
BPD Discard, Hoovering, and the Smear Campaign. What’s Different When Borderline Traits Are in the Picture
Why does the discard from someone with borderline traits feel less like a clean ending and more like a wildfire? This guide explains what makes BPD-related discard, hoovering, and smear campaigns distinct from narcissistic patterns, why the pull back can feel so hard to resist, and what recovery asks of you when fear of abandonment, not calculation, drove the harm. The composite scenes below are illustrative, not accounts of real clients.
Last reviewed: June 2026 by Annie Wright, LMFT. This article was drafted with AI writing assistance and edited and approved by Annie Wright, LMFT, prior to publication. It is educational and psychoeducational in nature. It does not diagnose any individual, does not constitute treatment, and does not replace an evaluation by a licensed clinician.
If you spent your childhood managing their emotional weather, my self-paced course Balanced After the Borderline names the terrain and gives you the recovery map.
- Why Is Cheri Counting the Minutes and Watching the Room?
- What Makes the Discard Different When Borderline Traits Are Present?
- Why Can BPD Hoovering Feel More Intense and Harder to Resist?
- How Does the BPD Smear Campaign Tend to Look Different from the Narcissistic Smear?
- Why Does the Fear of Abandonment Paradox Create Both the Discard and the Hoover?
- Both/And: You Can Have Compassion for Their Pain AND Still Need to Protect Yourself
- The Systemic Lens: Why Is BPD in Women Pathologized While the Same Traits in Men Are Excused?
- What Does Recovery Look Like When Borderline Traits Were in the Relationship?
- Frequently Asked Questions
In relationships where borderline personality disorder traits are present, the discard, hoovering, and smear campaign can follow a recognizable shape, though they carry a distinct emotional signature often connected to intense fear of abandonment and identity instability rather than purely strategic control. The discard in these contexts is often experienced by the person leaving as an urgent need to escape overwhelming internal pain, not a calculated step in a dominance strategy. Hoovering, the attempt to pull a partner back, can be driven by genuine distress about loss rather than solely a wish to regain control. In my work with driven women, the hardest part is usually holding the difference between understanding why someone behaves this way and deciding whether the relationship is safe to continue.
In short: BPD-related discard, hoovering, and smear campaigns often carry an emotional intensity connected to fear of abandonment and identity instability, which can make them feel more unpredictable and more desperate than the more coolly strategic patterns sometimes associated with narcissistic dynamics.
I’ve worked with the aftermath of these relational dynamics across more than 15,000 clinical hours, and survivors often struggle to find language that captures both the genuine suffering on both sides and the very real harm that resulted. The diagnostic criteria for Borderline Personality Disorder are defined in the DSM-5-TR, published by the American Psychiatric Association, which describes a pattern that can include frantic efforts to avoid abandonment, unstable relationships, and impulsive behaviors that may cause significant harm to the person and to others close to them (American Psychiatric Association 2022).
Why Is Cheri Counting the Minutes and Watching the Room?
The following scene is an illustrative composite, not an account of a specific person or session. It’s 10:17 on a Saturday night, and Cheri is standing in the corner of a kitchen she’s been to a hundred times, holding a glass of sparkling water. She switched to sparkling water at events like this months ago. Staying clear-headed feels necessary now. She needs to be fully awake for whatever the evening might ask of her. Across the room, one of her oldest friends hasn’t made eye contact with her once tonight. Cheri suspects she’s one of several people who were told something. She doesn’t know what, exactly, but she can feel its shape in the air.
Her phone lights up. It’s an Instagram notification: her ex has posted a photo from three years ago, one that features both of them. Cheri’s face isn’t in it. Not removed. Just cropped, right at the edge of her shoulder. Still there in the composition of the image. Just not visible. Cheri looks at it for a moment and then puts her phone face-down on the counter.
I am in this room without being in this room, Cheri thinks. That’s her particular skill. She stays for forty-five more minutes. She counts.
If you’ve been in a relationship with someone who shows borderline personality disorder traits, and you’re trying to make sense of what the ending, or the not-quite-ending, actually is, Cheri’s experience might feel uncomfortably familiar. The discard that arrives with intense ambivalence. The hoovering that feels somehow more emotionally credible than anything you’ve encountered before. The smear campaign that doesn’t feel like a cold strategic move so much as a wildfire moving through your social world. These dynamics can carry a specific texture when borderline traits are in the picture, and understanding that texture is part of how you find your footing again.
