaid multiplied by her after-tax monthly take-home pay. The final figure: her mortgage payment plus four months of groceries.
If you've earned the income but money still feels like chaos, my self-paced course Money Without the Mayhem works at the level where the actual problem lives.
Her phone pings. An email notification from her father’s care coordinator. The message reads, “We will need a family member present for the discharge meeting on Thursday.” Jordan is the only child, the default caregiver by necessity. No siblings to share the weight.
She breathes, the quiet hum of her apartment mixing with the soft morning light filtering through the blinds. “I have the right to take 12 weeks. I have the law on my side. I do not have the savings on my side. The law is real. The savings are also real. Both are real and I am the one holding them.” Her eyes fix on the button again. Time slows as her finger inches closer.
The tension between legal entitlement and financial reality pulses here, a silence pregnant with impossible choices that sandwich-generation women like Jordan face daily. The weight of caregiving is not only the physical presence at a hospital bedside or a discharge meeting but the invisible cost of pausing a life that has been meticulously built.
Jordan’s hesitation is more than a moment of indecision; it is a manifestation of profound systemic failure. The Family Medical Leave Act offers her a legal shield, yet it does not provide the economic scaffolding to protect her household. The conflict between her role as a caregiver and her role as a professional is a crucible where identity, responsibility, and survival collide.
This moment captures a broader reality: caregiving leave, especially under FMLA, is a crucible of financial and emotional trauma for many women caught in the sandwich generation. The personal becomes political here, as the law’s promise falters against the hard edge of economic necessity.
What FMLA Actually Covers (And What It Catastrophically Does Not)
The Family Medical Leave Act, enacted in 1993, grants eligible employees up to twelve workweeks of unpaid, job-protected leave within a 12-month period to care for a seriously ill family member or to address their own health conditions. For eligible servicemembers’ caregivers, this extends to twenty-six weeks. Yet, the law’s protections are fundamentally limited.
FMLA is a federal statute ensuring eligible employees unpaid, job-protected leave for qualifying family or personal medical reasons. Eligibility requires 12 months of employment and 1,250 hours worked in the previous year, among other criteria (U.S. Department of Labor).
In plain terms: If you’ve worked long enough and enough hours at your job, you can take time off to care for a seriously ill family member or yourself, and your job is protected, but you won’t get paid during that time.
Though the law’s job protection is vital, it fails to guarantee income replacement, leaving caregivers to face the brutal reality of unpaid leave. Additionally, FMLA does not cover caregiving beyond certain family members, excludes part-time workers, and does not mandate benefits continuation beyond health insurance premiums. Which may increase. Or retirement contributions.
The law’s eligibility criteria often exclude part-time workers, those in temporary or contract roles, and many hourly employees, categories where women, especially in caregiving roles, are overrepresented. These exclusions create a patchwork of protection that leaves many vulnerable to job loss or retaliation when caregiving demands arise.
Furthermore, FMLA’s definition of “family member” is narrow: typically limited to spouse, child, or parent. This excludes caregiving for siblings, grandparents, or other relatives who may be in critical need, a gap that slices deeply into the realities of multigenerational caregiving inherent to the sandwich generation.
The law’s silence on paid leave means caregivers must rely on employer generosity, state laws, or personal savings. While some states and employers offer paid family leave, this is uneven and often insufficient. The stark absence of income during leave forces many women to choose between caregiving and financial solvency.
Psychiatrist and trauma researcher Bessel van der Kolk, MD, has emphasized how financial insecurity compounds trauma responses, impairing emotional regulation and cognitive function. For caregivers, the stress of unpaid leave can exacerbate psychological distress, creating a feedback loop where financial trauma deepens caregiving strain.
The FMLA’s gaps thus represent not merely policy omissions but systemic blind spots that deepen the suffering of those who shoulder caregiving responsibilities. For women like Jordan, the law’s protections are a fragile lifeline stretched thin by economic realities.
