Relational Trauma & RecoveryEmotional Regulation & Nervous SystemDriven Women & PerfectionismRelationship Mastery & CommunicationLife Transitions & Major DecisionsFamily Dynamics & BoundariesMental Health & WellnessPersonal Growth & Self-Discovery

Join 23,000+ people on Annie’s newsletter working to finally feel as good as their resume looks

Browse By Category

Your Emotional First Aid Kit: Tools for Driven Women

Gaslighting and toxic relationship recovery — Annie Wright, LMFT
Gaslighting and toxic relationship recovery — Annie Wright, LMFT

Your Emotional First Aid Kit: Tools for Driven Women

Calm coastal landscape at dusk — Annie Wright trauma therapy emotional regulation

An Emotional Regulation Toolkit for Ambitious Women

SUMMARY

Emotional regulation isn’t about staying calm — it’s about knowing what to reach for when your nervous system has been pushed past its edge. This post is a therapist-designed framework organized around five specific states driven women encounter most: activation, numbness, overwhelm, grief, and the aftermath of conflict. Each state calls for a different set of tools, and learning to distinguish between them is where real resilience begins.

The Meeting That Undid Her in Four Minutes

It’s 2:47 on a Tuesday afternoon. Vivian is in the fourth hour of back-to-back video calls — the last one a board presentation she spent the weekend preparing for. The slides are precise. Her delivery is measured. She’s covered every objection she can anticipate.

Then one of the partners says something that isn’t quite dismissive, isn’t quite rude, but lands somewhere underneath her ribs like a stone dropped into still water. Something about “whether this strategy is mature enough yet.” Three words. Four seconds.

By the time the call ends, Vivian’s heart is pounding in a way that has nothing to do with exertion. Her jaw is tight. She can feel something hot building behind her eyes that she absolutely will not let become tears on a work call. She mutes herself, takes a breath, and holds it there — in suspension — for the next forty minutes of meetings she can’t cancel.

That night, she’s still wired at midnight. The words keep cycling. She runs through every response she could have given. She doesn’t sleep well. She wakes up with the particular exhaustion that comes not from doing too much, but from having held too much without anywhere to put it.

What Vivian needed — what most driven, ambitious women need and are rarely taught — is an emotional regulation toolkit. Not a vague exhortation to “practice self-care.” A specific, practiced set of tools she can reach for depending on exactly what state her nervous system is in.

This post is that toolkit. It’s organized by state, grounded in research, and designed for the reality of your life — not an idealized version of it with sixty free minutes and a meditation cushion.

What Emotional Regulation Actually Is

Before we go further, it’s worth being precise about what we mean — because “emotional regulation” gets used loosely in ways that don’t fully serve you.

EMOTIONAL REGULATION

The capacity to monitor, evaluate, and modify emotional responses — particularly their intensity and duration — in ways that support adaptive functioning. In the clinical literature, regulation includes both conscious, effortful strategies and more automatic, habitual processes that shift how emotions are experienced, expressed, and acted upon (Gross, 2015; Thompson, 1994).

In plain terms: It doesn’t mean not feeling things. It means having enough influence over your own nervous system that emotions don’t run the show when they can’t afford to — and that you can actually process them when they need to be. It’s the difference between being flooded and being moved.

The key distinction that’s often lost: regulation isn’t suppression. Suppressing an emotion means pushing it down and hoping it stays there. Regulating means working with it — acknowledging what’s happening, shifting the intensity enough to stay functional, and eventually creating the conditions for the feeling to actually move through you.

Guy Winch, PhD, psychologist and author of Emotional First Aid, describes this distinction clearly: the impulse to ignore emotional wounds, to push through them without tending to them first, creates a kind of psychological bleeding that compounds over time. The wound doesn’t close because we willed it to. It closes because we addressed it.

Driven women often mistake endurance for regulation. They’re different capacities. One depletes you. The other restores you.

Why Ambitious Women Need This More, Not Less

There’s a persistent cultural narrative that emotional steadiness is something that comes naturally to people who are “strong enough” or “together enough.” In my work with clients — driven women who run companies, lead clinical teams, manage complex organizations — I see how much damage that framing does.

