Self-Care Is Not Enough: What Helping Professionals Actually Need to Heal from Vicarious Trauma
LAST UPDATED: APRIL 2026
You’re doing all the things. Weekly supervision, a consultation group, exercise, meditation, and you’re still going home and dreaming about your clients, still feeling like you’re disappearing. Self-care is necessary, but it isn’t sufficient once vicarious trauma has restructured your nervous system. Here’s what actually helps, and why it’s more than a longer vacation.
Last reviewed: June 2026 by Annie Wright, LMFT
- The Night Reyna Said “I Think I’m Disappearing”
- What Vicarious Trauma Actually Requires
- The Role of Trauma-Informed Therapy
- The Somatic Dimension
- Restoring Meaning and Connection
- Both/And: Vulnerability and Strength Aren’t Opposites
- The Systemic Lens: The Conditions That Slow Healing
- A Real Path Forward
- Frequently Asked Questions
IF YOU’RE GOOGLING THIS AT 2:00 AM
- self-care not helping vicarious trauma
- what helps vicarious trauma
- vicarious trauma treatment
- how to heal from vicarious trauma
- therapist burnout treatment
- vicarious trauma recovery
It’s a Tuesday at 4:50pm, and Reyna is sitting on the blue velvet couch in my office with her hands folded so tightly in her lap that her knuckles have gone pale. She’s thirty-nine, a licensed therapist herself, eleven years into trauma work, and she is neither new to this nor naive about what it costs. She’s the person her group practice sends the hardest cases to. Her cold brew has gone watery in the cupholder of the tote bag at her feet. “I’m doing all the things,” she says, and her voice catches. “I’m doing every single thing they tell you to do. And I still go home and I can’t be present with my kids. I still dream about my clients. I still feel like I’m disappearing.” Then she says the sentence I have heard, in some form, from hundreds of clinicians. “I think I need more than self-care.”
If you're ready for the full healing arc, not a single piece of it, my signature program Fixing the Foundations is the structured path your relational trauma recovery has been missing.
She’d built her professional life with real care. Weekly supervision, a committed consultation group, regular runs along the water, a meditation practice she actually kept. She honored her boundaries, she took her vacations, she even ran quiet nervous-system check-ins during sessions. None of it had shielded her from the slow erosion of her own vitality. Reyna’s story isn’t an outlier, it’s a quiet epidemic among the people who dedicate their working lives to holding other people’s suffering. The tools that carry us through ordinary stress simply aren’t built for the kind of trauma that’s cumulative, secondhand, and absorbed one session at a time. (Name and identifying details are a composite, changed to protect confidentiality.)
“The expectation that we can be immersed in suffering and loss daily and not be touched by it is as unrealistic as expecting to be able to walk through water without getting wet.”
Rachel Naomi Remen, MD, physician, professor of family medicine, and author of Kitchen Table Wisdom
Vicarious trauma is the way a helping professional’s inner world gets reshaped through sustained empathic contact with clients’ traumatic material, and it’s distinct from burnout or compassion fatigue because it specifically alters the helper’s own beliefs, identity, and sense of the world. Self-care is necessary for the professionals who experience this, but it isn’t sufficient once vicarious trauma has restructured the nervous system at a level deeper than any wellness practice can reach. What actually helps is trauma-informed therapy for the helper, somatic work, and genuine professional community, not simply more supervision or another week off. In my work with driven clinicians, the hardest part is usually accepting that healers need healing too.
In short: Vicarious trauma restructures a helping professional’s inner world and nervous system through sustained empathic contact with client trauma, and healing it takes more than self-care. It takes trauma-informed clinical support for the helper.
Annie Wright, LMFT, has more than 15,000 clinical hours, and she’s worked extensively with helping professionals whose vicarious trauma was being managed with self-care strategies that never reached the neurobiological level of the wound. Bessel van der Kolk, MD, psychiatrist, trauma researcher, and author of The Body Keeps the Score, offers the clinical framework for understanding how empathic exposure to other people’s trauma produces structural changes in the nervous system that need specific, targeted intervention (van der Kolk 2014).
The Night Reyna Said “I Think I’m Disappearing”
The evidence-based approaches to healing vicarious trauma, which go beyond standard self-care and wellness interventions to address the specific neurological, psychological, and relational impacts of sustained exposure to other people’s traumatic experiences. Effective treatment typically includes trauma-focused modalities like EMDR and somatic experiencing, repair of the therapeutic relationship, and meaning-making work.
