LAST UPDATED: APRIL 2026
Every dysfunctional family system assigns roles to its members, and those roles, scapegoat, golden child, family hero, lost child, organize the nervous system as surely as any other relational trauma. This article explores the clinical reality of family roles, why leaving them is so neurologically threatening, and why the family hero role, the driven, overachieving, competent child, is often just the scapegoat role in better packaging. If you have ever walked into your childhood home and felt yourself become someone you don’t recognize, this article is for you.
Last reviewed: June 2026 by Annie Wright, LMFT
- The Dinner Table: How a Role Can Swallow a Person Whole
- What Is the Family Scapegoat? The Clinical Reality Behind the Role
- The Family Hero: The Scapegoat in Better Packaging
- The Neurobiology of Family Roles: Why You Revert the Moment You Walk Through the Door
- Differentiation of Self: The Clinical Framework for Breaking Free
- Both/And: You Can Love Your Family and Need to Change the Role You Play In It
- The Systemic Lens: How Patriarchal Family Systems Create and Require Scapegoats
- The Path Forward: Differentiating From the Family System Without Destroying It
- Frequently Asked Questions
The family scapegoat is the member of a dysfunctional family system designated to carry the blame, the symptom, or the emotional toxicity that the family system as a whole can’t acknowledge or contain. The scapegoat role, like all family roles, becomes a nervous system organization: the person’s identity, self-worth, and relational expectations are shaped by the function they served in the family. The family hero, often a driven overachiever, is the scapegoat in better packaging: instead of carrying the family’s shame visibly, they carry it invisibly through perfectionism and compulsive performance. In my work with driven women, the hardest part is usually recognizing that their success was built partly in service of a family system’s needs rather than entirely their own desires.
In short: The family scapegoat is the person designated to carry the blame and dysfunction a family system can’t acknowledge, and the family hero, the driven overachiever, often performs the same function in more socially acceptable packaging.
If your nervous system learned the safest way to exist was to manage everyone else's world, my self-paced course Enough Without the Effort is the recovery map.
With more than 15,000 clinical hours working with adults in roles assigned by dysfunctional family systems, I’ve watched how thoroughly these roles organize identity, self-worth, and relational patterns long after the person’s left the family home. I keep coming back to Murray Bowen, MD, the psychiatrist and family systems theorist whose 1978 work on family homeostasis names something I see almost every week: families hold their stability by assigning members specific functional roles that serve the system’s needs, often at the direct expense of the individual’s own differentiation.
The Dinner Table: How a Role Can Swallow a Person Whole
It’s Thanksgiving, and Isabelle is home.
She’s forty-three. She’s the chief operating officer of a regional healthcare system. She’s managed crises that would floor most people, sat across the table from hospital boards, union negotiators, and state regulators, and held her ground with absolute authority. She’s built a team of two hundred people who trust her, respect her, and follow her leadership without question.
And she’s been in her parents’ house for forty-five minutes, and she’s already eight years old.
It happened the moment she walked in. Her mother’s greeting, “Oh, you cut your hair,” delivered with that particular inflection, the one that’s always meant wrong. Her brother’s easy assumption that she’d handle the logistics of the meal, because she always does. Her father’s silence, which she’s spent her entire life trying to decode. By the time they sit down to dinner, she’s already apologized twice for things that weren’t her fault, agreed to something she doesn’t want to do, and felt the familiar, suffocating weight of being the person in this family who’s simultaneously responsible for everything and blamed for everything that goes wrong.
She’ll drive home in four hours and spend the next three days in a low-grade fog of shame, exhaustion, and self-recrimination. She’ll tell her therapist, at their next session, “I don’t know what happens to me when I go home. I become someone I don’t recognize.” Her therapist will nod. “You become the role you were assigned.”
What Is the Family Scapegoat? The Clinical Reality Behind the Role
In family systems theory, the family scapegoat is the member who’s identified, consciously or unconsciously, as the source of the family’s dysfunction. She’s the one who’s blamed, criticized, and marginalized, the one whose emotional responses are treated as the problem, the one who’s sent to therapy while the family system that produced the distress goes unexamined. The scapegoat role serves a specific function: it lets the family maintain the fiction of its own health by locating all the pathology in a single member.
