.entry-content .aw-definition-box .aw-term,
.entry-content .aw-definition-box p,
.entry-content .aw-definition-box .aw-kitchen-table {
font-style: normal !important;
font-family: inherit !important;
}
.entry-content .aw-definition-box .aw-term {
font-style: normal !important;
font-weight: 700 !important;
}

Money and Self-Worth: Why Your Net Worth Is Not Your Self-Worth (But Your Nervous System Thinks It Is)
Many driven women feel their sense of self rise and fall with their bank balance, even when they know, intellectually, that the number on the screen isn’t a verdict on who they are. In this post, I explore why money and self-worth get fused in the nervous system, what that fusion looks like in daily life, and how to start building a sense of worth that doesn’t move every time your account does.
- The Number on the Screen and the Feeling in Your Chest
- What Is Worth Conflation?
- The Nervous System of Money: Why a Bank Balance Can Feel Like Danger
- How Worth Conflation Appears in Driven Women
- What This Isn’t: Separating Metaphor From Diagnosis
- Untangling Net Worth From Self-Worth
- Both/And: You Can Be Financially Ambitious and Emotionally Free
- The Systemic Lens: Capitalism, Gender, and the Price Tag on Human Value
- Building Worth That Isn’t Contingent on Wealth
- Frequently Asked Questions
The Number on the Screen and the Feeling in Your Chest
It’s 6:40 on a Tuesday morning, and Ksenia is standing barefoot on the cold kitchen tile, phone in one hand, French press in the other, checking her investment account before she’s said a single word to another human being. She’s 37, a director of data science at a biotech firm, the kind of person whose Slack status says “in deep work” for six hours straight. The market was down 1.8 percent yesterday. She already knows this. She’s checking anyway.
If you've earned the income but money still feels like chaos, my self-paced course Money Without the Mayhem works at the level where the actual problem lives.
The number on the screen is fine. It’s actually fine. She has more saved at 37 than either of her parents had at retirement, more than most of her coworkers, more, honestly, than she ever pictured for herself when she was memorizing English vocabulary flash cards on the bus to a school where she didn’t yet understand the teacher. But her chest doesn’t know that. Her chest is doing something tight and fast, the same tightness she remembers from being nineteen and watching her mother separate grocery coupons at the kitchen table in Novosibirsk, before the family emigrated, sorting them by expiration date with the focus of a surgeon, the radio turned low, the electric bill propped against the sugar bowl where nobody could pretend not to see it.
“I know it’s irrational,” Ksenia tells me two weeks later, sitting on the blue couch in my office, still in her work blazer because she came straight from a board meeting, her laptop bag still on her shoulder as if she might need to leave at any moment. “I’ve money. I’ve more money than I ever thought I’d have. And I still feel like I’m one bad quarter away from being nothing.”
In my work with clients, I hear some version of this sentence constantly, from women who are, by every external measure, financially secure. The specific numbers change. The feeling doesn’t. It’s the sense that your worth as a person is somehow tethered to a figure that fluctuates with the market, the economy, a client’s payment schedule, or a company’s quarterly performance, something almost entirely outside your control, standing in for something that should never have been up for negotiation in the first place: whether you, as a person, are enough.
I want to say something clearly before we go any further. This piece is educational, not a financial plan and not a diagnosis. I’m not going to tell you what to do with your money, whether to invest more aggressively or pay down debt faster or change your spending. That’s for a financial planner or, in some cases, a financial therapist, and it isn’t work I’m trained or licensed to do. What I can offer is what I’ve seen across more than 15,000 clinical hours, sitting across from women who run departments, courtrooms, and hospital floors and still feel a specific kind of dread when an account balance updates: how money and self-worth get fused for so many driven women, why that fusion feels so believable from the inside, and what it actually takes, slowly, to start separating the two.
What Is Worth Conflation?
Let’s start with a clear definition, because the phrase “money and self-worth” gets used loosely, and loose language keeps people stuck.
A pattern in which a person’s felt sense of personal value becomes psychologically fused with a fluctuating external metric, most commonly income, net worth, or account balance, so that changes in the metric are experienced as changes in the person’s fundamental worth rather than as changes in circumstance.
In plain terms: It’s when a dip in your bank balance doesn’t just feel inconvenient. It feels like evidence. Evidence that you’re behind, that you’re failing, that you’re somehow less than you were the day before, even though the actual you hasn’t changed at all.