This article names what tends to be different. Not to characterize everyone with BPD as harmful, since many people with this diagnosis are carrying real, unprocessed early pain, and not to minimize the harm you may have experienced, which is real and deserves care. Both can be true at once.
What Makes the Discard Different When Borderline Traits Are Present?
If you’ve read about narcissistic abuse dynamics and the narcissistic smear campaign, you may have come to this article because something felt slightly off in that framing. The discard you experienced may not have felt like a cold, calculated move by someone who was simply finished with you. It may have felt more chaotic, more emotionally volatile. There may have been moments where the person discarding you seemed to be in as much visible pain as you were. And still, the harm may have been just as real.
One possible reason is that a BPD-related discard can follow a different internal logic than a narcissistic one. Understanding that logic doesn’t excuse it. It can, though, help you stop searching for rational explanations that simply don’t fit.
According to the National Institute of Mental Health’s clinical overview of Borderline Personality Disorder, drawing on the DSM-5-TR published by the American Psychiatric Association, BPD is characterized by a pervasive pattern of instability in interpersonal relationships, self-image, and affect, along with marked impulsivity, beginning by early adulthood and present across contexts. Diagnostic features can include frantic efforts to avoid real or imagined abandonment, a pattern of unstable and intense relationships marked by alternating idealization and devaluation, identity disturbance, impulsivity in self-damaging areas, affective instability, chronic feelings of emptiness, and intense anger (American Psychiatric Association 2022). Marsha Linehan, PhD, the clinical psychologist who developed Dialectical Behavior Therapy at the University of Washington, has written about BPD as a condition often rooted in emotionally invalidating early environments, reflecting significant emotional dysregulation rather than a character flaw. Her two-year randomized controlled trial of Dialectical Behavior Therapy published in Archives of General Psychiatry remains one of the field’s most cited studies on treatment outcomes for this population.
In plain terms: BPD isn’t about being manipulative by nature. It can develop when a person grows up in an environment where their emotional experience was consistently invalidated or dismissed, and their nervous system didn’t get the chance to build tolerance for intense feeling. Someone living with this pattern is often in genuine, ongoing pain. That doesn’t erase the reality of harm they may have caused.
In a relationship with someone who shows BPD traits, the discard often doesn’t feel like a clean severing. It’s more likely to come after a period of escalating push-pull: intense closeness followed by sudden hostility, a perceived slight, sometimes real and sometimes not, that tips the relationship into crisis, and then a break that may or may not be intended as permanent. The person doing the discarding may be as dysregulated as the person being discarded. They may reach back out within days. They may swing between anger and tearful apology. The discard cycle in these relationships is rarely a single, definitive event. Research on the phenomenon known as DARVO, from Jennifer Freyd’s Dynamics Lab at the University of Oregon, describes a related pattern in which the person causing harm denies, attacks, and reverses the roles of victim and offender, a dynamic that can layer onto BPD-related discard cycles and make the sequence of events even harder to track in real time.
The trauma bond that can form in these relationships is often particularly strong, partly because the relationship itself was so intense. A repeated cycle of idealization, rupture, and reconciliation can condition the nervous system in ways that make the pull toward reunion feel almost physiological. What you’re feeling isn’t weakness. It’s a trained nervous system responding the way it learned to respond.
One of the most common things clients describe in my work with people who’ve been in relationships like this is not understanding why they feel so responsible for the other person’s pain. That’s not incidental. When someone’s emotional dysregulation is highly visible and acute, partners often become hypervigilant emotional caretakers, not necessarily because they’re codependent, though that can be part of it, but because the distress signals are loud and often genuinely real. You may have learned, slowly, that managing their emotional state felt tied to managing your own safety.
Why Can BPD Hoovering Feel More Intense and Harder to Resist?
Hoovering, the term for the pattern of pulling someone back into a relationship after a rupture or ending, named for the vacuum cleaner brand, can look different depending on the relational dynamic you’re leaving. In narcissistic relationships, hoovering can be more calculated: love-bombing, promises of change, manufactured crises, often identifiable in retrospect by a transactional quality.
BPD-related hoovering can feel different in a way that makes it harder to name and resist, because the person reaching back out may genuinely be in pain, genuinely desperate for reconnection, and genuinely convinced, in that moment, of every word they’re saying. The apologies may not feel scripted. The promises of change may not feel strategic. The grief on the other end of the phone can sound real, because for that person, in that moment, it often is.
