Daughters of Borderline Mothers: What It Did to You and What to Do Now
Growing up with a mother who had borderline personality disorder leaves a very specific kind of mark: not a single dramatic wound but a nervous system trained to surveil, a self that learned it was responsible for someone else’s emotional weather, and a recurring guilt that doesn’t lift whether you call or you don’t. This article names what that childhood actually did to your attachment system, your sense of self, and your relationships now, and it maps what clinical healing for daughters of borderline mothers genuinely involves.
- Camille Had Her Hand on the Bedroom Door When Her Mother’s Text Came In at 6:49am
- BPD in Mothers: What the Diagnosis Means Clinically, and What It Means in the Kitchen
- How Growing Up with a Borderline Mother Shapes the Nervous System — The Specific Attachment Wound
- The Particular Patterns of Daughters of Borderline Mothers — Reading the Room as a Survival Skill, and Its Lifelong Cost
- The Splitting, the Push-Pull, and the “I Hate You Don’t Leave Me”
- Both/And: Your Mother’s Suffering Was Real AND You Were Not Required to Carry It
- The Systemic Lens: When BPD Remains Undiagnosed — How Untreated Emotional Dysregulation Becomes a Family’s Organizing Principle
- Separating Your Nervous System from Hers: What Clinical Work with Daughters of Borderline Mothers Actually Involves
- Frequently Asked Questions
Camille Had Her Hand on the Bedroom Door When Her Mother’s Text Came In at 6:49am
She was still in her robe, hand already on the bedroom door handle, about to begin a Thursday, when the phone lit up on the nightstand and she stopped moving entirely. The text was time-stamped 6:49am: “I guess you don’t want to talk to me anymore.” Camille had spoken with her mother two days ago. The coffee she’d poured before reaching for the phone was on the counter now, steam no longer rising from it. She hadn’t moved from the counter since she read the screen.
What she was doing, standing at the counter, was the calculation. It wasn’t new. She had been performing it her whole life: what is the emotional weather right now, and what do I need to do about it? “She texted at 6:49am,” Camille thought. “I will feel guilty for the next four hours if I don’t call back. I will also feel guilty if I do.” That sentence is one of the most precise descriptions I’ve heard a client give of what it’s like to be a daughter of a borderline mother. The guilt isn’t proportional to anything she’s done. It’s structural. It was built in.
Camille is 43 years old and the founder of a company she built from nothing. She reads people the way other executives read spreadsheets. She is extraordinarily capable. She is also exhausted in a way she can’t fully explain to the people who admire her, because the exhaustion isn’t about the company or the meetings. It’s about the vigilance, the surveillance, the fact that a single text can stop her completely in her own kitchen at 7:03am on a Thursday.
If you recognize that kitchen, this article is for you.
BPD in Mothers: What the Diagnosis Means Clinically, and What It Means in the Kitchen
Borderline personality disorder is one of the most clinically complex and frequently misunderstood diagnoses in mental health. It’s also one of the most frequently undiagnosed, which means many women reading this grew up in a home organized around BPD’s effects without ever having a name for what was happening. It’s worth being precise about what it actually is before we talk about what it does to daughters.
As defined in the DSM-5: a pervasive pattern of instability in interpersonal relationships, self-image, and emotions, plus marked impulsivity, present since early adulthood. Core features include frantic efforts to avoid abandonment, a pattern of unstable and intense relationships alternating between idealization and devaluation, identity disturbance, impulsivity in self-damaging areas, recurrent suicidal behavior or self-harm, affective instability, chronic emptiness, difficulty managing intense anger, and transient paranoid ideation or dissociation under stress.
In plain terms: A person with BPD experiences their inner world and their relationships as fundamentally unstable, not because they’re choosing to be difficult, but because the psychological architecture for emotional regulation and a stable sense of self wasn’t adequately built during development. The result is a person who cycles between desperately needing closeness and being terrified of it, whose emotional reactions often feel disproportionate to the people around them.
What the diagnosis means in the kitchen, in the actual daily texture of a home, is something different from a DSM checklist. It means the emotional climate changed without warning and without any reliable cause you could identify. A dinner that began normally could end in tearful accusations. You were sometimes the most precious person in the world to your mother and sometimes the source of all her suffering, within the same conversation. Ordinary separation, going to a friend’s house or building a life of your own, was treated as evidence of rejection rather than natural development.
