What Does It Mean to Do Inner Child Work. And Does It Actually Help?
LAST UPDATED: APRIL 2026
If “inner child work” sounds like something between a self-help cliché and an uncomfortable therapy exercise, you’re not alone in your skepticism. This article makes the clinical case for why it works, what the research actually says, and how it differs from the pop-psychology version that rightfully raises eyebrows. If you’re a driven woman who prefers evidence over woo, read this before dismissing it.
Last reviewed: June 2026 by Annie Wright, LMFT
- The Skeptic in the Therapy Chair
- What Inner Child Work Actually Is
- The Neuroscience Behind the Method
- How Inner Child Wounds Show Up in Driven Women
- What the Clinical Evidence Actually Shows
- Both/And: Honoring the Skeptic and the Wounded Child
- The Systemic Lens: Why Individual Healing Isn’t the Whole Picture
- How Inner Child Work Happens in Practice
- Frequently Asked Questions
Inner child work is a clinically grounded therapeutic approach that addresses the emotional needs of the younger developmental parts of the self that formed adaptive responses to inadequate or harmful early caregiving, and it isn’t the pop-psychology version that skeptics rightly question. The clinical version is supported by neurobiological evidence for the persistence of implicit emotional memory, the developmental research on early attachment, and the outcomes literature from schema therapy, Internal Family Systems, and ego-state therapy. It works precisely because those younger parts are not metaphors; they’re encoded in the body’s nervous system as real affective and behavioral patterns. In my work with driven women who arrive skeptical, the hardest part is usually the moment they recognize the child in question has been running their relationships for thirty years.
In short: Inner child work is a clinically supported method, grounded in implicit memory research and attachment theory, for addressing the encoded emotional responses of younger developmental parts that continue to shape adult behavior.
If you're ready for the full healing arc, not a single piece of it, my signature program Fixing the Foundations is the structured path your relational trauma recovery has been missing.
With over 15,000 clinical hours integrating inner child approaches with driven clients who require evidence before trust, I’ve found that the skeptics often make the most thorough and lasting shifts once they’ve reviewed the research and experienced the body’s response. Richard Schwartz, PhD, psychologist and developer of Internal Family Systems therapy, demonstrates how parts carrying childhood wounds, when approached with curiosity rather than management, are capable of genuine transformation and how that transformation reorganizes the adult self’s functioning from the inside out (Schwartz 2021).
The Skeptic in the Therapy Chair
Talia is a 35-year-old data scientist at a Bay Area tech company. She spent six years getting a Ph.D. from MIT, publishes in peer-reviewed journals, and makes data-driven decisions for breakfast. When her therapist. A kind, well-intentioned clinician she’d been seeing for anxiety. Suggested they try “inner child work,” Talia’s internal reaction was swift and withering: Absolutely not.
She didn’t say that, of course. She nodded, looked open-minded, and spent the next week quietly researching whether inner child work was a legitimate clinical method or something her therapist had learned at a weekend retreat. What she found was complicated. A landscape of genuine clinical research mixed with social media content that made the whole enterprise look like guided journaling and talking to a stuffed animal.
She almost quit. Instead, she found a therapist who could explain the research, the neurological mechanism, and the specific ways the method applied to her particular history. A childhood defined by a father whose emotional range was narrow and demanding, and a mother who coped by making herself small. Eighteen months later, she describes inner child work as “the most uncomfortable and most useful thing I’ve ever done.” She didn’t expect to say that.
If you’re like Talia, you’re probably reading this with at least one eyebrow raised. Good. Skepticism is appropriate. What it deserves, though, is a real answer. Not a reassurance or a dismissal. Let’s give it one.
What Inner Child Work Actually Is
The term “inner child” has a clinical origin that predates its pop-psychology drift by several decades. The concept emerges from multiple distinct theoretical traditions. Jungian analytical psychology, object relations theory, and developmental psychology. Each offering a different but compatible framework for the same fundamental observation: that early childhood experiences leave psychological structures that continue to operate in the adult psyche.