Splitting is a cognitive and emotional pattern associated with Borderline Personality Disorder in which a person oscillates between extremes of idealization and devaluation, perceiving others, and sometimes themselves, as entirely good or entirely bad, with limited capacity for integrated, complex perception. A 2023 study in Psychological Review modeling idealization and devaluation as a social inference process found that people with BPD show significantly higher and more symmetric splitting than the general population. Marsha Linehan, PhD, has described this kind of black-and-white perception as connected to the emotional dysregulation seen in BPD, often rooted in early environments where ambiguity felt unsafe.
In plain terms: When someone in the idealization phase of splitting looks at you, you can feel like the most important person in their world. When the switch flips to devaluation, you can feel like the source of everything wrong in their life. Neither of those is fully accurate, but both can feel completely real to the person experiencing them. This is part of why the hoovering can feel so convincing: you’re receiving the full force of re-idealization, and in that moment, it may genuinely feel real to them too.
Bessel van der Kolk, MD, psychiatrist and trauma researcher and founder of the Trauma Research Foundation, has written extensively about how early relational trauma can reshape the nervous system’s capacity for emotional regulation, attachment, and a stable sense of self. His work helps explain why someone with BPD traits doesn’t simply choose to cycle through discard and hoover. Their nervous system may be responding to cues of abandonment with an intensity that echoes how threatening emotional rejection may have felt in childhood. Hoovering, seen through this lens, can be understood as a dysregulated attachment system trying to restore a connection it perceives as essential to survival.
None of this means you have to go back. Understanding a mechanism isn’t the same as accepting it. What this framework can offer is a way to hold someone’s pain as real without making their dysregulation your responsibility to absorb.
One practice that tends to help most in this work is learning to distinguish between someone else’s emotional reality and your own obligation. Their pain may be real. Your responsibility to manage it is not. That distinction, which can feel impossibly thin in the middle of it, is exactly the kind of boundary that trauma-informed therapy can help you find and hold.
How Does the BPD Smear Campaign Tend to Look Different from the Narcissistic Smear?
Cheri noticed the shift in her social world gradually. The friend who stopped making eye contact. The group text that went quiet after she posted something. The invitation she didn’t receive. The way certain conversations seemed to pause when she walked in.
The smear campaign that can follow a narcissistic discard tends to be preemptive and strategic. A narcissistic partner may get to people first, control the narrative, and position themselves as the wronged party. It’s often designed to protect their image and isolate the other person, and it can be effective precisely because it’s deliberate.
A BPD-related smear campaign can look different, and in some ways that makes it harder to name because it may not feel like a campaign at all. It can emerge more organically from the person’s genuine experience of the relationship. They may not be lying exactly, because from inside their own splitting process, they may genuinely believe you were the destructive one. They’re sharing an emotional truth that’s been filtered through a nervous system in crisis, and a nervous system in crisis doesn’t tend to produce accurate reporting.
In practice, this can look like sharing things with mutual friends about what happened, often the moments where you were at your most reactive, the times you set a firm limit, the times you finally got angry, stripped of the context that would make your behavior understandable. They may share screenshots. They may describe you in terms that would be unrecognizable to anyone who knows you well. The account from someone with BPD traits often contains more visible emotional distress than a narcissistic version: more crying, more apparent vulnerability. That texture can make it more convincing to bystanders who don’t have the full picture.
This is part of why the aftermath of one of these relationships can feel so isolating and confusing. There’s the loss of the relationship itself, and there’s the separate loss of a social world that’s been partially reorganized around someone else’s pain narrative.
You don’t have to be perfectly defended to get through this. You don’t have to convince everyone, reclaim every friendship, or prove your version of events to every person who heard something. Working with a therapist who understands these dynamics can help you sort out which relationships are worth reinvesting in and which ones were never fully yours to begin with.
Why Does the Fear of Abandonment Paradox Create Both the Discard and the Hoover?
Here’s a central paradox in these dynamics, one that makes recovery genuinely complicated: the person who fears abandonment most intensely can also be the person most likely to create abandonment through their own behavior.
This isn’t irrational once you understand the underlying developmental logic. When the core wound is fear of abandonment, when a nervous system learned early that closeness leads to loss, one adaptive strategy the psyche can develop is to create the rupture before it happens to you. Discard, seen this way, isn’t the opposite of fear of abandonment. It can be a direct expression of it.