In plain terms: A massage can’t fix what years of bearing witness have done to your nervous system. Vicarious trauma isn’t stress, it’s a structural change in how your brain and body read the world, and addressing it takes the same kinds of interventions you’d offer a trauma client, turned around and applied to yourself.
Self-care has become the mantra of the helping professions, a badge of resilience and a boundary against burnout, and it is genuinely necessary. There’s no question that regular movement, restorative sleep, and social connection are foundational to mental health. The limits show up when trauma’s imprint runs deeper than fatigue. Vicarious trauma isn’t simply a matter of overwork, it’s a transformation of your inner terrain, a quiet shift in how the world looks to you and how you inhabit your own life inside it. The wellness practices that help with ordinary stress often can’t reach that kind of psychic and somatic recalibration, no matter how faithfully you keep them.
The problem lives in the nature of vicarious trauma itself. It isn’t only emotional exhaustion or compassion fatigue, though those often ride along with it. It’s a form of secondary trauma that reshapes how you think, how you feel, and how safe you feel in your own body. Laurie Anne Pearlman, PhD, and Karen Saakvitne, PhD, two clinical psychologists whose 1995 book Trauma and the Therapist I still hand to supervisees, were among the first to name how absorbing other people’s trauma changes a helper’s meaning systems, the deep beliefs about safety, trust, control, esteem, and intimacy that organize a life. Those shifts don’t reverse with a spa day or a weekend away. Self-care tends to treat the symptoms, the irritability, the broken sleep, but it rarely touches the rewiring underneath, or the way your core assumptions about the world have quietly cracked.
There’s another catch, too. Self-care as it’s popularly prescribed can turn into a performance, a checklist you complete perfectly while the deeper distress goes untouched. Reyna’s adherence to every recommended practice was meticulous, and none of it reached the dissociation or the creeping sense of disappearing she was describing. Without something that engages trauma’s neurobiological and relational dimensions, self-care becomes a bandage on a wound that needs actual repair.
What Vicarious Trauma Actually Requires
Healing vicarious trauma asks for interventions that move past symptom management into nervous-system regulation and the slow rebuilding of shattered meaning. Here’s what I keep coming back to in my own training and in session every week: the approaches that work integrate the cognitive, the somatic, and the relational, rather than picking one and hoping it’s enough. EMDR, which stands for Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing, has strong evidence for addressing trauma’s imprint on neural pathways, letting distressing material get processed and re-filed rather than looping. Reyna is EMDR-certified herself, and she found unexpected relief when she finally sat in the client’s chair and let someone recalibrate her own internal safety signals.
The neurobiology helps explain why. Chronic exposure to trauma narratives nudges the sympathetic nervous system into hypervigilance or freeze, a low hum of alarm that never quite switches off. Peter Levine, PhD, the psychologist who developed Somatic Experiencing, has spent his career documenting how trauma gets stored in the body as patterns of tension and dysregulation that talk therapy alone often can’t reach. Think of it like a house alarm that learned to trip during one real break-in years ago and never got recalibrated. Now it goes off during a client’s disclosure, during a raised voice at the dinner table, during a text from a colleague at 9pm. Which means, in practice, the tight jaw at night, the chest that won’t fully open, the sense that you’re bracing for something that isn’t in the room. The body keeps the score, even when your mind is certain it has managed the material.
Alongside the nervous-system work, there’s the slower project of restoring a coherent and compassionate view of the world. Trauma fractures our assumptions about safety and justice, and vicarious trauma pushes that rupture into the helper’s own sense of who she is and why she does this. Rebuilding a narrative you can actually live inside, supported by a genuinely attuned therapeutic relationship, gives you a framework that can hold suffering without being flooded by it. For Reyna, a real turn came when she stopped experiencing herself as a passive vessel for other people’s pain and started to reclaim her own agency inside the work.
The Role of Trauma-Informed Therapy
A therapeutic approach that addresses the clinician’s own trauma exposure, both direct and vicarious, inside a framework built on safety, collaboration, trustworthiness, empowerment, and cultural humility. It treats the helper as a whole person rather than a clinical instrument, and it situates her distress inside its real systemic and occupational context.
In plain terms: What you offer your clients, you deserve too. The same attuned, non-pathologizing, body-aware support you work so hard to provide is exactly what heals vicarious trauma. Not a five-step wellness plan, but an actual therapeutic relationship where you get to be the one who’s held.
