The Trauma of the Gifted Child: When Your Intelligence Becomes Your Prison
LAST UPDATED: JULY 2026
You were reading at three, tested into the gifted program at seven, and told you’d change the world. What almost nobody tells you is that the label can become a quiet, lifelong burden: chronic burnout, a fear of failure that never fully lifts, and a habit of intellectualizing feelings instead of having them. This guide walks through the psychology of gifted child trauma, the neurobiology behind it, and what it actually takes to separate your worth from your output.
Last reviewed: July 2026 by Annie Wright, LMFT · See our editorial policy
- The Girl Who Was Never Allowed to Be Ordinary
- What Is Gifted Child Trauma?
- What Does Asynchronous Development Actually Do to a Child’s Nervous System?
- How Does This Trauma Show Up in Driven Women?
- Why Do Parents Turn a Child’s Intelligence Into Their Own Trophy?
- Both/And: You Are Brilliant AND You Are Exhausted
- Why Does the Imposter Syndrome Trap Feel So Convincing?
- The Systemic Lens: Why This Isn’t Just a Personal Problem
- How Do You Actually Resign from the Pedestal?
- Frequently Asked Questions
I’m Annie Wright, a licensed marriage and family therapist with more than 15,000 clinical hours, and a good chunk of those hours have been spent across the couch from women who were the gifted child in their families or their schools. In my office, I’d estimate that four out of five of them describe the exact same private terror: not that they’ll fail, but that failing will finally reveal what they’ve suspected about themselves since they were seven years old. The exception is the woman who was gifted and also disabled, neurodivergent, or otherwise complicated in a way her school didn’t know how to hold. Her version of this wound looks different, and I want to name that here rather than flatten it. Alice Miller, PhD, the psychoanalyst who wrote The Drama of the Gifted Child, spent much of her career naming the cost of premature exceptional status, the loss of an ordinary childhood traded for a role a child never auditioned for. I think about her work often. It’s the one I hand to clients who ask why being smart feels like a cage.
The Girl Who Was Never Allowed to Be Ordinary
It’s 6:40 on a Tuesday morning, and Rocio is sitting on the edge of her bathtub with her laptop balanced on her knees, still in the gray t-shirt she slept in. She’s forty-five, a director of clinical research at a biotech firm, and she’s rereading an email from her own boss for the fourth time, hunting for the sentence where he tells her she’s finally been found out. There isn’t one. The email says her quarterly numbers are strong. Her coffee has gone cold on the tile beside her bare feet. On her phone, face down next to the mug, is a text from her mother that she hasn’t opened yet: saw on linkedin you got promoted again!! so proud, you were always the smart one.
If you're ready for the full healing arc, not a single piece of it, my signature program Fixing the Foundations is the structured path your relational trauma recovery has been missing.
“I used to think I’d feel done by now,” Rocio told me during our second session, turning her wedding ring in slow half-circles while she talked. “Like there’d be a point where I’d finally hit whatever the number was and I could just, I don’t know, exhale. I have three degrees. I have the corner office. I have a husband who does the dishes without being asked. And I still wake up every single morning convinced that today’s the day someone’s going to tap me on the shoulder and say, actually, we made a mistake, you’re not that smart, go home.”
Sitting with Rocio that morning, I felt the particular ache I’ve come to associate with women who were the gifted child. Not pity. Something closer to recognition. She wasn’t describing impostor syndrome as a personality quirk. She was describing a nervous system that had never once, in forty-five years, been allowed to consider the question of whether it had done enough.
What I’ve come to think of as the pedestal problem is exactly this: the moment a child is told she’s exceptional, she inherits a full-time, unpaid job with no end date and no performance review that counts as final. Rocio was seven when a teacher pulled her aside and told her parents she’d tested into the gifted program. Her parents framed the letter. It hung in the hallway of her childhood home until she left for college. Nobody in that house ever said out loud that her worth was tied to her test scores. Nobody had to. The frame on the wall said it for them.
If you were the “gifted” one, you probably know this feeling in your body before you know it in your head. You’ve been praised your whole life for your brain, and somewhere along the way, the praise stopped feeling like a compliment and started feeling like a bill that never gets paid off. That’s not a character flaw. Clinically, that’s a trauma response to a childhood built on conditional worth, and it’s the thing we’re going to spend this guide taking apart.