The nervous systems of ambitious women are, in many cases, among the most chronically taxed. Not because these women are fragile — quite the opposite. Because they operate under extraordinary cognitive and social load, often in environments that aren’t designed with them in mind, and because they’ve frequently spent decades learning to hold emotional experience at arm’s length in order to perform.

ALLOSTATIC LOAD

The cumulative physiological “wear and tear” on the body resulting from repeated or chronic stress responses. Coined by neuroscientist Bruce McEwen, PhD, at Rockefeller University, allostatic load refers to the biological cost of continuously adapting to stressors — including psychological and social ones — even when no single event feels catastrophic (McEwen & Stellar, 1993).

In plain terms: Your nervous system keeps a running tab. Every time you hold it together in a meeting, manage someone else’s emotions, override your own hunger or fatigue or grief to get through the day — that costs something biologically. Allostatic load is what happens when those costs accumulate faster than your body can recover.

Kristin Neff, PhD, psychologist and self-compassion researcher at UT Austin, has documented extensively how self-critical, high-demand internal environments increase the activation of the body’s threat response system — the same system you’re trying to regulate when you’re in a spiral after a hard meeting. The very inner climate that drives ambitious women to succeed is, in many cases, working against the nervous system’s ability to down-regulate.

This isn’t a character flaw. It’s a structural problem — and one that has practical solutions.

What I see consistently in my work: driven women who develop a real emotional regulation toolkit — not a vague commitment to “being more present,” but an actual practiced set of state-specific tools — report a different quality of life. Not easier. But more navigable. Less like being tossed around by weather, more like sailing through it.

If high-functioning anxiety is part of your experience, you already know the toll that an under-resourced nervous system takes. Regulation tools aren’t a luxury for women like you — they’re infrastructure.

The Five States Your Kit Needs to Address

Most “emotional regulation” resources treat all difficult emotional states as interchangeable. They’re not. And using the wrong tool for the wrong state doesn’t just fail to help — it can make things worse. Breathing exercises, for instance, can intensify anxiety in some individuals. Cognitive reframing can feel dismissive when someone is in grief.

Here are the five states I see most frequently in ambitious women — and what distinguishes each one.

1. Activation (fight/flight) — You’re wired, reactive, flooded. Heart rate up. Jaw tight. The threat response has been triggered, and your body is preparing to fight or flee even though there’s nothing to physically fight or flee. This is Vivian at the end of the board call. This is you at 11pm replaying a conversation you can’t stop.

2. Numbness (freeze/shutdown) — The opposite end of the dial. You feel flat, disconnected, or strangely empty after something that should have affected you. You go through the motions. You’re present in body, absent in felt sense. This is a nervous system that has shut down as a protective measure — often after sustained overwhelm, or after a loss that hasn’t been processed.

3. Overwhelm — Different from activation: overwhelm is the experience of too many things needing processing simultaneously, with insufficient capacity to do it. The sensation is often of being buried rather than chased. A particular kind of cognitive and emotional paralysis sets in. It’s the state where driven women are most likely to either collapse into avoidance or push harder in a way that burns them out.

4. Grief and loss — Loss that hasn’t been metabolized. This includes obvious losses — a relationship, a death, a career chapter ending — but also the less named ones: the version of yourself you were before a hard thing happened, the future you had to let go of, the relationship you finally admitted wasn’t what you’d believed. Grief doesn’t regulate the way anxiety does. It needs a different kind of tending.

5. Post-conflict dysregulation — The particular nervous system turbulence that follows an interpersonal collision: a hard conversation with a partner, a confrontation with a colleague, a rupture with a friend. The body often stays activated long after the cognitive event is “over.” This is especially pronounced for women with relational trauma histories, for whom conflict activates older threat responses alongside the current one.

Knowing which state you’re in is the first step. The second step is knowing what it actually calls for.

Tools for Each State

These tools are drawn from somatic therapy, cognitive-behavioral research, polyvagal theory, and self-compassion science. None of them require a therapist present to use. All of them are more effective with practice before you need them in a crisis.