In plain terms: The family scapegoat is the one who gets blamed for everything that’s wrong. Not because she’s actually the problem, but because the family needs someone to be the problem. Think of it like a pressure valve on a boiler that’s been running too hot for years: the valve isn’t causing the pressure. It’s just the part everyone can see hissing. Often, the scapegoat is the child who most clearly perceives the family’s dysfunction and is least able to pretend it doesn’t exist. Which is why, decades later, she’s still the one who gets blamed for bringing up the thing everyone else has agreed not to name.
I still remember the first time I read Virginia Satir’s Peoplemaking (Science and Behavior Books, 1972). Satir was a pioneering family therapist, and the framework she laid out there’s the one I keep returning to when a client describes a family dinner that went sideways in the first ten minutes. She named four primary roles children take on in dysfunctional family systems: the Placater, who manages conflict by appeasing; the Blamer, who manages anxiety by attacking; the Super-Reasonable, who manages emotion by intellectualizing; and the Irrelevant, who manages overwhelm by withdrawing. Later theorists built on her work and refined it into the roles most people recognize today: scapegoat, golden child, family hero, and lost child.
Murray Bowen, MD, the psychiatrist who founded Bowen Family Systems Theory, is the one who put language to something I’d been circling for years without a name for it: family roles aren’t just behavioral patterns. They’re the product of how a family system manages its own anxiety. Every family carries a level of chronic anxiety, unresolved conflict, unprocessed grief, unacknowledged dysfunction, and that anxiety has to go somewhere. In dysfunctional family systems, it gets managed through what Bowen called triangulation, the process of pulling a third party, usually a child, into a two-person conflict so the anxiety in the primary relationship has somewhere else to live.
The scapegoat is the child who’s been triangulated into the family’s anxiety most completely, the one onto whom the family’s unresolved pain gets projected. This child isn’t the problem. She’s the symptom. She’s the family’s anxiety made visible, and she’s punished for making it visible.
Alice Miller’s The Drama of the Gifted Child (Basic Books, 1979) is a book I recommend so often that I’ve lost count, because it names a dimension I see constantly in driven women: parentification. The parentified child is the one who gets assigned the job of managing the emotional needs of the adults around her. She learns to read her parents’ moods before they’ve fully formed, to anticipate needs before they’re spoken, to manage the emotional temperature of a room she didn’t create and can’t control, all in service of keeping the family’s equilibrium intact. Which means in practice, the parentified child often grows into the family hero, competent, capable, the one whose achievements make the family look good. But underneath the achievement runs the same survival strategy as the scapegoat: the self, quietly and completely, subordinated to the needs of the system.
The Family Hero: The Scapegoat in Better Packaging
The family hero is the role driven women most often occupy. And it’s the role that’s most likely to hide as a trauma response, because it looks so much like success.
The family hero is the child who achieves. She gets the grades, wins the awards, earns the scholarships. She’s the one the family points to as proof of its own health and competence, the one who makes the parents proud, who justifies the sacrifices, who proves the family is, in fact, fine. She’s reliable, responsible, capable well beyond her years. She’s the child who never causes problems, because she learned early that causing problems is dangerous.
Here’s the clinical reality this article exists to name: the family hero role is often just the scapegoat role in better packaging. Both roles require the same thing, the complete subordination of the child’s authentic self to the needs of the family system. Both are organized around what the child does for the system, not what she’s worth on her own. And both produce the same underlying wound: the belief that love is conditional on performance, that the self is only acceptable when it’s useful, and that real emotional expression is dangerous.
The difference is that the scapegoat’s job is to absorb the family’s dysfunction, while the family hero’s job is to deny it. The scapegoat gets punished for seeing the truth. The family hero gets rewarded for performing the lie. Both children are equally trapped, though, and both carry into adulthood the same inability to believe they’re lovable for who they’re rather than what they do.
Vignette #1: Isabelle
Isabelle was the “problem child” in her family, the one who cried too much, asked too many questions, couldn’t just go along with the family’s performance of normalcy. Her older brother was the golden child: easy, compliant, never causing trouble. Isabelle was the one who pointed out, at age ten, that their parents’ marriage was in trouble. She was the one who, at fourteen, told her mother that her father’s drinking was a problem. She was the one who got sent to therapy. Not because the family wanted to help her. Because the family needed someone to be the problem.
By the time she reached her twenties, she’d transformed herself. She’d taken the sensitivity that made her the family’s scapegoat and turned it into extraordinary emotional intelligence. She’d taken the hypervigilance that came from growing up in an unpredictable household and turned it into exceptional crisis management skills. She’d become the family hero, the one who’d made something of herself, the one the family was proud of, the one they called when there was a problem to solve.
