
Mare of Easttown: A Trauma Therapist on Grief, Guilt, and the Cost of Caretaking
Mare of Easttown is a profound exploration of trauma’s ripple effects within a small, tightly woven community. At its heart is Mare Sheehan, a woman grappling with the compounded grief of her son’s suicide, the parentification of raising her grandson, and the relentless emotional labor of caretaking in a community that both supports and burdens her.
- Why this Story Lands in the Body
- The Trauma Lens: Parentification; Complicated Grief; Survivor Guilt
- How Mare of Easttown Shows Up in Driven Women
- What the Story Gets Right Clinically
- What Trauma Survivors May Recognize in Themselves
- Both/And: Holding Truth and Compassion Together
- The Systemic Lens: Why This Wound Is Not Just Personal
- How This Connects to Recovery
- Clinical Deepening: What This Story Helps Us See
- Scene-Level Depth: Trauma and Relational Dynamics in Key Moments
- Frequently Asked Questions
Ethical note and spoiler note
This article offers a trauma-informed clinical reading of the HBO series Mare of Easttown as a cultural text. It doesn’t diagnose or pathologize any real person or actor involved in the production. The characters discussed are fictional, and this analysis focuses on the patterns and themes depicted in the storytelling, not on individuals. For those seeking personal support, therapy with a qualified clinician is irreplaceable. Pop culture can be a doorway into self-understanding but is never a substitute for professional care. This article contains spoilers for Mare of Easttown.
Why this Story Lands in the Body
What I want to be clear about — because it matters clinically — is that Mare of Easttown isn’t just a crime drama or a family saga. It’s a story that lands deeply in the body, in the nervous system, and in the relational heart of trauma survivors and caretakers. Mare’s experience resonates because it shows trauma as a lived reality, not a metaphor. Her grief isn’t tidy; her guilt isn’t simple; her caretaking isn’t heroic in a cliché way but fraught with cost.
A persistent, debilitating form of grief that does not move through ordinary stages of mourning — recognized as Prolonged Grief Disorder in the DSM-5-TR. Katherine Shear, MD, psychiatrist at Columbia University and founder of the Center for Prolonged Grief, defines it as grief that stays acutely painful for more than a year and disrupts functioning.
In plain terms: The kind of grief that doesn’t soften with time. The kind that stays sharp, that interrupts your life, that makes other people uncomfortable because you haven’t moved on.
Mare’s body keeps the score. Her stoicism, irritability, exhaustion, and emotional shutdown are all signs of a nervous system doing exactly what it was supposed to do to keep her safe in an unsafe world. This isn’t weakness or failure. It’s survival. This is the house of life for many who carry complex trauma, especially those who have been parentified or who live in tight-knit communities where trauma and grief are shared but often unspoken.
The portrayal of Mare’s layered trauma — the parentification of raising a grandchild, the complicated grief after her son’s suicide, and the survivor guilt that haunts her — opens a window onto how trauma rewires the body and mind. It also invites us to reflect on the invisible labor of caretaking women, the cultural expectations placed on them, and the toll this takes on their mental health and relationships.
The Trauma Lens: Parentification; Complicated Grief; Survivor Guilt
Parentification: The Child Who Became the Parent
Parentification is a trauma pattern where a child or young person is compelled to take on adult caregiving roles prematurely, often to meet the emotional or practical needs of their caregivers or family system. This role reversal can deeply disrupt healthy development and leave lasting imprints on identity, boundaries, and relational capacity.
In Mare of Easttown, this pattern extends intergenerationally. Mare herself was parentified as a young woman, and now after her son’s suicide, she steps into the parent role again for her grandson. This cyclical parentification compounds her trauma: she is both grieving the loss of her son and bearing the weight of raising his child.
Clinical literature, including Janina Fisher’s work on fragmented selves and Pat Ogden’s Sensorimotor Psychotherapy, highlights how parentification can cause chronic nervous system dysregulation. The survivor’s body remains in hypervigilance, alert to threats and needs that aren’t their own, leading to exhaustion, emotional numbing, and difficulty accessing their own needs.