In SG-S4, the section called Jordan Has Been Hovering on the FMLA Button for Eleven Minutes needs to be read as more than advice about time management. For a reader searching for fmla-caregiving-cant-afford-women-career, the pressure has already moved from the calendar into the body: she may be answering a parent’s call while rehearsing a work conversation, watching a teenager’s face for signs of disappointment, and scanning her own body for the moment she can safely stop performing competence. Pauline Boss, PhD gives language for ambiguous loss, but the clinical meaning becomes most visible in these ordinary moments, when the woman’s private life asks for tenderness at the same time her public life asks for precision.
The practical implication for FMLA You Can’t Afford to Take. The Financial Trauma of Caregiving Leave is that the solution cannot be reduced to a better list. For SG-S4, a list can still be useful, but the more important repair begins when the reader of FMLA You Can’t Afford to Take. The Financial Trauma of Caregiving Leave can separate present-day caregiving duties from inherited family training, identify which responsibilities require her adult consent, and notice where love has been confused with disappearance. In therapy or coaching, this distinction often becomes the first place the nervous system receives new information: she can remain devoted without consenting to be erased, and she can be responsible without becoming the only adult allowed to have no limits.
In SG-S4, the section called What FMLA Actually Covers (And What It Catastrophically Does Not) needs to be read as more than advice about time management. For a reader searching for fmla-caregiving-cant-afford-women-career, the pressure has already moved from the calendar into the family system: she may be answering a parent’s call while rehearsing a work conversation, watching a teenager’s face for signs of disappointment, and scanning her own body for the moment she can safely stop performing competence. Bruce McEwen, PhD gives language for allostatic load, but the clinical meaning becomes most visible in these ordinary moments, when the woman’s private life asks for tenderness at the same time her public life asks for precision.
The practical implication for FMLA You Can’t Afford to Take. The Financial Trauma of Caregiving Leave is that the solution cannot be reduced to a better list. For SG-S4, a list can still be useful, but the more important repair begins when the reader of FMLA You Can’t Afford to Take. The Financial Trauma of Caregiving Leave can separate present-day caregiving duties from inherited family training, identify which responsibilities require her adult consent, and notice where love has been confused with disappearance. In therapy or coaching, this distinction often becomes the first place the nervous system receives new information: she can remain devoted without consenting to be erased, and she can be responsible without becoming the only adult allowed to have no limits.
In SG-S4, the section called Why FMLA Is Structurally Inaccessible for Most Sandwich-Generation Women needs to be read as more than advice about time management. For a reader searching for fmla-caregiving-cant-afford-women-career, the pressure has already moved from the calendar into the work identity: she may be answering a parent’s call while rehearsing a work conversation, watching a teenager’s face for signs of disappointment, and scanning her own body for the moment she can safely stop performing competence. Steven Zarit, PhD gives language for caregiver burden, but the clinical meaning becomes most visible in these ordinary moments, when the woman’s private life asks for tenderness at the same time her public life asks for precision.
The practical implication for FMLA You Can’t Afford to Take. The Financial Trauma of Caregiving Leave is that the solution cannot be reduced to a better list. For SG-S4, a list can still be useful, but the more important repair begins when the reader of FMLA You Can’t Afford to Take. The Financial Trauma of Caregiving Leave can separate present-day caregiving duties from inherited family training, identify which responsibilities require her adult consent, and notice where love has been confused with disappearance. In therapy or coaching, this distinction often becomes the first place the nervous system receives new information: she can remain devoted without consenting to be erased, and she can be responsible without becoming the only adult allowed to have no limits.
In SG-S4, the section called The Three Financial Traumas of Caregiving Leave. Income Loss, Healthcare Premium Spike, and Retirement Hole needs to be read as more than advice about time management. For a reader searching for fmla-caregiving-cant-afford-women-career, the pressure has already moved from the calendar into the boundary: she may be answering a parent’s call while rehearsing a work conversation, watching a teenager’s face for signs of disappointment, and scanning her own body for the moment she can safely stop performing competence. Judith Herman, MD gives language for traumatic stress and recovery, but the clinical meaning becomes most visible in these ordinary moments, when the woman’s private life asks for tenderness at the same time her public life asks for precision.