Worth conflation isn’t the same as caring about money, wanting financial stability, or feeling stressed about a real financial problem. Those are ordinary, sane responses to ordinary, sometimes difficult circumstances. Worth conflation is specifically the moment where a financial fact gets translated, silently and automatically, into a verdict on your character.
I recently reread Bradley Klontz, PsyD, CFP, a financial psychologist and associate research professor at Kansas State University, and his 2011 paper with Sonya Britt, Jennifer Mentzer, and Ted Klontz, published in the Journal of Financial Therapy, introducing what they call money scripts. One of the four patterns they identified, money status, describes people who equate net worth with self-worth and place a premium on visible signs of financial success. Reading their data, I recognized nearly every client I’ve worked with who grew up believing their family’s stability, or instability, said something permanent about their worth as a person.
What Klontz and his colleagues found, and what I see constantly in my office, is that money scripts are rarely conscious. Nobody decides, as an adult, “I will now measure my value in dollars.” The belief gets installed early, usually in a household where money was either scarce, unpredictable, or used as a stand-in for love and approval, and it operates quietly for decades until a person is 37 and checking a healthy investment account before sunrise with a knot in her stomach.
What makes worth conflation especially hard to catch is that it wears the costume of a virtue. A woman who checks her accounts obsessively looks responsible. A woman who can’t enjoy a bonus looks humble. A woman who benchmarks her salary against everyone in her graduating class looks driven. Nobody in her life is likely to name the pattern, because from the outside it reads as competence, not as a nervous system quietly keeping score of something it was never designed to measure.
The Nervous System of Money: Why a Bank Balance Can Feel Like Danger
Here’s the question I hear most from clients like Ksenia: Why does this still feel so urgent when I know, logically, that I’m fine?
Part of the answer lives in the nervous system, though I want to be careful here, because this is exactly the point where money psychology tends to get oversimplified into neuroscience-flavored slogans. So let me say precisely what I mean, and hold myself to no more than that.
A term coined by Stephen Porges, PhD, to describe the nervous system’s largely unconscious process of scanning the environment for cues of safety or danger, a process that happens beneath conscious awareness and can trigger physiological stress responses to situations that pose no actual physical threat.
In plain terms: Your body is constantly asking, “Am I safe right now?” and it answers that question using old evidence more than present-moment facts. If money once meant danger in your house growing up, your body can still flag a bank notification as a threat, even when your rational mind knows better.
I’ve been reading Stephen Porges, PhD, a research professor and originator of polyvagal theory, whose 2025 paper on the current status and clinical applications of the theory is the one I keep returning to when clients ask me to explain why their body reacts before their mind does. Porges describes neuroception as an evaluative process, not a thought. It doesn’t ask permission first, and it doesn’t wait for the rational mind to weigh in. It just fires, fast and total, and the rest of the body follows without argument.
Think of it like a smoke detector that was installed during a real kitchen fire years ago and never got recalibrated. The original fire, maybe a parent’s job loss, a foreclosure notice on the counter, a hushed argument about the electric bill, is long over. But the detector still goes off at burnt toast. It goes off at a dip in the market. It goes off at an invoice that’s two weeks late. The alarm is loud and physical: a tight chest, a racing pulse, the urge to check the account for the fourth time before 7 a.m.
I want to be exact, even a little pedantic, about what I am and am not claiming here, because this is precisely where good psychology tips over into overreach. I’m not saying the nervous system literally assigns you a worth score, and I’m not saying every financial stress response is trauma. Bodies respond to real financial precarity because financial precarity is actually dangerous, in a plain, practical sense, not because of some symbolic wound underneath it. What I am saying, and only this, is that for people who grew up with money instability, a present-day financial fluctuation, even a survivable, ordinary one, can trigger the same physiological alarm as an actual threat, because the nervous system doesn’t always distinguish cleanly between then and now. Which means, in practice, you can be entirely financially secure and still feel, in your body, like you’re standing at the edge of something.
How Worth Conflation Appears in Driven Women
Worth conflation rarely announces itself. It hides inside habits that look, from the outside, like diligence.
It’s 9:15 on a Wednesday night, rain streaking the office window, and Liora is sitting cross-legged on her office floor in Tel Aviv-by-way-of-Boston, laptop balanced on a yoga block because her desk is covered in printouts. She’s 44, a partner at a mid-size law firm, the kind of lawyer whose name appears in the trade press twice a year. Her Nalgene bottle, covered in stickers from bar association conferences, sits untouched beside her, the water long gone flat. She has read her firm’s distribution memo six times. She could recite it. She reads it again.