Parentification also often involves a loss of agency and blurred boundaries, as the survivor’s role becomes enmeshed with caretaking and self-sacrifice. Mare’s irritability, withdrawal, and moments of dissociation illustrate this fragmentation.
Complicated Grief: Mourning That Does Not End
Mare’s grief over her son’s suicide is a textbook example of complicated grief, a form of prolonged and intense mourning that disrupts functioning and resists resolution. Unlike typical bereavement, complicated grief involves persistent yearning, guilt, anger, and difficulty accepting the loss.
Judith Herman’s seminal work on trauma and recovery situates complicated grief within complex trauma frameworks, especially when the death is sudden or stigmatized, as suicide often is. Mare’s grief is complicated by the community’s unspoken judgment and the fractured family dynamics following her son’s death.
Bessel van der Kolk’s neurobiological research shows how traumatic grief is stored in the body, leading to symptoms like insomnia, hypervigilance, and somatic distress. Mare’s physical and emotional symptoms throughout the series are consistent with this somatic imprinting of grief.
Complicated grief is often invisible to others, misunderstood as mere sadness or stubbornness. The series poignantly depicts how Mare’s grief is both deeply personal and publicly scrutinized, intensifying her isolation.
Survivor Guilt: The Weight of Living
Survivor guilt is a painful and often overlooked response to trauma, especially outside of war or disaster contexts. It involves feelings of shame and responsibility for surviving when others haven’t. Mare’s survivor guilt is palpable: she carries the burden of being alive while her son is dead, compounded by community stigma and personal regret.
Jennifer Freyd’s betrayal trauma theory helps frame this dynamic. The community, while offering some support, also betrays Mare through silence, stigma, and unspoken expectations. This creates a complex bind where Mare must suppress her pain to maintain social cohesion, leading to further emotional isolation.
Survivor guilt often fuels hypervigilance and caretaking, as survivors attempt to protect others from harm or atone for their survival. Mare’s relentless devotion to raising her grandson and solving the murder case can be seen as attempts to find meaning and regain control.
How Mare of Easttown Shows Up in Driven Women
In my work with clients — driven, ambitious women who present as the most competent person in every room they enter — the stories we’re analyzing here don’t stay on screen. They walk into the therapy room. Two composite client portraits, drawn from common patterns rather than any individual client:
Sarah is a 44-year-old physician at a Bay Area hospital. She’s had three difficult cases this week. She hasn’t told her husband. She hasn’t told her therapist. She’s the kind of woman colleagues describe as ‘unflappable’ — which is another way of saying no one has ever asked her how she’s actually doing.
Driven women like Sarah often come to therapy not because something dramatic has broken, but because they’ve gotten so good at performing fine that they’ve forgotten what they actually feel. Mare of Easttown gives that pattern a name.
Elena is a 41-year-old partner at her law firm. She made partner two years ago, six months after her father died. She has not stopped working since. When her therapist asked her last week what she was feeling, she said ‘fine’ and meant it — and then drove home and sat in her driveway for forty-five minutes before she could go inside.
Elena recognized herself in Mare of Easttown the way many of my clients do — not in any one scene, but in the slow, almost imperceptible way the story shows what happens when grief has nowhere to go.
Both Sarah and Elena — or whichever pair I’m sitting with that day — recognize themselves in the patterns the story is naming. That recognition is where the work begins. Not with diagnosis. With the relief of being able to put words on a pattern that had been operating in silence.
What the Story Gets Right Clinically
Mare of Easttown succeeds in portraying trauma with clinical accuracy and emotional depth. It doesn’t glamorize or simplify grief and caretaking but shows their complexity and cost. The series respects the nuance of trauma symptoms — Mare isn’t “broken,” she is adaptive.
A relational pattern in which a child is required to take on emotional or practical responsibility for their parents or siblings, described by the family therapist Salvador Minuchin, MD, founder of structural family therapy, and more recently by Lisa M. Hooper, PhD, researcher in family systems and parentification.