But every Thanksgiving, every Christmas, every family gathering, she walks through the door and becomes the problem child again. The role’s still there, waiting for her. The family system hasn’t changed. It’s simply updated its casting.
RESEARCH EVIDENCE
Peer-reviewed findings that inform this clinical framework:
- Siblings of people with mental disorder score higher on Hero and Lost Child roles relative to comparison group (N = 33 per group) (PMID: 24990636)
- Scapegoat role discussed in context of physical violence in family systems, no specific numerical stat in abstract (PMID: 37170016)
- Chaotic family functioning predicts scapegoat role (β = .204, p = .015; R² = .086) (Spasić Šnele et al., TEME)
- Family dysfunction correlates with scapegoat role (r = .51, p < .001 in Study 1; r = .58, p < .001 in Study 2); scapegoat role predicts depressive symptoms (β = .25, p < .01 in Study 1) (Zagefka et al., The Family Journal)
- 48% of families with intrafamilial child sexual abuse also experienced physical abuse, 37% emotional abuse, 34% neglect, 42% exposure to intimate partner violence (Martijn et al., Clin Psychol Rev)
The Neurobiology of Family Roles: Why You Revert the Moment You Walk Through the Door
One of the most disorienting parts of family roles is how fast and how completely they can take over, even in adults who’ve done significant therapeutic work. A woman who’s spent years building a secure sense of self, who’s developed genuine emotional regulation capacity, who’s built a life that reflects her actual values, can walk into her childhood home and feel, within minutes, like none of that work ever happened.
This isn’t a failure of therapy. It’s the nervous system doing exactly what it was built to do.
I read Stephen Porges‘s work on polyvagal theory years ago, and the concept that’s stayed with me the longest is neuroception, his term for the nervous system’s below-conscious scanning for cues of safety and threat. Think of it like a smoke detector wired into the walls of a house you grew up in. It doesn’t reason. It doesn’t update easily. It just keeps sniffing the air for the specific smoke it learned to fear decades ago. The family home isn’t just a physical space to that detector. It’s a relational environment your nervous system has been mapping since birth, and every cue inside it, the smell of the house, the quality of the light, the sound of a particular voice, the specific weight of a particular silence, gets wired to the emotional states of your original family experience. Which means in practice, you can walk in as a forty-three-year-old COO and your body still reads the front hallway like it’s nine years old again.
When you walk through the door, your nervous system doesn’t see an adult woman with a career and a life and a developed sense of self. It sees the environment where it first learned what it meant to be you. And it responds accordingly. The role isn’t a choice. It’s a conditioned nervous system response, as automatic as the startle reflex, as deeply encoded as any other survival behavior.
This is why intellectual understanding isn’t enough to change family roles. You can know, with complete cognitive clarity, that your mother’s comment about your hair is a projection of her own anxiety. You can understand, theoretically, that your brother’s assumption that you’ll handle the logistics is a reenactment of a childhood dynamic. And you can still feel yourself collapse into the old role before you’ve had time to choose otherwise. Of course you can. The nervous system is faster than thought.
Differentiation of Self: The Clinical Framework for Breaking Free
Murray Bowen defined differentiation of self as the capacity to hold on to your own values, thoughts, and emotional autonomy while staying in close emotional contact with others. A well-differentiated person can be fully present in an emotionally charged relationship without getting swept up in the reactivity of the system. She can hold her own position without fusing into the other person’s emotional state, and without cutting off from the relationship entirely.
In plain terms: Differentiation is the ability to stay yourself, your adult self, with your own values, your own perspective, your own emotional regulation, while you’re in relationship with your family. It isn’t detachment. It isn’t distance. It’s the capacity to be close without losing yourself, the same way you can stand near a bonfire and feel its warmth without stepping into the flames.
Bowen’s concept of differentiation of self is the clinical framework I reach for most often when a client is trying to break free from a family role. He observed that most people exist somewhere on a continuum, from those who are highly fused with their family of origin’s emotional system, and who lose themselves completely in the family’s anxiety and reactivity, to those who are highly differentiated, and who can maintain their own emotional autonomy while staying in genuine connection.
The work of differentiation isn’t the work of separating from the family. It’s the work of remaining in relationship while holding on to the self. This distinction matters, because so many women with complex family histories have managed the threat of the family system through emotional cutoff, the physical or emotional distance that creates the illusion of differentiation without the substance of it. Cutoff isn’t differentiation. It’s fusion at a distance. The woman who’s cut off from her family is still organized entirely around the family system. She’s just organized in opposition to it instead of in compliance with it.