Helping professionals often hesitate to seek therapy for themselves, sometimes out of a fear of being seen as vulnerable, sometimes out of a quiet belief that they ought to be immune. The irony is hard to miss. The people who provide trauma-informed care need that same quality of care, and often more urgently than they’ll admit. Trauma-informed therapy is defined by safety, collaboration, trustworthiness, empowerment, and cultural humility, and those qualities are exactly what create the container where vicarious trauma can finally be set down and looked at.
Reyna’s early reluctance to be a client reflected a stigma I see constantly in helping fields. She worried she’d be read as weak, or as somehow not good enough at her own job. What she found instead was a space that mirrored what she tried to offer her own clients: her experience validated, her reactions normalized, her healing explored as a collaboration rather than a verdict. That relational experience worked directly against the isolation that vicarious trauma breeds so reliably.
Good trauma-informed therapy for helpers also refuses to pretend the work happens in a vacuum. It doesn’t pathologize the clinician, it situates her distress inside the reality of chronic exposure to human suffering and the institutional constraints she works under. That framing grows self-compassion and a sense of shared responsibility, rather than private blame, which turns out to be part of the medicine.
RESEARCH EVIDENCE
Peer-reviewed findings that inform this clinical framework:
- Vicarious trauma and avoidance (OR=4.44, 95% CI 1.77-11.18) predicted mental health problems in nurses (PMID: 39802564)
- 15 studies (8 qualitative, 7 quantitative, total n=1597 professionals) documented vicarious post-traumatic growth (PMID: 35487902)
- 27 interventions reviewed for vicarious trauma in service providers working with traumatized people (PMID: 33685294)
- Vicarious trauma was positively associated with burnout in mental health professionals (n=214) (PMID: 36834198)
- 27% of trauma therapists presented PTSD symptoms from secondary trauma (Velasco et al., Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 2022)
The Somatic Dimension
“I ask my soul: ‘Give me sight to see what is really happening. Give me a third eye. A heart eye.’ There is always more to the story. We are born to rest. We are born to resist.”
Tricia Hersey, founder of The Nap Ministry and author of Rest Is Resistance: A Manifesto
The body remembers what the mind can’t always put into words. Vicarious trauma lives not only in your thoughts and feelings but in the small contractions and freezes that gather in muscle, posture, and breath. Reyna described nights when her chest felt banded tight and her jaw ached from clenching she never noticed doing, sensations that no amount of cognitive reframing could loosen. Somatic therapies, whether through breathwork, movement, or body-based mindfulness, open a door into those stored places that talking can’t quite reach.
Peter Levine, PhD, whose Somatic Experiencing work I lean on constantly with clinician clients, has shown how unresolved trauma leaves the nervous system stuck in survival patterns long after any real threat has passed. For people who absorb trauma secondhand, the body’s protective responses can settle into chronic hyperarousal or shutdown, a permanent bracing or a permanent numbness. Somatic approaches help discharge that trapped energy and coax the autonomic nervous system back toward balance. In plain terms, your body took on what your mind couldn’t hold, so the healing has to happen there too, not only in conversation.
In practice, weaving somatic techniques together with talk therapy creates a fuller path through. Reyna’s recovery deepened once she added somatic experiencing sessions alongside her EMDR and talk work. The gradual release of held tension in her body opened new room for emotional processing and for the cognitive integration that had felt out of reach. This embodied work isn’t a luxury add-on, it’s central to becoming whole again after vicarious trauma.
Restoring Meaning and Connection
The last part of vicarious trauma recovery, and often the slowest, is reclaiming meaning and connection. Trauma fractures our sense of purpose and belonging, and vicarious trauma quietly extends that fracture into the helper’s own reasons for doing the work. Reyna’s early years had been fueled by a fierce commitment to her clients’ healing. Over time she found herself wondering whether her efforts made any difference at all, or whether the suffering was simply too vast to touch. Reconnecting with the why, the deep values that drew her to trauma work in the first place, became a real turning point in her own healing.
Meaning-making is relational by nature. Rebuilding connection with the people you love, with your community, with colleagues who actually understand the work, is what counters the isolating pull of vicarious trauma. Reyna’s ability to be present with her kids improved as she built small rituals of presence, a real ten minutes at bedtime with her phone in another room, and let herself be honest with a few trusted people about what she was carrying. That honesty broke the silence that so often surrounds caregiver distress. Peer support groups that make room for authentic sharing, beyond the case-focus of supervision, did something similar for her sense of belonging.