In plain terms: Being the one who held it together so the adults didn’t have to. Growing up too early because someone had to.
The show’s depiction of the “I’m fine” armor worn by Mare aligns with trauma theory: this stoicism is a survival mechanism, not denial or weakness. Her emotional shutdowns, irritability, and occasional dissociation reflect nervous system dysregulation well documented by Pat Ogden and Janina Fisher.
The intergenerational trauma and systemic pressures are also realistically portrayed. The community’s role as both support and source of trauma echoes Jennifer Freyd’s institutional betrayal theory, extended to community dynamics.
By portraying Mare’s struggles without judgment and with empathy, the show invites viewers to witness the often invisible labor and pain of caretaking women, the cost of parentification, and the complexity of survivor guilt.
“You may shoot me with your words, you may cut me with your eyes, you may kill me with your hatefulness, but still, like air, I’ll rise.”
Maya Angelou, poet and memoirist
What Trauma Survivors May Recognize in Themselves
Many trauma survivors may see aspects of their own experience in Mare’s story:
- The relentless caretaking: putting others’ needs first at the expense of self-care, exhaustion, and resentment.
- The “I’m fine” armor: feeling compelled to appear strong and composed while struggling internally.
- Complicated grief: mourning losses that feel unresolved, especially when stigma or silence surrounds the death.
- Survivor guilt: carrying shame and responsibility for outliving loved ones or surviving trauma.
- Parentification: having taken on adult roles too early, leading to boundary confusion and chronic stress.
- Isolation within community: feeling alone despite being surrounded by people, due to unspoken rules and stigma.
- Nervous system dysregulation: symptoms like irritability, exhaustion, insomnia, and emotional numbing.
Recognizing these patterns is the first step toward reclaiming agency. As Janina Fisher emphasizes, healing involves transforming fragmented parts of the self into compassionate acceptance and integration.
Both/And: Holding Truth and Compassion Together
The both/and frame is central to trauma-informed care and essential when understanding Mare of Easttown. Mare’s survival strategies — her fierce caretaking, her stoicism, her problem-solving — were brilliant adaptations in a world that demanded strength and resilience.
At the same time, these strategies have costs: emotional exhaustion, isolation, difficulty accessing vulnerability, and fragmented connection to self and others. This isn’t an either/or but a both/and truth. The strategies that once saved Mare’s life now keep her stuck in cycles of pain.
This reframe invites compassionate curiosity rather than blame. It acknowledges Mare’s strength and suffering simultaneously, opening a path toward healing that honors both.
The Systemic Lens: Why This Wound Is Not Just Personal
Trauma doesn’t happen in a vacuum. Mare’s story unfolds within a small, close-knit community where everyone knows each other’s business, secrets are hard to keep, and collective trauma reverberates.
Jennifer Freyd’s institutional betrayal theory, while often applied to organizations, can be extended to communities. Easttown both supports and betrays its members — the silence around suicide, the stigma, and the pressure to maintain appearances create a toxic environment for grief and healing.
Gendered expectations add another layer. Women like Mare are culturally expected to hold families and communities together, often at great personal cost. This systemic pressure shapes trauma responses and complicates recovery.
Understanding this systemic context is crucial. Healing requires not only individual therapy but also community and cultural shifts that validate grief, dismantle stigma, and share caregiving burdens more equitably.
How This Connects to Recovery
Healing from the layered trauma depicted in Mare of Easttown requires a multi-dimensional approach:
- Safety first: Establishing nervous system safety as described by Stephen Porges and Deb Dana is foundational. This means feeling safe internally and externally to begin down-regulating hypervigilance or shutdown.
- Somatic approaches: Janina Fisher and Pat Ogden’s somatic therapies help integrate fragmented parts of the self and release trauma stored in the body.
- Narrative work: Judith Herman’s emphasis on telling and retelling one’s story helps survivors reclaim agency and process grief.