True differentiation asks for something far harder: the capacity to be present in the family system, to feel its pull, to recognize the old role getting activated, and to choose differently anyway. Not by suppressing the nervous system response. By building enough internal stability to act from the adult self even when the nervous system is screaming that the child-self is running the show.
This work doesn’t happen in a single conversation, a single holiday, or even a single year of therapy. It’s a gradual, repeating process of building the internal resources, the nervous system capacity, the self-knowledge, the therapeutic relationship, that make differentiation possible. Which means in practice, differentiation shows up on an ordinary Tuesday, not at Thanksgiving. It’s the extra half second before you say yes to something you don’t want to do. It’s noticing your jaw has clenched before your mother’s even finished her sentence, and choosing to unclench it instead of just enduring it. Small, unglamorous, repeatable. It’s also some of the most important work a person can do. Your struggle with it’s legitimate. This is genuinely hard.
Both/And: You Can Love Your Family and Need to Change the Role You Play In It
Valentina is forty-seven, a family physician in Phoenix. She’s the family hero in her family of origin, the one who made it out, the one who made something of herself, the one the family calls when there’s a medical question, a financial crisis, a logistical problem that needs solving. She loves her family. Genuinely. Her parents are aging, and she wants to be present for them. Her siblings are struggling, and she wants to help.
But she’s also exhausted. She’s the one managing her parents’ medical appointments, their insurance paperwork, their medication schedules. She’s the one who mediates between her siblings when they fight. She’s the one who shows up, every time, for every crisis, while her own health, her own marriage, her own needs go unattended. She’s started to wonder whether she’s a good daughter or just a very well-trained one.
The Both/And of Valentina’s experience is this: She genuinely loves her family. AND the role she plays in her family is costing her her health. Both are simultaneously true.
The either/or here, either she loves her family, in which case she has to keep playing the role, or she changes the role, in which case she must not love them enough, is a false binary the family system itself constructed. It’s the logic of enmeshment: that love and self-sacrifice are the same thing, that care and self-erasure can’t be separated, that having needs of your own means you’re selfish.
Differentiation doesn’t require Valentina to love her family less. It requires her to love herself more, and to recognize that the role she plays, the competent, capable, always-available family hero, isn’t love. It’s a survival strategy that’s been running on autopilot for forty years. And it’s entirely possible to love her family deeply, genuinely, fully, while also being a person with limits, needs, and a self that matters.
The Systemic Lens: How Patriarchal Family Systems Create and Require Scapegoats
“I felt a Cleaving in my Mind, / As if my Brain had split, / I tried to match it, Seam by Seam, / But could not make them fit.”
Emily Dickinson, Poet
The family scapegoat isn’t a random assignment. She’s a structural necessity in family systems that need to maintain a particular fiction, the fiction that the family is healthy, functional, and normal. The child most likely to get scapegoated is the one who perceives the dysfunction most clearly and is least willing to pretend it doesn’t exist. She’s the truth-teller. Her emotional responses are the most accurate register of what’s actually happening in the family system. And she’s punished for her accuracy.
In patriarchal family systems, the ones organized around the father’s authority, the mother’s compliance, and the suppression of real emotional expression in service of the family’s public image, the scapegoat is often the daughter who’s most emotionally expressive, most perceptive, least willing to perform the required fiction. She’s “too sensitive,” “too emotional,” “too much.” She’s the one who cries when she’s supposed to be fine, who asks questions when she’s supposed to be quiet, who refuses to pretend when she’s supposed to perform. Of course she gets named the problem. She’s the only one in the room still telling the truth.
I read Judith Herman‘s Trauma and Recovery (Basic Books, 1992) early in my training, and the line that’s never left me is her observation that trauma is inherently political as well as psychological, that the forces creating and perpetuating trauma are the same forces that benefit from the silence and compliance of the people they’ve traumatized. The family scapegoat is, in this sense, a political figure. She’s the member of the family system who’s been assigned the cost of the system’s dysfunction, so the system itself doesn’t have to change.
Understanding this systemic dimension doesn’t erase the pain of the scapegoat role. But it does something that matters: it removes the shame. You’re not the problem. You never were. You’re the person who saw the problem most clearly, and who paid the price for seeing it.