Recovery, it turns out, isn’t a return to some earlier baseline. It’s a transformation into a new way of being, one that can hold complexity, acknowledge pain without being swallowed by it, and find real sustenance in connection. The work of healing vicarious trauma is slow and rarely linear, and it’s also a genuine reclamation of your own life and purpose. If Reyna’s story resonates, trauma-informed therapy may be a place to begin.
Both/And: Vulnerability and Strength Aren’t Opposites
There’s a particular isolation that driven women carry into recovery: the belief that needing help means they’ve failed. They’ve built whole identities around competence, self-sufficiency, and never being a burden, so asking for support, let alone admitting they’re struggling, feels like a betrayal of everything they’ve worked to become. In my practice this is one of the first beliefs we examine together, because it’s almost always a relic of childhood, a strategy that once kept a small girl safe.
Deepa is an entrepreneur who runs a company worth many millions and texts her team at 5 a.m. She canceled her first three therapy appointments before she finally walked in and sat down. “I handle things,” she told me in that first session, as if it were a personality trait rather than a survival strategy she’d been running since she was nine. What Deepa couldn’t yet see is that her capacity to handle things and her need for support weren’t competing. They could live side by side. Her refusal to let them had been quietly costing her for decades.
Both/And means Deepa gets to be the person her whole team relies on and the person who cries on my blue couch on a Thursday afternoon. She can run a company and still need someone to hold space for her. She can be the strongest person in almost every room she enters and still deserve one room where she doesn’t have to be strong at all. These aren’t contradictions. This is what wholeness actually looks like.
Gabrielle is a forty-year-old pediatric social worker at a children’s hospital, the clinician her colleagues describe as “the one who really gets it,” the one who can sit with a family in their worst moment and stay present in a way that feels like a gift. At home, after her shifts, Gabrielle can’t watch television without leaving the room when something hard comes on. She stopped being able to read fiction, “too many feelings,” she says. Last month she realized she’d been answering her partner in one-word replies for weeks without noticing. “I give everything I have at work,” she told me, “and by the time I get home, the tank is empty. I don’t have feelings left for my own life.” That’s a near-textbook presentation of vicarious traumatization, and it isn’t solved by a yoga class or an early bedtime. It’s solved by treating the injury as an injury.
The Systemic Lens: The Conditions That Slow Healing
When we tell driven women to “get help” for their trauma, we tend to skip over what getting help actually requires: money for quality therapy, schedule flexibility for consistent appointments, a workplace that doesn’t punish prioritizing mental health, and a social world where vulnerability is safe. Those things aren’t universally available. For many women, they aren’t available at all.
Even driven women with real resources hit structural walls. The pressure to be endlessly productive means therapy gets crammed into margins that don’t leave room for the emotional processing the work needs. The cultural expectation that women should “handle things” quietly means many of them hide their therapy from colleagues, friends, even partners, which adds the weight of secrecy on top of the already demanding work of healing. And the habit of squeezing trauma into tidy diagnostic boxes often misses what relational trauma actually looks like inside an accomplished, high-functioning life.
In my work, I try to hold the systemic reality right alongside the individual journey. You’re doing courageous, difficult work, and the world around you wasn’t built to support that work. Both things are true at once. Understanding the constraints isn’t permission to stop, it’s a reason to be gentler with yourself about the pace, and a little more outraged at a system that makes healing harder than it has any right to be.
There’s a dimension of this that hits helping professionals hardest. The healthcare and social-service systems that employ them often treat vicarious trauma as a retention problem rather than a clinical one. When a therapist burns out, the institution loses a practitioner, and the fix offered is almost never structural. It’s individual. “Self-care.” “Supervision.” “Set limits with your caseload.” The advice isn’t wrong, it’s just insufficient, and it quietly hands the entire burden of an organizational failure back to the person most harmed by it.
What would actually help is not mysterious: reduced caseloads, paid clinical consultation, organizational cultures that destigmatize struggle, leadership that names emotional labor as labor. These aren’t radical demands, they’re what the research on sustainable clinical practice keeps recommending. The fact that they get treated as luxuries rather than as basic infrastructure tells you something real about how the helping professions are built, and how little that structure has shifted despite decades of evidence.
Renata, a forty-two-year-old social worker who’d spent eight years in child protective services, came to therapy describing “an inability to feel hopeful about anything.” Her supervisor had told her she needed better boundaries. What she actually needed was specialized trauma processing, real peer consultation, and an honest reckoning with whether her caseload was survivable at all, and all three required institutional change she couldn’t make by herself. The work of therapy helped her find her own agency inside a genuinely constraining system, to see where she had a real choice and where she didn’t, and to stop pathologizing herself for the effects of the part she couldn’t control. (Name and details are a composite, changed to protect confidentiality.)
