LAST UPDATED: JULY 2026
When we talk about how childhood trauma shapes adult relationships, the conversation almost always centers on romantic partnerships. But for many driven women, the most painful and hidden effects of relational trauma show up in their friendships instead. Hypervigilance, people-pleasing, the fear of abandonment, and the inability to trust don’t disappear just because the relationship is platonic. This article explores the specific ways complex trauma disrupts adult friendships, and how to start building secure platonic attachments.
Last updated: July 2026 by Annie Wright, LMFT · Editorial Policy
- Why Is the “Strong Friend” Often the Loneliest Person in the Room?
- Does Attachment Theory Actually Apply to Friendships, Not Just Romance?
- Why Do I Feel Hypervigilant About Social Rejection With My Friends?
- Why Do I Swing Between Oversharing and Total Emotional Lockdown With Friends?
- What Is the Fawn Response, and How Does It Wreck Peer Equality?
- Why Do I Keep Choosing “Safe” Friends Who Don’t Actually Fulfill Me?
- Both/And: Can You Be a Good Friend AND Have Terrible Boundaries?
- The Systemic Lens: Why Do Women’s Friendships Carry So Much Weight?
- How Do You Build Earned Security in Friendships?
- Who I Am and Why I Know This
- Frequently Asked Questions
Childhood trauma’s impact on adult friendships comes from the same attachment system that governs romantic relationships. Early disruptions in attachment, emotional neglect, or relational danger shape how the nervous system approaches peer bonds, not only partnerships. John Bowlby, MD, defined the attachment system as a biological drive to seek proximity to a protective figure when we’re stressed or frightened, and that system doesn’t distinguish between a spouse and a best friend. So unresolved attachment wounds show up in friendships through hypervigilance, the fawn response, or a pattern of choosing safe but unfulfilling connections. For driven women, this often looks like a wide circle of acquaintances that never quite becomes a small circle of people who actually know you. In my work with driven women, realizing that trauma patterns have reached their friendships is often more destabilizing than recognizing the same patterns in romance.
In short: Childhood trauma shapes adult friendships through the same attachment system that governs romantic relationships, producing hypervigilance, emotional inequality, and chronic loneliness in peer bonds.
If your nervous system learned the safest way to exist was to manage everyone else's world, my self-paced course Enough Without the Effort is the recovery map.
Why Is the “Strong Friend” Often the Loneliest Person in the Room?
Misty is forty, a hospital pharmacist, and the person everyone calls when they’re in crisis. She’s the friend who organizes the meal trains, remembers the anniversaries of hard things, and will stay on the phone until 2:00 AM listening to someone cry about a breakup she saw coming six months ago.
She’s also profoundly lonely.
Three weeks ago, on a gray Tuesday in Adriene, Misty’s mother was hospitalized after a fall. Misty told no one in her friend group. She drove to the hospital alone, sat in the vinyl chair beside her mother’s bed with her badge from work still clipped to her scrub top, and answered emails on her phone so nobody at the pharmacy would notice she’d left early. When a friend eventually found out, weeks later, and asked why Misty hadn’t reached out, Misty waved a hand like she was swatting a fly. “I didn’t want to bother you,” she said. “You’ve got so much going on with the twins. I handled it.”
What Misty didn’t say, what she couldn’t have said even if you’d asked her directly, was that the idea of asking for help felt physically dangerous. Not uncomfortable. Dangerous. Her nervous system, wired by a childhood where having needs resulted in punishment or being ignored, reads vulnerability as a threat signal. She’s built a social life entirely around being needed, because being needed feels safe. Being needy feels like a death sentence.
Misty doesn’t have a partner right now, so she assumes her relational trauma is dormant, parked somewhere out of the way while she’s single. She’s wrong. Her trauma is actively organizing every friendship she has. It’s dictating who she picks, how she shows up, and what she hides, and it’s been doing that quietly for twenty years.
Does Attachment Theory Actually Apply to Friendships, Not Just Romance?
John Bowlby, MD, the father of attachment theory, defined the attachment system as a biological drive to seek proximity to a protective figure when we’re stressed, frightened, or ill. While this system forms in infancy with primary caregivers, it stays active across the entire lifespan. In adulthood, the attachment system activates not just with romantic partners, but with any close relationship where we depend on another person for emotional safety.