For activation: Physiological sigh and orienting

The physiological sigh — a double inhale through the nose followed by a long, complete exhale through the mouth — is among the most rapidly effective tools for down-regulating the sympathetic nervous system. Andrew Huberman, PhD, neuroscientist at Stanford University, has described its mechanism: the double inhale re-inflates alveoli in the lungs, which signals the brain to slow heart rate via the parasympathetic branch of the nervous system. It’s reflexive in humans under stress (we do it involuntarily as a “shudder”) and can be used deliberately.

Pair it with orienting: slow your gaze around the room, naming five things you can see. This is a technique drawn from somatic trauma therapy — it engages the ventral vagal system by signaling to the body that the environment is not a threat. You’re not in danger. You’re here, in this room, and it’s safe.

For numbness: Gentle somatic activation

When the nervous system has gone into freeze or shutdown, the instinct is often to push through with cognitive effort. This rarely works. What the system actually needs is gentle, safe activation — a signal that it’s okay to come back online.

Peter Levine, PhD, developer of Somatic Experiencing — a body-based approach to trauma resolution — has described how titrated movement and sensation can help discharge a frozen nervous system without re-traumatizing it. Practical applications: slow walking with attention to the sensation of your feet on the ground. Gentle shaking (letting your hands and arms vibrate loosely). Placing a warm hand on your own sternum and breathing into the contact. These aren’t strange or woo — they’re neurologically coherent ways to invite a shutdown system back into regulated aliveness.

For overwhelm: Container and triage

Overwhelm is, neurologically, a processing bottleneck. The brain’s prefrontal cortex — the part responsible for executive function, planning, and rational thought — goes partially offline when the emotional load exceeds its capacity. This is why you can’t think your way out of overwhelm. You need to reduce the number of inputs first.

The container exercise: imagine a strong, sealed container — a vault, a chest, a particular drawer — and consciously place into it everything you don’t need to process right now. This isn’t avoidance. It’s a deliberate deferral that allows the prefrontal cortex to come back online so you can actually attend to what’s most immediate. Then do a single-item triage: what is the one thing that most needs my attention in the next ten minutes? Not the next ten days. The next ten minutes.

For grief: The self-compassion break

Kristin Neff, PhD, developed the self-compassion break as a formalized practice for moments of pain. It has three components: acknowledging that what you’re experiencing is painful (mindfulness); recognizing that suffering and loss are part of being human (common humanity); and offering yourself the same warmth and care you’d extend to a close friend (self-kindness). Each component counteracts a different way that driven women tend to compound their own grief — by minimizing it, by feeling isolated in it, or by treating themselves with contempt for having it.

Grief also often calls for witness — someone to sit with you in it without trying to fix it. Co-regulation matters here: the nervous system calms in the presence of a regulated, connected other. This is one of the core mechanisms of trauma-informed therapy, but it’s also available in trusted relationships. You don’t have to process loss alone.

For post-conflict dysregulation: The butterfly hug and repair sequence

The butterfly hug — crossing your arms over your chest and alternately tapping your shoulders — was developed by Lucina Artigas and Ignacio Jarero as a resource-installation tool in EMDR therapy. Its bilateral stimulation effect is gentle and can be used outside of formal therapy to help the nervous system return to baseline after an interpersonally charged event. It sounds simple because it is. That doesn’t make it less effective.

After conflict, the narrative brain also needs tending. Internally: distinguish between what actually happened and the story you’re now telling about it. Get granular. What were the exact words? What do you know versus what are you inferring? Then consider whether any repair is needed — with yourself (self-compassion for however you showed up), with the other person (if the relationship merits it), or both. Repair doesn’t require the other person’s participation when you’re regulating internally.

Elaine, a physician running a large clinical practice, came to work with me after a period of what she described as “emotional whiplash” — she’d go from fine to completely undone in what felt like seconds, then be numb for days afterward. When we mapped her states, she recognized that her primary pattern was activation followed by shutdown: the nervous system would spike, she’d white-knuckle through it, and then flatline. She had no tools for either state.