“I made partner,” she says when we meet the following week, turning her grandmother’s ring around her finger, a habit I’ve learned means she’s circling something hard to say. “I made partner and I still spent forty minutes last night comparing my draw to the other partners in my class. Forty minutes, Annie. I’ve a nine-year-old asleep down the hall and a husband who wanted to know why I wasn’t in bed, and I told him I was finishing an email. I wasn’t finishing an email. I was doing math that had nothing to do with anything real.”
Sitting with Liora that evening, I felt the particular ache I’ve come to recognize in driven women who have technically won by every external measure and still feel like they’re failing some invisible exam. Not concern, exactly. Recognition. She is, by any reasonable definition, one of the more successful attorneys of her graduating class. None of that was in the room with us. What was in the room was a woman turning a ring on her finger, doing math that had nothing to do with the actual number on the memo. The forty minutes of comparison math was never about the money. It was about a much older question: am I enough, and how would I even know?
What I’ve come to think of as comparison arithmetic is something I see in driven women almost weekly. The instinct to benchmark, to recalculate, to hold her own number up against someone else’s number and read the difference as a verdict, isn’t vanity. It’s the nervous system running an old, familiar search: prove you’re safe. Prove you’re enough. The trouble is that the search has no finish line, because the target was never really about money.
Which is why worth conflation tends to surface in a driven woman’s life in small, unglamorous ways most people would never notice, and rarely in the dramatic moments you’d expect. It’s checking a shared bank account before answering a text from a partner. It’s feeling a flush of shame ordering the cheaper entree at dinner with colleagues. It’s the inability to enjoy a bonus for more than a day before the mind moves on to what could still go wrong. It’s lying awake doing math about a client who’s two weeks late on an invoice, math that has already been done four times that day.
What This Isn’t: Separating Metaphor From Diagnosis
Before we go further, I want to be direct about the limits of everything I’m describing, because this topic invites overstatement, and overstatement doesn’t help anyone heal.
I want to be clear that this piece isn’t a diagnosis. I can’t tell you, from an essay, whether your relationship to money reflects worth conflation, ordinary financial stress, a legitimate financial problem that needs a financial professional, or some combination of all three. Only an actual conversation, ideally with a licensed clinician who knows your specific history in detail, can sort that out with any real accuracy.
This piece is also not financial advice. Nothing here should be read as a recommendation about investing, saving, debt repayment, or any specific account action. If your financial stress is connected to an actual financial shortfall, the most useful next step is a financial planner or a certified financial therapist, not a blog post about nervous systems.
And I want to correct something the language of “your nervous system thinks it’s” can imply if taken too literally. The nervous system doesn’t reason. It doesn’t hold beliefs about worth the way a mind does. What I mean, more precisely, is that a bank balance can trigger the same physiological alarm response, in the body, that an actual threat would trigger, because early experience taught the body to treat financial instability as danger. That’s a documented pattern in trauma-informed clinical work, one clinicians see regularly across very different client histories. It’s not the same as saying your amygdala has opinions about your salary. Precision matters here, because the moment metaphor slides into overstated neurobiology, a person stops being helped and starts being handed a slogan instead.
Untangling Net Worth From Self-Worth
If worth conflation is learned, the good news, and it’s real good news, is that it can be unlearned, slowly, with practice. Not quickly, and not through a single insight, but through repeated experience that teaches the nervous system a different lesson.
A stable sense of one’s own value that does not depend on achievement, comparison, or external validation, distinguished by researchers such as Kristin Neff, PhD, from self-esteem, which tends to rise and fall with performance and outcomes.
In plain terms: Intrinsic worth means you’re valuable simply because you exist, not because of what you produced, earned, or accumulated this quarter. It’s a much steadier floor to stand on than a number that changes every day.
I first read Kristin Neff, PhD, psychologist and pioneering self-compassion researcher, in her book Self-Compassion, on a plane, of all places, somewhere over the Midwest on the way to a conference, and I haven’t been able to stop recommending it to clients since. Neff distinguishes self-esteem, which depends on comparing yourself favorably to others or hitting a specific benchmark, from self-compassion, which offers a steadier kind of worth that doesn’t require winning anything at all. Her research suggests that people high in self-compassion report more stable well-being over time than people who rely on achievement-based self-esteem, precisely because self-compassion doesn’t collapse the moment performance dips. When I read that, I thought immediately of every client who has told me some version of, “I only feel okay about myself when the numbers are good.”