- Relational repair: Healing relational trauma requires safe, attuned connections that can undo isolation and mistrust.
- Boundary setting: Reclaiming agency often means setting boundaries around caretaking and family roles, especially for those parentified or enmeshed.
- Community engagement: Recovery can include finding or creating communities that validate and support authentic grief and healing, countering stigma and isolation.
For those touched by similar trauma patterns, Annie Wright’s Fixing the Foundations course offers clinically grounded tools for nervous system regulation, boundary setting, and reclaiming agency — essential steps toward recovery.
Clinical Deepening: What This Story Helps Us See
Scene-Level Depth: Trauma and Relational Dynamics in Key Moments
One of the most striking aspects of Mare of Easttown is how it uses intimate scenes to portray complex trauma dynamics without resorting to overt exposition. For instance, the scene where Mare visits the grave of her son, Kevin, is quiet but charged. Judith Herman (1997) reminds us that trauma isn’t just an event but a “shattering of the ordinary human experience of time, place, and self.” Here, Mare’s visit encapsulates that rupture—her grief is frozen in time, complicated by layers of guilt and unresolved loss. The silence and her physical stillness speak volumes about the internal fragmentation she carries.
Similarly, the interactions between Mare and her grandson, Drew, reveal the subtle enactment of parentification. Janina Fisher (2017) emphasizes how children who are parentified often develop hypervigilance and a premature sense of responsibility, which can lead to chronic stress and difficulties in self-regulation. Drew’s oscillation between needing care and acting as a pseudo-adult mirrors this clinical reality. The show’s nuanced portrayal invites viewers to witness the invisible labor that parentified children perform and the emotional toll it exacts.
In the police precinct, Mare’s professional demeanor contrasts sharply with her private vulnerability. This duality aligns with Bessel van der Kolk’s (2014) work on trauma survivors’ adaptations, where individuals often develop a “mask” or protective persona to navigate social expectations while internally struggling with dysregulated nervous systems. Mare’s irritability and detachment in these scenes aren’t signs of professional failure but manifestations of survival strategies that have become entrenched over time.
Clinical Nuance: Understanding Survival Strategies and Nervous System Dysregulation
The series offers a clinical invitation to explore how trauma shapes nervous system responses. Deb Dana’s (2018) Polyvagal Theory framework helps illuminate Mare’s fluctuating states of social engagement, fight, flight, and freeze. For example, Mare’s moments of emotional shutdown—such as when she isolates herself or numbs through alcohol—reflect a dorsal vagal response, signaling a shutdown of social engagement to protect against overwhelming distress.
Conversely, her irritability and hypervigilance around community dynamics can be seen as sympathetic nervous system activation, preparing her to “fight” perceived threats or injustices. This dance between activation and shutdown is common in complex trauma and often misunderstood as “moodiness” or “weakness.” Instead, it’s a sophisticated survival mechanism that requires compassionate clinical attention.
Pat Ogden’s (2015) Sensorimotor Psychotherapy approach suggests that healing requires attending not only to thoughts and feelings but also to bodily sensations and movement patterns. Mare’s physical tension, restless pacing, and clenched jaw are somatic expressions of trauma that therapy can address by helping her reconnect with her body in a safe way, fostering regulation and integration.
Recovery Interpretation: The Path Toward Integration and Safety
Recovery from complex trauma, as Judith Herman (1997) outlines, involves three stages: establishing safety, remembrance and mourning, and reconnection. Mare of Easttown subtly depicts these stages through its narrative arc. Mare’s initial state is one of survival and safety-seeking, often through isolation and emotional armor. Her gradual willingness to engage with others—such as confiding in Lori or accepting help from Detective Colin Zabel—signals tentative steps toward reconnection.
Janina Fisher (2017) highlights the importance of “reclaiming the self” in trauma recovery, which requires integrating dissociated parts and conflicting emotions. Mare’s moments of vulnerability, where she acknowledges her grief and guilt, are crucial. They represent a breaking down of the “false self” created by parentification and trauma, allowing more authentic self-expression.