BPD is not the same as narcissistic personality disorder, though they sometimes overlap. If you’ve read about the narcissistic mother, you’ll recognize some shared features. But the internal experience driving BPD is more dominated by fear of abandonment and an unstable sense of self that needs the child to provide stability. Daughters of narcissistic mothers and daughters of borderline mothers share some wounds while carrying different specific injuries. Not every difficult mother has BPD; a formal diagnosis requires clinical assessment. What we’re talking about here is the constellation of experiences that daughters of mothers with BPD traits recognize, whether or not a formal diagnosis was ever made.
How Growing Up with a Borderline Mother Shapes the Nervous System — The Specific Attachment Wound
The damage done by growing up with a borderline mother isn’t primarily psychological in the abstract sense. It’s neurobiological. Understanding this isn’t about pathologizing yourself; it’s about understanding why the calculation Camille does every morning isn’t a habit she could decide to stop. It’s a trained response in a nervous system that learned, during its most formative years, that the environment was fundamentally unpredictable and that she was responsible for managing it.
As described by Bessel van der Kolk, MD, psychiatrist and trauma researcher at Boston University School of Medicine and author of The Body Keeps the Score: a state of heightened sensory and emotional alertness developed in response to chronic unpredictability, in which the nervous system remains on constant surveillance for threat even in objectively safe environments. The person scans faces, tones of voice, and relational atmospheres for warning signals, not as a choice but as an automatic neurological function.
In plain terms: When you grew up never knowing which version of your mother was going to walk through the door, your brain learned to watch for signs. That watching became automatic, wired into your baseline. Now, even in relationships where you’re genuinely safe, your brain is still doing the surveillance. You can’t simply decide to stop; you need clinical support to help your nervous system learn that it doesn’t need to be on duty every moment.
Bessel van der Kolk, MD, whose research has shaped how clinicians understand the long-term effects of early relational injury, writes extensively about how the nervous systems of children with chronically dysregulated caregivers become organized around threat detection. The developing brain learns that the emotional landscape can shift without warning, that proximity to the caregiver brings both comfort and danger, and that attunement to her emotional state is the primary survival tool available.
Dan Siegel, MD, clinical professor of psychiatry at the UCLA School of Medicine and author of The Developing Mind, established that when a mother cannot consistently regulate her own nervous system, she cannot co-regulate with her child. Co-regulation with a calm, present caregiver is what builds the child’s capacity for self-regulation. Without it, the child develops an impaired capacity for integration, the ability to hold complex, sometimes contradictory experiences as part of a coherent whole.
As described by Mary Main, PhD, professor of psychology at UC Berkeley, and Judith Solomon, PhD, developmental psychologists who identified this attachment pattern through landmark research: the attachment pattern most associated with caregivers who are simultaneously the source of comfort and the source of fear. When the caregiver is both necessary and frightening, the child cannot organize a coherent strategy. The resulting behavior is characterized by simultaneous approach and avoidance, and in adult life by relationships experienced as simultaneously necessary and terrifying.
In plain terms: If your mother was both the person you needed most and the person you were most afraid of, your attachment system couldn’t organize itself around a clear strategy. You needed her and feared her at the same time. As an adult, closeness in relationships may feel both desperately wanted and deeply threatening, not because anything is wrong with your current relationship, but because your attachment system learned that closeness and danger go together.
This disorganized attachment pattern is the specific injury most commonly seen in daughters of borderline mothers. It’s distinct from anxious attachment and avoidant attachment. It’s the wound of a caregiver who was both necessary and frightening. Many daughters carry it for decades without knowing it has a name. Working through attachment wounds from parents requires a clinician who understands both the neurobiology and the relational dynamics involved.
The Particular Patterns of Daughters of Borderline Mothers — Reading the Room as a Survival Skill, and Its Lifelong Cost
In my work with clients who grew up with borderline mothers, certain patterns appear so consistently I’ve come to think of them as a signature. They manifest differently depending on temperament and other available resources, but the core constellation is remarkably recognizable.
The first and most central is what Camille does before she walks into any room: the emotional weather read. Daughters of borderline mothers become extraordinarily skilled at reading people. They detect a shift in tone before the other person is consciously aware of feeling differently. They notice micro-expressions, what’s not being said, what’s being held back. In professional settings, this capacity can look like exceptional emotional intelligence. In personal relationships, it’s often experienced as exhausting because it never turns off.