Glennon Doyle put language to something I find myself returning to often in this work, the quiet confusion between being valuable and being valued.
“We were never meant to earn our worth. It was never a prize at the end of enough achievement. Somewhere along the way we confused being valuable with being valued, and spent our lives chasing a number that was never going to fill the space it promised to fill.”
Glennon Doyle, author of Untamed
Oliver isn’t writing about money at all, but the question underneath her line is the same one worth conflation quietly answers wrong. If your value depends on a number, then your one wild and precious life becomes a performance review. If your value is intrinsic, the number becomes what it actually is: useful information about your finances, not a referendum on your soul.
The spreadsheet isn't the problem. You already know that.
A focused self-paced course on financial trauma, the nervous-system patterns that override every budgeting app, every money mindset book, and every well-meaning financial planner. Not a productivity tool. The level underneath all of those.
Untangling the two isn’t a single realization. It’s a practice, closer to physical therapy than an epiphany, rebuilding a muscle that atrophied a long time ago through small, repeated moments of noticing the fusion and gently separating it again.
Both/And: You Can Be Financially Ambitious and Emotionally Free
Here’s where I want to correct a misunderstanding I run into often with clients: the idea that healing worth conflation means becoming indifferent to money, or that ambition itself is the problem.
It isn’t. You can want to build wealth, negotiate hard for a raise, grow a business, and plan seriously for retirement, and you can do all of that from a place of real, steady security rather than fear. Financial ambition and emotional freedom aren’t opposites. They’re both/and. I’ve watched clients worry that healing this pattern will somehow blunt their edge, make them softer in a negotiation or less driven in a client pitch. In my experience, the opposite tends to happen. A woman who isn’t privately terrified that a bad quarter means she’s worthless negotiates from a steadier place, not a more desperate one.
Ksenia didn’t stop checking her investment account after our work together. She still checks it, because she’s a data scientist and checking things is, frankly, part of who she is and part of what makes her good at her job. What changed was the forty-five seconds after she checks it. Before, a market dip triggered a cascade: tight chest, spiraling thoughts about being one bad year from losing everything, an hour lost to recalculating scenarios that had already been calculated the night before. Now, more often than not, she notices the number, feels the familiar flicker in her chest, and says to herself, silently, this is information, not a verdict, before going back to her coffee, still lukewarm, still sitting on the counter where she left it.
That’s the both/and. Stay ambitious. Keep building. Keep negotiating for what you’re owed. And let your sense of self stop riding shotgun on a number the market can move without your permission.
The goal was never to want less. The goal was to stop needing the number to say something it was never built to say.
The Systemic Lens: Capitalism, Gender, and the Price Tag on Human Value
It would be incomplete, and frankly dishonest, to talk about money and worth as if this were purely a private, psychological matter. The ground underneath this pattern isn’t neutral.
We live inside an economic system that has, for most of its history, priced human beings unequally by design. Women in the United States couldn’t hold a credit card in their own name until 1974. Black families were systematically excluded from federally backed home loans through redlining well into the twentieth century, a policy whose wealth effects are still measurable today, visible in home equity gaps that persist across generations regardless of individual effort or income. Immigrant families, like Ksenia’s, often arrive with credentials that don’t transfer, a medical degree that means nothing to a state licensing board, an engineering background that has to be re-proven from the first undergraduate course, forced to rebuild financial standing from scratch in a system that treats their prior expertise as invisible. None of this is ancient history. It’s the terrain many of the women I work with were raised on, whether or not they ever named it that way at the time.
Capitalism, as a structure, has a habit of collapsing human value into productive output. It rewards what can be measured, monetized, and scaled, and it has very little patience for what can’t be. Caregiving, rest, grief, the slow work of raising a child or tending a marriage, none of it appears on a balance sheet, and a culture that only counts what can be priced will always struggle to value what can’t. When a culture consistently signals that a person’s contribution is worth exactly what they’re paid for it, it should not surprise us that individuals internalize the same math and apply it to themselves, right down to the quiet arithmetic of a Tuesday morning.