In clinical practice, inner child work refers to therapeutic interventions that access and address developmental wounds. The unmet needs, unprocessed emotions, and false beliefs that formed in childhood and continue to shape adult experience. Dr. John Bradshaw, counselor and author of Homecoming: Reclaiming and Healing Your Inner Child, brought this concept into mainstream discourse, but its clinical roots are found in the work of theorists including Donald Winnicott, John Bowlby, and later in the trauma-informed frameworks of Bessel van der Kolk and Judith Herman. Contemporary manifestations include schema therapy’s “vulnerable child mode,” IFS’s “exile” parts, and EMDR’s developmental protocol targeting early maladaptive experiences. (PMID: 22729977) (PMID: 9384857) (PMID: 13803480) (PMID: 13785877) (PMID: 22729977) (PMID: 9384857) (PMID: 13803480) (PMID: 13785877)
In plain terms: Inner child work is therapy that goes back to the source. The childhood moments where you formed your core beliefs about yourself, love, and safety. And updates them with the resources you have as an adult.
It’s worth being clear about what inner child work isn’t. It isn’t regression therapy or rebirthing. It isn’t convincing yourself to believe you have a literal child living inside you. It isn’t the same as the social media content that tells you to buy your inner child ice cream or take her on dates. Those metaphors, while well-intentioned, flatten what is actually a sophisticated, evidence-supported clinical framework into something that rightly invites skepticism.
The clinical version. Particularly as it exists in evidence-based modalities like Internal Family Systems, schema therapy, and EMDR. Is rigorous, structured, and grounded in decades of research on memory, attachment, and neuroplasticity. It works with specific, concrete experiences from childhood to identify the beliefs, emotional states, and behavioral patterns those experiences created. And uses the therapeutic relationship and specific techniques to create new experiences that update those structures.
If you want to understand the full landscape of what inner child work actually involves clinically, there’s a comprehensive guide that goes into modalities, process, and what to expect in detail.
The Neuroscience Behind the Method
Here’s the thing that makes inner child work clinically credible to the skeptic: it doesn’t ask you to go back and change the past in some magical sense. It works with how memory actually functions. And memory, as neuroscience has shown, is not a fixed archive. It’s reconstructive, and under the right conditions, it’s updatable.
Dr. Bessel van der Kolk, M.D., professor of psychiatry at Boston University School of Medicine and author of the landmark The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma, has spent decades documenting how trauma is encoded in the body and brain. His research demonstrates that traumatic memories. Including the diffuse, relational trauma of childhood emotional neglect or conditional parenting. Are stored differently than ordinary memories. They remain encoded with the emotional charge and physical sensations of the original experience, which is why they continue to trigger fight-flight-freeze responses in the adult nervous system even when the original threat is long past.
What effective trauma therapy does. Including the methods used in inner child work. Is create the conditions under which these memories can be reconsolidated: accessed, held in the presence of safety and adult resources, and updated so they lose their dysregulating charge. This is the neurological basis of interventions like EMDR and IFS, both of which have been validated in clinical research.
Dr. Jeffrey Young, Ph.D., founder of schema therapy and director of the Schema Therapy Institute, has spent decades developing and testing “limited reparenting”. A core technique in schema therapy’s work with the vulnerable child mode. Research by Young and colleagues has consistently shown that accessing and working with early maladaptive schemas (the cognitive-emotional structures formed in childhood) produces significant change in personality disorders, depression, anxiety, and relational patterns. Often more effectively than cognitive-behavioral approaches alone.
The neuroscience confirms what clinicians have observed for decades: the past isn’t just history. It’s actively shaping your present through neurological pathways that were laid down before you had the language to describe what was happening. Understanding childhood emotional neglect and its neurological legacy is fundamental to understanding why this work matters.
RESEARCH EVIDENCE
Peer-reviewed findings that inform this clinical framework:
- SMD = -0.65 (medium protective effect on posttraumatic stress symptoms) (PMID: 34584575)
- r = -0.28 (childhood maltreatment negatively correlated with self-compassion) (Zhang et al., Trauma Violence Abuse)
- r = -0.31 (emotional neglect and self-compassion) (Zhang et al., Trauma Violence Abuse)
How Inner Child Wounds Show Up in Driven Women
The women who most need inner child work are often the ones least likely to identify as needing it. They’re accomplished, articulate, and often highly self-aware in an intellectual sense. The wound, for them, shows up not as visible fragility but as patterns that seem to contradict their competence: the executive who can negotiate a contract in a boardroom but freezes when she needs to ask for something personal; the attorney who advocates brilliantly for clients but can’t advocate for herself in her marriage; the physician who can hold space for a patient’s grief but dissociates from her own.