What makes it so hard to name is the isolation built into it. Rocio couldn’t talk about this at work, where vulnerability reads as a liability the moment you’re the one running the department. She couldn’t talk about it at home, either, not really, because her husband saw the woman with the corner office and the calm voice on client calls and had no reason to imagine the version of her sitting on the edge of the bathtub at 6:40 in the morning. And she’d stopped talking about it with friends years ago, mostly because she didn’t have many left. Genuine closeness asks for a kind of emotional availability her nervous system had been rationing since she was seven.
What Is Gifted Child Trauma?
Gifted child trauma isn’t caused by the intelligence itself. It’s caused by what a family or a school does in response to that intelligence. It’s the psychological cost of a child’s intellectual capacity getting prioritized over her emotional development, again and again, until the two stop growing at the same rate.
A cluster of psychological patterns, including chronic anxiety, perfectionism, and emotional suppression, that develops when a child is labeled “gifted” and learns that her value is entirely conditional on intellectual performance. The label becomes the burden: an exceptional child learns that ordinary effort, or ordinary failure, isn’t tolerated, and because she’s cognitively precocious, she also understands the adult expectations riding on her earlier and feels the weight of them more acutely than a same-age peer would.
In plain terms: it’s the slow, terrifying realization that people don’t love you, they love your brain, and if your brain ever stops producing results, you’ll be left with nothing to offer.
That belief creates a rigid, fragile identity, one that can shatter the moment its owner runs into a problem she can’t immediately solve. This is where a second concept becomes useful, because it explains where the belief actually comes from.
A parenting pattern in which a child receives warmth, approval, and affection contingent on meeting a standard of performance, achievement, or behavior, rather than as an unconditional expression of love. Carl Rogers, the psychologist who named unconditional positive regard as foundational to healthy development, argued that its absence teaches a child her inherent worth is provisional. Daniel Siegel, MD, clinical professor of psychiatry at UCLA and author of The Developing Mind, has written about how, when a caregiver’s attunement is repeatedly tied to a child’s performance, the child’s developing sense of self fuses with her accomplishments, so that failure starts to feel existentially threatening instead of just disappointing.
In plain terms: if the warmth you got as a kid tracked with how well you performed, at school, at sports, at being the good one, you learned something that felt like love but had a condition buried inside it. That condition followed you into adulthood. You’re only lovable when you’re extraordinary. And carrying that around every day is exhausting.
What Does Asynchronous Development Actually Do to a Child’s Nervous System?
To understand what’s actually happening inside a gifted child, it helps to look at a concept called asynchronous development. In a neurotypical child, cognitive, emotional, and physical growth happen at roughly the same pace. A gifted child’s cognitive development races ahead of the rest. An eight-year-old might read and reason like a sixteen-year-old, but she still has the emotional regulation capacity of an eight-year-old, because that part of her hasn’t sped up to match.
Here’s what that looks like in an actual living room. That same eight-year-old can intellectually grasp a concept like divorce, or a parent’s job loss, or what it means when Grandma is dying. She can follow the adult conversation happening at the dinner table. What she can’t do is metabolize the emotional weight of any of it, because her nervous system is still eight years old, even though her vocabulary sounds forty. Because she sounds like a small adult, the adults around her start treating her like one. She gets pulled into conversations she isn’t developmentally ready to hold, and she’s quietly denied the ordinary, boring, protected experience of just being a child.
A developmental pattern common in intellectually gifted children in which cognitive abilities advance significantly faster than emotional, social, or physical maturation, creating an internal mismatch that adults frequently misread. Linda Silverman, PhD, founder of the Gifted Development Center, coined and elaborated the term in her 1997 paper on the construct, noting that a gifted child may reason and communicate at the level of a teenager while processing emotion at, or below, her actual age. Bruce Perry, MD, PhD, a child psychiatrist affiliated with the ChildTrauma Academy, has documented how this gap becomes a chronic stressor when a child’s emotional needs are assessed against her intellectual functioning instead of her real developmental stage.
In plain terms: just because you could articulate what you felt doesn’t mean you were equipped to handle it. You were pulled into adult conversations and given adult responsibility because everyone could see how smart you were. What they couldn’t see was that your emotional self was still very young. That gap, between how capable you looked and how overwhelmed you actually were, is where the wound lives.