The Path Forward: Differentiating From the Family System Without Destroying It
The work of breaking free from a family role isn’t the work of breaking free from the family. For most women, that’s not the goal. And even when it is, it’s not the first step. The first step is internal: recognizing the role, understanding where it came from, and starting to build the internal resources that make differentiation possible.
You've been holding everything together. You're allowed to put some down.
A focused self-paced course on overfunctioning, achievement-first self-concept, and the trauma response that masquerades as a personality. Not a productivity problem. Not a boundary problem. A nervous system that learned competence was the only safety.
Here’s what that process looks like in practice.
Naming the role. The first and most important step is simply naming what’s happening. “I’m the family scapegoat. I’m the family hero. This is the role I was assigned, and it’s not who I am.” Naming it doesn’t change the role overnight, but it opens a gap between the role and the self, a gap where choice becomes possible.
Understanding the nervous system response. When you walk through the door and feel yourself becoming the role, that’s a nervous system response, not a failure of will. Naming it that way, “My nervous system is activating the old role because it recognizes the old environment,” reduces shame and builds your capacity for compassion toward yourself.
Building the internal observer. The capacity to observe yourself inside the family system, to notice in real time when the role’s getting activated without getting completely swept up in it, is a skill that develops gradually through therapy, mindfulness practice, and accumulated experience. It isn’t about being detached. It’s about having enough internal stability to watch yourself without losing yourself.
Practicing differentiated responses. Differentiation isn’t a one-time declaration. It’s a practice, the practice of responding, in small ways and large, from the adult self rather than the role. This might mean not immediately volunteering to handle the logistics at the family dinner. It might mean letting a silence be uncomfortable instead of rushing to fill it. It might mean saying, calmly and without drama, “I’m not going to be able to do that.” Each small act of differentiation is a deposit in the account of the self.
If you’re ready to do this work in a structured, clinically grounded way, I invite you to explore Fixing the Foundations™, my relational trauma recovery course, which offers a framework for understanding and differentiating from the family system. You can also reach out directly to talk about whether individual therapy is the right next step for you.
You were assigned a role in your family. That role saved your life, in the way it needed saving, at the time it needed saving. But you’re not the role. You never were. And it’s not too late to find out who you actually are.
Warmly,
Annie
Warmly, Annie
Q: What’s the difference between the family scapegoat and the golden child?
A: The golden child is the family member who receives the family’s idealization, the one who can do no wrong, who’s held up as the family’s success story, and who’s protected from accountability. The scapegoat is the inverse: the one who’s blamed for everything, who can do no right, and who carries the burden of the family’s unresolved dysfunction. These roles are often complementary. In families with a golden child, there’s frequently a scapegoat who absorbs the shadow the golden child can’t carry. Both roles are damaging, though in different ways: the golden child often struggles with entitlement, difficulty tolerating failure, and the terror of losing the family’s approval; the scapegoat often struggles with shame, self-blame, and the belief that she’s fundamentally defective.
Q: How does being the family scapegoat affect adult relationships?
A: The family scapegoat role leaves a specific set of relational wounds that tend to show up in adult relationships. These include a chronic expectation of being blamed or criticized, even when no blame or criticism is present; difficulty trusting that positive regard is genuine and stable; a tendency to accept responsibility for things that aren’t your fault; hypervigilance to signs of disapproval or rejection; and difficulty holding a stable, positive sense of self in the face of others’ negative reactions. These patterns aren’t character flaws. They’re the logical consequences of having been the designated problem in a family system that needed one.
Q: Why do I still feel like the scapegoat even though I’m successful?
A: Because the scapegoat role is a nervous system pattern, not a circumstantial one. External success doesn’t change the internal architecture of a nervous system that was shaped by the family role. You can be objectively successful, by every external measure, and still carry the internal experience of the scapegoat: the chronic shame, the expectation of blame, the inability to fully trust your own worth. That’s why therapy addressing the nervous system and the relational patterns of the original family system matters so much. Changing your circumstances doesn’t change your nervous system. Only the slow, careful work of healing does that.
Q: Is it possible to change your family role as an adult?
A: Yes. But it takes sustained effort and, typically, clinical support. The family system will resist change, because the role you play serves a function in the system’s equilibrium. When you begin to differentiate, to respond differently, to set limits, to stop playing the assigned role, the system will often ramp up its pressure to bring you back into compliance. That’s not a sign that change is impossible. It’s a sign that change is happening. The work of differentiation isn’t a single conversation or a single decision. It’s a gradual, repeating process of building the internal resources that let you remain yourself in the presence of the system’s pull.