Gabriela, a 44-year-old physician and department chief at a regional hospital, came to therapy after noticing that her reactions to criticism from colleagues were wildly out of proportion to the stakes. A neutral comment about a patient chart could spiral her into hours of self-reproach. She was, by any external measure, excellent at her job. But inside, she still operated according to a childhood rule system: if you’re not perfect, you’re nothing; if you need something, you’re a burden; if you show vulnerability, it will be used against you.
These weren’t intellectual beliefs she consciously held. They were felt as truths. Old, urgent, preverbal. They’d been adaptive in a childhood home where her mother’s mood was volatile and her father’s approval required constant earning. They’d also, ironically, been part of what drove her to medical school and through residency. But they were now the limiting factor in her leadership, her marriage, and her ability to feel at peace in a life that looked. From the outside. Exactly like what she’d always wanted.
What I see consistently in driven women with inner child wounds includes: an internal critic so internalized it feels like the voice of objective truth; a profound difficulty receiving care without immediately reciprocating or deflecting it; a tendency to over-function in relationships as a way of earning belonging; a disconnection from the body’s signals of need or distress; and a sense of inauthenticity. Performing a version of themselves that doesn’t quite fit, because the authentic self was never fully allowed to form. These patterns trace back, almost universally, to specific childhood experiences that can be identified, processed, and updated in skilled therapeutic work.
What the Clinical Evidence Actually Shows
Let’s be direct about what the evidence shows and what it doesn’t. “Inner child work” as a branded term isn’t a manualized treatment protocol with a body of randomized controlled trials behind it. But the modalities that operationalize inner child work. Schema therapy, IFS, EMDR, somatic experiencing, attachment-focused therapy. Have significant and growing evidence bases.
Schema therapy, in particular, has some of the most robust evidence for relational trauma and personality-level patterns. A 2006 randomized controlled trial published in the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology found schema therapy significantly outperformed transference-focused psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder. Subsequent research has demonstrated its efficacy for cluster B personality disorders, chronic depression, and. Critically for our context. Long-standing relational patterns rooted in childhood deprivation or abuse.
EMDR, which uses bilateral stimulation while the client holds in mind traumatic memories, has received designation as an evidence-based treatment from the World Health Organization, the American Psychiatric Association, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and numerous international bodies. Its developmental protocol. Designed specifically for childhood trauma. Directly addresses inner child material using EMDR’s neurological mechanism of memory reconsolidation.
Internal Family Systems received evidence-based status from SAMHSA (the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration) in 2015, following a randomized controlled trial showing significant improvement in depression and overall functioning. Qualitative research consistently shows that IFS’s work with “exiled” child parts produces shifts in shame, self-compassion, and relational functioning that other approaches struggle to replicate.
Dr. van der Kolk’s research team at the Trauma Center in Brookline, Massachusetts, has documented the physiological changes. In brain activity, cortisol regulation, and body sensation. That accompany effective trauma treatment of the kind used in inner child work. This isn’t theoretical. It’s measurable in the body.
Memory reconsolidation is a neurological process by which previously stored memories are retrieved, temporarily made malleable, and then re-stored. A process that allows the emotional content of the memory to be updated. Research by Dr. Karim Nader, Ph.D., professor of neuroscience at McGill University and a leading figure in memory reconsolidation research, has demonstrated that every time a memory is recalled, it enters a labile state in which new information can be incorporated before the memory is re-stored. This is the neurological mechanism that explains why revisiting childhood memories in the context of therapeutic safety can actually change their emotional charge. Not their factual content, but the felt meaning and urgency they carry.
In plain terms: Your childhood memories aren’t fixed records on a hard drive. Every time you access them, there’s a window in which their emotional meaning can be updated. That’s what good inner child work does. It opens the window.
Both/And: Honoring the Skeptic and the Wounded Child
Here’s the both/and that inner child work requires: you can be a rigorous, evidence-based thinker who demands research AND you can have a wounded younger part of yourself that’s been waiting decades to be seen. These aren’t contradictory. In fact, the most effective inner child work I’ve done with clients often happens with the most intellectually sophisticated women. Because their capacity to hold complexity, to observe themselves with curiosity, and to tolerate uncertainty makes them excellent candidates for this work.