In plain terms: Your nervous system doesn’t know the difference between a spouse and a best friend when it comes to vulnerability. If you learned in childhood that people who get close to you’ll eventually hurt or abandon you, your brain applies that same threat-detection algorithm to your friendships just as fiercely as it does to your romantic life.
I recently reread John Bowlby’s original 1969 volume on attachment, the one every clinical training program assigns and almost nobody rereads once they’re licensed, and I was struck again by how little space he gives to romance. Bowlby wasn’t writing about marriages. He was writing about the biological wiring that makes any human being seek a safe other when the world feels unsafe. Friendship was never excluded from his model. We just excluded it from our cultural conversation about trauma.
What I keep coming back to, though, is the neuroscience layered on top of Bowlby’s original theory. Stephen Porges, PhD, developed polyvagal theory to explain what he calls the “social engagement system,” the ventral vagal state that lets us connect, read facial expressions, and feel safe with other people. When we carry a history of relational trauma, this system gets hijacked routinely by our defense states of fight, flight, or freeze, and it doesn’t check anyone’s ID before doing it. It hijacks connection with a spouse. It hijacks connection with the friend you’ve known since college.
Here’s the three-layer version I give clients. Layer one, the clinical concept: the attachment system doesn’t distinguish relationship category. Layer two, the kitchen-table version: think of it like a home alarm system installed to protect against one specific intruder from years ago, an alarm that now goes off for the mail carrier, the cat, and your closest friend leaning in for a hug. Layer three, the Tuesday-afternoon outcome: you cancel plans with the one friend who actually sees you clearly, because her closeness triggered the alarm, and you tell yourself you’re just tired.
Because our culture places so much weight on romantic love, we often fail to notice when our defense states are running the show in our platonic relationships. We assume that if we’re struggling to make or keep friends, it’s a personality flaw. We’re “too introverted,” “too intense,” or “just bad at socializing.” In reality, these struggles are often textbook trauma responses wearing an ordinary outfit. Here’s how relational trauma specifically shows up in adult friendships.
Why Do I Feel Hypervigilant About Social Rejection With My Friends?
If you grew up in a home where love was conditional, unpredictable, or suddenly withdrawn, your nervous system became fluent in reading the smallest shifts in another person’s mood. That fluency has a name: hypervigilance.
A chronic state of heightened alertness to interpersonal cues, shifts in tone, facial expression, response latency, or word choice, that developed as a survival adaptation in unpredictable early relational environments. Described extensively in attachment and complex trauma literature, social hypervigilance reroutes normal social engagement into a threat-detection system, which makes genuine connection hard to sustain.
In plain terms: You became an expert at reading rooms long before you knew what you were doing. Now every friend group is a room you’re reading. And it’s exhausting.
In adult friendships, this looks like constantly scanning for evidence that abandonment is imminent. If a friend takes four hours to text back, you don’t assume she’s busy. You assume she’s angry with you. If a friend uses a slightly different tone of voice on a Wednesday call, you spend the rest of the afternoon mentally replaying every interaction you’ve had with her over the past month, hunting for the moment you did something wrong.
This hypervigilance is exhausting in a way that’s hard to explain to someone who hasn’t lived it. It turns friendship into a high-stakes performance instead of a place of rest. You’re constantly managing someone else’s perception of you to keep yourself safe, and safety, not connection, becomes the whole point of the relationship.
Jill knows this scanning intimately. She’s fifty-two, a hospice social worker with almost three decades in the field, the kind of woman who has sat with hundreds of families in the worst moment of their lives and known exactly what to say. At home, in her own friendships, she’s a different person entirely. One Sunday this spring, she sat at her kitchen island with her reading glasses pushed up into her gray hair, staring at a text from her closest friend that read only “call me when you can.” Jill read it eleven times. “I already know it’s bad,” she told me two days later, still holding her coffee mug like a brace. “I know she’s going to tell me she’s moving away, or she’s mad at me, or something’s wrong, and I’ve basically rehearsed the whole conversation in my head before she even calls.” The call, when it finally came, was about a dentist appointment. Jill laughed about it in session, but underneath the laugh was something rawer. Sitting with her, I felt the particular exhaustion of a woman who has spent her whole life being the calm one for everyone else and has never once been able to extend that same steadiness to her own nervous system. What I’ve come to think of as professional calm, borrowed calm, is exactly what Jill has for her clients and exactly what she can’t locate for herself.
Why Do I Swing Between Oversharing and Total Emotional Lockdown With Friends?