The cultural water driven women swim in deserves naming out loud, too. Joan C. Williams, JD, distinguished professor at UC Law San Francisco, has documented for years how women in high-status professions face what she calls the “double bind,” judged harshly when they’re warm, read as not competent enough, and judged harshly when they’re competent, read as not warm enough. Add a relational trauma history to that bind, and the internal monitoring becomes nearly continuous. Real healing has to include a clear-eyed look at how much of the exhaustion was never yours alone. It’s a load you’ve been carrying for systems that were never designed to hold you.
A Real Path Forward
In my work with therapists, social workers, nurses, first responders, and other people in the helping professions, one of the most painful moments I witness is when someone realizes that the bubble baths and boundary-setting and yoga practices they’ve been faithfully maintaining aren’t touching the real problem. Vicarious trauma isn’t a self-care deficit. It’s an injury to the helper’s own nervous system and worldview, sustained through repeated, empathic exposure to other people’s pain, and it needs the same level of serious, sustained clinical attention as any other trauma. The people best positioned to understand this, the helping professionals themselves, are so often the last to apply that understanding to their own lives.
The first thing I want to name is the strange irony of it. Helping professionals frequently know exactly what they need, in theory. They can list the modalities, they understand trauma physiology, they can explain why self-blame is an unhelpful response to burnout. Applying that same knowledge to themselves feels entirely different, harder and more resistant, colored by professional identity and the unspoken rule in helping fields that says you’re supposed to be able to take this. Recognizing that you’re not exempt from the injuries your work can cause isn’t a professional failure. It’s the prerequisite for actually healing.
For vicarious trauma, I consider Somatic Experiencing close to essential. Clinicians who’ve been absorbing clients’ pain for years are carrying physiological residue that self-reflection alone won’t discharge. Somatic Experiencing works with the body’s incomplete stress cycles, the activation that never got to finish, the grief and horror that got compartmentalized instead of processed, and it offers a way to release all that safely, at a pace the nervous system can actually tolerate. Many of my clinician clients describe it as the first time they’ve felt a genuine physiological shift rather than one more cognitive reframe.
EMDR is worth naming too, especially for helpers carrying specific incidents: the client who died by suicide, the case they can’t get out of their mind, the family they couldn’t protect. Those particular experiences often form the nucleus of vicarious trauma, and EMDR’s capacity to reprocess discrete memories makes it well-suited to that targeted work. It’s also efficient enough to respect the reality of a packed clinical schedule.
I’d strongly encourage any helper experiencing vicarious trauma to pursue her own ongoing therapy, not just supervision or peer consultation. There’s a meaningful difference between professional support about your clinical work and personal therapeutic support for the person doing that work, and too many clinicians quietly substitute the first for the second. Being in therapy yourself isn’t a luxury or a sign of pathology. For helping professionals, it’s an act of professional integrity and personal sustainability. Therapy with a clinician who understands the specific experience of the helper-as-client can be a genuinely different, and more effective, experience than generic support.
The structural picture matters here as well. Vicarious trauma doesn’t happen in a vacuum, it happens in underfunded organizations, in settings where caseloads run too high and support runs too thin, in professional cultures that mistake burnout for commitment. Healing while you’re still inside those conditions takes more than individual intervention, it takes an honest assessment of whether your current environment is survivable, and what structural change might be possible. Executive coaching can be a useful space to think through those organizational questions alongside your own sustainability.
The people you serve need you whole, and being whole isn’t something you can maintain through self-care alone. It takes the same quality of clinical attention you offer your clients, and you deserve exactly that. Reaching out for support isn’t a sign that you’ve failed at this work. It’s a sign that you understand it well enough to know what it truly costs, and what it truly requires.
What I see consistently in my work with driven women is that the body tells the truth long before the mind catches up. By the time a client lands on my couch describing what isn’t working, her nervous system has been signaling for months, sometimes years. The tightness in her jaw at 3 a.m., the way her shoulders climb toward her ears during certain conversations, the fatigue no amount of sleep can touch. These aren’t separate problems, they’re a single integrated story her body has been telling about an emotional terrain her conscious mind hasn’t been able to face yet. Of course you’re tired. You’ve been holding an unbearable amount, and you were never meant to hold it alone.