The second pattern is the guilt structure. I’m using “structure” deliberately, because the guilt daughters of borderline mothers carry isn’t ordinary guilt about something they’ve done. It’s structural guilt built into the relational dynamic regardless of what they actually do. Call and your mother will express she needed you to call earlier. Don’t call and she’ll express abandonment. Many daughters spend decades trying to find the action that would resolve the guilt, without understanding that it isn’t asking to be resolved through action.
The third is compulsive caretaking. When you grew up as the emotional manager of a parent’s inner world, you become extraordinarily skilled at identifying what other people need before they’ve asked. From the outside this looks like exceptional generosity. From the inside it can feel like compulsion, a difficulty tolerating someone else’s distress without immediately fixing it, because allowing distress to exist without fixing it feels, in the body, like something catastrophic is about to happen.
“The wounded child inside many females is a girl who was taught from early childhood that she should not take her emotional life seriously, that she should always be attending to someone else’s feelings.”
bell hooks, author and cultural critic, All About Love: New Visions
The fourth pattern surprises some women when they first recognize it: difficulty distinguishing their own emotional states from others’. When you spent your formative years calibrated to your mother’s emotional weather, your own internal compass becomes unreliable. Women describe not knowing what they want until they’ve assessed what the people around them want first. They describe difficulty feeling their own feelings in the moment, as distinct from managing everyone else’s. This is one of the most workable patterns in clinical treatment, and also one of the most disorienting to recognize.
Karyl McBride, PhD, licensed marriage and family therapist and author of Will I Ever Be Good Enough? Healing the Daughters of Narcissistic Mothers, notes that daughters in these family systems often develop what she calls the “empty mirror” experience. They grew up looking into a parent who could not consistently reflect them back as separate, whole people with their own valid inner lives. The result is that adult daughters often have difficulty trusting their own perceptions or judgment independent of others’ assessment of them.
The Splitting, the Push-Pull, and the “I Hate You Don’t Leave Me” — What These Looked Like in Childhood and What They Look Like in Your Relationships Now
One of the most destabilizing features of a borderline mother’s emotional life is the mechanism psychologists call splitting. Recognizing it in retrospect can be profoundly orienting for daughters who grew up believing they simply couldn’t predict what was going to happen next.
As described in object relations theory by Melanie Klein, Wilfred Bion, and further developed by Otto Kernberg, MD, professor of psychiatry at Weill Cornell Medical College: the primitive psychological defense of dividing people and experiences into entirely “all good” or “all bad” without integrative capacity. In borderline personality organization, the internal architecture that would allow holding both has not been adequately built. The result is a world of emotional absolutes, where the same person can be experienced as everything and as a complete betrayer, sometimes within the same day.
In plain terms: When your mother was happy with you, you were everything, her favorite person, the one who understood her. When she felt hurt or abandoned, you became the source of all her pain. These weren’t mood swings exactly; they were wholesale perceptual shifts. She was experiencing two entirely different versions of you, neither of which was actually you. Both felt real to her.
The push-pull dynamic is the behavioral manifestation of splitting over time. Your mother needed closeness desperately and was also terrified of it. When you pulled away for any reason, her abandonment fears activated, and she pulled hard for your return, often through expressions of devastation so overwhelming that you came back not out of want but out of feeling responsible for her survival.
What this does to a child is teach a deeply confused lesson about love and proximity: that love means being responsible for someone else’s survival, that closeness means losing yourself, and that the way to avoid causing harm is to never fully separate. This is the architecture of enmeshment with your mother, not a choice either of you made, but a relational structure built by years of this dynamic.
In your adult relationships, this early learning shows up in specific ways. When a partner or friend becomes emotionally volatile, your own emotional experience is immediately subordinated to managing theirs, not as a thoughtful choice but as an automatic response. Setting a limit with someone you love may activate a terror disproportionate to the actual stakes, because some part of you learned that having needs of your own means abandoning the people who love you. None of this is a character flaw.