I recently sat with the 1997 paper where Silverman first laid this out for a room of gifted-education researchers, and I haven’t been able to stop thinking about one line in particular: she describes asynchrony as a child being “out of sync both internally and externally.” That phrase does something I haven’t found anywhere else in the clinical literature. It locates the wound not in the child’s intelligence, and not in her family, but in the mismatch itself, the gap between two clocks running at different speeds inside one small body.
How Does This Trauma Show Up in Driven Women?
By the time Rocio came to see me, this pattern had settled into three specific, highly compensated habits, and I want to walk through each one, because they rarely show up alone.
The fixed mindset. The clinical concept here is straightforward: a fixed mindset treats intelligence as an innate, static trait rather than something built through effort. Think of it like believing you were handed a fixed amount of money at birth and every withdrawal brings you closer to zero, so spending any of it on visible struggle feels dangerous. What this looks like on a Tuesday afternoon is Rocio quietly abandoning a pottery class after the second session, the moment the bowls stopped looking effortless, because struggling in front of other people threatened something bigger than a hobby.
The paralysis of choice. Because you were told as a child that you could do anything, adulthood becomes an unbearable menu. You’re not indecisive because you don’t care. You’re indecisive because caring about everything, and being told your potential was limitless, means every choice you make is secretly a choice against every other life you could have lived. In practice, that means a woman like Rocio can spend four months circling two nearly identical job offers, not because either is wrong, but because choosing one means grieving the ghost of the other.
Emotional intellectualization. Clinically, this means processing an emotion cognitively rather than somatically, analyzing a feeling instead of letting your body experience it. Picture a woman who, when she notices she’s angry, opens a mental spreadsheet: what triggered this, is it proportionate, what would a reasonable person feel here. That’s Layer 2. Layer 3 is what it costs her: she can narrate her own grief with total clarity in a therapy session and still not cry for eleven years, because crying was never modeled as safe, only understanding was.
Why Do Parents Turn a Child’s Intelligence Into Their Own Trophy?
It’s 4:47 on a Thursday afternoon, golden light coming in sideways through the blinds of my office, and Rosario is sitting across from me holding a paper cup of water she hasn’t taken a single sip from. She’s forty, a partner at a mid-sized law firm, and she hasn’t taken a sick day in three years. Her associates describe her as unflappable. Her managing partner describes her as the future of the firm. Her mother, when she finally found her way into my office six months ago, would have described her as the proof that all those years of pushing had been worth it.
“I don’t know exactly when it started,” Rosario said, turning the cup a quarter-turn in her hands without drinking from it. “I just know that somewhere along the way I stopped being a kid and became a resume. My mom used to introduce me to her friends by my GPA. Not my name first. My GPA first. ‘This is Rosario, four-point-oh, she’s going to be a lawyer.’ And now I don’t actually know how to be a person who isn’t accomplishing something. I don’t know what I’d do with a free Saturday. I’ve never had one.”
What Rosario was describing wasn’t burnout, even though it can wear burnout’s clothes. It was the quiet cost of building an entire identity on top of a childhood wound that whispered one sentence on a loop: you are only as valuable as your last accomplishment. In my clinical work, I see this dynamic constantly, a parent who never developed a stable sense of her own worth starts to use her child’s intelligence as a narcissistic extension of herself. The child’s report cards and awards become the parent’s trophies. The unspoken job description handed to that child is to regulate her parent’s self-esteem by staying exceptional.
When a child becomes a narcissistic extension of a parent, she isn’t allowed to have needs, flaws, or ordinary failures, because she isn’t fully a separate person in that dynamic. She’s a mirror, angled to reflect the image her parent needs to see. If the mirror cracks, if she brings home a B, if she quits the violin, the parent doesn’t just get disappointed. The parent withdraws warmth, sometimes suddenly enough that the child never forgets the temperature change in the room. This is a core piece of what I’ve come to call the Achievement as Sovereignty pattern, and you can read more about how it plays out across a whole life in my piece on workaholism and ambition as relational trauma. It’s also central to the Fixing the Foundations™ work: the pedestal was never entirely yours to begin with.
Both/And: You Are Brilliant AND You Are Exhausted
One of the hardest things for a former gifted child to admit out loud is her own mediocrity at something. The thought underneath it is usually some version of: if I’m not the smartest person in the room, who am I? What do I have left to offer?