For women specifically, and especially for first-generation professionals and women of color working inside industries that weren’t built with them in mind, worth conflation often carries an added layer: proving, through income, that they belong somewhere they were told, implicitly or explicitly, they didn’t. Liora has told me more than once that making partner wasn’t just a career milestone. It was evidence, she said, “that they were wrong about me,” meaning every person who assumed a woman with her accent and her background wouldn’t make it that far. That’s not a personal insecurity. That’s a rational response to a system that made her prove something no one should have had to prove.
None of this excuses worth conflation as inevitable or untreatable, and it’s not a reason to abandon the internal work in favor of only naming the system. Both are true at once. But naming the terrain matters, because it keeps the responsibility for healing exactly where it belongs: with a person doing real, hard internal work inside a system that made that work necessary in the first place, not with a person who is simply “too sensitive about money,” a phrase I’ve heard said to more than one client by a well-meaning parent or partner who had no idea what they were actually dismissing.
Building Worth That Isn’t Contingent on Wealth
So what does the actual work look like? Not a five-step plan, because worth conflation doesn’t dissolve on a schedule, but a set of practices I’ve watched actually shift things for clients, slowly, over months and years.
Start with noticing, not fixing. Before you can untangle net worth from self-worth, you have to catch the moment they fuse. That means paying attention to the physical sensation, the tight chest, the racing thoughts, the urge to check an account for the fifth time, and naming it out loud, even just to yourself: this is the old alarm, not new information.
Separate the financial fact from the emotional story. A market dip is a fact. “I’m failing” is a story layered on top of the fact. Learning to hold the two apart, on paper if it helps, is slow, unglamorous work, and it’s some of the most durable work I’ve watched clients do.
Write your money autobiography. Where did you first learn that money meant safety, danger, love, or shame? Whose voice do you hear when you look at your bank balance? Most clients are startled by how specific and how old these memories are, a coupon-sorting kitchen table, a hushed argument through a bedroom wall, a parent’s face when a check bounced. I ask clients to write this out longhand if they can, not typed, because something about the slower pace of handwriting tends to surface details a quick mental review skips right past.
Diversify where you locate your worth. If your sense of value has one input, income, then every fluctuation in that single input becomes existential. Building other, steadier sources of it, your relationships, your integrity, your curiosity, the specific way you love the people in your life, gives your nervous system more than one place to stand when the number moves.
Practice receiving without earning it first. For many driven women, rest, help, and even compliments feel unsafe unless they’ve been “earned” through output. Practicing the discomfort of simply receiving, a compliment, an unhurried Saturday, a friend’s help, without translating it into a transaction, is quietly radical work, and it’s often the piece clients resist longest, because it asks them to sit with a kind of stillness that has never once felt safe.
Track the pattern over time rather than only in the moment. Keeping a short, private log of when the fusion happens, what triggered it, what the story was, what actually happened afterward, tends to reveal something useful within a few weeks: the story almost never matches the outcome. The bad quarter passes. The invoice gets paid. The comparison fades. Seeing the pattern in writing, in your own handwriting or your own typed words, carries a different weight than simply remembering it happened.
And when the pattern runs deep, get support that matches the depth. A financial planner can help you build a sound financial life, with real numbers and a real plan. A financial therapist can help you understand your specific relationship to money. And a trauma-informed therapist can help you work with the nervous system patterns underneath both, patterns that neither a spreadsheet nor a single conversation will fully resolve. These aren’t competing options. For many of the women I work with, they’re all three, running in parallel.
Ksenia still checks her account every morning. Liora still turns her grandmother’s ring when something hard surfaces. Neither of them has arrived anywhere final, and I don’t think either of them needs to. Healing this pattern was never going to look like a finish line, a day when the checking stops entirely or the comparison math never returns. That’s not how nervous systems work, and it’s not the promise I make to anyone who sits across from me on the blue couch. What’s changed is smaller and, I’d argue, more durable than any finish line could be: the gap between the number and the feeling has widened just enough for both of them to breathe inside it, to notice the old alarm going off and choose, most days, not to obey it.
References
Sources Cited (Vancouver style, books and journal articles)
- Klontz BT, Britt SL, Mentzer J, Klontz T. Money Beliefs and Financial Behaviors: Development of the Klontz Money Script Inventory. Journal of Financial Therapy. 2011;2(1):1-22.
- Porges SW. Polyvagal Theory: Current Status, Clinical Applications, and Future Directions. Clinical Neuropsychiatry. 2025;22(3):169-184.