Ines, 37, a pediatric hospitalist who came to clinical work because she kept finding herself in relationships that felt like “managing a patient in crisis,” recognized the push-pull pattern immediately when she learned its name. “My mother would call me her best friend, then not speak to me for a week when I canceled plans because I was on call. Then she’d call to say she’d been in the emergency room.” Ines became a doctor partly because in medicine, she can actually help someone. Many daughters of borderline mothers become skilled helpers, healers, and managers because of the extraordinary emotional competence their backgrounds forced them to develop. The question isn’t whether the skills are real. It’s whether they’re running on your terms now, or on the terms of a six-year-old who learned that reading the room was the price of safety. Healing from the mother wound often requires separating the genuine capacity from the survival strategy underneath it.
Both/And: Your Mother’s Suffering Was Real AND You Were Not Required to Carry It — The Difference Between Empathy and Enmeshment
One of the most important clinical distinctions in working with daughters of borderline mothers is the one between empathy and enmeshment. Because daughters in this position are almost universally empathic people, there’s often profound reluctance to acknowledge the damage done, out of fear that doing so means abandoning compassion for their mother.
The Both/And framework holds something that seems contradictory until you sit with it: your mother’s suffering was real, AND you were not required to carry it. Your mother didn’t choose BPD. Her own developmental history shaped her into someone whose regulation was profoundly compromised. She was not performing her pain. And: a child is not a therapist, not a co-regulator for an adult, not responsible for managing her parent’s emotional survival. The fact that you were required to function in that role is a genuine injury. Naming it as such is not a betrayal of your mother. It’s an accurate account of what happened.
What gets in the way for many daughters is the thought: “If I say she hurt me, I’m saying she was a bad person. If I say she was suffering, I’m saying it was fine.” The Both/And holds that both are true simultaneously without requiring either cancellation. She suffered significantly. And you were a child shaped by that suffering in ways you didn’t choose and didn’t deserve.
Empathy means I can understand your experience and care about it while remaining a distinct person with my own interior life. Enmeshment means the boundary has collapsed, your pain is my pain, your survival feels like my job. Most daughters of borderline mothers grew up enmeshed not by choice but by the relational structure that required it. Rebuilding the internal architecture of a separate self is what clinicians mean when they talk about reparenting yourself, developing the capacity to provide the stability and self-compassion that weren’t consistently available from your earliest caregiver.
Many daughters also feel terror about the “AND you were not required to carry it” half of this Both/And. Receiving that truth means acknowledging the magnitude of what was placed on you, and that acknowledgment can come with grief so large it feels unmanageable. It’s grief for what didn’t happen, for the little girl who deserved attunement and got a surveillance job instead. Moving through it is one of the central tasks of inner child work for daughters of borderline mothers.
The Systemic Lens: When BPD Remains Undiagnosed — How Untreated Emotional Dysregulation Becomes a Family’s Organizing Principle
Most women who come to clinical work as daughters of borderline mothers grew up without a name for what was happening in their family. Their mother was never assessed, never treated, never understood through a clinical lens. The family organized itself around the emotional dysregulation as though it were the weather, an environmental reality that everyone adapted to without questioning it.
In families where a parent’s untreated emotional dysregulation becomes the organizing principle, other caregivers organize their behavior around managing the borderline parent’s emotional state, sometimes consciously and sometimes not. Fathers become managers, moderators, or absentees. Siblings develop complementary adaptations. The whole family becomes an ecosystem shaped by the demands of one person’s unmet regulation needs.
As described by Charles Figley, PhD, professor of social work at Tulane University and founder of the field of traumatology: the indirect traumatic impact of being in close relationship with someone experiencing or expressing trauma. Figley’s research established that individuals in sustained close contact with a traumatized person can develop trauma symptomology themselves, not from direct exposure to an event but from living inside someone else’s traumatic responses. For daughters of borderline mothers, this means years of sustained exposure to a parent’s emotional crises and cycles of decompensation can produce PTSD-adjacent symptoms even without any single discrete traumatic event.
In plain terms: You don’t have to have experienced a single identifiable trauma to be traumatized. If you grew up inside the relational field of someone else’s chronic emotional crisis, managing it, bracing for it, trying to prevent it, that sustained exposure is itself traumatizing. Your nervous system responded to chronic threat regardless of whether any single event meets the criteria you might apply.
Because the dysregulation was never named, the family developed explanatory narratives that protected everyone from confronting what was happening. “She’s just sensitive.” “She’s had a hard life.” “You know how she gets.” These narratives contain truth, but they functioned to normalize what should have been recognized as a clinical pattern requiring treatment. The daughter who grew up inside them often carries them into adulthood, explaining her mother’s behavior in terms that obscure what it actually cost her.