Here’s the Both/And I ask Rocio, and women like her, to try holding: your unusually high cognitive capacity was brilliant, and understandable, and it kept you safe in a household where being smart was the one currency that consistently bought you love. And it is now costing you the ability to feel ordinary, to rest without guilt, to be average at things that don’t matter. You don’t have to choose between honoring what your intelligence has given you and grieving what it’s taken. You’re allowed to be bad at math. You’re allowed to be a mediocre painter. You’re allowed to be a regular employee who logs off at five o’clock and means it.
You do not have to pick between your intelligence and your humanity. You can be smart without also being the family’s designated savior.
I recently reread Richard Schwartz, PhD, the developer of Internal Family Systems therapy, and a line from his work on protective “parts” has stayed with me for weeks. Schwartz writes about the parts of us that took over during childhood to keep us safe, the manager who over-functions, the striver who never stops. His framework doesn’t ask you to get rid of the striving part of yourself. It asks you to thank her, and then gently invite her to step back from running the whole show. That’s not a character flaw you’re being asked to fix. It’s an adaptation that made complete sense at the time, and it can be renegotiated now.
FOR MORE ON THIS PATTERN
Enough Without the Effort
If achievement has become the only place you feel safe, this is the mini-course built for exactly that pattern. It isn’t open for enrollment yet, but you can join the waitlist now.
Why Does the Imposter Syndrome Trap Feel So Convincing?
The gifted child is uniquely primed for imposter syndrome, and the mechanism is almost mechanical once you see it. If you coasted through elementary and middle school without ever really studying, you never built the skill of struggling and surviving the struggle. So when you finally hit a real wall, in college, in a graduate program, in your first demanding job, your nervous system doesn’t read it as a normal developmental hurdle. It reads it as an emergency.
Because you never practiced the skill of tolerating difficulty, you interpret the difficulty itself as proof that you were a fraud all along. The thought that shows up is usually something like: they finally figured out I’m not actually that smart. What you don’t see in that moment is that everyone around you is struggling too. They just built the tolerance for not knowing the answer immediately, and you never had to, so you never did.
I think often about a specific claim from Bessel van der Kolk, MD, psychiatrist and author of The Body Keeps the Score: that the nervous system doesn’t file experiences by category the way our conscious minds do. It doesn’t separate “this is a scary math exam” from “this is a threat to my survival.” For a formerly gifted child, both can trip the exact same alarm, because both threaten the same fragile structure, a sense of self built entirely on the scaffolding of being exceptional. Rosario described this to me almost exactly, in her own words, during her fifth session: “When my managing partner asked me to redo a memo last month, my whole body went cold before my brain even caught up. Like something was actually in danger. Not my job. Me.”
Stephen Porges, PhD, the developer of Polyvagal Theory, offers language I find myself returning to with clients like Rosario. His 2025 paper on the theory’s clinical applications describes how the body’s threat-detection system, what he calls neuroception, can flag an ordinary social moment, a raised eyebrow from a boss, a request for a redo, as unmistakably dangerous, long before conscious thought is involved. For a woman whose sense of safety was built on never being caught out, that’s not an overreaction. It’s a nervous system doing exactly what it was trained to do.
“I see many students don’t give themselves permission to just have a hobby or just chill out with friends. They believe to be busy is to be competent.”
Rachel Simmons, author and leadership educator at Smith College, author of Odd Girl Out and Enough As She Is, How to Ensure That Every Girl Knows She Is Enough As She Is, with Rachel Simmons
The Systemic Lens: Why This Isn’t Just a Personal Problem
It would be convenient, and culturally familiar, to frame everything in this guide as an individual problem. Something Rocio or Rosario could fix with the right therapist, the right morning routine, the right set of boundaries. That framing is comfortable precisely because it keeps the problem small and private. It also misses what’s actually happening.
We live inside a culture that rewards women for their labor, emotional, professional, and domestic, while simultaneously treating any need of their own as an inconvenience. A driven woman who was once a gifted child isn’t struggling because she’s broken. She’s struggling because she was trained early, by a family and then reinforced later, by an economy that runs on precisely this kind of overfunctioning, to treat her own needs as negotiable and her output as non-negotiable. That’s the mechanism: a child learns that being exceptional buys safety, and an entire culture then profits from adults who never unlearn that lesson.