Trauma survivors often can’t locate the middle ground of appropriate vulnerability. Instead, they swing between two extremes.
The “too much” pattern, sometimes called trauma dumping: In a rushed attempt to fast-track intimacy and test whether a new friend is safe, a survivor might overshare deeply personal, painful information very early in the relationship. This is an unconscious strategy, and it usually sounds something like this internal logic: if I show you the worst parts of me right now, and you don’t leave, then maybe I can trust you.
The “too little” pattern, sometimes called the fortress: Conversely, a survivor might maintain friendships for years without revealing anything real about her internal life. She’s an excellent conversationalist, a great listener, and entirely impenetrable. She keeps every relationship in the shallow end, because depth equals danger in her nervous system’s calculation.
Misty runs the fortress version. In four years of friendship with her running group, not one woman knows that Misty’s father left when she was six, that she put herself through pharmacy school waiting tables, or that she still checks the locks on her apartment door three times before bed. She knows their divorces, their kids’ diagnoses, their mothers’ health scares in granular detail. She has never once told them a piece of her own history that cost her anything to say. “I’m the person people talk to,” she told me, arms crossed over a faded race T-shirt from a 10K she ran the year her dad left, though she didn’t connect those two facts out loud. “I don’t really need anyone to talk to me back.” The sentence landed in the room with a weight she clearly hadn’t intended.
What Is the Fawn Response, and How Does It Wreck Peer Equality?
The fawn response is a trauma survival strategy in which a person avoids conflict and secures safety by appeasing whatever feels like a threat. In childhood, this looks like the “good girl” who never causes trouble and constantly anticipates her parents’ needs before they’re spoken.
In adult friendships, the fawn response creates a dynamic of real inequality. You make yourself smaller so your friend can take up more space. You defer to her preferences for restaurants, plans, and which topics get airtime. You never voice disagreement. You absorb her bad moods without complaint, and you tell yourself this is generosity.
The tragedy of the fawn response in friendship is that it blocks genuine connection at the exact moment it’s trying hardest to create it. Your friend isn’t in a relationship with you. She’s in a relationship with the compliant, agreeable mask you built to stay safe. And because some part of you knows she only loves the mask, you feel profoundly unseen even inside your closest relationships, which is its own particular kind of lonely.
Jill fawns with a specific woman in her book club, a friend she has known since their kids were in elementary school together. Jill always suggests the restaurant her friend prefers. Jill always agrees the book was “fine” even when she found it tedious. Six months ago, when her friend forgot Jill’s birthday for the second year running, Jill said nothing, made herself a cup of chamomile tea alone in her kitchen, and told herself it wasn’t a big deal. “I don’t want to be the friend who keeps score,” she said, twisting her wedding ring, a habit I’ve watched her do for two years now whenever she’s minimizing something that actually hurt. Sitting across from her, I felt the particular ache of watching someone defend the very dynamic that’s starving her. Jill has spent thirty years as a hospice social worker learning to sit with other people’s grief. What she hasn’t yet learned, what we’re working on now, is how to notice her own.
Why Do I Keep Choosing “Safe” Friends Who Don’t Actually Fulfill Me?
I’ve been rereading Harville Hendrix, PhD, this year, the psychologist who developed the concept of the Imago in couples work: the idea that we unconsciously seek out romantic partners who carry both the positive and negative traits of our early caregivers, in an attempt to finally heal the original wound. His framework was built for marriages, but I think it applies just as precisely to friendship, and in fifteen years of clinical work, I haven’t found a reason he’d disagree.
Trauma survivors often unconsciously recreate their family dynamics inside their friend groups. If you had a demanding, self-focused parent, you may find yourself repeatedly drawn to demanding, self-focused friends, because the dynamic feels familiar, and familiar registers as safe to a nervous system that prefers predictability over actual peace.
Alternatively, you might gravitate toward friends who are noticeably less capable, less driven, or more chaotic than you’re used to being around. By staying the “together” one in every friendship, you keep control. You never have to feel the vulnerability of being the one who needs help, which, if you grew up needing help and not receiving it, might be the single most threatening position you can imagine occupying.
Both/And: Can You Be a Good Friend AND Have Terrible Boundaries?