The practical implication for FMLA You Can’t Afford to Take. The Financial Trauma of Caregiving Leave is that the solution cannot be reduced to a better list. For SG-S4, a list can still be useful, but the more important repair begins when the reader of FMLA You Can’t Afford to Take. The Financial Trauma of Caregiving Leave can separate present-day caregiving duties from inherited family training, identify which responsibilities require her adult consent, and notice where love has been confused with disappearance. In therapy or coaching, this distinction often becomes the first place the nervous system receives new information: she can remain devoted without consenting to be erased, and she can be responsible without becoming the only adult allowed to have no limits.
Why FMLA Is Structurally Inaccessible for Most Sandwich-Generation Women
Structural barriers make FMLA a distant promise rather than an accessible benefit for many women balancing multi-generational care. Women disproportionately occupy roles that lack the tenure or hours required to qualify. Many work in part-time, gig, or contract positions without FMLA protections. Even among eligible employees, unpaid leave is often unaffordable.
The sandwich generation predominantly comprises women. Estimates suggest nearly two-thirds of caregivers are female. They carry the invisible labor of caregiving at home and the emotional labor of professional roles, often without workplace accommodations or understanding.
“Addiction begins when a woman loses her handmade and meaningful life, and takes up instead the trance of perfection.”
Clarissa Pinkola Estés, PhD, Jungian analyst, Women Who Run With the Wolves
This dynamic forces many women into untenable compromises: choosing between financial survival and caregiving presence, or silently absorbing emotional trauma. The law’s design reflects systemic assumptions about caregiving as a private, unpaid responsibility rather than a societal-level concern demanding equitable support.
Joan Williams, JD, legal scholar, describes the “caregiver penalty,” the career and economic disadvantages women face from caregiving responsibilities that are often invisible to employers and lawmakers alike. Her work highlights how workplace cultures and policies fail to accommodate caregiving realities, especially for women in mid-career stages when caregiving demands peak.
Moreover, the intersection of race, class, and gender intensifies structural inaccessibility. Women of color and lower-income women disproportionately hold jobs without FMLA protections or paid leave, compounding financial vulnerability. The sandwich generation is not monolithic but layered with these disparities.
Psychologist and meditation teacher Tara Brach, PhD, speaks to the emotional isolation many women feel under these pressures, emphasizing the need for compassionate self-awareness amidst systemic neglect. The emotional labor of caregiving and the cognitive burden of managing complex leave arrangements compound to create chronic stress.
The result is a landscape where FMLA eligibility is necessary but far from sufficient. Women caught in the sandwich generation often must navigate a labyrinth of policies, workplace cultures, and financial constraints that render the law’s protections difficult to exercise without collateral damage.
The Three Financial Traumas of Caregiving Leave. Income Loss, Healthcare Premium Spike, and Retirement Hole
Taking unpaid leave under FMLA triggers three interlocking financial traumas that compound stress and risk for sandwich-generation women.
First, the immediate income loss is stark: no paychecks arrive for twelve weeks or more, forcing reliance on savings or debt. This sudden cessation can destabilize household budgets, forcing difficult choices about essentials like housing, food, and utilities. The psychological weight of this loss often mirrors the trauma of caregiving itself, as financial insecurity breeds anxiety and disrupts emotional resilience.
Second, healthcare premiums often spike during unpaid leave, as employers may require full premium payment without payroll deduction, threatening coverage continuity or financial strain. For many caregivers, maintaining health insurance is critical, not only for themselves but for dependents. The fear of losing coverage or accruing medical debt adds a layer of dread that compounds the caregiving burden.
Third, retirement contributions halt, creating a “retirement hole” that can take years to recover, diminishing long-term security. This gap is particularly pernicious because it is invisible in the present but compounds over decades. For women already facing wage penalties from caregiving, the retirement hole threatens financial independence in later life, perpetuating cycles of vulnerability.
Financial trauma refers to the psychological and physiological stress response triggered by sudden or chronic financial hardship, including loss of income, debt, or insecurity (Bruce McEwen, PhD, neuroscientist).
In plain terms: When money problems feel overwhelming and unsafe, your mind and body react just like with other kinds of trauma, making it harder to think clearly and feel secure.
The cumulative impact of these traumas is profound. Psychiatrist Judith Herman, MD, who pioneered research on complex PTSD, reminds us that trauma is not only about the event but about the ongoing conditions that prevent safety and recovery. Financial trauma from caregiving leave becomes a chronic stressor that undermines healing and stability.