Over several months, she built out what she called her “regulation menu.” Physiological sigh and orienting for the spike. Slow walks and bilateral tapping for the flatline. The self-compassion break for the grief that was often underneath both. What changed wasn’t that her life became less demanding — her practice is as full as ever. What changed was that she stopped losing two or three days of her life to every hard emotional event. The recovery time collapsed from days to hours, then from hours to thirty minutes, then sometimes to less.

“I didn’t know I could do that,” she told me at one point. “I thought the only way to get through hard feelings was to push through them.” What she’d discovered instead was that you can move through them — and that movement is entirely different.

“Tell me, what is it you plan to do / with your one wild and precious life?”

Mary Oliver, The Summer Day

Both/And: Tools That Are Both Practical and Radical

There’s a version of the emotional regulation conversation that’s entirely utilitarian — a kind of optimization framing. Tools to stay productive. Tools to perform better. Tools to get back online faster. That framing is genuinely useful, and it’s partly what this post is about.

But there’s another way to hold this that I want to name explicitly: learning to regulate your nervous system is also a profound act of self-respect.

For driven, ambitious women, particularly those whose early lives asked them to manage themselves relentlessly — to be good, to be capable, to not be too much, to hold their own distress carefully so it didn’t inconvenience anyone — developing a genuine capacity for emotional self-care is both deeply practical and quietly subversive. It says: my internal experience matters. Not only because it affects my performance, but because I am a person whose inner life has inherent worth.

Both things are true at once. Tools for regulation are practical and they’re radical. They help you function and they restore something that prolonged self-neglect erodes.

Simone, a serial founder in her early forties, had built and sold two companies before she started working with me. She was, by any external measure, remarkable. And she had never once in her adult life taken a sick day for a mental health reason, asked for help when she was struggling, or allowed herself to grieve the things she’d lost along the way — a marriage that ended during her first company’s growth phase, friendships that fell away, years of her children’s lives she was physically present for but emotionally absent from.

What she had developed, instead, was a ferocious competence at suppression. She could hold anything. She didn’t know she’d been holding everything.

The relational and psychological foundations beneath her impressive life had never been properly built. She wasn’t broken. She was under-resourced in one specific domain — the domain of her own interior. When we started building her toolkit, what she discovered wasn’t weakness. It was relief. There were things she could actually do, in the moment, that changed what happened inside her body. That was new. That was everything.

This is both/and: you can be formidable in the world and tender with yourself. You can be capable and in need of care. You can have achieved extraordinary things and still have a nervous system that needs tending. These aren’t contradictions. They’re the full picture of a human life.

The Systemic Lens: Why Regulation Is Political for Ambitious Women

We can’t have an honest conversation about emotional regulation without naming the systemic context that makes it harder for ambitious women specifically.

The professional environments where many driven women operate were not designed for human nervous systems in general — and certainly not for the nervous systems of women, whose emotional expression has been historically pathologized, policed, and used against them. “Too emotional” is a charge leveled almost exclusively at women who express what male counterparts express freely. The clinical literature on this is clear: women’s emotional labor is expected, underpaid, and routinely invisible.

This creates a specific double bind: the very environments that generate the most regulatory challenge also provide the least permission to regulate. You can’t take ten minutes after a hard meeting. You can’t be seen crying on a video call. You absorb the cost of someone else’s aggression without recourse. You manage the emotional temperature of every room you walk into.

The result is a nervous system that is perpetually in demand — and a cultural message that the inability to meet that demand without visible distress is a personal failing rather than a structural one.

Naming this matters for two reasons. First, because overwhelm that originates in structural inequity is not best addressed by individual-level tools alone. Tools help — genuinely. But they don’t fix the system. The chronic stress behind the stress often has systemic roots.

Second, because the internal narrative that ambitious women often carry — “I should be handling this better, I should be stronger, other people manage just fine” — is frequently a story they’ve absorbed from systems that benefit from them believing it. The truth is that regulated nervous systems require regulated environments. When your environment is structurally dysregulating, the burden of regulation falls disproportionately on you — and that’s not a you problem.