Vignette: The Resentful Giver
Misty prides herself on being a fiercely loyal friend, and she’s one. When her running-group friend went through a divorce two winters ago, Misty spent every weekend at her house, helped her pack boxes into a rented U-Haul, and listened to her vent for hours over cold coffee that neither of them ever finished. A year later, Misty was passed over for a pharmacy director role she’d been counting on. She called her friend, crying, from the parking lot of the hospital. Her friend listened for maybe ten minutes, then said, “That really sucks, but hey, I’ve got to run, my sister’s here. We’ll talk tomorrow?”
Misty was devastated. She decided, almost instantly, that the friendship was finished. “I give and give,” she told me, “and nobody ever gives it back.”
What Misty couldn’t see in that moment was her own hand in building the dynamic. She had spent four years training her friend to believe Misty never needed anything. She had never once set a boundary. She had never asked for support before that phone call. When she finally did, and her friend failed the test without knowing a test was happening, Misty’s abandonment wound got confirmed rather than healed. The Both/And is this: her friend was genuinely underresponsive in that moment, AND Misty had engineered a relationship where her own needs were invisible by design.
The Both/And of trauma and friendship is this: you can be a deeply loving, loyal, supportive friend AND you can have terrible boundaries that ultimately corrode the relationship from the inside. Both are true at the same time, and neither cancels the other out.
Many driven women with trauma histories take real pride in their loyalty. But loyalty without boundaries is just enmeshment wearing a nicer name. If you can’t say no to a friend, your yes doesn’t mean anything. It’s not generosity. It’s a survival strategy that happens to look like generosity from the outside.
The Systemic Lens: Why Do Women’s Friendships Carry So Much Weight?
It’s worth looking at this through a systemic lens, because the pressure isn’t only coming from inside any one woman’s nervous system. Women are socialized from early childhood to be the emotional caretakers of everyone around them. We’re taught that our value lives in our ability to nurture, accommodate, and hold relationships together, often at direct cost to ourselves.
When you layer that cultural conditioning on top of a history of relational trauma, the pressure on female friendships becomes immense. The culture tells you that you must be a perfect, selfless friend to be considered a good woman. Your trauma tells you that you must be a perfect, selfless friend to survive. Two different forces, pointing at the exact same behavior, both demanding it.
Here’s the sensation test, because a structural observation means nothing if it doesn’t land somewhere specific. This double bind shows up as the tight chest you feel typing “I can’t tonight” into a text thread. It shows up as the three a.m. replay of a boundary you set that afternoon. It shows up in a bank account quietly drained by always being the one who picks up the dinner tab because saying “let’s split it” feels like a betrayal of the caretaker role you were assigned before you could talk.
This double bind makes it genuinely difficult for women to set boundaries in their friendships. When a woman starts healing her trauma and begins saying no to her friends, something as small as “I can’t listen to you vent about your boss tonight, I don’t have the capacity,” she’s often met with real pushback. Not just from the friend on the other end of the text. From her own internalized cultural shame, which has been rehearsing this exact scenario as a moral failure since she was small.
How Do You Build Earned Security in Friendships?
Healing relational trauma inside friendship takes the same slow, deliberate work as healing it in romantic relationships. The goal is what attachment researchers call earned security: the capacity to trust, to be vulnerable, and to handle conflict without the whole relationship rupturing.
You've been holding everything together. You're allowed to put some down.
A focused self-paced course on overfunctioning, achievement-first self-concept, and the trauma response that masquerades as a personality. Not a productivity problem. Not a boundary problem. A nervous system that learned competence was the only safety.
Here’s how that work actually begins.
1. Notice your nervous system before you respond.
Before you answer a friend’s text, notice your body first. Are your shoulders up near your ears? Are you holding your breath without realizing it? Are you responding out of a genuine desire to connect, or out of fear that she’ll be upset if you don’t answer fast enough? If it’s fear, wait an hour before replying. The hour won’t cost you the friendship. It will cost you the reflex.
2. Practice micro-vulnerabilities.
You don’t have to hand a friend your deepest secret to build real intimacy. Start smaller. Admit you’re tired. Admit you made a mistake at work today. Say, out loud, “I’m actually having a really hard day.” Then notice what happens when you show a small crack in the armor. If she responds with warmth, your nervous system logs a little bit of evidence that safety is possible here.
3. Tolerate the discomfort of disappointing someone you love.
The real test of a secure friendship is whether it survives a no. You have to practice disappointing your friends in small, low-stakes ways. Cancel a plan when you’re genuinely exhausted. Decline an invitation without a three-paragraph justification. The anxiety that floods you when you do this is your trauma response talking. The fact that she still loves you the next morning is the evidence that starts to heal it.