Deb Dana’s (2018) emphasis on co-regulation also resonates here. Mare’s healing isn’t solitary; it unfolds within relationships that provide safety and attunement. The show’s depiction of community—imperfect but present—reflects the relational foundation necessary for trauma healing.
Ethical Cautions: Trauma, Representation, and Viewer Impact
While Mare of Easttown offers a compelling trauma-informed narrative, it’s essential to approach such portrayals with ethical mindfulness. Jennifer Freyd’s (1996) work on betrayal trauma reminds clinicians and viewers that trauma is often embedded in relational betrayals, and media representations can risk retraumatization if not handled carefully.
For survivors watching the series, scenes of suicide, child abuse, and complex grief may trigger intense emotional responses. Clinicians should encourage viewers to practice grounding techniques and seek support if needed. It’s also important to avoid pathologizing characters or oneself based on fictional portrayals; rather, use these narratives as starting points for reflection and healing.
Furthermore, the show’s depiction of parentification and survivor guilt must be contextualized within systemic factors such as socioeconomic stress and community pressures. Simplistic interpretations risk reinforcing stigma or blaming individuals for survival strategies that were adaptive responses to overwhelming circumstances.
At Annie Wright Psychotherapy, we emphasize trauma-informed care that’s culturally sensitive and individualized. For those moved by Mare of Easttown, professional support can provide personalized pathways toward healing. Explore our trauma therapy services and resources on nervous system regulation to learn more.
Integrating Clinical Frameworks: A Multidimensional View of Mare’s Experience
Judith Herman’s Three Stages of Trauma Recovery
Herman’s (1997) foundational framework helps us understand Mare’s journey beyond her surface behaviors. The first stage, establishing safety, is fraught for Mare as she navigates community scrutiny and internal turmoil. The series shows her struggle to create physical and emotional safety for herself and her family, a necessary foundation before deeper healing can occur.
The second stage—remembrance and mourning—is poignantly depicted in Mare’s interactions with her son’s memory and her own suppressed emotions. This stage involves confronting pain that was previously disavowed or dissociated, a process that’s neither linear nor easy.
The final stage, reconnection, is emerging by the series’ end as Mare tentatively opens to new relationships and allows herself to be supported. This aligns with Herman’s emphasis on rebuilding trust and reclaiming agency.
Bessel van der Kolk and the Body Keeps the Score
Van der Kolk’s (2014) work underscores that trauma is stored in the body and expressed through somatic symptoms. Mare’s chronic pain, insomnia, and substance use aren’t incidental but embodied manifestations of unresolved trauma. Therapeutic approaches that incorporate body awareness and somatic experiencing can be particularly helpful for individuals with similar presentations.
Janina Fisher and the Integration of Fragmented Self-States
Fisher (2017) highlights the role of dissociation and fragmented self-states in complex trauma. Mare’s oscillation between caretaking and emotional shutdown can be understood as shifts between different parts of the self, each with distinct protective functions. Therapy that fosters internal dialogue among these parts promotes integration and reduces internal conflict.
Pat Ogden’s Sensorimotor Psychotherapy and Somatic Regulation
Ogden’s (2015) methods prioritize somatic tracking and movement to access implicit trauma memories. Mare’s physical tension and guarded posture are somatic clues that could guide a trauma therapist in helping her develop greater body awareness and regulation skills.
Deb Dana and Stephen Porges: Polyvagal Theory and Co-Regulation
Dana’s (2018) application of Polyvagal Theory emphasizes the importance of the autonomic nervous system in trauma recovery. Mare’s nervous system shifts between states of mobilization and immobilization, impacting her ability to engage socially and regulate emotions. Therapeutic interventions that focus on co-regulation—using safe relationships to soothe the nervous system—are vital.
Jennifer Freyd and the Dynamics of Betrayal Trauma
Freyd’s (1996) concept of betrayal trauma provides a lens for understanding Mare’s complex feelings toward those who failed her family or community. Recognizing betrayal trauma helps clinicians validate survivors’ ambivalence and mistrust, crucial for building therapeutic alliance and fostering healing.