Perhaps most importantly for the daughter’s healing: when the dysregulation is never named, her adaptations never get recognized as adaptations. They become “her personality.” She’s the perceptive one, the responsible one, the one everyone goes to. No one has ever told her that these capacities emerged from a survival context and that she now has a choice about how she uses them.
“The child who is not embraced by the village will burn it down to feel its warmth.”
Gabor Maté, MD, physician and trauma researcher, In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts
The systemic lens also illuminates why simply setting limits with the mother is insufficient and often backfires. A limit delivered without an understanding of the surrounding architecture will typically activate the mother’s abandonment terror and produce exactly the crisis the daughter was trying to avoid. Limits are necessary and not the whole treatment. That whole treatment process is what therapy with Annie can support.
It’s also worth naming the intergenerational dimension. BPD doesn’t emerge randomly. It comes from developmental histories of caregivers who were themselves inadequately regulated, themselves wounded. This doesn’t excuse what happened to you. It does place it in a lineage, and with the right support, you may be one of the first women in your family to stop passing it forward.
Separating Your Nervous System from Hers: What Clinical Work with Daughters of Borderline Mothers Actually Involves
The question I’m asked most often by women beginning to understand this framework is: “So what do I actually do now?” The answer is more specific than “get therapy” and less linear than a five-step plan. Here’s what this clinical work actually involves.
The first and most foundational layer is nervous system work. Because hypervigilance is wired in at a neurobiological level, talk therapy alone is often insufficient. Effective clinical work incorporates somatic approaches that address the body’s trained patterns, not just the mind’s understanding of them. EMDR is particularly well-supported for this population, because it can address implicit memories stored in the body without requiring every event to be verbally narrated. IFS (Internal Family Systems) and Somatic Experiencing are also well-supported approaches that engage the body’s wisdom alongside cognitive insight.
The second layer is attachment repair. Disorganized attachment doesn’t re-wire through understanding alone. It re-wires through sustained experience in a relationship that is simultaneously close and safe. The therapeutic relationship itself, when it’s built well, provides this. Working through Fixing the Foundations can be valuable for the practice of sustained engagement with a reflective, regulated other.
The third layer is what I often call the identity excavation. Many daughters of borderline mothers have spent decades calibrated to other people’s emotional states and have, as a result, a relatively underdeveloped relationship with their own interior. Who are you when you’re not managing anyone? What do you actually want, as distinct from what you’ve learned to want to keep the peace? These questions often surprise women who consider themselves highly self-aware, because their self-awareness has always pointed outward.
The fourth layer is grief. Real grief, not managed sadness. Grief for the childhood that didn’t happen and for the little girl who deserved attunement and got something far more complicated. To grieve the mother you needed but didn’t have seems, to the part of you still organizing around her needs, like a kind of desertion. It is not. It is honesty. And it is, paradoxically, one of the things that makes genuine compassion for your actual mother more accessible, not less.
The fifth layer is limit-building from the inside out. Not rules about when you’ll answer texts, but the internalized belief that your own needs, your own time, your own inner life are real and worth protecting. Without that belief, a limit is just a policy that won’t hold under pressure. With the belief in place, limits become natural expressions of self-respect rather than acts of war. This is the heart of what reparenting yourself makes possible over time.
Camille, back at her kitchen counter at 7:03am with the cold coffee and the 6:49am text, is not yet finished with this work. But she’s begun it. She told me recently that the most liberating thing she’s encountered in therapy is realizing that the calculation she’s been doing her whole life doesn’t have to run automatically. She can notice it. She can decide whether to follow it. That gap between the trigger and the response was always there. She just didn’t know she was allowed to live there. That gap is where the healing happens. And if you’re reading this, standing at your own counter with your own cold coffee, it’s available to you too. You might also explore what daughters of narcissistic mothers carry in similar ways, or begin inner child work as a practice for rebuilding the self shaped in those early years.
Q: What does it mean to have grown up with a borderline mother?