4. Re-evaluate who’s actually on your roster.
As you heal, some friendships will end, and that’s not a failure of the work. It’s the work. The friends who only liked you because you never had needs will drift when you start having them out loud. This is painful and also necessary. You’re making room for people who want the real, occasionally tired, occasionally needy version of you.
If you’re recognizing these patterns in your own friendships and want a structured framework for changing them, I invite you to explore Fixing the Foundations™, my relational trauma recovery course. It addresses attachment wounds across every relationship, not only romantic ones. You can also reach out directly to talk about individual therapy.
Six weeks into our work together, Misty texted her running group before a Saturday long run: “I’m not going to make it today, I’m wiped.” No explanation, no apology paragraph. She told me later she reread the text four times before sending it, sitting in her car in the pharmacy parking lot with her hand hovering over the phone. Nobody in the group asked her to explain herself. One friend wrote back, “get some rest, see you next week.” Misty said the relief felt almost physical, like something in her chest had been holding a position for twenty years and had finally been allowed to set it down. The work isn’t finished. She still checks her locks three times most nights. But the text got sent, and that’s not nothing.
You deserve friendships where you’re allowed to be messy, tired, and needy sometimes. You deserve to be loved for your actual self, not only for what you can do for everyone else.
Warmly,
Annie.
Who I Am and Why I Know This
Across more than 15,000 direct clinical hours, I’ve watched how often the impact of early relational trauma on friendships goes unaddressed, because clients and even clinicians assume the focus belongs on romantic partnerships. John Bowlby, MD, the founding theorist of attachment, established that the attachment system activates under stress and threat regardless of relationship type, which means insecure attachment patterns extend into every close bond a person has, not a select few. I’ve seen this pattern in Silicon Valley executives, physicians, and stay-at-home mothers alike. The friendship version of relational trauma isn’t rarer than the romantic version. It’s just less discussed.
This article is for information and support. It is not a substitute for therapy, diagnosis or treatment from a licensed clinician who knows you. If you are in immediate danger, call or text 988 in the United States to reach the Suicide and Crisis Lifeline, or call 911. See the full medical disclaimer.
ANNIE’S SIGNATURE COURSE
Fixing the Foundations
The deep work of relational trauma recovery. At your own pace. Annie’s step-by-step course for driven women ready to repair the psychological foundations beneath their impressive lives.
This article is educational and psychoeducational in nature. It isn’t a diagnostic tool and doesn’t replace individualized clinical care. If you’re in crisis or having thoughts of harming yourself, please contact the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline by calling or texting 988, available 24 hours a day in the United States.
Warmly, Annie
Q: Why do I feel more anxious about my friendships than my romantic relationship?
A: This is very common. Sometimes we choose romantic partners who are emotionally distant, which can feel safe because it doesn’t trigger a fear of engulfment, while seeking deep emotional intimacy with friends instead. Because friendships hold that emotional weight, they activate the attachment system more intensely. Friendships also lack the structural scripts, like marriage or living together, that romantic relationships have, which can make them feel more ambiguous and therefore more threatening to a traumatized nervous system.
Q: How do I stop being the therapist friend in every group?
A: Start by not volunteering for the job automatically. When a friend starts venting, practice a boundary phrase like, “I want to support you, but I don’t have the bandwidth to process this right now,” or “I love you, but I think this is something for your actual therapist.” You’ll also need to tolerate the guilt that shows up when you stop over-functioning. That guilt is a trauma response. It doesn’t mean you’re doing something wrong.
Q: Is it normal to want to cut off all my friends when I start trauma therapy?
A: Yes, and it’s a very common Stage 1 reaction. As your window of tolerance expands in early therapy, you often become suddenly aware of how one-sided or draining certain relationships have been. It’s usually best to avoid making drastic relational decisions this early, though. Instead, practice setting small boundaries and see how each friend responds. The healthy ones adjust. The ones who can’t will often remove themselves.
Q: Can a friendship survive if only one person is doing trauma recovery work?
A: It depends heavily on the other person’s capacity for flexibility and respect. If you start setting boundaries and she respects them, even without fully understanding them, the friendship can survive and often deepen. If she relies on your lack of boundaries for her own stability and reacts with anger when you change the rules, the friendship will likely end. You can’t heal a relationship alone, no matter how much work you personally do.
Q: How do I make new friends when trauma has left me with trust issues?