The skeptical part of you that rolled its eyes at “inner child work” isn’t wrong to want evidence. That part has served you well. But that part is also, often, a protector. A way of staying in your head so you don’t have to feel what’s in your body. Both are true. You can honor the skeptic and still show up to the work.
“I felt a Cleaving in my Mind. / As if my Brain had split. / I tried to match it. Seam by Seam. / But could not make them fit.”
EMILY DICKINSON, Poet, “I felt a Cleaving in my Mind,” Poem 867
Talia, the data scientist from earlier, said something in a later session that I’ve thought about many times since: “I spent thirty years being excellent at understanding things from the outside. Inner child work was the first thing that asked me to understand something from the inside. I hated it and I needed it.” That tension. Between the part of you that needs to understand before it can trust, and the part that can only understand by experiencing. Is the central both/and of this work.
The therapeutic frame doesn’t ask you to abandon your critical mind. It invites you to use it alongside your felt experience, not instead of it. The skeptic and the wounded child don’t have to compete. They can coexist, and eventually, they can be integrated. Which is, in the end, what inner child work is actually aiming at. If you’re curious about the relationship between this work and complex PTSD, understanding the overlap between those frameworks is deeply useful.
There’s another both/and worth naming explicitly: you can do inner child work and still be skeptical of some of the cultural packaging around it. The social media version. The affirmation cards, the inner child journaling prompts, the guided meditations telling you to hold yourself as a small child. These aren’t necessarily harmful, and for some women they’re genuinely useful entry points. But they’re not the same as the clinical work, and they can create false comfort. The sense of having “done the work” when you’ve actually done the preparation for the work. The clinical depth happens in an attuned, consistent relationship over time. The social media version can be a warm-up. Honor both without conflating them.
One more thing the both/and of inner child work requires: holding the grief alongside the insight. Understanding, intellectually, that you had an inner child who was wounded is not the same as actually grieving that child. Feeling the sorrow of what she didn’t receive, the anger of what was taken from her, and eventually the compassion that arises when you can see her clearly. That grief, when it finally surfaces in the right therapeutic container, often feels like something ancient being released. It isn’t dramatic, necessarily. Sometimes it’s very quiet. But something moves. Something that has been held still for decades begins, finally, to move. That movement. That thaw. Is inner child work doing exactly what the evidence says it should.
The Systemic Lens: Why Individual Inner Child Work Isn’t the Whole Story
A systemic view of inner child work asks a harder question: why did so many of us need it in the first place? What are the social, cultural, and familial conditions that produce generations of adults carrying unprocessed childhood wounds?
Part of the answer is structural. We live in a culture that has systematically undervalued the emotional dimensions of childhood development. Particularly in certain generations and certain demographics. Emotional attunement, empathic parenting, and the explicit acknowledgment of children’s emotional lives were not prioritized in many families, not because parents were malicious but because they were themselves products of systems that didn’t teach those capacities. Intergenerational transmission of emotional limitation. Of intergenerational trauma. Is the systemic context within which individual inner child wounds form.
This matters because it means inner child work, while deeply personal, isn’t a private failing. You didn’t arrive at this wound because something was wrong with you. You arrived here because of a set of relational conditions that were embedded in a family that was embedded in a culture. Seeing that systemic frame doesn’t diminish the work. It contextualizes it in a way that can reduce shame and increase compassion.
There’s also a cultural narrative worth examining: the idea that effective adults “should” be done with their childhoods. That it’s indulgent or self-focused to spend time and money attending to wounds that happened decades ago. This narrative serves no one well. And it disproportionately affects driven women who already struggle with prioritizing their own needs. The wound doesn’t care how successful you are. It doesn’t close just because you’ve built an impressive life over it. Addressing it isn’t indulgence. It’s maintenance on the psychological infrastructure everything else is built on.
How Inner Child Work Happens in Practice
If you decide to pursue inner child work. Or if you’re already in therapy and want to understand what you might ask for. Here’s what the actual clinical process looks like, so you can enter it with your eyes open.
It starts with safety and stabilization. No competent therapist goes straight to the wound. The first stage of inner child work establishes what therapists call “window of tolerance”. Your capacity to access difficult emotional material without being overwhelmed by it. This often involves learning somatic regulation techniques (breath, grounding, orienting) that give you tools to stay in the work without flooding or shutting down.