A real emotional regulation toolkit includes: individual tools, yes. But also the capacity to set limits on how much of others’ dysregulation you absorb. The ability to ask for what you need when it comes to recovery time. The willingness to build workplaces and relationships where your emotional reality is acknowledged, not just your deliverables. And — perhaps most fundamentally — the decision to stop treating your interior life as a problem to be optimized and start treating it as something worth protecting.

This is where individual healing and systemic awareness meet. Both are necessary. Executive coaching and therapy, together, can help you navigate the intersection — learning to regulate within imperfect systems while also working to change them.

How to Build and Practice Your Own Kit

A toolkit you’ve never practiced before a crisis is significantly less effective than one you’ve rehearsed. The nervous system, under duress, returns to what’s most deeply grooved. That’s not a problem — it’s an argument for practice.

Here’s how to actually build and maintain yours:

Step 1: Know your default state. Most people have a nervous system signature — a state they tend to go to first under stress. Some people spike (activation). Some people flatline (numbness). Some people scatter (overwhelm). Spend a week noticing. When things get hard, which way does your system go? This tells you which tools to practice most.

Step 2: Learn two tools per state. You don’t need a comprehensive library. You need two reliable tools per state — one that’s body-based (physiological sigh, orienting, bilateral tapping, movement) and one that’s cognitively or relationally oriented (container exercise, self-compassion break, calling a regulated friend). Two per state means you have backup when the first one doesn’t land.

Step 3: Practice when you don’t need them. This is the piece most people skip. Use your tools on low-intensity moments: the mild frustration in traffic, the small disappointment in an email. This builds the neurological pathway so it’s accessible when the stakes are higher.

Step 4: Create cue anchors. Link each tool to a sensory cue — a specific spot you sit, a particular scent, a physical gesture (hand on sternum). The body learns to associate cue with response. Over time, the cue alone begins to trigger a regulatory shift.

Step 5: Do repair after rupture. When you’ve been through a hard emotional event and come out the other side, take five minutes to consciously close the loop. What happened? What tool did or didn’t work? What would you reach for differently next time? This isn’t self-criticism — it’s the kind of gentle, honest self-study that builds real emotional agility over time.

Step 6: Consider professional support. A toolkit built in the context of good therapy is almost always more effective than one built alone — because a skilled clinician can help you understand the origins of your nervous system patterns and address the roots, not just the surface presentation. If you’ve been curious about working with a therapist who understands the specific context of ambitious women’s lives, that curiosity is worth following.

The women I work with who make the most sustained change don’t find a perfect toolkit in one sitting. They iterate. They find that some tools land differently at different life stages, or that a tool that felt pointless at first becomes essential after they’ve practiced it twenty times. The relationship with your own nervous system is exactly that — a relationship. It takes time and attention and a willingness to stay curious about what you actually need.

What you’re building, ultimately, is not a crisis plan. It’s a way of being in relationship with your own interior life — one that doesn’t require you to override it to function, and doesn’t require you to be undone by it to feel.

That’s the work. It’s worth doing.

If you’re a driven, ambitious woman who’s been white-knuckling your way through the demands of your life without adequate tools for your own nervous system — you’re not alone in that. It’s one of the most common patterns I see. And it’s one of the most workable. You’ve built remarkable things in the world with far less information and support than you deserved. You can do this too. Start with one tool, in one state, and practice it once. That’s the whole beginning.

CO-REGULATION

The process by which one person’s regulated nervous system helps another person’s nervous system return to a state of calm. Grounded in Polyvagal Theory as developed by Stephen Porges, PhD, neuroscientist and Distinguished University Scientist at Indiana University, co-regulation refers to the bidirectional exchange of physiological cues — through voice prosody, facial expression, body language, and touch — that signal safety and facilitate nervous system down-regulation (Porges, 2011).

In plain terms: You can actually borrow someone else’s calm. When you’re around a person who is grounded and present — a regulated friend, a good therapist, a partner who isn’t themselves activated — your own nervous system reads those cues and begins to settle. This is why isolation during distress tends to make things worse, and why being witnessed by the right person can change everything without a single word being said.