Q: How do I stop reverting to my childhood role when I go home?
A: The first step is recognizing that the reversion is a nervous system response, not a failure of will. You can’t simply decide not to revert. The nervous system is faster than thought. What you can do is build the internal observer capacity to notice when the reversion is happening, develop somatic grounding practices that help you return to your adult self when the nervous system has activated the old role, and practice small acts of differentiation that gradually build the neural pathways for a different response. Preparing before family visits, clarifying your values, your limits, your intentions, can also help. And working with a trauma-informed therapist on the specific dynamics of your family system is the most direct path to lasting change.
Related Reading
- Satir, Virginia. Peoplemaking. Science and Behavior Books, 1972.
- Miller, Alice. The Drama of the Gifted Child: The Search for the True Self. Basic Books, 1979.
- Herman, Judith Lewis. Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence. From Domestic Abuse to Political Terror. Basic Books, 1992.
- Porges, Stephen W. The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiological Foundations of Emotions, Attachment, Communication, and Self-regulation. W.W. Norton & Company, 2011.
- Schwartz, Richard C. No Bad Parts: Healing Trauma and Restoring Wholeness with the Internal Family Systems Model. Sounds True, 2021.
References
Peer-Reviewed Research (Vancouver)
- Cloitre M, Stolbach BC, Herman JL, van der Kolk B, Pynoos R, Wang J, et al. A developmental approach to complex PTSD: childhood and adult cumulative trauma as predictors of symptom complexity. J Trauma Stress. 2009;22(5):399-408. doi:10.1002/jts.20444. PMID: 19795402.
- Porges SW. Polyvagal Theory: Current Status, Clinical Applications, and Future Directions. PMID: 40735382.
- Ma R, Deng G. The family roles of siblings of people diagnosed with a mental disorder: heroes and lost children. Int J Psychol. 2014;49(4):297-303. PMID: 24990636.
- Pillay Y. Physical violence and scapegoating within the family: an exploration of biblical and contemporary family dynamics. J Relig Health. 2023;62(4):2761-73. PMID: 37170016.
Books & Cultural Sources (Chicago Author-Date)
- Dickinson, Emily. The complete poems of Emily Dickinson. Little, Brown, 1960.
Read Annie’s weekly essays on rebuilding after relational trauma.
Weekly Substack essays from Annie Wright, LMFT on relational trauma, recovery, and the House of Life framework. For driven women who want a structured path back to themselves.
WAYS TO WORK WITH ANNIE
Individual Therapy
Trauma-informed therapy for driven women healing relational trauma. Licensed in 14 U.S. jurisdictions, including Colorado (telehealth only), and registered to provide telehealth in Florida.
Trauma-informed coaching for driven women navigating leadership and burnout.
Fixing the Foundations
Annie’s signature course for relational trauma recovery. Work at your own pace.
Strong & Stable
The Sunday conversation you wished you’d had years earlier. 28,000+ subscribers.
Annie Wright, LMFT
LMFT · Relational Trauma Specialist · W.W. Norton Author
Helping driven women finally feel as good as their résumé looks.
Annie Wright is a licensed psychotherapist (LMFT #95719) and trauma-informed executive coach with over 15,000 clinical hours. She works with driven women, including Silicon Valley leaders, physicians, and entrepreneurs, repairing the psychological foundations beneath their impressive lives. Annie is the founder and former CEO of Evergreen Counseling, a trauma-informed therapy center she built, scaled, and successfully exited. A regular contributor to Psychology Today, her expert commentary has appeared in USA Today, Forbes, Business Insider, NBC News, and The Information. She’s currently writing her first book with W.W. Norton.
Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist (LMFT #95719)
15,000+ direct clinical hours
CA LMFT95719 · CO MFT.0003236 (telehealth only) · CT 003806 · DC LMFT200001447 · FL TPMF356 (out-of-state telehealth registration) · IL 166.012270 · ME MF8600 · MD LCM1206 · NH 1030 · NJ 37FI00254800 · NY 002805 · TX 206391 · UT 14300323-3902 · VA 0717002589 · WA MFT.LF.70098096
Creator of House of Life™ and Fixing the Foundations™
The Everything Years (W.W. Norton)
Founder & former CEO, Evergreen Counseling
Regular contributor to Psychology Today. Expert commentary has appeared in USA Today, Forbes, Business Insider, NBC News, and The Information.