Identification of the core wound. Working with your therapist, you’ll identify the specific early experiences that formed the beliefs and emotional patterns you’re working with. These might be explicit memories or more diffuse sense memories. The feeling of a particular dynamic rather than a specific scene. The goal isn’t to excavate every painful moment, but to identify the organizing experiences around which your inner child’s core beliefs formed.
Rescripting or reparenting. In schema therapy, this is called “imagery rescripting”. You return to the childhood memory in imagination, but with your adult self and your therapist present, able to intervene in ways that weren’t possible originally. In IFS, you “unburden” the exile part, giving it what it needed and couldn’t receive. In EMDR, bilateral stimulation processes the emotional charge while the memory is held. In each case, the aim is to update the felt meaning of the experience, not to change what happened but to change how the nervous system is carrying it.
Integration. The insights and shifts from this work are then integrated into your present-day life and relationships. You start to notice the moments when the wounded child is driving. When you’re reacting from an old place rather than your adult resources. And you develop more choice about how to respond. This is the practical payoff: not just understanding your patterns intellectually, but actually having more freedom within them.
If you’re curious about whether this work might be right for you, taking the childhood wound quiz is a useful starting point. It can help you identify the specific wound pattern that’s most shaping your present experience. And if you want to explore what this work looks like in individual therapy, I’d welcome a conversation about working together. This is, in many ways, the core of the clinical work I do with driven women. And I’ve seen what’s possible when the right person gets the right therapeutic container.
The skeptic in the therapy chair often becomes the therapy’s most devoted advocate. Not because she stopped thinking critically. But because she finally got an answer to the most important question: does this actually work? When you feel the shift in your body, in your relationships, in the quality of your internal life. You don’t need another study. You already know.
What I want to leave you with is this: inner child work is not about becoming someone different. It’s about completing who you already are. The child who learned to manage without being seen, to achieve without feeling deserving, to give without receiving. She is still in you. She doesn’t need to be fixed or transcended or left behind. She needs to be met. When she finally is. In the presence of an attuned therapist, in the context of a therapeutic process that makes room for her. What happens isn’t that you become less yourself. You become more. The resourced adult you are learns to carry the wounded child alongside her, rather than running from her. And that integration. That coming home to the whole self. Is the actual goal of the work. It’s available to you, including if you’re a data scientist who needed the research first. It’s especially available to you if you’re someone who needed to understand before you could feel. That’s not a barrier to inner child work. In my clinical experience, it’s often exactly the path in.
If you’re wondering whether your particular childhood experiences. Even ones that felt “not that bad” or “just the way it was”. Might be worth exploring in this framework, the childhood wound quiz is a useful first step. And if you’re ready to take the skeptic’s curiosity into a genuine clinical process, I’d welcome the conversation about working together.
ANNIE’S SIGNATURE COURSE
Fixing the Foundations™
The deep work of relational trauma recovery. At your own pace. Annie’s step-by-step course for driven women ready to repair the psychological foundations beneath their impressive lives.
Q: Is inner child work the same as regression therapy?
A: No, and this distinction matters. Regression therapy. Which uses hypnosis or other altered states to “return” to the past. Has very little clinical evidence behind it and carries significant risks, including the creation of false memories. Inner child work, as practiced in evidence-based modalities like EMDR, schema therapy, and IFS, uses imagination and the therapeutic relationship to work with present-day emotional patterns that were formed in childhood. You’re not going back in a literal sense. You’re working with the neurological residue of the past in the present, in a state of conscious awareness.
Q: I had a good enough childhood. Can I still benefit from inner child work?
A: Yes. Inner child work isn’t only for people with overtly traumatic childhoods. Many women with objectively “fine” childhoods carry wounds from emotional attunement failures. Moments where a parent was emotionally unavailable, critical, dismissive, or inconsistent. That don’t rise to the level of abuse or neglect but still leave developmental marks. Childhood emotional neglect in particular is a common wound that doesn’t announce itself dramatically. If you notice patterns in yourself. The inner critic, the difficulty receiving care, the sense of not quite belonging in your own life. Those are worth exploring regardless of how your childhood “looks” from the outside.
Q: How is inner child work different from regular talk therapy?