WINDOW OF TOLERANCE

A term coined by Daniel Siegel, MD, clinical professor of psychiatry at the UCLA School of Medicine and author of The Developing Mind, referring to the zone of optimal arousal in which an individual can process information and emotional experience effectively without becoming hyper-aroused (flooded, anxious, reactive) or hypo-aroused (shut down, numb, dissociated). Trauma and chronic stress both narrow the window, making regulation more difficult.

In plain terms: Think of it as the range of intensity your nervous system can tolerate while still staying functional. When your window is wide, a hard conversation is manageable. When it’s narrow — after years of chronic stress, or during a difficult season — the same conversation can send you to either end of the spectrum. The goal of regulation work is to gently widen the window over time.

If you’ve been wondering whether what you’re dealing with goes deeper than a toolkit can address — if you recognize patterns that feel old, relational, and resistant to your own best efforts — individual therapy with someone who understands the specific experience of ambitious women may be the most important investment you make. The relational roots of how you learned to manage emotion are often where the real work lives.

THE RESEARCH

The patterns described in this article are supported by peer-reviewed research. Below are key studies that illuminate the clinical territory we’ve been exploring.

  • B.M. Dinić and colleagues, writing in Journal of adolescence (2025), examined “A Tri-Directional Examination of Parental Personality, Parenting, and Context on Adolescent Behaviors: A Replication and Extension in a New Cultural Context.” (PMID: 40229963). (PMID: 40229963) (PMID: 40229963)
  • T.E. Truhan and colleagues, writing in Journal of adolescence (2023), examined “A tri-directional examination of adolescent personality, perceived parenting, and economic and parental adversity contexts in influencing adolescent behavioral outcomes.” (PMID: 37504510). (PMID: 37504510) (PMID: 37504510)
  • G. Coppola and colleagues, writing in International journal of environmental research and public health (2020), examined “The Apple of Daddy’s Eye: Parental Overvaluation Links the Narcissistic Traits of Father and Child.” (PMID: 32751639). (PMID: 32751639) (PMID: 32751639)
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Q: I’ve tried deep breathing before and it doesn’t work for me. Am I doing something wrong?

A: Not necessarily. Generic “deep breathing” is actually under-specified as a technique — and for some people, particularly those with anxiety or trauma histories, directing attention to the breath can intensify rather than reduce distress. The physiological sigh is more specific and tends to be more effective: a double inhale through the nose followed by a full, complete exhale through the mouth. The elongated exhale is what activates the parasympathetic response. If even that doesn’t work, try orienting instead — slowly scanning the room with your eyes, naming what you see. These are different regulatory pathways, and what works varies by person and by state.

Q: I don’t feel much emotionally most of the time. Is that a regulation problem?

A: It can be. Chronic emotional flatness or numbness is often a sign that the nervous system has settled into a hypo-aroused, shutdown state — sometimes called the freeze response or dorsal vagal shutdown. It’s particularly common in women who’ve experienced sustained overwhelm, relational trauma, or a long period of pushing through without adequate recovery. It’s a nervous system strategy, not a personality trait, and it’s workable. Gentle somatic activation — slow movement, sensation-based grounding, co-regulation with safe people — is usually more effective than trying to think or talk your way into feeling more.

Q: How long does it take to actually feel the benefit of these tools?

A: Some tools — particularly physiological sigh and orienting — can produce a noticeable shift within minutes, especially with practice. The longer-term benefits: a widened window of tolerance, faster recovery time after dysregulation, a generally quieter nervous system baseline — those develop over weeks to months of consistent practice. The research on nervous system change is encouraging: the brain retains significant plasticity in adulthood, and repeated practice of regulatory strategies does produce measurable changes in how the nervous system responds. Don’t judge the tools by your first three attempts. Give them thirty.

Q: Is emotional regulation the same as not letting things bother you?

A: No — and this distinction matters enormously. Regulation isn’t about becoming less affected by your life. It’s about having enough influence over your nervous system’s response that you’re not overwhelmed by it. Things are still allowed to bother you. Grief is still allowed to hurt. Anger at injustice is still allowed to be anger. The goal isn’t emotional blunting or stoicism — that’s suppression, not regulation. The goal is what researchers call “flexible responding”: the capacity to feel what you feel, stay present with it, and decide how you want to act rather than being automatically swept into a reaction.