None of this is about blaming your parents, and it’s usually not useful to. Most of the parents I hear about in session weren’t cruel. They were doing what they’d been taught, inside a culture that has treated a child’s giftedness as a family asset for generations, something to be groomed, displayed, and monetized rather than simply loved. Naming the system isn’t about assigning blame. It’s about accuracy, because without accuracy, therapy just becomes one more place a driven woman performs being good instead of being honest.
Here’s what that looks like in an actual week: it’s the reason Rocio’s calendar has no unscheduled hour in it, because an unscheduled hour feels like wasted potential rather than rest. It’s the reason Rosario’s inbox gets answered at eleven at night, because a slow response reads, somewhere under conscious thought, as evidence she’s finally slipping. Of course you’re tired. You’ve been asked to carry your own healing and the system’s expectations in the same two hands.
How Do You Actually Resign from the Pedestal?
You can’t heal gifted child trauma with another degree or another award. Healing asks you to step off the pedestal on purpose, which is its own kind of terrifying, because the pedestal has also, for a long time, kept you safe.
1. Practice failing on purpose. Do something you’re genuinely bad at, on a regular basis, in front of other people. A pottery class you don’t quit at the first wobbly bowl. A language you mangle in front of a native speaker. A recreational sports league where you’re visibly the weakest player on the court. You’re teaching your nervous system, slowly, that you can fail publicly and still be loved, still be safe, still be you.
2. Decouple your worth from your output. This is the childhood conditioning to actually address head-on: the belief that you’re only valuable while you’re producing. You have to practice believing, on days when you produce nothing measurable, that you’re still worthy of love, rest, and care simply because you exist, not because of your GPA, your billable hours, or your last performance review.
3. Grieve the potential. You have to let yourself grieve the world-changing life you were promised as a child, the one where your giftedness was going to add up to something singular and unmistakable. In its place, you get to accept the beautiful, mundane reality of an ordinary life, well lived. You were never required to change the world. You’re only required to live your own.
Rocio, six months into our work together, put it this way during a session in early spring: “I think I’ve come to call it retiring the résumé. Not throwing it away. Just, retiring it. Like it did its job. It kept me safe for a long time. It just doesn’t get to run my whole life anymore.” She hadn’t found a tidy resolution. She still checks her email too early. But that Tuesday, for the first time, she left it face down on the counter for eleven whole minutes before she looked.
Rosario’s version of this looked smaller and, in its own way, just as brave. Two weeks after our conversation about the cold-body feeling during the redone memo, she told me she’d taken an actual sick day, her first in three years, and spent most of it doing nothing that could be measured. “I felt guilty the entire time,” she said. “But I did it anyway. That’s new for me.” The room, as I told her that afternoon, doesn’t need to be finished to have a door in it. Hers is open. She’s not all the way through it yet.
Of course you’re tired. You were asked to be a whole person’s worth of accomplishment before you were old enough to know what a whole person even was. That’s not your unique failing, and you’re not required to keep carrying it the same way. This work of trauma-informed therapy isn’t about dismantling everything you’ve built. It’s about finally understanding why you built it, and then, carefully, with someone who can hold the whole complicated weight of it alongside you, starting to separate who you are from who you had to become in order to survive.
If you recognize yourself anywhere in this guide, in Rocio’s bathtub-edge mornings or Rosario’s untouched cup of water, I want to say the thing that too few people say directly: searching for language for this is itself a sign of health. It means some part of you, underneath the performing, still knows you deserve more than survival dressed up as success. You don’t have to earn the right to start. The quiet ache that brought you here tonight is reason enough.
This is what I mean when I talk about fixing the foundations. Not fixing you. You were never broken. Fixing the beliefs about yourself that got installed in a childhood you didn’t choose, reinforced by a culture that profited from your adaptations, and maintained by a nervous system that was only ever trying to keep you safe. Those foundations can be rebuilt. It tends to go better with someone willing to go down there with you.
If you’re in crisis right now, please don’t wait on a guide like this one to help you. Contact the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline by calling or texting 988. This content is psychoeducational and reflects patterns I see in clinical practice. It isn’t a substitute for individualized care from a licensed provider.
Warmly,
Annie
Warmly, Annie
Q: Why do I feel bored and unfulfilled at work even though I’m objectively doing well?
A: Often because your mind is asking for more stimulation than your current role provides, while your nervous system is too depleted from years of overfunctioning to safely pursue it. You end up caught between under-stimulation and exhaustion at the same time, which feels less like boredom and more like a low, constant static.