A: Growing up with a borderline mother typically means growing up in an emotional environment shaped by profound unpredictability, where love and closeness could shift to hurt and withdrawal without warning, and where your mother’s fear of abandonment organized much of the relational life of the home. It doesn’t mean your mother was malicious. It means her own psychological architecture made consistent, regulated caregiving genuinely difficult. The impact tends to show up in adult life as hypervigilance in relationships, structural guilt that doesn’t respond to logic, and difficulty distinguishing your own emotional needs from others’.
Q: How do I know if my mother has BPD or is just difficult?
A: A clinical diagnosis of BPD requires formal assessment by a licensed mental health professional. What you can assess is the pattern of your own experience: Was there cycling between idealization and devaluation, where you were her favorite person one moment and the source of all her pain the next? Did ordinary separation consistently produce intense expressions of abandonment and guilt? Whether or not a formal diagnosis was ever made, if those patterns are familiar, the relational dynamics are consistent with BPD presentation, and the impacts on you are real.
Q: Is it possible to have a relationship with a borderline mother as an adult?
A: Yes, though it requires significant internal work and realistic expectations about what the relationship can offer. Many daughters maintain relationships with their borderline mothers that are meaningful, but they’ve done the work of building genuine internal limits and of separating their sense of self from their mother’s emotional state. The goal isn’t to fix the relationship or get your mother to understand what her dysregulation cost you. It’s to develop a relationship with yourself that’s stable enough that you can engage with her without being reorganized by her needs.
Q: Why do I have anxiety and hypervigilance even in relationships where I’m safe?
A: Because hypervigilance isn’t a response to your current environment. It’s a trained state of your nervous system, laid down when your earliest attachment environment was genuinely unpredictable. Your brain learned that scanning for emotional threat was the most important survival tool you had. That learning is procedural, meaning it runs automatically below conscious thought. Your frontal cortex can know the current relationship is safe while your nervous system, running older programming, continues the surveillance. This is neurobiological, not a personality flaw, and it’s workable with somatic and EMDR approaches that address the nervous system’s patterns directly.
Q: What kind of therapy is best for daughters of borderline mothers?
A: The most effective approaches address both the relational attachment injury and the nervous system’s trained patterns. EMDR is well-supported for processing implicit memories and reducing hypervigilance. IFS (Internal Family Systems) works well with the protective parts of the self that developed in response to the borderline environment. Somatic Experiencing addresses the body’s stored patterns. Attachment-informed relational therapy, which uses the therapeutic relationship itself as a vehicle for attachment repair, is often foundational. Pure CBT is sometimes less effective as a standalone treatment because the injuries are pre-verbal and body-based. A therapist with specific experience with adult daughters of disordered parents makes a significant difference.
Related Reading
- van der Kolk, Bessel. The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. New York: Viking, 2014.
- Siegel, Daniel J. The Developing Mind: How Relationships and the Brain Interact to Shape Who We Are. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press, 2020.
- Mason, Paul T., and Randi Kreger. Stop Walking on Eggshells: Taking Your Life Back When Someone You Care About Has Borderline Personality Disorder. 3rd ed. Oakland: New Harbinger Publications, 2020.
- McBride, Karyl. Will I Ever Be Good Enough? Healing the Daughters of Narcissistic Mothers. New York: Atria Books, 2008.
- Linehan, Marsha M. Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder. New York: Guilford Press, 1993.
WAYS TO WORK WITH ANNIE
Individual Therapy
Trauma-informed therapy for driven women healing relational trauma. Licensed in 9 states.
Executive Coaching
Trauma-informed coaching for ambitious women navigating leadership and burnout.
Fixing the Foundations
Annie’s signature course for relational trauma recovery. Work at your own pace.
Strong & Stable
The Sunday conversation you wished you’d had years earlier. 20,000+ subscribers.
Annie Wright, LMFT
LMFT · Relational Trauma Specialist · W.W. Norton Author
Helping ambitious women finally feel as good as their résumé looks.
Annie Wright is a licensed psychotherapist (LMFT #95719) and trauma-informed executive coach with over 15,000 clinical hours. She works with driven, ambitious women — including Silicon Valley leaders, physicians, and entrepreneurs — in repairing the psychological foundations beneath their impressive lives. Annie is the founder and former CEO of Evergreen Counseling, a multimillion-dollar trauma-informed therapy center she built, scaled, and successfully exited. A regular contributor to Psychology Today, her expert commentary has appeared in Forbes, Business Insider, Inc., NBC, and The Information. She is currently writing her first book with W.W. Norton.