Q: When does emotional dysregulation signal something that needs professional support rather than self-help tools?

A: A few indicators: if you’re regularly unable to return to baseline after emotional events — if you stay activated or shut down for days at a time without relief; if your dysregulation is significantly affecting your relationships, your work, or your capacity to function; if you have a history of relational trauma, complex loss, or chronic stress that you haven’t been able to fully address on your own. Self-help tools are genuinely useful, and they have real limits. The nervous system patterns that are most deeply entrenched — the ones that formed in early relational environments — usually require the relational context of good therapy to fully shift. That’s not a failing. It’s how deep change tends to happen.

Q: I’m always the regulated one in my relationships. Why is it so much harder when I’m the one who needs support?

A: This is one of the most common patterns I see in ambitious women with relational trauma histories. Becoming the regulated anchor for others — partners, children, colleagues, aging parents — is a role that often has deep roots: it’s frequently how we earned safety or love in early environments. The skill is real and it serves people. But it gets built at the expense of your own receiving capacity. When you actually need co-regulation, two things tend to happen: the relationships you’ve organized around your being the capable one don’t have the structure to hold that, and some part of you resists being in the position of needing. Both are workable. Both are worth examining — ideally with professional support.

Related Reading

  1. Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781
  2. Neff, K. D. (2011). Self-Compassion: The Proven Power of Being Kind to Yourself. New York: William Morrow. https://self-compassion.org
  3. Levine, P. A. (2010). In an Unspoken Voice: How the Body Releases Trauma and Restores Goodness. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books. https://www.somaticexperiencing.com
  4. Porges, S. W. (2011). The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiological Foundations of Emotions, Attachment, Communication, and Self-Regulation. New York: W. W. Norton. https://www.stephenporges.com
  5. Winch, G. (2013). Emotional First Aid: Healing Rejection, Guilt, Failure, and Other Everyday Hurts. New York: Hudson Street Press. https://www.guywinch.com
  6. McEwen, B. S., & Stellar, E. (1993). Stress and the individual: Mechanisms leading to disease. Archives of Internal Medicine, 153(18), 2093–2101. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1993.00410180039004

WAYS TO WORK WITH ANNIE

Individual Therapy

Trauma-informed therapy for driven women healing relational trauma. Licensed in 9 states.

Learn More

Executive Coaching

Trauma-informed coaching for ambitious women navigating leadership and burnout.

Learn More

Fixing the Foundations

Annie’s signature course for relational trauma recovery. Work at your own pace.

Learn More

Strong & Stable

The Sunday conversation you wished you’d had years earlier. 20,000+ subscribers.

Join Free

Annie Wright, LMFT — trauma therapist and executive coach

About the Author

Annie Wright, LMFT

LMFT · Relational Trauma Specialist · W.W. Norton Author

Helping ambitious women finally feel as good as their résumé looks.

Annie Wright is a licensed psychotherapist (LMFT #95719) and trauma-informed executive coach with over 15,000 clinical hours. She works with driven, ambitious women — including Silicon Valley leaders, physicians, and entrepreneurs — in repairing the psychological foundations beneath their impressive lives. Annie is the founder and former CEO of Evergreen Counseling, a multimillion-dollar trauma-informed therapy center she built, scaled, and successfully exited. A regular contributor to Psychology Today, her expert commentary has appeared in Forbes, Business Insider, Inc., NBC, and The Information. She is currently writing her first book with W.W. Norton.

Work With Annie

Medical Disclaimer

Medical Disclaimer

What's Running Your Life?

The invisible patterns you can’t outwork…

Your LinkedIn profile tells one story. Your 3 AM thoughts tell another. If vacation makes you anxious, if praise feels hollow, if you’re planning your next move before finishing the current one—you’re not alone. And you’re *not* broken.

This quiz reveals the invisible patterns from childhood that keep you running. Why enough is never enough. Why success doesn’t equal satisfaction. Why rest feels like risk.

Five minutes to understand what’s really underneath that exhausting, constant drive.

Related Posts

Ready to explore working together?