Q: How do I stop intellectualizing my feelings instead of actually feeling them?
A: Start moving the question from your head to your body. Instead of asking “why am I feeling this,” try asking “where do I feel this, physically, right now.” That single shift, from analysis to sensation, is often the first real crack in a lifelong habit of intellectualizing.
Q: Is it normal to feel resentment toward parents who pushed me academically?
A: Yes. Most parents who push hard genuinely believe they’re helping, but the effect can still be a loss of ordinary childhood, and grief for that loss is a normal, healthy response, not disloyalty.
Q: How do I handle the fear of disappointing people who see me as the smart one?
A: Try separating their projection from your obligation. If someone placed you on a pedestal, that pedestal was their construction, built from their own needs and history. You’re not required to keep standing on it to keep the relationship intact.
Q: Can therapy actually help with gifted child burnout, or is it just about better time management?
A: Therapy can help, and it’s rarely about time management. It’s usually about creating a relationship where you don’t have to be the smartest person in the room, where you can be confused, unfinished, and human, and still be met with warmth instead of withdrawal.
Q: What’s the difference between healthy ambition and gifted child trauma?
A: Healthy ambition can coexist with rest, failure, and average days without your sense of self collapsing. Gifted child trauma is what’s underneath it when ambition can’t coexist with any of those things, when a single mediocre outcome feels like proof of worthlessness rather than just a normal Tuesday.
Related Reading
[1] Miller, Alice. The Drama of the Gifted Child: The Search for the True Self. New York: Basic Books, 1981.
[2] Dweck, Carol S. Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. New York: Random House, 2006.
[3] Webb, James T. Searching for Meaning: Idealism, Bright Minds, Disillusionment, and Hope. Tucson: Great Potential Press, 2013.
[4] Maté, Gabor, and Daniel Maté. The Myth of Normal: Trauma, Illness, and Healing in a Toxic Culture. New York: Avery, 2022.
[5] Dana, Deb. The Polyvagal Theory in Therapy. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2018.
References
Peer-Reviewed Research
- Silverman LK. The construct of asynchronous development.
- Silverman LK. Perfectionism. High Ability Studies. 1999;13(3). journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/026142949901300303.
- Porges SW. Polyvagal Theory: current status, clinical applications, and future directions. Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2025;22(3):169-184. PMID: 40735382.
- Brenner EG, Schwartz RC, Becker C. Development of the internal family systems model. Fam Process. 2023;62(4):1290-1306. PMID: 37924221.
- Family role and dysfunction research: sibling hero/lost-child roles. PMID: 24990636.
Books & Cultural Sources
- Siegel, Daniel J. The Developing Mind. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press, 2020. See also en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_J._Siegel.
- van der Kolk, Bessel. The Body Keeps the Score. New York: Viking, 2014. See also en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bessel_van_der_Kolk.
- Woodman, Marion. Addiction to Perfection: The Still Unravished Bride. Toronto: Inner City Books, 1982.
WAYS TO WORK WITH ANNIE
Individual Therapy
Trauma-informed therapy for driven women healing relational trauma. Licensed in 14 U.S. jurisdictions, including Colorado (telehealth only), and registered to provide telehealth in Florida.
Trauma-informed coaching for driven women moving through leadership and burnout.
Fixing the Foundations
Annie’s signature course for relational trauma recovery. Work at your own pace.
Strong & Stable
The Sunday conversation you wished you’d had years earlier. 28,000+ subscribers.
Annie Wright, LMFT
LMFT · Relational Trauma Specialist · W.W. Norton Author
Helping driven women finally feel as good as their résumé looks.
Annie Wright is a licensed psychotherapist (LMFT #95719) and trauma-informed executive coach with over 15,000 clinical hours. She works with driven women, including Silicon Valley leaders, physicians, and entrepreneurs, on repairing the psychological foundations beneath their impressive lives. She is licensed in 14 U.S. jurisdictions and registered to provide telehealth in Florida, including Colorado (telehealth only). Annie is the founder and former CEO of Evergreen Counseling, a multimillion-dollar trauma-informed therapy center she built, scaled, and successfully exited. A regular contributor to Psychology Today, her expert commentary has appeared in Forbes, Business Insider, NBC News, and The Information. She is currently writing her first book with W.W. Norton.