Ambiguous loss theory, developed by family therapist Pauline Boss, PhD, further illuminates the experience of caregivers who endure shifting roles and uncertain futures while managing financial precarity. The loss is ambiguous because it defies clear closure, caregivers grieve the erosion of financial security even as they strive to provide care.
Jordan’s calculator tally silently reminds her: the law offers a right but not a cushion. The financial trauma of caregiving leave is a hidden wound that reverberates long after the leave ends, influencing mental health, relationships, and career trajectories.
What Happens to Career Trajectory When a Driven Woman Takes Unpaid Leave at Mid-Career
Leaving work for caregiving disrupts professional momentum, often at the very moment women’s careers are poised for advancement. Unpaid leave can stall promotions, reduce visibility, and create gaps that employers interpret. Consciously or unconsciously. As reduced commitment.
Michelle Budig, PhD, sociologist and economist, identifies the motherhood-like wage penalty that extends to caregiving leave, where women experience persistent wage and opportunity losses linked to caregiving roles. This penalty is compounded by workplace bias and structural barriers that undervalue caregiving as a legitimate professional consideration.
For driven women in mid-career, the stakes feel existential. The internal conflict of meeting caregiving duties while sustaining professional identity often triggers executive-function strain, anxiety, and feelings of invisibility. The “only-daughter default” intensifies pressure, as women like Jordan carry outsized family expectations without sibling buffers.
The tension between professional self and caregiving self is not simply a matter of time management but relational trauma and identity fracture. The career cost of eldercare caregiving is well documented, yet rarely openly acknowledged. Women may internalize stigma or guilt, feeling they must perform flawlessly in both spheres or risk professional marginalization.
This dynamic can lead to chronic stress and burnout, especially when compounded by financial insecurity. The trauma of caregiving leave thus extends beyond the immediate financial loss to undermine long-term career satisfaction and psychological well-being.
The workplace culture often lacks frameworks to support women in these dual roles, perpetuating isolation and invisibility. This gap calls for systemic change, but meanwhile, women must navigate a landscape fraught with risk and sacrifice.
Both/And: You Are Entitled to This AND The System Is Designed to Make Entitlement Unaffordable
Jordan’s dilemma embodies the paradox: she is legally entitled to FMLA leave, yet the system structurally makes taking that leave unaffordable. This both/and reality generates deep cognitive dissonance and moral injury.
“I stand in the ring in the dead city and tie on the red shoes. They are not mine, they are my mother’s, her mother’s before, handed down like an heirloom but hidden like shameful letters.”
Anne Sexton, “The Red Shoes”
The inherited cultural narrative around caregiving and work often frames women’s sacrifices as invisible duties, reinforcing systemic barriers. The caregiving penalty Joan Williams describes is not merely individual but embedded in workplace norms and policies.
Joan Williams, JD, defines the caregiver penalty as the career and economic disadvantages women face due to caregiving responsibilities, including lost wages, stalled promotions, and diminished retirement security.
In plain terms: When you take on caregiving, your job and paycheck often suffer in ways that are hard to fix later, even if you’re doing everything right.
This architecture discourages sustainable use of leave, forcing women into “quiet compromises” that sacrifice well-being and financial security. The tension between entitlement and affordability is a form of systemic trauma, where legal rights exist in theory but are effectively denied in practice.
The moral injury here is profound: women feel guilt for needing leave, shame for financial strain, and anger at a system that fails to support them. This constellation of feelings can erode self-worth and contribute to relational trauma within families and workplaces.
Recognizing this both/and reality is a step toward healing. It acknowledges the validity of entitlement alongside the brutal economic constraints, inviting compassion rather than blame.
The Architecture of Taking Leave Sustainably. Negotiating With HR, Stacking PTO, and the Quiet Compromises
Given FMLA’s unpaid nature, women like Jordan often must piece together a patchwork leave strategy to survive financially, stacking paid time off (PTO), vacation days, sick leave, and short-term disability where possible. This choreography requires intimate knowledge of employer policies and assertive negotiation with HR.
The spreadsheet isn't the problem. You already know that.
A focused self-paced course on financial trauma, the nervous-system patterns that override every budgeting app, every money mindset book, and every well-meaning financial planner. Not a productivity tool. The level underneath all of those.