If what you’ve read here resonates, please know that individual therapy and executive coaching are available for driven women ready to do this work. You can also explore my self-paced recovery courses or schedule a complimentary consultation to find the right fit. If you’re in crisis right now, you don’t have to wait. In the US, you can call or text 988 to reach the Suicide and Crisis Lifeline, twenty-four hours a day.
ANNIE’S SIGNATURE COURSE
Fixing the Foundations™
The deep work of relational trauma recovery, at your own pace. Annie’s step-by-step course for driven women ready to repair the psychological foundations beneath their impressive lives.
Q: I’ve been doing “all the right things” and I’m still not getting better. What’s missing?
A: Self-care addresses depletion, and vicarious trauma addresses restructuring. If your worldview has shifted, if the world feels more dangerous than it used to, if you can’t be present with your family, if hope has started to feel performative, then you’re dealing with something that needs trauma processing rather than more replenishment.
Q: Can vicarious trauma get better without formal therapy?
A: In mild cases, yes, with significant lifestyle changes, real peer support, and a sustained reduction in trauma exposure. But if your symptoms have persisted more than a few months, if your personal life is affected, or if you’re experiencing intrusive client material, formal trauma-focused intervention is the evidence-based path.
Q: What does somatic work have to do with vicarious trauma?
A: Just about everything. Vicarious trauma is held in the body, the tight chest, the clenched jaw, the bracing quality that doesn’t leave when the workday does. Talk therapy alone can’t fully discharge what’s been somatically encoded, and somatic approaches reach the parts cognitive work can’t.
Q: My supervision is good. Why isn’t that enough?
A: Supervision addresses your clinical work. It rarely has the scope, the role structure, or the time to address what’s happening to you as a human being. Good supervision is essential, and it isn’t therapy. Both are needed, and they serve different functions.
Q: Can I keep doing trauma work and heal from vicarious trauma at the same time?
A: Yes, with concurrent therapeutic support, reduced caseload intensity where that’s possible, and strong somatic and relational practices. The goal isn’t to stop doing the work, it’s to build the internal and external scaffolding that makes continuing the work sustainable.
Q: How can I work with Annie Wright?
A: Annie offers trauma-informed therapy and executive coaching for driven clinicians working through vicarious trauma recovery. To explore working together, connect here.
- American Psychological Association. (2023). Stress in America. APA.org.
- Van der Kolk, B. (2014). The Body Keeps the Score. Viking.
- Maté, G. (2019). When the Body Says No. Knopf Canada.
- Pearlman, L. A., & Saakvitne, K. W. (1995). Trauma and the Therapist. W. W. Norton.
Further Reading on Relational Trauma
Explore Annie’s clinical writing on relational trauma recovery.
One of the most important things I tell clients in early sessions is this: the patterns we’re going to look at together aren’t character flaws, they’re the residue of strategies that once kept you safe. The over-functioning, the difficulty resting, the way you find yourself absorbing other people’s moods before you’ve even registered your own. Every one of those adaptations made sense in the original environment that shaped them. The work isn’t to shame the strategy, it’s to update the system that keeps generating it.
Read Annie’s weekly essays on rebuilding after relational trauma.
Weekly Substack essays from Annie Wright, LMFT on relational trauma, recovery, and the House of Life framework. For driven women who want a structured path back to themselves.
WAYS TO WORK WITH ANNIE
Individual Therapy
Trauma-informed therapy for driven women healing relational trauma. Licensed in 9 states.
Executive Coaching
Trauma-informed coaching for driven women moving through leadership and burnout.
Fixing the Foundations
Annie’s signature course for relational trauma recovery. Work at your own pace.
Strong & Stable
The Sunday conversation you wished you’d had years earlier. 25,000+ subscribers.
Annie Wright, LMFT
LMFT · Relational Trauma Specialist · W.W. Norton Author
Helping driven women finally feel as good as their résumé looks.
Annie Wright is a licensed psychotherapist (LMFT #95719) and trauma-informed executive coach with over 15,000 clinical hours. She works with driven women, including Silicon Valley leaders, physicians, and entrepreneurs, in repairing the psychological foundations beneath their impressive lives. Annie is the founder and former CEO of Evergreen Counseling, a multimillion-dollar trauma-informed therapy center she built, scaled, and successfully exited. A regular contributor to Psychology Today, her expert commentary has appeared in Forbes, Business Insider, Inc., NBC, and The Information. She is currently writing her first book with W.W. Norton.