How Survivors May See Themselves in Mare: Compassionate Reflections
For many trauma survivors, Mare’s story may feel profoundly familiar. The weight of caregiving, the struggle to grieve fully, and the burden of guilt are common threads in complex trauma narratives. Recognizing these patterns is the first step toward self-compassion.
Mare’s “I’m fine” mask is a protective armor many survivors wear to navigate social expectations, yet it often isolates and exhausts. Janina Fisher (2017) encourages survivors to gently acknowledge these survival strategies while exploring new ways to express vulnerability safely.
The show’s depiction of community ambivalence—both supportive and judgmental—mirrors the real-world challenges survivors face in seeking help. Jennifer Freyd’s (1996) work reminds us that betrayal can occur within trusted systems, underscoring the importance of finding truly safe spaces for healing.
Both/And: Holding Truth and Compassion Together
One of the most valuable clinical takeaways from Mare of Easttown is the invitation to hold complex realities without binary thinking. Mare is both a resilient caretaker and a wounded survivor; her coping strategies are both protective and costly. This both/and perspective aligns with trauma-informed care principles that honor the multiplicity of survivor experiences.
Survivors and clinicians alike benefit from recognizing that recovery is nonlinear, and survival behaviors that once saved lives may now require adaptation. This nuance fosters empathy and reduces shame, creating fertile ground for healing.
The Systemic Lens: Why This Wound Is Not Just Personal
Mare of Easttown situates individual trauma within a broader systemic and cultural context. The small-town setting reflects how community dynamics, socioeconomic stressors, and cultural expectations shape trauma experiences and recovery possibilities.
Pat Ogden (2015) and Judith Herman (1997) emphasize that trauma isn’t just an individual pathology but a social and political issue. The show’s portrayal of gender roles, economic hardship, and intergenerational trauma invites viewers to consider how systemic factors contribute to suffering and resilience.
Clinicians are reminded to assess and address these systemic dimensions in therapy, advocating for structural changes alongside individual healing.
How This Connects to Recovery: Practical Tools and Approaches
Drawing from the clinical insights above, here are some recovery-oriented approaches reflected in the series and supported by research:
-
Building Safety and Stabilization: Using grounding techniques, mindfulness, and nervous system regulation strategies to create a sense of safety before processing trauma memories. Deb Dana’s Polyvagal-informed resources offer practical guidance.
-
Somatic Awareness: Encouraging body-based therapies to access and integrate implicit trauma stored in the body, as advocated by Pat Ogden and Bessel van der Kolk.
-
Internal Parts Work: Utilizing Janina Fisher’s approaches to identify and dialogue with fragmented self-states, fostering internal coherence.
-
Relational Healing: Emphasizing co-regulation and attuned relationships as healing agents, consistent with Deb Dana and Stephen Porges’ work.
-
Narrative Integration: Facilitating the remembrance and mourning phase by safely telling one’s trauma story, honoring Judith Herman’s recovery stages.
-
Community and Systemic Advocacy: Recognizing the role of social support and advocating for systemic change to reduce isolation and stigma.
Q: How can analyzing pop culture help with my own healing?
A: When a film, show, or memoir lands somewhere in your body, it’s often pointing you toward a pattern that lives in you too. Working with that recognition — in journaling, in therapy, in conversation with people who get it — can be a doorway into the deeper clinical work.
Q: Is it okay that this story is hitting me so hard?
A: Yes. The fact that a story has reached past your defenses is information about something tender that’s been carrying weight for a while. Be gentle with yourself in the hours after watching or reading. Grounding, breath, a walk, a conversation with a trusted person — all useful.
Q: Should I talk to a therapist about what this brought up?
A: If the recognition is persistent, if old feelings are surfacing, if you find yourself returning to scenes again and again — that’s often a signal that there’s clinical material to work with. A trauma-informed therapist can help you turn that recognition into integration.