Intermittent leave, taking FMLA in smaller increments, can offer flexibility but demands ongoing coordination and may strain workplace relationships.
Intermittent leave under FMLA allows eligible employees to take leave in separate blocks of time for a single qualifying reason, rather than one continuous period (U.S. Department of Labor).
In plain terms: You can take time off here and there to care for your family rather than all at once, but it takes extra planning and communication.
Negotiating sustainable leave also means navigating unspoken workplace norms and potential scrutiny, a stressor that magnifies emotional labor. Many women quietly absorb these burdens to protect their careers and families, sacrificing self-care and long-term financial health.
The skill of negotiating leave is often learned through trial and error, mentorship, or coaching. Understanding employer benefits, local and state laws, and workplace culture is essential. Some women successfully negotiate flexible schedules, remote work, or phased returns, softening the financial blow.
Michelle Budig, PhD, identifies this penalty as wage reductions and lost earnings associated with caregiving responsibilities, extending beyond motherhood to eldercare and other unpaid care roles.
In plain terms: Taking care of family, even beyond having kids, can reduce your wages and lifetime earnings, in ways that add up over time.
The quiet compromises women make may include returning to work before fully ready, foregoing benefits, or absorbing additional unpaid labor. These decisions reflect resilience but also highlight systemic failure to provide adequate caregiving support.
The emotional labor involved in managing these complex negotiations and compromises is itself a form of trauma, often unrecognized but deeply felt. Psychotherapist Annie Wright often emphasizes the importance of therapeutic support to process these experiences and build sustainable strategies.
The Women Who Took FMLA and Came Back. What They Knew the Second Time
Some women navigate the financial trauma of caregiving leave and return to work with new knowledge and strategies. They learn to advocate for themselves more effectively, prepare financially by building emergency savings, and seek workplace allies who understand the caregiving landscape.
Therapeutic support, executive coaching, and peer networks become vital resources in recalibrating identity and managing the psychological toll of dual roles. These women often embrace a both/and mindset: honoring their caregiving commitment while reclaiming professional agency.
Intermittent leave under FMLA allows eligible employees to take leave in separate blocks of time for a single qualifying reason, rather than one continuous period (U.S. Department of Labor).
In plain terms: You can take time off here and there to care for your family rather than all at once, but it takes extra planning and communication.
Their experience reflects the systemic tension: entitlement coexists with structural barriers. Healing involves not only financial planning but also addressing relational trauma and ambiguous loss woven into caregiving.
Communities of women in the sandwich generation amplify each other’s voices, illuminating possibilities beyond isolation and exhaustion. They embody resilience, not perfection.
In their stories, the wisdom of Judith Herman’s trauma recovery framework shines through: safety, remembrance, mourning, and reconnection. These women create spaces for authentic grief over lost career opportunities and financial stability, while forging new paths forward.
They also cultivate radical self-compassion, as Tara Brach teaches, learning to hold paradox and uncertainty without self-judgment. This internal shift supports sustainable caregiving and professional engagement.
Ultimately, the women who return from caregiving leave with greater clarity about boundaries, priorities, and their own worth, lessons that transform not only their careers but their relationships and sense of self.
,
Readers who recognize themselves in FMLA You Can’t Afford to Take. The Financial Trauma of Caregiving Leave may also want the adjacent Annie Wright resources on betrayal trauma and relational shock, relational trauma patterns, individual therapy with Annie, executive coaching for driven women, and Fixing the Foundations™. These are not detours from the caregiving question; they are often the surrounding terrain that explains why this particular load lands so deeply in the body.
Q: What does FMLA actually cover and what does it not?
FMLA guarantees up to twelve weeks of unpaid, job-protected leave for serious family or personal medical needs for eligible employees. It does not guarantee paid leave, full benefits continuation, or coverage for all caregiving situations. Eligibility rules and workplace policies can limit access, especially for part-time or short-tenured employees.
Q: Can I afford to take FMLA at mid-career as a sandwich-generation woman?
Many cannot afford the income loss without substantial savings or paid leave options. The financial trauma of unpaid leave includes lost wages, increased healthcare premiums, and retirement contribution gaps. Planning, negotiation, and community support are essential to mitigate these impacts.