- Neff K. Self-Compassion: The Proven Power of Being Kind to Yourself. New York: William Morrow; 2011.
- van der Kolk BA. The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. New York: Penguin Books; 2014.
If your sense of worth rises and falls with your bank balance, your last bonus, or the number in your retirement account, I want to name that this isn’t greed or shallowness. For many driven women, money got wired early to safety, and safety got wired to being lovable. So your nervous system genuinely experiences a dip in income as a threat to survival, even when the spreadsheet says you’re fine. You can take your financial life seriously, plan wisely, want more, and also begin to loosen the belief that your worth is denominated in dollars, both at once. Neither your ambition nor your inherent worth has to be sacrificed for the other. Your net worth and your self-worth were never the same thing. Untangling them is slow, somatic work, and it’s easier with support. When you’re ready for that, I’m here.
Warmly,
Annie
Q: Why do I feel physically anxious when I check my bank balance, even when I’ve enough money?
A: In my work with clients, this usually points to an old nervous system pattern rather than a present-day financial problem. If money once meant real instability in your household growing up, your body can still react to a bank balance the way it once reacted to actual scarcity, even when the current facts don’t support that reaction at all. It’s not irrational. It’s outdated information running on autopilot.
Q: Does wanting to be financially successful mean I’ve worth conflation?
A: No. Wanting financial success, security, or growth is a healthy and often practical goal. Worth conflation isn’t about wanting money. It’s about what happens internally when the number moves, whether a dip or a gain gets translated into a statement about your fundamental value as a person.
Q: I grew up financially stable, so why do I still tie my worth to money?
A: Worth conflation isn’t only about scarcity. In some households, money was used as a measure of achievement or approval even amid comfort, tied to grades, career choices, or comparisons with siblings or peers. If love or attention felt conditional on performance of any kind, money can become one more scoreboard, regardless of how much of it was actually present.
Q: How is worth conflation different from imposter syndrome?
A: The two often travel together, but they’re not the same thing. Imposter syndrome centers on competence, the fear of being exposed as not skilled enough despite evidence to the contrary. Worth conflation centers specifically on a financial metric standing in for personal value. You can have one without the other, though in my practice, I frequently see them reinforcing each other.
Q: Should I see a therapist or a financial advisor for this?
A: It depends on what’s actually driving the distress. If your finances are truly unstable, a financial planner or certified financial therapist is the right first call. If your finances are objectively sound but your internal experience of them isn’t, a trauma-informed therapist can help you work with the underlying pattern. Many clients benefit from both, working in parallel rather than choosing one.
Q: My partner and I fight about money constantly. Is that the same thing as worth conflation?
A: Not necessarily, though the two can overlap. Ordinary money conflict often comes from differing values, spending styles, or communication patterns, none of which require any deeper explanation. Worth conflation becomes relevant when one or both partners experience financial disagreements as a threat to their basic sense of value, rather than a purely logistical disagreement. A couples therapist can help distinguish which dynamic, or combination, is actually at play.
Read Annie’s weekly essays on rebuilding after relational trauma.
Weekly Substack essays from Annie Wright, LMFT on relational trauma, recovery, and the House of Life framework. For driven women who want a structured path back to themselves.
WAYS TO WORK WITH ANNIE
Individual Therapy
Trauma-informed therapy for driven women healing relational trauma. Licensed in 15 U.S. jurisdictions, including Colorado (telehealth only).
Executive Coaching
Trauma-informed coaching for driven women managing leadership and burnout.
Fixing the Foundations™
Annie’s signature course for relational trauma recovery. Work at your own pace.
Strong & Stable
The Sunday conversation you wished you’d had years earlier. 27,281 readers.
Annie Wright, LMFT
LMFT · Relational Trauma Specialist · W.W. Norton Author
Helping driven women finally feel as good as their resume looks.
Annie Wright is a licensed psychotherapist (LMFT #95719) and trauma-informed executive coach with over 15,000 clinical hours. She works with driven women, including Silicon Valley leaders, physicians, and entrepreneurs, in repairing the psychological foundations beneath their impressive lives. Annie is the founder and former CEO of Evergreen Counseling, a multimillion-dollar trauma-informed therapy center she built, scaled, and successfully exited. A regular contributor to Psychology Today, her expert commentary has appeared in Forbes, Business Insider, Inc., NBC, and The Information. She is currently writing her first book with W.W. Norton.