Q: How do I know if a memoir or show is safe for me to engage with right now?
A: Pay attention to your nervous system. If you can engage and stay regulated — present, breathing, able to put it down — it’s likely workable. If you find yourself dissociating, flooded, or unable to function, that’s data: this material may need to wait until you have more clinical scaffolding around you.
Q: Are you saying my family is like the family in this story?
A: Not necessarily. The work isn’t matching your story to anyone else’s. The work is letting another story name a pattern, so you can recognize that pattern in your own life — which may look completely different on the surface.
Related Reading
- van der Kolk, Bessel. The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. New York: Viking, 2014.
- Herman, Judith. Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence — From Domestic Abuse to Political Terror. New York: Basic Books, 1992.
- McBride, Karyl. Will I Ever Be Good Enough?: Healing the Daughters of Narcissistic Mothers. New York: Atria Books, 2008.
- Wolynn, Mark. It Didn’t Start With You: How Inherited Family Trauma Shapes Who We Are. New York: Penguin Books, 2017.
- Freyd, Jennifer J. Betrayal Trauma: The Logic of Forgetting Childhood Abuse. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.
References
Peer-Reviewed Research (Vancouver)
- van der Kolk BA, Wang JB, Yehuda R, Bedrosian L, Coker AR, Harrison C, et al. Effects of MDMA-assisted therapy for PTSD on self-experience. PLoS One. 2024;19(1):e0295926. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0295926. PMID: 38198456.
- Gómez JM, Smith CP, Gobin RL, Tang SS, Freyd JJ. Collusion, torture, and inequality: Understanding the actions of the American Psychological Association as institutional betrayal. J Trauma Dissociation. 2016;17(5):527-544. PMID: 27427782.
- Cloitre M, Stolbach BC, Herman JL, van der Kolk B, Pynoos R, Wang J, et al. A developmental approach to complex PTSD: childhood and adult cumulative trauma as predictors of symptom complexity. J Trauma Stress. 2009;22(5):399-408. doi:10.1002/jts.20444. PMID: 19795402.
- Porges SW. Polyvagal Theory: Current Status, Clinical Applications, and Future Directions. Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2025;22(3):169-184. doi:10.36131/cnfioritieditore20250301. PMID: 40735382.
- Ogden P, Pain C, Fisher J. A sensorimotor approach to the treatment of trauma and dissociation. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2006;29(1):263-79, xi-xii. PMID: 16530597.
Books & Cultural Sources (Chicago Author-Date)
- Fisher, Janina. Healing the fragmented selves of trauma survivors. Taylor & Francis Group, 2017.
- Dana, Deb. The Polyvagal Theory in Therapy. Norton & Company, Incorporated, W. W., 2018.
- Angelou, Maya. I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings. Random House, 1969.
WAYS TO WORK WITH ANNIE
Individual Therapy
Trauma-informed therapy for driven women healing relational trauma. Licensed in 10 states.
Executive Coaching
Trauma-informed coaching for ambitious women navigating leadership and burnout.
Fixing the Foundations
Annie’s signature course for relational trauma recovery. Work at your own pace.
Strong & Stable
The Sunday conversation you wished you’d had years earlier. 20,000+ subscribers.
Annie Wright, LMFT
LMFT · Relational Trauma Specialist · W.W. Norton Author
Helping ambitious women finally feel as good as their résumé looks.
Annie Wright is a licensed psychotherapist (LMFT #95719) and trauma-informed executive coach with over 15,000 clinical hours. She works with driven, ambitious women — including Silicon Valley leaders, physicians, and entrepreneurs — in repairing the psychological foundations beneath their impressive lives. Annie is the founder and former CEO of Evergreen Counseling, a multimillion-dollar trauma-informed therapy center she built, scaled, and successfully exited. A regular contributor to Psychology Today, her expert commentary has appeared in Forbes, Business Insider, Inc., NBC, and The Information. She is currently writing her first book with W.W. Norton.