Q: What’s intermittent FMLA and is it the better option for my situation?
Intermittent FMLA allows leave in separate blocks, providing flexibility for ongoing caregiving. It can help balance work and family demands but requires careful coordination with employers and may risk workplace strain. Whether it’s better depends on your caregiving needs and work environment.
Q: Will my employer punish me for taking caregiving leave?
FMLA protects your job legally, but subtle penalties, reduced opportunities, or workplace bias can occur. Building rapport with HR, documenting communications, and using supportive resources can help mitigate risks.
Q: How do I negotiate with HR for a survivable leave structure?
Understand your employer’s policies, discuss stacking PTO with unpaid leave, and explore short-term disability or flexible scheduling. Being transparent about caregiving needs while framing your commitment to the role can aid negotiation.
Q: What happens to my retirement and healthcare premiums during FMLA?
Healthcare premiums often must be paid in full without payroll deduction, risking coverage loss. Retirement contributions usually pause, creating gaps that reduce long-term savings. Planning ahead and discussing options with benefits coordinators are critical.
Q: Does therapy help with the financial-trauma side of caregiving?
Yes. Therapy can address the stress, anxiety, and relational trauma caused by financial strain and caregiving pressures. It supports executive functioning, emotional regulation, and coping strategies essential for sustaining caregiving and professional roles.
References
Peer-Reviewed Research (Vancouver)
- Cloitre M, Stolbach BC, Herman JL, van der Kolk B, Pynoos R, Wang J, et al. A developmental approach to complex PTSD: childhood and adult cumulative trauma as predictors of symptom complexity. J Trauma Stress. 2009;22(5):399-408. doi:10.1002/jts.20444. PMID: 19795402.
- van der Kolk BA, Wang JB, Yehuda R, Bedrosian L, Coker AR, Harrison C, et al. Effects of MDMA-assisted therapy for PTSD on self-experience. PLoS One. 2024;19(1):e0295926. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0295926. PMID: 38198456.
Books & Cultural Sources (Chicago Author-Date)
- Estés, Clarissa Pinkola. Women Who Run with the Wolves. Vintage, 1982.
- Sexton, Anne. The complete poems. Houghton Mifflin (P), 1981.
- Brach, Tara. Radical acceptance. Bantam Books, 2003.
Read Annie’s weekly essays on rebuilding after relational trauma.
Weekly Substack essays from Annie Wright, LMFT on relational trauma, recovery, and the House of Life framework. For driven women who want a structured path back to themselves.
WAYS TO WORK WITH ANNIE
Individual Therapy
Trauma-informed therapy for driven women healing relational trauma. Licensed in 11 jurisdictions.
Executive Coaching
Trauma-informed coaching for driven women navigating leadership and burnout.
Fixing the Foundations
Annie’s signature course for relational trauma recovery. Work at your own pace.
Strong & Stable
The Sunday conversation you wished you’d had years earlier. 25,000+ subscribers.
Annie Wright, LMFT
LMFT · Relational Trauma Specialist · W.W. Norton Author
Helping driven women finally feel as good as their résumé looks.
Annie Wright is a licensed psychotherapist (LMFT #95719) and trauma-informed executive coach with over 25,000 clinical hours. She works with driven women. Including Silicon Valley leaders, physicians, and entrepreneurs. In repairing the psychological foundations beneath their impressive lives. Annie is the founder and former CEO of Evergreen Counseling, a multimillion-dollar trauma-informed therapy center she built, scaled, and successfully exited. A regular contributor to Psychology Today, her expert commentary has appeared in Forbes, Business Insider, Inc., NBC, and The Information. She is currently writing her first book with W.W. Norton.
Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist (LMFT #95719)
15,000+ direct clinical hours
California · Connecticut · Washington DC · Florida · Maine · Maryland · New Hampshire · New Jersey · Texas · Virginia · Washington
Creator of House of Life™ and Fixing the Foundations™
The Everything Years (W.W. Norton)
Founder & former CEO, Evergreen Counseling
Regular contributor to Psychology Today. Expert commentary has appeared in Forbes, Business Insider, Inc., NBC, and The Information.