A: Talk therapy typically works at the cognitive and emotional level. Identifying thoughts, exploring feelings, building insight. Inner child work goes deeper, accessing the experiential and somatic dimensions of early wounds. Rather than talking about the past, you’re creating a new experience within the therapeutic relationship that updates the neurological encoding of the old experience. Many women find that they’ve done years of insightful talk therapy without the fundamental patterns changing. Because insight alone doesn’t update the nervous system. Inner child work addresses the level at which the wound actually lives.
Q: Can I do inner child work on my own, outside of therapy?
A: Some self-directed practices. Journaling, meditation, somatic awareness exercises. Can support inner child healing, particularly as complements to therapy. Books like Pete Walker’s Complex PTSD: From Surviving to Thriving or Patrick Carnes’ work offer useful frameworks for self-reflection. But for deep inner child wounds, self-directed work has significant limitations: without an attuned other holding the container, the nervous system often can’t access the level of safety required to do the deeper work. The therapeutic relationship itself is a primary vehicle of healing. Because the wound happened in relationship, and it heals most completely in relationship.
Q: How do I know if I’m doing inner child work right?
A: In my clinical experience, you know you’re in the right territory when something in you softens. When you touch something real rather than staying in a familiar story about yourself. It’s often accompanied by grief or tenderness rather than insight or analysis. If you’re describing your childhood without feeling anything, or if you’re going through techniques without anything moving, that’s worth discussing with your therapist. The work should feel alive and slightly uncomfortable, not mechanical or intellectual. And you’ll know it’s working when you start noticing real changes in your present-day reactions, relationships, and sense of self. Not just understanding of your patterns, but actual freedom within them.
References
Peer-Reviewed Research (Vancouver)
- van der Kolk BA, Wang JB, Yehuda R, Bedrosian L, Coker AR, Harrison C, et al. Effects of MDMA-assisted therapy for PTSD on self-experience. PLoS One. 2024;19(1):e0295926. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0295926. PMID: 38198456.
- Cloitre M, Stolbach BC, Herman JL, van der Kolk B, Pynoos R, Wang J, et al. A developmental approach to complex PTSD: childhood and adult cumulative trauma as predictors of symptom complexity. J Trauma Stress. 2009;22(5):399-408. doi:10.1002/jts.20444. PMID: 19795402.
- Bowlby J. Attachment and loss: retrospect and prospect. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1982;52(4):664-678. doi:10.1111/j.1939-0025.1982.tb01456.x. PMID: 7148988.
Books & Cultural Sources (Chicago Author-Date)
- Winnicott, D.W.. Playing and reality. Penguin, 1971.
- Walker, Pete. Complex PTSD. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2013.
Read Annie’s weekly essays on rebuilding after relational trauma.
Weekly Substack essays from Annie Wright, LMFT on relational trauma, recovery, and the House of Life framework. For driven women who want a structured path back to themselves.
WAYS TO WORK WITH ANNIE
Individual Therapy
Trauma-informed therapy for driven women healing relational trauma. Licensed in 11 jurisdictions.
Executive Coaching
Trauma-informed coaching for driven women navigating leadership and burnout.
Fixing the Foundations
Annie’s signature course for relational trauma recovery. Work at your own pace.
Strong & Stable
The Sunday conversation you wished you’d had years earlier. 25,000+ subscribers.
Annie Wright, LMFT
LMFT · Relational Trauma Specialist · W.W. Norton Author
Helping driven women finally feel as good as their résumé looks.
Annie Wright is a licensed psychotherapist (LMFT #95719) and trauma-informed executive coach with over 15,000 clinical hours. She works with driven women. Including Silicon Valley leaders, physicians, and entrepreneurs. In repairing the psychological foundations beneath their impressive lives. Annie is the founder and former CEO of Evergreen Counseling, a multimillion-dollar trauma-informed therapy center she built, scaled, and successfully exited. A regular contributor to Psychology Today, her expert commentary has appeared in USA Today, Forbes, Business Insider, Inc., NBC, and The Information. She is currently writing her first book with W.W. Norton.
Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist (LMFT #95719)
15,000+ direct clinical hours
California · Connecticut · Washington DC · Florida · Maine · Maryland · New Hampshire · New Jersey · Texas · Virginia · Washington
Creator of House of Life™ and Fixing the Foundations™
The Everything Years (W.W. Norton)
Founder & former CEO, Evergreen Counseling
Regular contributor to Psychology Today. Expert commentary has appeared in USA Today, Forbes, Business Insider, Inc., NBC, and The Information.