A: Very slowly, and slowly is the point, not the obstacle. Trauma survivors often try to rush intimacy to secure the attachment faster. Instead, practice what I call titrated friendship building. Meet for coffee once a month. Share small, low-stakes details and watch how the person handles them. Does she gossip? Does she judge? Does she reciprocate? Trust isn’t a leap of faith. It’s an accumulation of evidence over time, and you’re allowed to let that evidence build before you give anyone full access to your inner life.
Q: If I’m having thoughts of harming myself while processing these patterns, what should I do?
A: This article is educational and isn’t a substitute for crisis support or individualized clinical care. If you’re having thoughts of harming yourself, please contact the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline by calling or texting 988, available 24 hours a day in the United States, or go to your nearest emergency room.
Related Reading
- Bowlby, John. Attachment and Loss: Volume 1. Attachment. Basic Books, 1969.
- Herman, Judith Lewis. Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence. From Domestic Abuse to Political Terror. Basic Books, 1992.
- Porges, Stephen W. The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiological Foundations of Emotions, Attachment, Communication, and Self-regulation. W.W. Norton & Company, 2011.
- Tatkin, Stan. Wired for Love: How Understanding Your Partner’s Brain and Attachment Style Can Help You Defuse Conflict and Build a Secure Relationship. New Harbinger Publications, 2011.
- Hendrix, Harville. Getting the Love You Want: A Guide for Couples. Henry Holt and Company, 1988.
References
Peer-Reviewed Research (Vancouver)
- Porges SW. Polyvagal Theory: Current Status, Clinical Applications, and Future Directions. PMID: 40735382.
- Bowlby J. Attachment and loss: retrospect and prospect. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1982;52(4):664-678. doi:10.1111/j.1939-0025.1982.tb01456.x. PMID: 7148988.
- Guo Y, et al. Suicidal ideation among adults with insecure attachment histories. PMID: 31218269.
- Adverse adult experiences and loneliness outcomes. PMID: 32994797.
- Offspring of parents with PTSD: symptom and distress outcomes. PMID: 33646805.
WAYS TO WORK WITH ANNIE
INDIVIDUAL THERAPY
Trauma-informed therapy for driven women healing relational trauma.
Licensed in 14 U.S. jurisdictions, including Colorado (telehealth only), and registered to provide telehealth in Florida. Work one-on-one with Annie to repair the psychological foundations beneath your impressive life.
Trauma-informed coaching for driven women facing leadership pressure and burnout.
For driven women whose professional success has outpaced their internal foundation. Coaching that goes beyond strategy.
FIXING THE FOUNDATIONS
Annie’s signature course for relational trauma recovery.
A structured, self-paced program for women ready to do the deeper work of healing the patterns beneath their success.
STRONG & STABLE
The Sunday conversation you wished you’d had years earlier.
Weekly essays, practice guides, and workbooks for driven women whose lives look great on paper and feel heavy behind the scenes. Free to start.
Annie Wright
LMFT · Relational Trauma Specialist · W.W. Norton Author
Helping driven women finally feel as good as their résumé looks.
As a licensed psychotherapist (LMFT #95719), trauma-informed executive coach, and relational trauma specialist with over 15,000 direct clinical hours, she guides driven women, including Silicon Valley leaders, physicians, and entrepreneurs, in repairing the psychological foundations beneath their impressive lives. Annie is the founder and former CEO of Evergreen Counseling, a multimillion-dollar trauma-informed therapy center she built, scaled, and successfully exited. A regular contributor to Psychology Today, her expert commentary has appeared in USA Today, Forbes, Business Insider, NBC News, and The Information. She’s currently writing her first book with W.W. Norton.
Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist (LMFT #95719)
15,000+ direct clinical hours
CA LMFT95719 · CO MFT.0003236 (telehealth only) · CT 003806 · DC LMFT200001447 · FL TPMF356 (out-of-state telehealth registration) · IL 166.012270 · ME MF8600 · MD LCM1206 · NH 1030 · NJ 37FI00254800 · NY 002805 · TX 206391 · UT 14300323-3902 · VA 0717002589 · WA MFT.LF.70098096
Creator of House of Life™ and Fixing the Foundations™
The Everything Years (W.W. Norton)
Founder & former CEO, Evergreen Counseling
Regular contributor to Psychology Today. Expert commentary has appeared in USA Today, Forbes, Business Insider, NBC News, and The Information.