Marsha Linehan, PhD, described a central dialectic in her foundational work on BPD: a person can be simultaneously desperate for connection and terrified of it, wanting to be fully known and fully loved while feeling certain that being fully known will lead to being left. The relationship can then be shaped by an intense closeness, a perceived threat, real or imagined, then rupture, then hoovering. The cycle isn’t manipulation for its own sake. It functions more like a survival system doing what survival systems do.
Practically, this means that if you’ve spent months or years trying to figure out what you did wrong, trying to find the thing that triggered the rupture so you could prevent it next time, that search can end. There may not have been a correct thing you could have done. The discard cycle can exist inside the other person’s nervous system, not in your behavior.
Cherie, an illustrative composite of a woman who left a long relationship with a partner who showed BPD traits, described it this way: “I kept trying to understand the logic of it. I thought if I could map the pattern, I could stop it. But there was no pattern I could stop. The pattern was the relationship itself.” That clarity, once she found it, was both devastating and freeing. It meant she hadn’t failed. It also meant there was nothing left to fix.
Understanding the trauma bond dynamics that keep you tethered to a relationship, even after you’ve left, matters. The bond may have been real. The love may have been real. And the relationship may not have been sustainable. All of that can be true at once, and you don’t have to resolve that paradox before you can start to heal.
Both/And: You Can Have Compassion for Their Pain AND Still Need to Protect Yourself
One place clients get stuck when recovering from these relationships is the compassion trap. Because BPD is often rooted in earlier trauma, because the person in your life was clearly suffering, because you came to understand that the behavior that hurt you likely came from deep fear rather than calculated cruelty, it can feel wrong to name what happened as harmful, as though naming the harm were the same as lacking empathy for their story.
It isn’t. You don’t have to choose.
BPD is a real condition, often rooted in real early trauma, and the person living inside it is frequently in extraordinary pain. The dysregulation, the splitting, the fear of abandonment are not performances. They can be visible evidence of a nervous system that didn’t get what it needed in childhood and has been in a state of relational crisis for a long time. Holding that with compassion is possible, and it can be part of your own healing too, because carrying ongoing contempt for someone who was genuinely suffering can keep you tethered to the relationship in a different way.
And your pain, the pain of being on the other end of the discard, the hoovering, the smear campaign, is also real and also deserves care. Compassion for a diagnosis does not require you to absorb the harm. Both of these things can live in the same sentence.
This is the Both/And: you can understand deeply why someone behaved the way they did, hold genuine compassion for their pain, hope for their healing, and still know with clarity that you cannot be in relationship with them right now, or possibly ever. Understanding a mechanism of harm doesn’t obligate you to keep experiencing it. Compassion and self-protection aren’t opposites. Extending empathy to someone doesn’t require extending access.
Cherie, a different illustrative composite, spent almost a year after leaving her relationship cycling between guilt and anger. “I kept telling myself I should feel more sorry for her,” she said. “She had a difficult childhood. She didn’t mean to hurt me the way she did. So why was I still so angry?” What helped wasn’t choosing one feeling over the other. It was letting both exist. The anger was legitimate information about her own experience. The compassion was her integrity intact. She didn’t have to sacrifice one to keep the other.
If you’re in the early stages of separating from someone with BPD traits, working with a trauma-informed therapist who can help you hold both sides of this without collapsing into either pure self-blame or dehumanizing the other person is one of the more valuable investments you can make in your own recovery.
The Systemic Lens: Why Is BPD in Women Pathologized While the Same Traits in Men Are Excused?
We cannot talk about BPD, smear campaigns, and recovery without talking about who receives a BPD diagnosis, and why.
BPD is diagnosed in women at notably higher rates than in men, and research increasingly suggests this may reflect, at least in part, how similar behaviors are interpreted differently depending on the gender of the person expressing them, rather than a true difference in underlying prevalence. A woman who becomes frantic when she perceives abandonment, who cycles between idealizing and devaluing people she loves, is more likely to receive a BPD diagnosis. A man who exhibits similar patterns is more likely to be described as difficult or intense, or to receive a different diagnosis altogether, or none at all.
Women diagnosed with BPD often carry significant stigma across medical settings, family court, and friendship networks. The diagnosis can be used to question their credibility or their fitness as parents. The label can follow them and shape how their character is perceived before anyone has looked closely at the specifics.
At the same time, the patterns BPD traits can produce in relationships, including discard cycles, hoovering, and smear campaigns, cause genuine harm to partners. This article holds both: the structural unfairness in how BPD tends to be gendered, and the legitimate recovery needs of people who have been hurt in these relational patterns. These aren’t competing truths. They’re part of the same complex reality.
“I am not free while any woman is unfree, even when her shackles are very different from my own.”
Audre Lorde, poet and activist, The Cancer Journals
Audre Lorde’s words carry particular weight here. A woman who receives a BPD diagnosis and carries its stigma through medical appointments, custody hearings, and social settings where she may already feel pre-judged is genuinely unfree in a specific sense. And a woman trying to recover from a relationship where BPD patterns caused real harm is also carrying something real. The two experiences exist in a structural relationship with each other, shaped by systems that weren’t designed with women’s complexity in mind.
What does this mean practically? It means we can question the over-diagnosis of BPD in women and the way stigma compounds an original trauma, while still taking seriously the harm caused when dysregulated relational patterns go unaddressed. It means advocating for better, less stigmatizing frameworks for understanding emotional dysregulation while still holding people accountable for how their behavior affects others.
Recovering from one of these relationships doesn’t require dismissing the systemic forces that shaped the person who hurt you, and it also doesn’t require using those forces as a reason to dismiss what happened to you. Systems and individuals both matter. Structural analysis doesn’t erase personal experience.
If someone in your life with BPD traits is seeking help through DBT, trauma therapy, or relational recovery work, that’s worth acknowledging, even from a distance. Research on DBT suggests a genuinely hopeful outlook for people who engage consistently with treatment. That isn’t your job to facilitate. It is worth knowing.
What Does Recovery Look Like When Borderline Traits Were in the Relationship?
Recovery from a relationship shaped by BPD traits is not identical to recovery from a narcissistic one, and it’s worth naming some of what tends to make it distinct. Not because one is harder or more valid, but because the tools need to match the wound.
First: you may grieve this relationship more complexly than you expect. Because the relationship may not have been characterized by cold calculation, because the other person may have hurt you from within their own pain rather than from indifference to it, the grief can carry more layers. You may grieve them genuinely: the relationship you thought you were in, and also the person they were in the moments they were most themselves. That grief is allowed. It doesn’t mean you made the wrong decision to leave.
You spent your childhood managing their emotional weather.
A focused self-paced course on the specific damage of being raised by a borderline parent, the emotional dysregulation, the chaos, the role you had to play to survive it. Including what you were never given social permission to grieve.
Second: untangling the trauma bond often needs to happen before you can assess the relationship clearly. Questions like “was this abusive,” “was it my fault,” or “did I cause the discard cycle” often can’t be answered accurately until your nervous system has settled enough to think outside the bond. If you’re still in a heightened activation state the relationship trained you into, your thinking itself will likely be distorted. Regulation first, then clarity.
Third: find support that understands the nuance. Not every therapist is equipped to hold the both/and of these relationships, the genuine harm you experienced and the genuine pain the other person carried. A therapist who moves immediately to demonizing the person with BPD traits may miss the real love you felt and the real grief you’re carrying. A therapist who moves immediately to explaining away the harm through the diagnosis may also miss something important. Look for someone who can hold the full complexity.
Fourth: rebuild your social world deliberately. A smear campaign may have rearranged your friendships, and some of that may be permanent. There’s a specific grief in losing friendships to someone else’s narrative, the feeling of being erased or unwitnessed. Part of recovery is finding the people and spaces where you’re taken seriously and investing there. The Strong & Stable newsletter has been a starting point for many women in this work, a weekly touchpoint that can normalize what they’re experiencing.
Fifth: expect non-linear progress. Because BPD hoovering can feel so emotionally credible, there may be times during your recovery when a single text, a single voicemail, a single social media notification, like Cheri’s cropped photo at 10:17 on a Saturday night, sends you back to the beginning. That’s not necessarily a sign you’re failing to recover. It can be a sign your nervous system hasn’t fully updated yet. With the right support and enough time, it usually will.
Cheri stayed forty-five minutes and counted every one of them. Then she left the party, walked to her car, and sat there for a few minutes before driving home. She didn’t text anyone. She didn’t check Instagram again. She drove home, made tea, and called her therapist in the morning. That’s what recovery can look like sometimes: not triumph, not dramatic clarity, just the small, deliberate choice to get yourself home.
If you’re somewhere in the middle of this, trying to figure out what happened, why the pull back feels so strong, whether what you experienced was real: it was real. The love may have been real. The harm was real. The grief is real. And so is the path forward, even when it’s hard to see.
Whether you’re early in the process of leaving or years out and still trying to make sense of it, trauma-informed support designed for these kinds of relational wounds is available. You don’t have to have everything figured out before you reach out. Healing from a relationship shaped by BPD traits is possible, and it often begins with being witnessed in the full complexity of what you’ve been through. Whenever you’re ready, there are ways to start.
Q: How is a BPD discard different from a narcissistic discard?
A: A narcissistic discard tends to be strategic and relatively clean, with little visible distress from the person leaving. A BPD-related discard is often more volatile, with the person discarding you appearing genuinely distressed too. Discard followed by hoovering is common here, since abandonment fear makes full separation feel intolerable. It’s usually a cycle, not one event.
Q: Why does BPD hoovering feel more intense and harder to resist?
A: It can feel more convincing because the person reaching back out is often genuinely distressed and believes, in that moment, what they’re saying. Combined with a trauma bond formed through repeated cycles of closeness and rupture, your nervous system may respond to this person’s pull with real intensity. It isn’t a character flaw. It reflects a conditioned response.
Q: What does a BPD smear campaign typically look like?
A: Unlike a preemptive, strategic narrative-control operation, a BPD-related smear campaign can look more like someone sharing an emotional experience filtered through splitting and distress. They may share moments where you reacted badly, stripped of context, describing you in terms others wouldn’t recognize. Because the person sharing seems to be suffering, bystanders may find the account credible without deliberate calculation.
Q: Can someone with BPD be in a healthy relationship?
A: Yes, particularly with treatment such as Dialectical Behavior Therapy, developed by Marsha Linehan, PhD. DBT builds emotional regulation, distress tolerance, interpersonal effectiveness, and mindfulness skills. People who engage consistently with DBT and trauma treatment can build stable, reciprocal relationships. What tends not to be sustainable is a relationship where dysregulation remains ongoing and untreated.
Q: What should I do if I’m being hoovered by someone with BPD traits?
A: Notice the pull and name it without needing to act on it right away. Look at the pattern across time rather than this single moment. Decide your contact policy while regulated, not the moment you receive the message, and write it down. Get support from a therapist or trusted friend who knows the full history.
Related Reading
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed., text rev. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Publishing, 2022.
Linehan, Marsha M. Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder. New York: Guilford Press, 1993.
Linehan, Marsha M. DBT Skills Training Manual. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press, 2014.
van der Kolk, Bessel. The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. New York: Viking, 2014.
Lorde, Audre. The Cancer Journals. Argyle, NY: Spinsters Ink, 1980.
Read Annie’s weekly essays on rebuilding after relational trauma.
Weekly Substack essays from Annie Wright, LMFT on relational trauma, recovery, and the House of Life framework. For driven women who want a structured path back to themselves.
WAYS TO WORK WITH ANNIE
Individual Therapy
Trauma-informed therapy for driven women healing relational trauma. Licensed in 11 jurisdictions.
Executive Coaching
Trauma-informed coaching for driven women moving through leadership and burnout.
Fixing the Foundations
Annie’s signature course for relational trauma recovery. Work at your own pace.
Strong & Stable
The Sunday conversation you wished you’d had years earlier. 25,000+ subscribers.
Annie Wright, LMFT
LMFT · Relational Trauma Specialist · W.W. Norton Author
Helping driven women finally feel as good as their résumé looks.
Annie Wright is a licensed psychotherapist (LMFT #95719) and trauma-informed executive coach with over 15,000 clinical hours. She works with driven women, including Silicon Valley leaders, physicians, and entrepreneurs, in repairing the psychological foundations beneath their impressive lives. Annie is the founder and former CEO of Evergreen Counseling, a multimillion-dollar trauma-informed therapy center she built, scaled, and successfully exited. A regular contributor to Psychology Today, her expert commentary has appeared in USA Today, Forbes, Business Insider, Inc., NBC, and The Information. She is currently writing her first book with W.W. Norton.
Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist (LMFT #95719)
15,000+ direct clinical hours
California · Connecticut · Washington DC · Florida · Maine · Maryland · New Hampshire · New Jersey · Texas · Virginia · Washington
Creator of House of Life™ and Fixing the Foundations™
The Everything Years (W.W. Norton)
Founder & former CEO, Evergreen Counseling
Regular contributor to Psychology Today. Expert commentary has appeared in USA Today, Forbes, Business Insider, Inc., NBC, and The Information.

